Questões de Concurso Sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês

Foram encontradas 12.903 questões

Q3964424 Inglês
Building Trustworthy AI in Government: Enablers, Guardrails, and Engagement 







    Governments are starting to use AI in areas like public services, tax work, and disaster response. When it works well, AI can help people get answers faster, spot problems earlier, and support better decisions. As a result, AI can improve productivity, responsiveness, and accountability in government.
    However, many public AI projects stay in small pilots. This happens because governments often lack skills, good data, modern digital systems, and clear ways to measure impact. These gaps can also increase risk aversion, so teams avoid innovation even when the potential benefits are high.
    The OECD proposes a simple way to understand “trustworthy AI in government”: a framework with three connected pillars. In the figure, the goal is in the centre. Around it, the three pillars explain what governments must build and do, so they can reach the public value goals shown on the outer ring (productivity, responsiveness and accountability).
     Enablers are the foundations. They include strong governance, quality data, and digital infrastructure, as well as skills and talent in the civil service. They also require purposeful investment, smart public procurement, and partnerships with non-government actors, so that AI systems can be built and used reliably.
    Guardrails are the safety systems that guide AI use. They include ethics and risk management, transparency duties, and monitoring and oversight bodies that can check results over time. They can also be non-binding guidance or binding laws and policies, along with enforcement measures. Tools like impact assessment and auditing help keep these guardrails practical. Still, guardrails should be proportionate: not every rule fits every use case, or progress may stop.
    Engagement means involving the people who are affected. This includes working across levels of government, across policy areas, and with the broader ecosystem (civil society, businesses and researchers). It also includes citizens and civil servants, and sometimes collaboration across borders. Engagement pushes governments to design user-centred systems, listen to concerns, and make necessary adjustments.
     The main message is that trust is “unlocked” by the right mix. If enablers are weak, AI cannot scale. If guardrails are missing, harms grow. If engagement is shallow, solutions may look efficient but feel unfair, and trust can fall.


(Adapted from oecd.org on February 22, 2026)
No 5º parágrafo do texto, a palavra “guardrails” é usada em sentido figurado. Ela se refere, mais diretamente, a: 
Alternativas
Q3964423 Inglês
Building Trustworthy AI in Government: Enablers, Guardrails, and Engagement 







    Governments are starting to use AI in areas like public services, tax work, and disaster response. When it works well, AI can help people get answers faster, spot problems earlier, and support better decisions. As a result, AI can improve productivity, responsiveness, and accountability in government.
    However, many public AI projects stay in small pilots. This happens because governments often lack skills, good data, modern digital systems, and clear ways to measure impact. These gaps can also increase risk aversion, so teams avoid innovation even when the potential benefits are high.
    The OECD proposes a simple way to understand “trustworthy AI in government”: a framework with three connected pillars. In the figure, the goal is in the centre. Around it, the three pillars explain what governments must build and do, so they can reach the public value goals shown on the outer ring (productivity, responsiveness and accountability).
     Enablers are the foundations. They include strong governance, quality data, and digital infrastructure, as well as skills and talent in the civil service. They also require purposeful investment, smart public procurement, and partnerships with non-government actors, so that AI systems can be built and used reliably.
    Guardrails are the safety systems that guide AI use. They include ethics and risk management, transparency duties, and monitoring and oversight bodies that can check results over time. They can also be non-binding guidance or binding laws and policies, along with enforcement measures. Tools like impact assessment and auditing help keep these guardrails practical. Still, guardrails should be proportionate: not every rule fits every use case, or progress may stop.
    Engagement means involving the people who are affected. This includes working across levels of government, across policy areas, and with the broader ecosystem (civil society, businesses and researchers). It also includes citizens and civil servants, and sometimes collaboration across borders. Engagement pushes governments to design user-centred systems, listen to concerns, and make necessary adjustments.
     The main message is that trust is “unlocked” by the right mix. If enablers are weak, AI cannot scale. If guardrails are missing, harms grow. If engagement is shallow, solutions may look efficient but feel unfair, and trust can fall.


(Adapted from oecd.org on February 22, 2026)
No trecho “These gaps can also increase risk aversion”, presente no segundo parágrafo, a expressão “these gaps” refere-se, principalmente, 
Alternativas
Q3964422 Inglês
Building Trustworthy AI in Government: Enablers, Guardrails, and Engagement 







    Governments are starting to use AI in areas like public services, tax work, and disaster response. When it works well, AI can help people get answers faster, spot problems earlier, and support better decisions. As a result, AI can improve productivity, responsiveness, and accountability in government.
    However, many public AI projects stay in small pilots. This happens because governments often lack skills, good data, modern digital systems, and clear ways to measure impact. These gaps can also increase risk aversion, so teams avoid innovation even when the potential benefits are high.
    The OECD proposes a simple way to understand “trustworthy AI in government”: a framework with three connected pillars. In the figure, the goal is in the centre. Around it, the three pillars explain what governments must build and do, so they can reach the public value goals shown on the outer ring (productivity, responsiveness and accountability).
     Enablers are the foundations. They include strong governance, quality data, and digital infrastructure, as well as skills and talent in the civil service. They also require purposeful investment, smart public procurement, and partnerships with non-government actors, so that AI systems can be built and used reliably.
    Guardrails are the safety systems that guide AI use. They include ethics and risk management, transparency duties, and monitoring and oversight bodies that can check results over time. They can also be non-binding guidance or binding laws and policies, along with enforcement measures. Tools like impact assessment and auditing help keep these guardrails practical. Still, guardrails should be proportionate: not every rule fits every use case, or progress may stop.
    Engagement means involving the people who are affected. This includes working across levels of government, across policy areas, and with the broader ecosystem (civil society, businesses and researchers). It also includes citizens and civil servants, and sometimes collaboration across borders. Engagement pushes governments to design user-centred systems, listen to concerns, and make necessary adjustments.
     The main message is that trust is “unlocked” by the right mix. If enablers are weak, AI cannot scale. If guardrails are missing, harms grow. If engagement is shallow, solutions may look efficient but feel unfair, and trust can fall.


(Adapted from oecd.org on February 22, 2026)
A frase “If engagement is shallow, solutions may look efficient but feel unfair, and trust can fall”, no último parágrafo, sugere que a principal consequência de um engajamento fraco é
Alternativas
Q3964175 Inglês
Texto para questão


How do we measure attention?


    Attention, broadly defined, is the ability to direct the mind on a specific task, says Gloria Mark, author of Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness and Productivity. There are two main types of attention, Mark explains. Involuntary attention is automatic—it’s what allows us to react to a loud noise or a jarringly bright light. Focalized attention, by contrast, is the ability to concentrate on a specific task. This latter type is what scientists measure when researching attention spans. 

    Since the early 2000s, Mark has tracked focalized attention by observing how long people remain on a task before switching to something else—such as checking email or opening a new browser tab. At first, Mark used in-person observations— researchers shadowed employees throughout the office. In recent years, she has tracked attention spans using software that monitors people’s computers.

    “Data from our first study, in 2003, revealed that people spent an average of 2.5 minutes on something before turning their attention to a different task,” she says, “Our most recent study done over the past five years shows that the figure has gone down to 40 seconds.” The measure doesn’t capture how long people can focus under ideal conditions, Mark notes, meaning shorter attention spans don’t reflect a permanent loss of attention capacity, but changes in how often people break their focus in daily life.


National Geographic. Jan 21, 2026. Adaptado.
No que se refere aos procedimentos de mensuração do tempo de atenção, infere-se que, na atualidade, 
Alternativas
Q3964174 Inglês
Texto para questão


How do we measure attention?


    Attention, broadly defined, is the ability to direct the mind on a specific task, says Gloria Mark, author of Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness and Productivity. There are two main types of attention, Mark explains. Involuntary attention is automatic—it’s what allows us to react to a loud noise or a jarringly bright light. Focalized attention, by contrast, is the ability to concentrate on a specific task. This latter type is what scientists measure when researching attention spans. 

    Since the early 2000s, Mark has tracked focalized attention by observing how long people remain on a task before switching to something else—such as checking email or opening a new browser tab. At first, Mark used in-person observations— researchers shadowed employees throughout the office. In recent years, she has tracked attention spans using software that monitors people’s computers.

    “Data from our first study, in 2003, revealed that people spent an average of 2.5 minutes on something before turning their attention to a different task,” she says, “Our most recent study done over the past five years shows that the figure has gone down to 40 seconds.” The measure doesn’t capture how long people can focus under ideal conditions, Mark notes, meaning shorter attention spans don’t reflect a permanent loss of attention capacity, but changes in how often people break their focus in daily life.


National Geographic. Jan 21, 2026. Adaptado.
Considere a oração “This latter type is what scientists measure when researching attention spans.” Pode-se concluir que, ao pesquisar o tempo de atenção, os cientistas mensuram
Alternativas
Q3964172 Inglês
Texto para questão


How do we measure attention?


    Attention, broadly defined, is the ability to direct the mind on a specific task, says Gloria Mark, author of Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness and Productivity. There are two main types of attention, Mark explains. Involuntary attention is automatic—it’s what allows us to react to a loud noise or a jarringly bright light. Focalized attention, by contrast, is the ability to concentrate on a specific task. This latter type is what scientists measure when researching attention spans. 

    Since the early 2000s, Mark has tracked focalized attention by observing how long people remain on a task before switching to something else—such as checking email or opening a new browser tab. At first, Mark used in-person observations— researchers shadowed employees throughout the office. In recent years, she has tracked attention spans using software that monitors people’s computers.

    “Data from our first study, in 2003, revealed that people spent an average of 2.5 minutes on something before turning their attention to a different task,” she says, “Our most recent study done over the past five years shows that the figure has gone down to 40 seconds.” The measure doesn’t capture how long people can focus under ideal conditions, Mark notes, meaning shorter attention spans don’t reflect a permanent loss of attention capacity, but changes in how often people break their focus in daily life.


National Geographic. Jan 21, 2026. Adaptado.
Em uma análise global do texto apresentado, é possível afirmar que o tom discursivo é, predominantemente,
Alternativas
Q3962165 Inglês

Study these sentences and decide if they are true ( T ) or false ( F ), according to structure and grammar use.



( ) The noun rice is countable and can be used with a/an.


( ) the genitive case is being used correctly in the sentence The children’s toys are on the floor.


( ) The following sentences are examples of the correct use of indefinite and relative pronouns There isn’t nothing in the box; The house which roof was damaged needs repairs.


( ) The sentence in direct speech I will call you tomorrow, she said., in indirect speech is She said that she would call me the next day.


( ) The sentence It says that the company will close soon., is the Passive form of People say that the company will close soon.



Choose the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.

Alternativas
Q3962161 Inglês

Study the sentences below about “Vocabulary and Communication of English-speaking countries”, appropriate for Ensino Fundamental, and decide if they are true ( T ) or false ( F ).



( ) In many English-speaking countries, shaking hands is a common form of greeting.


( ) The words kitchen, closet, bedroom, and cellphone are part of the semantic field of parts of a house.


( ) In the United States and the United Kingdom, punctuality is generally considered important in social and professional contexts.


( ) Words like teacher, classroom, and homework are connected to the semantic field of school and education.


( ) Semantic fields are only useful for advanced learners and are not important in elementary English learning.



Choose the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.

Alternativas
Q3962160 Inglês

Text 1


A Message Across Screens


Every morning, Emma checked her phone before getting out of bed. Messages, videos, and stories filled her screen, connecting her to people from different parts of the world. One day, she came across a short digital story shared by a student from another country. It talked about learning English through music, social media, and online friendships.


Curious, Emma replied to the post. Soon, they started exchanging messages and videos, sharing their daily routines, cultures, and challenges. Through these digital interactions, Emma realized that storytelling was no longer limited to books. It now lived on screens, combining images, sounds, and words to create meaning.


Over time, their stories helped them understand each other better. Digital storytelling became a bridge between cultures, showing that language learning is also about empathy, communication, and connection.

Read the following text about Reading Comprehension.



Cohesion and coherence play a crucial role in reading comprehension because they help readers understand how ideas are connected and how meaning is constructed throughout a text.



..............................., on the other hand, relates to the logical organization of ideas and the overall sense that the text makes as a whole.         



............................... refers to the linguistic elements that link sentences and paragraphs, such as conjunctions, pronouns, repetition, and ............................. ties, guiding the reader through the text smoothly. When a text is cohesive and coherent, readers can follow the flow of information more easily, make inferences, and grasp both explicit and implicit meanings, which significantly ..................... comprehension.



Choose the alternative that contains the correct words to complete it.

Alternativas
Q3962158 Inglês

Text 1


A Message Across Screens


Every morning, Emma checked her phone before getting out of bed. Messages, videos, and stories filled her screen, connecting her to people from different parts of the world. One day, she came across a short digital story shared by a student from another country. It talked about learning English through music, social media, and online friendships.


Curious, Emma replied to the post. Soon, they started exchanging messages and videos, sharing their daily routines, cultures, and challenges. Through these digital interactions, Emma realized that storytelling was no longer limited to books. It now lived on screens, combining images, sounds, and words to create meaning.


Over time, their stories helped them understand each other better. Digital storytelling became a bridge between cultures, showing that language learning is also about empathy, communication, and connection.

Read text 1 carefully. Study the sentences below and decide if they are true ( T ) or false ( F ).



( ) Emma shared the digital story she found with a student from another country.


( ) Storytelling has changed because now it combines images, sounds, and words on digital platforms.


( ) The main idea of the text is ‘social media replaces education’.


( ) Emma and her students communicate through messages and books.


( ) Every morning Emma writes stories.



Choose the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.

Alternativas
Q3955804 Inglês
Education is considered as an investment in human beings in terms of development of human resources, skills, motivation and knowledge. Evaluation is concerned with:
Alternativas
Q3954852 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Why Audits Fail: A Story of Missteps and Lessons Learned

24 January 2025


Let's look at three common reasons why audits fall apart and see what we can learn from them.


1. ______[subtítulo]_____


Picture an auditor walking into a company with a checklist and a laptop, ready to make sense of the chaos. But instead of finding clarity, they're handed a series of false assumptions. Maybe management paints an overly rosy picture of their processes. Or worse, the evidence provided is incomplete or outright fabricated. Imagine the frustration of trying to solve a puzzle when pieces are deliberately hidden or swapped out.

Sometimes it's not malicious -management might not even realize their statements are misleading. But the result is the same: the auditor can't do their job, and critical issues go unnoticed. 


2. ALack of Skilled Resources


Now imagine the audit team itself. Maybe they're new, overwhelmed, or simply don't have the expertise needed to navigate the complexities of this organization. Instead of spotting red flags, they miss them - or worse, don't even know where to look. Auditing isn't easy. It takes specialized knowledge to dig into systems, spot gaps in controls, and interpret what the data is really saying. Without skilled resources, even the most thorough audit plan can fall apart.


3. No Support from the Organization


Finally, imagine the company itself. The audit team asks for access to critical systems but gets stuck waiting for approval. Employees avoid answering questions because they're either too busy or worried about saying the wrong thing. The systems in place are outdated, making it impossible to track down reliable data. At this point, it's like the auditor is running a race with their shoelaces tied together.

Auditors can't succeed without support. They need access to systems, cooperation from employees, and tools that make their job easier -not harder. When the organization doesn't provide this support, even the most well-intentioned audit is doomed.


How to Avoid a Failed Audit


So, how can we change the ending to this story? It comes down to preparation and collaboration. Here are a few things every organization can do:

- Be Transparent: Don't hide problems. Audits are there to help, not punish.

Invest in Skills: Train your audit team and give them the tools they need to succeed.

Foster a Supportive Culture: Make sure ure employees see audits as opportunities for growth, not something to fear.


(Adapted from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-audits-fail-story-missteps-lessons-learned-morfa-itil-cobit-5-1rghe/)
Um subtítulo adequado para a primeira circunstância que pode impedir uma boa auditoria é
Alternativas
Q3954851 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Why Audits Fail: A Story of Missteps and Lessons Learned

24 January 2025


Let's look at three common reasons why audits fall apart and see what we can learn from them.


1. ______[subtítulo]_____


Picture an auditor walking into a company with a checklist and a laptop, ready to make sense of the chaos. But instead of finding clarity, they're handed a series of false assumptions. Maybe management paints an overly rosy picture of their processes. Or worse, the evidence provided is incomplete or outright fabricated. Imagine the frustration of trying to solve a puzzle when pieces are deliberately hidden or swapped out.

Sometimes it's not malicious -management might not even realize their statements are misleading. But the result is the same: the auditor can't do their job, and critical issues go unnoticed. 


2. ALack of Skilled Resources


Now imagine the audit team itself. Maybe they're new, overwhelmed, or simply don't have the expertise needed to navigate the complexities of this organization. Instead of spotting red flags, they miss them - or worse, don't even know where to look. Auditing isn't easy. It takes specialized knowledge to dig into systems, spot gaps in controls, and interpret what the data is really saying. Without skilled resources, even the most thorough audit plan can fall apart.


3. No Support from the Organization


Finally, imagine the company itself. The audit team asks for access to critical systems but gets stuck waiting for approval. Employees avoid answering questions because they're either too busy or worried about saying the wrong thing. The systems in place are outdated, making it impossible to track down reliable data. At this point, it's like the auditor is running a race with their shoelaces tied together.

Auditors can't succeed without support. They need access to systems, cooperation from employees, and tools that make their job easier -not harder. When the organization doesn't provide this support, even the most well-intentioned audit is doomed.


How to Avoid a Failed Audit


So, how can we change the ending to this story? It comes down to preparation and collaboration. Here are a few things every organization can do:

- Be Transparent: Don't hide problems. Audits are there to help, not punish.

Invest in Skills: Train your audit team and give them the tools they need to succeed.

Foster a Supportive Culture: Make sure ure employees see audits as opportunities for growth, not something to fear.


(Adapted from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-audits-fail-story-missteps-lessons-learned-morfa-itil-cobit-5-1rghe/)
Segundo o texto,
Alternativas
Q3954850 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Big Techs


When tax bills are in the millions or even billions, some individuals will go to any lengths to avoid paying up

RS, HMRC, FTS or CRA: whatever you like to call him, there's no hiding from the taxman. No individual or institution is immune from the annual tax deadline, although many aim to reduce what they pay as much as possible through regulatory loopholes and profit redistribution schemes.

When that tips over into illegal territory, though, it becomes a major problem. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that over $600bn is lost every year due to tax avoidance, with the US, China and Japan named as the greatest culprits.

Multinational technology companies including Google, Apple and Amazon have been slapped with multiple allegations in recent years regarding non-payment of taxes in Europe. In 2016, Apple was ordered to pay $15.4bn in back taxes to Ireland after it was revealed that the company paid just one percent tax on its European profits in 2003, down to 0.005 percent in 2014. That same year Google was accused of using two regulatory loopholes, nicknamed the 'double Irish', allowing it to pay just six percent corporation tax rather than the required 19.3 percent.

The Double Irish arrangement was a base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax avoidance tool used mainly by United States multinationals since the late 1980s to avoid corporate taxation on non-US profits. (The US was one of a small number of countries that did not usea "territorial" tax system, and taxed corporations on all profits, no matter whether the profit was made outside the US or not, in contrast to "territorial" tax systems which tax only profits made within that country.) It was the largest tax avoidance tool in history. By 2010, it was shielding US$100 billion annually in US multinational foreign profits from taxation, and was the main tool by which US multinationals built up untaxed offshore reserves of US$1 trillion from 2004 to 2018.

Despite US knowledge of the Double Irish fora decade, it was the European Commission that in October 2014 forced Ireland to close the scheme, starting in January 2015. However, users of existing schemes, such as Apple, Google, Facebook and Pfizer, were given until January 2020 to close them.

At the announcement of the closure, it was known that multinationals had replacement BEPS tools in Ireland, the Single Malt (2014). and Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) (2009):

- Single malt is almost identical to the Double Irish, and was identified with Microsoft (Linkedin), and Allergan in 2017;

CAIA can provide up to twice the tax shield of Single Malt, or Double Irish, and was identified with Apple in the 2015 leprechaun economics affair, i.e., a huge statistical distortion in Ireland's GDP caused by Apple's tax restructuring. The company transferred intangible assets to its Irish subsidiary, which artificially inflated the country's GDP by more than 26.3% in a single year (later revised to 24.6%), an absurd leap for a relatively small economy. This growth did not reflect real production, but rather Apple's tax inversion of about US$ 300 billion of its intangible assets (mainly intellectual property) to Ireland.


(Adapted from https://www.worldfinance.com/wealth-management/top-5-tax-scandals)



De acordo com o texto,
Alternativas
Q3954848 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Big Techs


When tax bills are in the millions or even billions, some individuals will go to any lengths to avoid paying up

RS, HMRC, FTS or CRA: whatever you like to call him, there's no hiding from the taxman. No individual or institution is immune from the annual tax deadline, although many aim to reduce what they pay as much as possible through regulatory loopholes and profit redistribution schemes.

When that tips over into illegal territory, though, it becomes a major problem. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that over $600bn is lost every year due to tax avoidance, with the US, China and Japan named as the greatest culprits.

Multinational technology companies including Google, Apple and Amazon have been slapped with multiple allegations in recent years regarding non-payment of taxes in Europe. In 2016, Apple was ordered to pay $15.4bn in back taxes to Ireland after it was revealed that the company paid just one percent tax on its European profits in 2003, down to 0.005 percent in 2014. That same year Google was accused of using two regulatory loopholes, nicknamed the 'double Irish', allowing it to pay just six percent corporation tax rather than the required 19.3 percent.

The Double Irish arrangement was a base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax avoidance tool used mainly by United States multinationals since the late 1980s to avoid corporate taxation on non-US profits. (The US was one of a small number of countries that did not usea "territorial" tax system, and taxed corporations on all profits, no matter whether the profit was made outside the US or not, in contrast to "territorial" tax systems which tax only profits made within that country.) It was the largest tax avoidance tool in history. By 2010, it was shielding US$100 billion annually in US multinational foreign profits from taxation, and was the main tool by which US multinationals built up untaxed offshore reserves of US$1 trillion from 2004 to 2018.

Despite US knowledge of the Double Irish fora decade, it was the European Commission that in October 2014 forced Ireland to close the scheme, starting in January 2015. However, users of existing schemes, such as Apple, Google, Facebook and Pfizer, were given until January 2020 to close them.

At the announcement of the closure, it was known that multinationals had replacement BEPS tools in Ireland, the Single Malt (2014). and Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) (2009):

- Single malt is almost identical to the Double Irish, and was identified with Microsoft (Linkedin), and Allergan in 2017;

CAIA can provide up to twice the tax shield of Single Malt, or Double Irish, and was identified with Apple in the 2015 leprechaun economics affair, i.e., a huge statistical distortion in Ireland's GDP caused by Apple's tax restructuring. The company transferred intangible assets to its Irish subsidiary, which artificially inflated the country's GDP by more than 26.3% in a single year (later revised to 24.6%), an absurd leap for a relatively small economy. This growth did not reflect real production, but rather Apple's tax inversion of about US$ 300 billion of its intangible assets (mainly intellectual property) to Ireland.


(Adapted from https://www.worldfinance.com/wealth-management/top-5-tax-scandals)



De acordo com o texto,
Alternativas
Q3954846 Inglês

Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.



Artificial Intelligence in Accounting and Auditing


Federica De Santis


27 October 2024



   The labor-intensive and repetitive nature of auditing tasks, combined with strict compliance requirements, make auditing an ideal area for the integration of digital technologies like artificial intelligence (Al). Al offers significant potential for auditors, enabling them to accelerate auditing tasks, minimize human errors and bias, overcome sampling limitations, examine entire transaction populations, and lower audit costs. Nonetheless. similar to any innovation in professional practices, the adoption of Al in auditing poses unique challenges for both professionals and policymakers. These challenges mainly pertain to auditors' readiness for technological advancements, their willingness to adapt their approach to audit tasks, and the ethical considerations of utilizing Al in their work.



(Adapted from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-71371-2_9)

Segundo o texto,
Alternativas
Q3954844 Inglês

Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.



Defining the Role of a Tax Auditor



    The core function of a tax auditor is to examine financial records and supporting documentation against the figures reported on official returns, whether for individuals or corporations. This examination seeks to verify every line item, from gross receipts and reported income to specific deductions claimed for ordinary and necessary business expenses. A primary goal is to confirm that the taxpayer's stated liability aligns precisely with the relevant federal or state tax law.


    The auditor works to identify discrepancies or misapplications of the law that may lead to an underpayment of taxes due. They scrutinize documentation that supports deductions, such as receipts for depreciation claimed or substantiation for charitable contributions. The auditor ultimately determines if the taxpayer owes additional tax, is duea refund, or if the return is accurate as filed.



(Adapted from https://egalclarity.org/what-is-a-tax-auditor-and-what-do-they-do/)

O significado de supporting, conforme empregado no texto, é
Alternativas
Q3953951 Inglês
Communication Strategies in English as a Second Language (ESL) Context 
        [...] Foreign language learners may encounter various communication problems when their interlanguage is limited. In order to convey their messages and remain in a conversation until their communication goal is achieved, [...] learners need to employ communication strategies, which have been defined generally as device used by second language learners to overcome perceived barriers to achieving specific communication goals [...]. Language learning cannot be separated from its culture. Language is a clear manifestation of culture. A word can have both cognitive meaning and cultural meaning. Cultural meaning refers to words and expressions which represent cultural perception, values and behavior. At discourse level, the link between language, communication and culture is virtually inseparable.
        Miscommunication occurs when one interprets communicative rules of one culture in terms of the rules of another culture. In the process of learning a second language, learners make some errors due to first language interference. By knowing strategies to avoid misinterpretation between different backgrounds of speakers, the problems mentioned before shall be avoided easily. Language teaching at school has traditionally been aimed at developing linguistic competence. Teachers tend to teach grammar and linguistic features without letting their learners practice and improve their communication in English. Probably this is one reason that cause some learners are good in English but they cannot use English orally. This problem may be solved by introducing communication strategies to learners in order to avoid communication problems and equip them with strategies to overcome the problems of speaking that they are dealing with [...].
        Communication strategies are usually associated with spoken language and research has shown that students tend to use various communication strategies when they are unable to express what they want to say because of their lack of resources in their second language (L2) [...]. When learners experience that fluency in their first language (hereafter L1) does not follow the same pattern as their L2, a gap is created in the knowledge of their L2. These gaps can take many forms: a word, a phrase, a structure, a tense marker or an idiom [...]. In order to overcome that gap, learners have two options: they can either leave the original communicative goal or they can try to reach alternative plans and use other linguistic means that they have at their disposal [...]. It is also important to know that culture and language cannot be separated. Therefore, in the context of language teaching, the knowledge of language and its culture need to be taught as well. The role of teachers in introducing communication strategies to students could determine learners’ successfulness in facing problems of communication [...].
        Despite the fact that many [...] researchers lend support to communication strategies training, some opposition to it has been expressed. Bialystok (1990) and Kellerman (1991) argue that one should teach the language itself rather than the strategies. Schmidt (1983) believes that L2 learners develop their strategic competence at the expense of their linguistic competence. According to Skehan (1998), using communication strategies by skilled learners may hinder the development of their interlanguage knowledge resources [...].
Available in: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1129727.pdf. Acess on: Jan. 30, 2026.
According to the text,

Alternativas
Q3953950 Inglês
        Multiliteracies and multimodal literacies are a comprehensive response to the mobile semiotics of contemporary society. Flows of people, images and ideas, have meant the impact is experienced globally as well as locally and contextually. Along with New Literacy Studies, multiliteracies framework has as its central focus a socially just and culturally inclusive curriculum. Further, informed by critical pedagogy and critical literacy, multiliteracies has, at its conceptual centre, a transformative pedagogy aimed at effective learning across social and cultural differences, and across different learning styles. To attend to the change in social futures, multiliteracies has, at its nexus, student knowledges, lived experiences and student centred resources.
        Central to multiliteracies is the concept of Design. The New London Group indicates the numerous ways by which signification occurs. More recently, as Kalantzis and Cope (2005) describe it, “there is a nice ambiguity in the word ‘design’. Design can denote morphology or the sense of invisible inner structures or inherent relationships of cause and effect” (p. 41). Kalantzis and Cope (2005) use Design in a comprehensive manner to denote “agency” as the “stuff of the characteristically self-conscious pedagogical moves, teaching frameworks and organisational forms of education as we currently understand it” (p. 41). In brief, as Falk (2001) observes, for the New London Group, Design expresses “the active role of the literacy learner in constructing new meaning from existing resources” (p. 314). Because Design rejects isolated, abstract and decentralised learning, it demands “production of the new rather than replication of the old” (Kress, 2000, p. 141). In Design, the learner is actively creating and re-creating while having choices in learning that did not exist in traditional print-based models of literacy.
        The modes or Design concepts are: linguistic, visual, audio, spatial and gestural; however, the New London Group do not perceive each of these literacies as singular and isolated from other literacies. For students who engage with the four knowledge processes there is deep understanding and proactive learning: 
• Experiencing: through the known and the new, where the evidence data from the prior knowledge and life experience of the learner is combined with immersion in new knowledge and new experience in meaningful settings.
• Conceptualising: abstract concepts and theoretical synthesis by the process of naming and theorising. This enables the learner to define, apply concepts and comprehend the abstract generalised meanings in concepts and visual representations.
• Analysing: analysing, interpreting functions capably, through the comprehension of the role of knowledge and critically by analysing purpose and intentions.
• Applying: knowledge appropriately and creatively by understanding suitable situations to apply knowledge and extending it to create new knowledges.

IYER, Radha; LUKE, Carmen. Multimodal, Multiliteracies: Texts and Literacies for the 21st century. In: PULLEN, Darren L.; COLE, David R. Multiliteracies and Technology Enhanced Education. Social Practice and the Global Classroom. Hershey and New York: ICI Global, 2010, p. 22. (Adapted).

After reading this passage on multiliteracies and design, choose the alternative that best conceptualizes those two words. 
Alternativas
Q3953949 Inglês
Read the abstract from na article titled “Social media pedagogy: Applying an interdisciplinary approach to teach multimodal critical digital literacy”.
Abstract
    Social media permeates the daily lives of millennials, as they use it constantly for a variety of reasons. A significant contributing factor is the availability of social media through smartphones and mobile apps. This kind of immersive and complex media environment calls for a literacy pedagogy that prepares students to understand, engage with, and adapt to social media that are inevitably going to remain a part of their lives. Research into digital literacy/literacies has sought to address the development of tools and methods to aid college students in becoming more situated and adept digital citizens. This article extends the conceptualization and application of digital media literacy through the inclusion of a critical, multimodal, and interdisciplinary pedagogical approach. The paper illustrates that critical digital literacy drawing upon multimodal and interdisciplinary analysis is imperative in preparing students to manage the predominance of social media in their lives.
TALIB, Saman. Social media pedagogy: Applying an interdisciplinary approach to teach multimodal critical digital literacy. In E-Learning and Digital Media. Sage, 2018. Available at: journals.sagepub.com/home/ldm. Access on: Feb 12, 2026. DOI: 10.1177/2042753018756904.
This objective of the article as stated in the abstract is to
Alternativas
Respostas
321: B
322: A
323: C
324: B
325: A
326: B
327: D
328: B
329: C
330: E
331: C
332: C
333: D
334: C
335: D
336: B
337: A
338: B
339: A
340: A