Questões de Concurso
Sobre ensino da língua estrangeira inglesa em inglês
Foram encontradas 2.182 questões
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FACET Concursos
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Monteiro - PB
Prova:
FACET Concursos - 2025 - Prefeitura de Monteiro - PB - Professor de Educação Fundamental 2 - Língua Inglesa |
Q3758304
Inglês
Materials should be contextualized, inclusive,
and multimodal (cf. Tomlinson). Technology (LMSs,
corpora, ASR, adaptive platforms) supports input variety
and feedback but must respect privacy and validity.
Data-driven learning leverages corpora to raise noticing
of collocation and phraseology. Choose the correct
alternative.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FACET Concursos
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Monteiro - PB
Prova:
FACET Concursos - 2025 - Prefeitura de Monteiro - PB - Professor de Educação Fundamental 2 - Língua Inglesa |
Q3758298
Inglês
Cross-cultural pragmatics shows how speech
acts (apologies, requests) vary in directness, mitigation,
and stance across English-speaking communities (cf.
Blum-Kulka; Wierzbicka). Misalignment in politeness
systems may produce unintended rudeness or
deference. Pedagogy should address pragmalinguistic
and sociopragmatic knowledge, not merely forms.
Choose the correct alternative.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FACET Concursos
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Monteiro - PB
Prova:
FACET Concursos - 2025 - Prefeitura de Monteiro - PB - Professor de Educação Fundamental 2 - Língua Inglesa |
Q3758289
Inglês
In English phonology, vowel quantity and quality
interact with stress and rhythm to shape intelligibility (cf.
Cruttenden). Contrastively, Brazilian Portuguese
exhibits seven oral vowels with stable /e ~ ɛ/ and /o ~ ɔ/
distributions, while English presents a denser vowel
space and widespread vowel reduction in unstressed
syllables (e.g., schwa). Moreover, aspiration of voiceless
plosives in stressed onset (/p, t, k/ → [pʰ, tʰ, kʰ]) is
phonetic but phonologically contrastive in perception
for many learners. From a teaching viewpoint (cf.
Jenkins’ Lingua Franca Core), prioritizing vowel length
contrasts and consonant clusters often yields greater
communicative payoff than pursuing native-like
allophones. Choose the correct option.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753600
Inglês
In English language teaching, some oral activities focus
on helping learners organize their ideas, speak fluently,
and use intonation naturally while narrating events or
retelling personal experiences. These techniques
emphasize structure, coherence, and expressiveness,
encouraging students to practice rhythm, pronunciation,
and creativity as they construct meaning through speech.
Which pedagogical strategy represents this approach?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753599
Inglês
Autonomous learning refers to students' ability to take
charge of their own learning process, setting goals,
selecting strategies, and self-evaluating progress. Digital
technologies offer unprecedented opportunities for
autonomous English learning through apps, online
platforms, podcasts, and authentic materials. However,
effective autonomy requires explicit instruction in learning
strategies, digital literacy skills, and critical evaluation of
online resources. Teachers play a crucial role in
scaffolding learner autonomy rather than simply
assigning independent work. Responsible technology use
involves understanding privacy concerns, identifying
credible sources, managing screen time, and recognizing
AI limitations. How can English teachers effectively
promote genuine learner autonomy while ensuring
responsible technology use?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753597
Inglês
In English pronunciation practice, teachers often use a
technique that involves students repeating words,
sounds, or sentences several times after the teacher.
This repetition helps learners internalize the rhythm,
intonation, and pronunciation patterns of the language,
building accuracy and fluency through controlled
imitation. Which teaching technique does this description
refer to?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753595
Inglês
English language teachers must explicitly teach reading
strategies to help students process texts efficiently.
Different reading purposes require different approaches.
When students need to find specific information quickly,
such as a date, name, price, or particular fact, without
reading the entire text, they should employ a particular
technique. This strategy involves moving eyes rapidly
over the text to locate specific keywords or information,
similar to searching for a contact in a phone list. It differs
from other strategies like skimming (getting general idea),
intensive reading (detailed comprehension), or extensive reading (reading for pleasure). What is this reading
strategy called when students search for specific
information without reading every word?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753591
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article presents an argumentative structure where
the author analyzes Reeves' budget strategy, provides
evidence, and evaluates potential consequences. The
text employs cohesive devices such as "At the same
time," "As ever," "Finally," and contrastive structures like
"But" to connect ideas logically. In teaching
argumentative writing in English, particularly for students
preparing to write opinion essays or analytical texts about
current events, it is essential to focus on thesis
statements, supporting evidence, counterarguments, and
appropriate linking words. Consider a teacher who wants
students to write a 250-word argumentative essay
responding to the question: "Should governments
prioritize reducing debt over increasing welfare
spending?" Which instructional sequence would prepare
students for this task?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753589
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
In authentic spoken English, native speakers use
features of connected speech including linking
(connecting final consonant sounds to initial vowel
sounds), elision (dropping sounds), assimilation (sounds
changing when they meet), and weak forms. In the
sentence "Reeves gave particular importance to sticking
with her iron-clad fiscal rules," native speakers would
likely link sounds between words, use weak forms for
function words, and potentially reduce certain sounds.
Understanding these features is crucial for both listening
comprehension and pronunciation teaching. A teacher
preparing students for oral communication should
address these phenomena. Which approach effectively
develops students' ability to understand and produce
natural connected speech?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753585
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article uses several idiomatic expressions and
collocations that are characteristic of British political and
economic discourse. For example: "balancing the books"
(managing finances to ensure income matches
expenditure), "iron-clad fiscal rules" (extremely firm financial regulations), "bite the bullet" (make a difficult
decision), and "the stakes could not be higher" (the
consequences are extremely serious). Understanding
these expressions is crucial for authentic comprehension
of English texts. A teacher planning a lesson on idiomatic
expressions from authentic political texts should consider
both their literal and figurative meanings, as well as
register and context. Which pedagogical approach would
effectively help intermediate-level students understand
and use such expressions appropriately?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753583
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach
emphasizes meaningful communication and functional
language use over mechanical grammar drills.
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), an extension of
CLT, organizes instruction around tasks that reflect
real-world language use. Using the article about UK
budget policy, a teacher could design a task-based
lesson where students engage with authentic content.
The task cycle typically includes: pre-task (introducing
topic and useful language), task (students complete the
task in pairs/groups), planning (preparing to report to
class), report (presenting findings), analysis (examining
language features), and practice (focused work on
language forms that emerged). Which lesson design exemplifies task-based principles while using this article?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751465
Inglês
Methodologies and teaching approaches for teaching
English in the early and later years of Elementary School
When planning English language instruction in
Elementary School, the teacher must adapt the approach
to the age group. Which methodological practice is most
appropriate for the early years (1st to 5th grade)?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751464
Inglês
Skimming and scanning strategies are essential to
optimize reading comprehension in English. Analyze the
statements below:
I. Skimming is the strategy of reading a text quickly and superficially, focusing on elements such as titles, subtitles, cognates, and the first and last paragraphs, with the goal of grasping the main idea (the "gist").
II. Scanning is the strategy of rapidly searching for a specific piece of information in the text, such as a name, a date, a number, or a keyword, running one's eyes over the text without reading every word.
III. Skimming is the term used for detailed, analytical reading of a text, focusing on every word and grammatical structure for deep comprehension.
Which statements are correct?
I. Skimming is the strategy of reading a text quickly and superficially, focusing on elements such as titles, subtitles, cognates, and the first and last paragraphs, with the goal of grasping the main idea (the "gist").
II. Scanning is the strategy of rapidly searching for a specific piece of information in the text, such as a name, a date, a number, or a keyword, running one's eyes over the text without reading every word.
III. Skimming is the term used for detailed, analytical reading of a text, focusing on every word and grammatical structure for deep comprehension.
Which statements are correct?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751463
Inglês
Teaching English in the early years of primary education
has specific features that differ from teaching
adolescents or adults. Mark T for true and F for false:
(__) The main focus is raising awareness of linguistic and cultural diversity, using playful activities such as games, songs, and stories.
(__) The priority is explicit grammatical correction and the production of complex passive-voice sentences, aiming at academic proficiency.
(__) Contact with English broadens students' awareness of their own mother tongue (Portuguese) through contrast and comparison (metalinguistic awareness).
(__) The goal is to achieve full oral fluency and native-like pronunciation before 6th grade, this being the main indicator of success.
Select the option that shows the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
(__) The main focus is raising awareness of linguistic and cultural diversity, using playful activities such as games, songs, and stories.
(__) The priority is explicit grammatical correction and the production of complex passive-voice sentences, aiming at academic proficiency.
(__) Contact with English broadens students' awareness of their own mother tongue (Portuguese) through contrast and comparison (metalinguistic awareness).
(__) The goal is to achieve full oral fluency and native-like pronunciation before 6th grade, this being the main indicator of success.
Select the option that shows the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751461
Inglês
A dimensão intercultural no ensino de Língua Inglesa,
conforme preconizado pela Base Nacional Comum
Curricular (BNCC), vai além do ensino de "curiosidades"
sobre países de língua inglesa. Qual é o objetivo central
dessa abordagem?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750970
Inglês
Within the framework of the Brazilian National Curriculum Guidelines (BNCC, 2018), what should be the teacher’s main focus when teaching phonemes and their allophonic variations in English?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750969
Inglês
According to the Brazilian National Curriculum Guidelines (BNCC, 2018), English is conceived as a Lingua Franca (EFL), a perspective that legitimizes the diverse linguistic and cultural repertoires of speakers worldwide and challenges the notion that only American or British varieties of English should be considered “correct.” Based on this premise, which of the following represents an implication for the adoption of English as a Lingua Franca in language education?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750968
Inglês
In light of the conceptualization of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) – which emphasizes the use of English as a means of communication among speakers from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds – it is incorrect to affirm that:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750966
Inglês
Which strategy for enhancing vocabulary and lexicogrammatical competence in written production is considered ineffective?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750965
Inglês
Which instructional focus should teachers adopt to develop students’ macro-level reading comprehension skills?
Conheça nossos planos