Questões de Concurso Público ALERJ 2026 para Especialista Legislativo - Nível IV - Relações Públicas (Institucionais)
Foram encontradas 80 questões
A TV Alerj é apresentada como “um veículo de divulgação e transparência da Assembleia Legislativa do Rio de Janeiro, transmitindo 24 horas diárias pelo canal 12 da Net, 10.2 UHF digital e no YouTube”.
Seu objetivo declarado é aproximar os parlamentares dos cidadãos do estado. Para isso, sua grade apresenta os programas listados a seguir, à exceção de um. Assinale-o.
Em novembro de 2025, foi sancionada a lei que instituiu a Política Nacional de Linguagem Simples, voltada a facilitar a comunicação entre órgãos públicos e a população.
Ela indica que a comunicação dirigida ao cidadão deve
Ao desenvolver uma campanha de endomarketing, com o objetivo de estimular funcionários a adotarem uma nova postura ou comportamento, é importante pensar em cinco aspectos, a saber:
I. desafios propostos de forma lúdica;
II. estímulos e incentivos constantes;
III. informação para gerar envolvimento;
IV. reconhecimento permanente; e
V. recompensas opcionais.
Sobre esses aspectos, é correto afirmar que
Leia o texto a seguir.
Comissão de Defesa dos Direitos da Mulher debate a Violência Estatal
A Comissão de Defesa dos Direitos da Mulher, da Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, realiza nesta terça-feira (09/12), audiência pública com o tema "Mulheres e Violência Estatal". O encontro será a partir das 10h, na sala 1801 do Edifício Lúcio Costa, sede do Parlamento. Foram convidadas para participar da audiência a assistente social da Ouvidoria da Defensoria Pública do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (DPRJ), Lidiane Helena; a representante do Conselho Regional de Psicologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRP-RJ), Elisa Martins; a coordenadora do Eixo Direito à Segurança Pública e Acesso à Justiça das Redes da Maré, Tainá Alvarenga, entre outras convidadas.
(Disponível no site da Alerj)
Esse tipo de comunicação, assinado “Por Comunicação Social”, é um(a)
O Glossário de Crise, publicado pelo Observatório Brasileiro de Comunicação e Crise (OBCC), em 2025, traz 60 verbetes, desenvolvidos por 47 autores de seis países.
Assinale a opção que apresenta, corretamente, a definição do verbete issues management.
Existem diversos tipos de redes sociais digitais, que podem ser classificados de acordo com suas funções primárias.
As “Redes sociais baseadas em mídia” têm como funções primárias o streaming multimídia e a interação entre usuários e criadores de conteúdo.
Esse tipo de rede pode ser exemplificado no
Devido à impossibilidade de fazer esse tipo de monitoramento manualmente, é necessário o apoio de ferramentas de social listening, tais como
Ao tentar traçar um modelo de comunicação pública estatal para os países sul-americanos, em geral, e para o Brasil, em particular, Haswani (2013) indicou uma etapa destinada a “Apuração das demandas de informação e de comunicação em cada órgão público”, situando-as nas dimensões:
• divulgação de normas e leis;
• divulgação da estrutura, do funcionamento dos órgãos públicos e os modos de acessá-los;
• utilidade pública emergencial;
• utilidade pública permanente;
• promoção da imagem institucional; e
• campanhas emergenciais.
Observe as publicações a seguir, disponíveis no perfil da Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, no Instagram.
Elas atendem, respectivamente, às demandas por
Um estagiário da Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Alerj) foi instado, por seu superior hierárquico, a indicar duas especializações subjacentes à área de divulgação e relações públicas.
O estagiário indicou corretamente, em consonância com a Resolução nº 590/1994, da Alerj, as especializações de
Leia o texto a seguir sobre a relação entre fontes e jornalistas.
Estabelecer uma relação profissional com jornalistas tem conexão com a compreensão do papel da imprensa nas sociedades democráticas, independentemente do desconforto e do risco que a interação possa causar. É a mídia que exerce a vigilância sobre as demais instituições, expressa os conflitos e expõe os contraditórios da visão e atuação dos diferentes atores sociais.
Aproveitar cada oportunidade para transmitir informações com segurança e precisão exige, além de compromisso em prestar contas à sociedade, habilidades que podem reduzir os riscos: capacidade de definir previamente e apresentar mensagens, lidar com a linguagem e as características dos diferentes tipos de veículo e se adaptar a cada circunstância.
(DUARTE, 2018: 338)
Portanto, ao preparar uma fonte para uma entrevista, deve-se orientá-la a
O Conselho Federal de Profissionais de Relações Públicas (Conferp) publicou, em novembro de 2025, a Resolução Normativa 133, que “altera e atualiza a Resolução Normativa 123/2024, publicada no DOU em 29 de junho de 2024, seção I, página 338, considerando o registro de profissionais oriundos de cursos superiores conexos às Relações Públicas decorrentes da RN 132/2025, publicada no DOU em 31 de outubro de 2025, seção I, página 197”.
Sobre essa resolução e seus impactos, assinale a afirmativa correta.
Um grupo de Deputados Estaduais da Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Alerj) entendeu que a sistemática regimental afeta a determinada temática deveria sofrer alteração.
Após analisar o Regimento Interno da Alerj, o grupo concluiu corretamente que
A Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Alerj) aprovou o projeto de lei complementar nº X (PLCX), que foi encaminhado para o Governador do Estado para fins de sanção.
O Chefe do Poder Executivo vetou o projeto, tendo a Alerj, na forma regimental, confirmado o veto. Logo depois, um grupo de Deputados Estaduais cogitou a imediata apresentação de novo projeto sobre a mesma matéria.
Na situação descrita, à luz do Regimento Interno da Alerj, é correto afirmar que
Diversas organizações não governamentais iniciaram um movimento de grande impacto junto à população, visando à aprovação de um Plano Estratégico de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social de Estado (PEDES).
Ao receber os líderes do movimento, o Presidente da Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Alerj) informou corretamente que, de acordo com a Constituição do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, o referido plano
Um servidor da Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Alerj), especializado em Relações Públicas, foi instado a oferecer subsídios na estruturação de uma manifestação a ser elaborada pela liderança de determinado bloco partidário.
Em termos estruturais, um aspecto que se mostrou relevante ao servidor foi a informação dos contornos essenciais de um bloco dessa natureza, de modo que a referida manifestação pudesse ser mais bem avaliada pelos seus destinatários.
Assinale o dado corretamente sugerido pelo servidor, em relação aos referidos aspectos estruturais, que deveria ser informado.
Read the following text and answer the next five question.
The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate
Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.
Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.
At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.
Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]
The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.
Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf
Based on the information provided by the text, mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F).
( ) Public messages are detached from their environment.
( ) The pervasiveness of “many-to-many” communication predates the turn of the century.
( ) Innovations in technology have enabled the quick spread of inaccurate information.
The statements are, respectively:
Read the following text and answer the next five question.
The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate
Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.
Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.
At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.
Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]
The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.
Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf
“Indeed” in “Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent” (1st paragraph) indicates:
Read the following text and answer the next five question.
The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate
Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.
Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.
At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.
Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]
The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.
Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf
The first word in “shifts in the information ecosystem” (1st paragraph) is close in meaning to:
Read the following text and answer the next five question.
The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate
Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.
Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.
At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.
Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]
The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.
Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf
The verb phrase in “official messages are drowned out” (5th paragraph) is in the:
Read the following text and answer the next five question.
The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate
Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.
Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.
At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.
Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]
The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.
Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf
The text ends by pointing out the need for governments to be:
Conheça nossos planos