🎯 Saiba o que estudar

Avançado com Treinador a partir de R$ 0,76/dia

Questões Discursivas

Foram encontradas 46.087 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3364441 Inglês
Something in the water? Why we love shark films


From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films.

Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror.

There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark.

Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president.

I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool.

It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres.

Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea.

She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie.

So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News.

“Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.”

But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers.

“We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes.

The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers.

“As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.”

“I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.”

She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.”

Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”.

Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have.

US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them.

She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media.

Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed.

“Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.”

“So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.”

“But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.”

“If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.”

Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation.

“It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.”

“The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.”

“It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.”

“We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.”

It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them.

But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans.

(Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in:<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckmmgxvp7dgo>. Adapted.)
Consider the author’s personal experience with shark movies: “I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool.” (5th§) It’s correct to say that the underlined terms could be replaced, without change in meaning, by:
Alternativas
Q3364440 Inglês
Something in the water? Why we love shark films


From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films.

Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror.

There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark.

Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president.

I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool.

It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres.

Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea.

She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie.

So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News.

“Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.”

But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers.

“We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes.

The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers.

“As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.”

“I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.”

She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.”

Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”.

Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have.

US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them.

She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media.

Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed.

“Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.”

“So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.”

“But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.”

“If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.”

Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation.

“It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.”

“The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.”

“It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.”

“We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.”

It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them.

But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans.

(Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in:<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckmmgxvp7dgo>. Adapted.)
Consider the underlined term: “It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres.” (6th§) It’s correct to imply that these centres are designed for activities related to: 
Alternativas
Q3364439 Inglês
Something in the water? Why we love shark films


From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films.

Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror.

There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark.

Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president.

I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool.

It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres.

Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea.

She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie.

So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News.

“Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.”

But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers.

“We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes.

The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers.

“As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.”

“I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.”

She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.”

Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”.

Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have.

US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them.

She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media.

Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed.

“Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.”

“So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.”

“But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.”

“If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.”

Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation.

“It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.”

“The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.”

“It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.”

“We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.”

It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them.

But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans.

(Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in:<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckmmgxvp7dgo>. Adapted.)
Consider the sentence "We kill 100 million sharks every year, […]”, said by the British director Hayley Easton Street (12th§) The pronoun “we” refers to:
Alternativas
Q3364438 Inglês
Something in the water? Why we love shark films


From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films.

Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror.

There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark.

Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president.

I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool.

It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres.

Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea.

She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie.

So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News.

“Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.”

But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers.

“We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes.

The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers.

“As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.”

“I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.”

She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.”

Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”.

Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have.

US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them.

She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media.

Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed.

“Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.”

“So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.”

“But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.”

“If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.”

Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation.

“It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.”

“The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.”

“It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.”

“We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.”

It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them.

But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans.

(Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in:<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckmmgxvp7dgo>. Adapted.)
Consider the underlined term: “Even Donald Trump is a fan - he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president.” (4th§) It’s correct to say that it could be replaced, without change in meaning, by the word:
Alternativas
Q3364437 Inglês
Something in the water? Why we love shark films


From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films.

Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror.

There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark.

Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president.

I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool.

It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres.

Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea.

She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie.

So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News.

“Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.”

But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers.

“We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes.

The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers.

“As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.”

“I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.”

She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.”

Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”.

Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have.

US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them.

She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media.

Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed.

“Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.”

“So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.”

“But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.”

“If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.”

Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation.

“It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.”

“The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.”

“It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.”

“We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.”

It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them.

But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans.

(Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in:<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckmmgxvp7dgo>. Adapted.)
According to the text, it’s correct to affirm that Donald Trump:
Alternativas
Q3358289 Biblioteconomia
A biblioteca escolar não deve ser um mero depósito de livros, pois é um fator fundamental para o aperfeiçoamento e a intensificação de uma forma correta de alfabetização e aprendizagem, capaz de estimular a criatividade, o intelecto e a capacidade de raciocínio crítico. Considerando as características de uma biblioteca escolar, marque V para as afirmativas verdadeiras e F para as falsas.
( ) Ela deve estar intimamente relacionada com a escola para funcionar como verdadeiro complemento das atividades realizadas em classe.
( ) Elas podem ser subordinadas a uma entidade científica e de pesquisa, uma empresa industrial ou comercial, ou mesmo um serviço público especializado.
( ) Elas devem estar mais voltadas para a recreação, pois, além de um acervo bem selecionado, devem proporcionar atividades como organização do clube de leitura, escolinhas de arte, exposições, dramatizações, hora do conto e outras.
( ) Ela tem por finalidade atender às necessidades de estudo, consulta e recreação de determinada comunidade, independente de classe social, cor, religião ou profissão.

A sequência está correta em
Alternativas
Q3358288 Biblioteconomia
De acordo com Luís Milanesi, em seu livro intitulado “Biblioteca”, a criança, talvez, seja o público mais complexo dos serviços de informação. Sobre a biblioteca infantil, é correto afirmar que:
Alternativas
Q3358287 Biblioteconomia
As bibliotecas escolares, ainda que sejam tão poucas no Brasil, possuem uma grande quantidade de livros infantojuvenis, utilizados tanto para o processo didático e de incentivo às atividades de leitura quanto para momentos de lazer e entretenimento. Sobre livros infantojuvenis, assinale a afirmativa correta.
Alternativas
Q3358286 Biblioteconomia
Em uma sociedade letrada, caracterizada por abundância de informações, fica evidente a necessidade de preparar crianças e jovens para serem usuários competentes da escrita, capazes de selecionar e interpretar criticamente as informações. A biblioteca escolar, mais do que um estoque de conhecimentos, pode constituir-se em um espaço adequado para desenvolver nos alunos o melhor entendimento do complexo ambiente informacional da sociedade contemporânea. Em relação à definição de biblioteca escolar, assinale a afirmativa INCORRETA.
Alternativas
Q3358285 Biblioteconomia
A transposição da dimensão conceitual do letramento informacional para sua prática foi sustentada pela sistematização das habilidades informacionais desejáveis. Isso foi feito por instituições representativas de bibliotecários ou por entidades educacionais para auxiliar seus membros na implantação e na avaliação de programas de letramento informacional nas escolas. O mais conhecido desses documentos é o Information Power, da American Association of School Librarians. Destinado a alunos do ensino básico, o Information Power define nove normas ou parâmetros de letramento, divididas em três segmentos; relacione-os
1. Competência informacional. 2. Aprendizagem independente. 3. Responsabilidade social.

( ) Aborda a atitude ética com relação à informação e ao compartilhamento de práticas informacionais.
( ) Enfatiza as habilidades de acessar, avaliar e usar a informação.
( ) Diz respeito à capacidade de buscar e usar a informação de maneira autônoma.

A sequência está correta em
Alternativas
Q3358284 Biblioteconomia
De acordo com o livro “Manual de fontes de informação”, de Murilo Bastos da Cunha, é comum a dúvida sobre as diferenças entre enciclopédia, dicionário e dicionário enciclopédico. Assinale a afirmativa INCORRETA.
Alternativas
Q3358283 Português
O resumo é uma representação sucinta, porém exata, do conteúdo de um documento. Veja um exemplo de resumo:
“Pretende-se analisar o impacto das bibliotecas escolares na aprendizagem de alunos, em particular no contexto nacional. Apresenta-se um estudo com o objetivo de adaptar um instrumento americano à realidade brasileira. Inclui os objetivos, aponta a metodologia utilizada, os resultados alcançados e a conclusão do trabalho.”
(GUEDES FERREIRA, T.; DE CASTRO SILVA CASARIN, H. .; CANDIDA DE ALMEIDA, C. Adaptação de um instrumento para avaliação do impacto de bibliotecas escolares: estudo com o questionário do Student Learning Through Ohio School Libraries (OELMA). Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 27, n. 3, p. 89-114, jul/set 2022. Adaptado.)

O resumo anterior deve ser caracterizado como:
Alternativas
Q3358282 Biblioteconomia
O índice é um instrumento indispensável à recuperação de informações contidas em uma publicação. Tendo em vista tal contexto, assinale a afirmativa correta.
Alternativas
Q3358281 Biblioteconomia
Ao publicar um livro no Brasil, deve-se estar atento às regras de normalização e padronização definidas pela Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). De acordo com a NBR 6029, de setembro de 2002, relacione adequadamente os itens às suas respectivas características.
1. Contracapa. 2. Folha de rosto. 3. Falsa folha de rosto. 4. Lombada.
( ) Folha opcional também chamada de olho e anterrosto. ( ) Folha que contém os elementos essenciais à identificação do trabalho. ( ) Revestimento externo, de material flexível ou rígido. ( ) Parte da capa do livro ou folheto que reúne as margens internas ou dobras das folhas, também chamada de dorso.

A sequência está correta em
Alternativas
Q3358280 Biblioteconomia
Os livros contêm elementos materiais, relativos à sua estrutura física, sejam pré-textuais, textuais e pós-textuais. Segundo o “Manual para normalização de publicações técnico-científicas”, dos elementos materiais apresentados a seguir, se caracterizam como obrigatórios:
I. Sobrecapa.
II. Capa.
III. Folhas de guarda.
IV. Lombada ou dorso da publicação.
V. Orelhas.
Está correto o que se afirma apenas em
Alternativas
Q3358279 Biblioteconomia
Considerando o processo de aquisição de novos materiais audiovisuais para biblioteca, para garantir o acesso dos usuários, qual fator deve considerado?
Alternativas
Q3358278 Biblioteconomia
Na gestão de acervos eletrônicos, um dos principais desafios que pode ser enfrentado é: 
Alternativas
Q3358277 Biblioteconomia
Na organização de uma biblioteca especializada em saúde, a prioridade na seleção de novos materiais é: 
Alternativas
Q3358276 Biblioteconomia
Durante o processo de catalogação de coleção de livros infantis com o uso da CDD, são encontrados livros sobre temas variados. Considerando a situação hipotética, qual a melhor abordagem para garantir uma organização eficaz?
Alternativas
Q3358275 Biblioteconomia
Assinale, a seguir, a principal preocupação em relação ao acesso dos usuários, quando da organização de coleção de livros impressos, ebooks e audiolivros.
Alternativas
Respostas
8981: C
8982: D
8983: B
8984: A
8985: A
8986: C
8987: A
8988: D
8989: B
8990: D
8991: D
8992: C
8993: C
8994: D
8995: D
8996: D
8997: C
8998: A
8999: D
9000: D