Questões de Concurso Público MCTI 2008 para Analista em C&T Pleno 1-I - Ciências Humanas
Foram encontradas 120 questões
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
As far as project evaluation is concerned, it is useless to try evaluate uncertainty.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
During the last years, the difference between foreseen results and the real outcome has often been a problematic issue.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
It is not easy to predict in a trustworthy way future result of a project.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
Project evaluation methods have succeeded in assessing the problems of uncertainty.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
Sensitivity analysis methods determine a set of values of factors which if altered is liable to have crucial impact on the cost-effective results.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
As to cost-effective results, public accountability can be taken for granted.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
The use of sensitivity analysis allows project managers to understand precisely the uncertainty of substantial factors beforehand.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
Past projects should play no role in setting up current sensitivity analysis for the new ones.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
More data are required to enable comparative analysis of doubtful factors which come together during project implementation and project evaluation results.
1 In recent years, a gap between predicted results and
actual results has been a frequent problem when project
evaluations have been performed. But because it is difficult
4 to reliably predict each factor that impacts project evaluation
results into the future, these results unavoidably include
uncertain factors. Project evaluation methods are proposed
7 but the problem of uncertainty is not adequately assessed.
Therefore, project evaluation methods that account for
uncertainty of future project factors must be developed.
10 Introduction of sensitivity analysis methods
Sensitivity analysis methods set a range of values of
factors that have a substantial impact on the results of cost
13 benefit analysis and assess the degree that changes of these
factors affect the results of cost benefit analysis. In this way,
the results of cost benefit analysis are presented including
16 this range, guaranteeing flexibility of evaluations and
improving public accountability. Because performing
sensitivity analysis permits the clarification of the degree of
19 impact on the results of cost benefit analysis of changes of
important influential factors, project managers can accurately
understand uncertainties surrounding a project in advance to
22 manage the implementation of the project appropriately and
take measures to deal with decreased efficiency by a
continuous confirmation process.
25 Set up of the project evaluation data base
In order to perform sensitivity analysis of a project
evaluation, it is necessary to carry out an analysis to
28 determine the degree of uncertainty of projects implemented
in the past. On the other hand, although the introduction of
project re-evaluations has increased the opportunities to
31 revise evaluation results, not enough data have been
accumulated to permit comparative analysis of uncertain
factors accompanying project implementation with the
34 project evaluation results.
Internet: <http://www.nilim.go.jp/> (adapted).
Based on the text, judge the following items.
In the text, “have been performed” (l.3) can be replaced by was performed.
A respeito da administração pública, julgue os itens a seguir.
Considere que Marcelo, portador de deficiência, é servidor titular de cargo efetivo de determinado município. Nesse caso, a Constituição Federal (CF) permite a adoção de requisitos e critérios diferenciados para a concessão de aposentadoria, nos termos definidos em leis complementares.
A respeito da administração pública, julgue os itens a seguir.
Considere que Benício seja titular de dois cargos públicos privativos de profissionais de da área de saúde, com profissões regulamentadas. Nesse caso, se houver compatibilidade de horário, a CF permite a referida acumulação.
Com referência ao regime jurídico dos servidores públicos da União, ao regulamento do pregão eletrônico e aos princípios do direito administrativo, julgue os itens seguintes.
Considere que tenha sido instaurado processo disciplinar contra Marcelo, servidor público da União. Nesse caso, a instauração do processo disciplinar interrompe a prescrição da ação disciplinar até a apresentação da defesa de Marcelo.
Com referência ao regime jurídico dos servidores públicos da União, ao regulamento do pregão eletrônico e aos princípios do direito administrativo, julgue os itens seguintes.
Considere que, em uma sessão pública, a empresa X foi declarada vencedora de determinado pregão eletrônico. Nesse caso, a falta de manifestação, imediata e motivada da empresa Y, quanto à intenção de recorrer, importará na decadência desse direito, ficando o pregoeiro autorizado a adjudicar o objeto ao licitante declarado vencedor.
Com referência ao regime jurídico dos servidores públicos da União, ao regulamento do pregão eletrônico e aos princípios do direito administrativo, julgue os itens seguintes.
Consoante preceitua o princípio da indisponibilidade, os bens e interesses públicos não pertencem à administração nem a seus agentes. Cabe-lhes geri-los, conservá-los e por eles velar em prol da coletividade, que é a verdadeira titular dos direitos e interesses públicos.
A respeito dos direitos e garantias fundamentais, julgue os itens que se seguem.
Francisco, italiano, faleceu no Brasil deixando uma esposa e bens no país. Nessa situação, não sendo favorável a lei pessoal do de cujus, a sucessão de seus bens será regulada pela lei brasileira.
A respeito dos direitos e garantias fundamentais, julgue os itens que se seguem.
Na hipótese de cancelamento da naturalização por sentença transitada em julgado, a CF permite a cassação de direitos políticos.
No que diz respeito à organização político-administrativa e aos Poderes Executivo e Legislativo, julgue os itens subseqüentes.
Lei complementar que autorize os estados a legislar sobre questões específicas relativas à defesa aeroespacial contraria a CF.
No que diz respeito à organização político-administrativa e aos Poderes Executivo e Legislativo, julgue os itens subseqüentes.
Sendo o presidente da República acusado de cometimento de crime de responsabilidade, a acusação deverá ser admitida por dois terços do Senado Federal, competindo ao Supremo Tribunal Federal seu julgamento.
No que diz respeito à organização político-administrativa e aos Poderes Executivo e Legislativo, julgue os itens subseqüentes.
A CF permite a edição de medidas provisórias sobre matéria já disciplinada em projeto de lei aprovado pelo Congresso Nacional e pendente de sanção ou veto do presidente da República.
Conheça nossos planos