Questões de Vestibular Nível médio

Foram encontradas 71.618 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107428 Inglês
       The term AI winter refers to a period of reduced funding in the development of AI. In general, AI has followed a path on which proponents overstate what is possible, inducing people with no technology knowledge at all, but lots of money, to make investments. A period of criticism then follows when AI fails to meet expectations, and, finally, the reduction in funding occurs.

         A number of these cycles have occurred over the years — all of them devastating to true progress. AI is currently in a new hype phase because of machine learning, a technology that helps computers learn from data. Having a computer learn from data means not depending on a human programmer to set operations (tasks), but rather deriving them directly from examples that show how the computer should behave. It’s like educating a baby by showing it how to behave through example. Machine learning has pitfalls because the computer can learn how to do things incorrectly through careless teaching.

         Scientists are working on machine learning algorithms, each one from a different point of view. At this time, the most successful solution is deep learning, which is a technology that strives to imitate the human brain. Deep learning is possible because of the availability of powerful computers, smarter algorithms, large datasets produced by the digitalization of our society, and huge investments from businesses such as Google, Facebook, Amazon, and others that take advantage of this AI renaissance for their own businesses.

         People are saying that the AI winter is over because of deep learning, and that’s true for now. However, when you look around at the ways in which people are viewing AI, you can easily figure out that another criticism phase will eventually occur unless proponents tone the rhetoric down. AI can do amazing things, but they’re a mundane sort of amazing. 


John Paul Mueller and Luca Massaron. Artificial Intelligence For Dummies.
Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley & Sons, 2022

Judge the following items according to the previous text.  

With the sentence “AI can do amazing things, but they’re a mundane sort of amazing”, the author indicates that he does not believe in everything AI proponents are saying AI can do. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107427 Inglês
         The idea that we might one day be able to construct some artefact which has a mind in the same sense that we have minds is not a new one. It has featured in entertaining and frightening fictions since Mary Shelley first conceived of Frankenstein’s monster.

        In the classic science fiction of the early to mid-twentieth century, this idea was generally cashed out in terms of ‘mechanical men’ or robots – from the Czech word robata, which translates roughly as the feudal term corvée, a term which refers to the unpaid labour provided to one’s liege lord.

    In more modern fiction, the idea of a mechanical mind has given way to the now commonplace notion of a computational artificial intelligence. The possibility of actually developing artificial intelligence, however, is not just a question of sufficiently advanced technology. It is rather a philosophical question. 



Matt Carter. Minds and Computers: an introduction to the philosophy of artficial intelligence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007 (adapted). 

About the preceding text, judge the following item.

From the information given in the second paragraph of the text, it is correct to assume that the origins of the word “robots” had to do with the slavery system. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107426 Inglês
         The idea that we might one day be able to construct some artefact which has a mind in the same sense that we have minds is not a new one. It has featured in entertaining and frightening fictions since Mary Shelley first conceived of Frankenstein’s monster.

        In the classic science fiction of the early to mid-twentieth century, this idea was generally cashed out in terms of ‘mechanical men’ or robots – from the Czech word robata, which translates roughly as the feudal term corvée, a term which refers to the unpaid labour provided to one’s liege lord.

    In more modern fiction, the idea of a mechanical mind has given way to the now commonplace notion of a computational artificial intelligence. The possibility of actually developing artificial intelligence, however, is not just a question of sufficiently advanced technology. It is rather a philosophical question. 



Matt Carter. Minds and Computers: an introduction to the philosophy of artficial intelligence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007 (adapted). 

About the preceding text, judge the following item.

The author suggests that the philosophical question behind the development of AI plays a more central role in the AI related debate than the advanced technology it demands.
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107425 Inglês
         The idea that we might one day be able to construct some artefact which has a mind in the same sense that we have minds is not a new one. It has featured in entertaining and frightening fictions since Mary Shelley first conceived of Frankenstein’s monster.

        In the classic science fiction of the early to mid-twentieth century, this idea was generally cashed out in terms of ‘mechanical men’ or robots – from the Czech word robata, which translates roughly as the feudal term corvée, a term which refers to the unpaid labour provided to one’s liege lord.

    In more modern fiction, the idea of a mechanical mind has given way to the now commonplace notion of a computational artificial intelligence. The possibility of actually developing artificial intelligence, however, is not just a question of sufficiently advanced technology. It is rather a philosophical question. 



Matt Carter. Minds and Computers: an introduction to the philosophy of artficial intelligence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007 (adapted). 

About the preceding text, judge the following item.

The text states that the idea of developing human-like minds in non-human artefacts has been part of fictional production for many decades. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107424 Inglês
         The idea that we might one day be able to construct some artefact which has a mind in the same sense that we have minds is not a new one. It has featured in entertaining and frightening fictions since Mary Shelley first conceived of Frankenstein’s monster.

        In the classic science fiction of the early to mid-twentieth century, this idea was generally cashed out in terms of ‘mechanical men’ or robots – from the Czech word robata, which translates roughly as the feudal term corvée, a term which refers to the unpaid labour provided to one’s liege lord.

    In more modern fiction, the idea of a mechanical mind has given way to the now commonplace notion of a computational artificial intelligence. The possibility of actually developing artificial intelligence, however, is not just a question of sufficiently advanced technology. It is rather a philosophical question. 



Matt Carter. Minds and Computers: an introduction to the philosophy of artficial intelligence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007 (adapted). 

About the preceding text, judge the following item.

The first sentence of the first paragraph would still keep both its original meaning and its grammar correctness if the word “might” were replaced with can
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107423 Inglês
         The idea that we might one day be able to construct some artefact which has a mind in the same sense that we have minds is not a new one. It has featured in entertaining and frightening fictions since Mary Shelley first conceived of Frankenstein’s monster.

        In the classic science fiction of the early to mid-twentieth century, this idea was generally cashed out in terms of ‘mechanical men’ or robots – from the Czech word robata, which translates roughly as the feudal term corvée, a term which refers to the unpaid labour provided to one’s liege lord.

    In more modern fiction, the idea of a mechanical mind has given way to the now commonplace notion of a computational artificial intelligence. The possibility of actually developing artificial intelligence, however, is not just a question of sufficiently advanced technology. It is rather a philosophical question. 



Matt Carter. Minds and Computers: an introduction to the philosophy of artficial intelligence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007 (adapted). 

About the preceding text, judge the following item.

The word “It”, in the beginning of the second sentence of the text, refers to “some artifact which has a mind in the same sense that we have minds”. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107422 Inglês
       In January 1818, Mary Shelley anonymously published a strange little novel that would eventually make her world-famous. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who is driven by an unrelenting “thirst for knowledge,” an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth. He works tirelessly to engineer a sentient being who, upon coming alive, is hideous to him. Realizing with horror that his plan has gone awry, Frankenstein flees his creature who in turn angrily chases him to the end of the Earth and finally destroys him at the novel’s end.

        Shelley’s dystopian tale has managed to stay relevant since its publication. It has a riddling quality that has edified and entertained readers for centuries, inspiring a range of interpretations. Recently, it has been making appearances in the heated debates over generative artificial intelligence, where it often is evoked as a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific overreach. Some worry that in pursuing technologies like AI, we are recklessly consigning our species to Victor Frankenstein’s tragic fate. Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines, might ultimately destroy us. This fear is an expression of what science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once called the “Frankenstein complex.”

        Strangely, it’s not only people who are afraid of robots who are expressing such fears today; it is also some of the people who are most aggressively at the forefront of technological innovation. Elon Musk seemed to have had Mary Shelley’s story in mind when he warned a World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017 that sometimes “a scientist will get so engrossed in their work that they don’t really realize the ramifications of what they’re doing.”


Jennifer Banks. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can illuminate the debate over generative AI. In: Big Think. Internet: (adapted)
Based on the previous text, judge the following item. 

According to the text, Elon Musk is someone who is afraid of robots, even though he is one of the leaders of technological innovation. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107421 Inglês
       In January 1818, Mary Shelley anonymously published a strange little novel that would eventually make her world-famous. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who is driven by an unrelenting “thirst for knowledge,” an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth. He works tirelessly to engineer a sentient being who, upon coming alive, is hideous to him. Realizing with horror that his plan has gone awry, Frankenstein flees his creature who in turn angrily chases him to the end of the Earth and finally destroys him at the novel’s end.

        Shelley’s dystopian tale has managed to stay relevant since its publication. It has a riddling quality that has edified and entertained readers for centuries, inspiring a range of interpretations. Recently, it has been making appearances in the heated debates over generative artificial intelligence, where it often is evoked as a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific overreach. Some worry that in pursuing technologies like AI, we are recklessly consigning our species to Victor Frankenstein’s tragic fate. Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines, might ultimately destroy us. This fear is an expression of what science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once called the “Frankenstein complex.”

        Strangely, it’s not only people who are afraid of robots who are expressing such fears today; it is also some of the people who are most aggressively at the forefront of technological innovation. Elon Musk seemed to have had Mary Shelley’s story in mind when he warned a World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017 that sometimes “a scientist will get so engrossed in their work that they don’t really realize the ramifications of what they’re doing.”


Jennifer Banks. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can illuminate the debate over generative AI. In: Big Think. Internet: (adapted)
Based on the previous text, judge the following item. 

The last paragraph of the text states that Elon Musk was thinking of Mary Shelley when he declared scientists didn’t realize the ramifications of what they were doing.  
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107420 Inglês
       In January 1818, Mary Shelley anonymously published a strange little novel that would eventually make her world-famous. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who is driven by an unrelenting “thirst for knowledge,” an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth. He works tirelessly to engineer a sentient being who, upon coming alive, is hideous to him. Realizing with horror that his plan has gone awry, Frankenstein flees his creature who in turn angrily chases him to the end of the Earth and finally destroys him at the novel’s end.

        Shelley’s dystopian tale has managed to stay relevant since its publication. It has a riddling quality that has edified and entertained readers for centuries, inspiring a range of interpretations. Recently, it has been making appearances in the heated debates over generative artificial intelligence, where it often is evoked as a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific overreach. Some worry that in pursuing technologies like AI, we are recklessly consigning our species to Victor Frankenstein’s tragic fate. Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines, might ultimately destroy us. This fear is an expression of what science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once called the “Frankenstein complex.”

        Strangely, it’s not only people who are afraid of robots who are expressing such fears today; it is also some of the people who are most aggressively at the forefront of technological innovation. Elon Musk seemed to have had Mary Shelley’s story in mind when he warned a World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017 that sometimes “a scientist will get so engrossed in their work that they don’t really realize the ramifications of what they’re doing.”


Jennifer Banks. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can illuminate the debate over generative AI. In: Big Think. Internet: (adapted)
Based on the previous text, judge the following item. 

In the last sentence of the second paragraph, the excerpt “Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines” refers to the creatures that may be created by AI. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107419 Inglês
       In January 1818, Mary Shelley anonymously published a strange little novel that would eventually make her world-famous. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who is driven by an unrelenting “thirst for knowledge,” an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth. He works tirelessly to engineer a sentient being who, upon coming alive, is hideous to him. Realizing with horror that his plan has gone awry, Frankenstein flees his creature who in turn angrily chases him to the end of the Earth and finally destroys him at the novel’s end.

        Shelley’s dystopian tale has managed to stay relevant since its publication. It has a riddling quality that has edified and entertained readers for centuries, inspiring a range of interpretations. Recently, it has been making appearances in the heated debates over generative artificial intelligence, where it often is evoked as a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific overreach. Some worry that in pursuing technologies like AI, we are recklessly consigning our species to Victor Frankenstein’s tragic fate. Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines, might ultimately destroy us. This fear is an expression of what science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once called the “Frankenstein complex.”

        Strangely, it’s not only people who are afraid of robots who are expressing such fears today; it is also some of the people who are most aggressively at the forefront of technological innovation. Elon Musk seemed to have had Mary Shelley’s story in mind when he warned a World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017 that sometimes “a scientist will get so engrossed in their work that they don’t really realize the ramifications of what they’re doing.”


Jennifer Banks. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can illuminate the debate over generative AI. In: Big Think. Internet: (adapted)
Based on the previous text, judge the following item. 

According to the author of the text, Shelley’s novel should be mentioned in debates over AI because it proves things can go very wrong with new technologies.  
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107418 Inglês
       In January 1818, Mary Shelley anonymously published a strange little novel that would eventually make her world-famous. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who is driven by an unrelenting “thirst for knowledge,” an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth. He works tirelessly to engineer a sentient being who, upon coming alive, is hideous to him. Realizing with horror that his plan has gone awry, Frankenstein flees his creature who in turn angrily chases him to the end of the Earth and finally destroys him at the novel’s end.

        Shelley’s dystopian tale has managed to stay relevant since its publication. It has a riddling quality that has edified and entertained readers for centuries, inspiring a range of interpretations. Recently, it has been making appearances in the heated debates over generative artificial intelligence, where it often is evoked as a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific overreach. Some worry that in pursuing technologies like AI, we are recklessly consigning our species to Victor Frankenstein’s tragic fate. Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines, might ultimately destroy us. This fear is an expression of what science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once called the “Frankenstein complex.”

        Strangely, it’s not only people who are afraid of robots who are expressing such fears today; it is also some of the people who are most aggressively at the forefront of technological innovation. Elon Musk seemed to have had Mary Shelley’s story in mind when he warned a World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017 that sometimes “a scientist will get so engrossed in their work that they don’t really realize the ramifications of what they’re doing.”


Jennifer Banks. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can illuminate the debate over generative AI. In: Big Think. Internet: (adapted)
Based on the previous text, judge the following item. 

In the last sentence of the first paragraph, “awry” is used to indicate that Victor Frankenstein’s plan went well, as his creature was similar to a human being. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107417 Inglês
       In January 1818, Mary Shelley anonymously published a strange little novel that would eventually make her world-famous. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who is driven by an unrelenting “thirst for knowledge,” an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth. He works tirelessly to engineer a sentient being who, upon coming alive, is hideous to him. Realizing with horror that his plan has gone awry, Frankenstein flees his creature who in turn angrily chases him to the end of the Earth and finally destroys him at the novel’s end.

        Shelley’s dystopian tale has managed to stay relevant since its publication. It has a riddling quality that has edified and entertained readers for centuries, inspiring a range of interpretations. Recently, it has been making appearances in the heated debates over generative artificial intelligence, where it often is evoked as a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific overreach. Some worry that in pursuing technologies like AI, we are recklessly consigning our species to Victor Frankenstein’s tragic fate. Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines, might ultimately destroy us. This fear is an expression of what science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once called the “Frankenstein complex.”

        Strangely, it’s not only people who are afraid of robots who are expressing such fears today; it is also some of the people who are most aggressively at the forefront of technological innovation. Elon Musk seemed to have had Mary Shelley’s story in mind when he warned a World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017 that sometimes “a scientist will get so engrossed in their work that they don’t really realize the ramifications of what they’re doing.”


Jennifer Banks. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can illuminate the debate over generative AI. In: Big Think. Internet: (adapted)
Based on the previous text, judge the following item. 

According to the text, at the end of Mary Shelley’s novel, Doctor Frankenstein kills the monster he created. 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: UNB Prova: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - UNB - Prova de Conhecimentos I - Inglês - 1° dia |
Q3107416 Inglês
       In January 1818, Mary Shelley anonymously published a strange little novel that would eventually make her world-famous. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who is driven by an unrelenting “thirst for knowledge,” an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth. He works tirelessly to engineer a sentient being who, upon coming alive, is hideous to him. Realizing with horror that his plan has gone awry, Frankenstein flees his creature who in turn angrily chases him to the end of the Earth and finally destroys him at the novel’s end.

        Shelley’s dystopian tale has managed to stay relevant since its publication. It has a riddling quality that has edified and entertained readers for centuries, inspiring a range of interpretations. Recently, it has been making appearances in the heated debates over generative artificial intelligence, where it often is evoked as a cautionary tale about the dangers of scientific overreach. Some worry that in pursuing technologies like AI, we are recklessly consigning our species to Victor Frankenstein’s tragic fate. Our wonderchildren, our miraculous machines, might ultimately destroy us. This fear is an expression of what science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once called the “Frankenstein complex.”

        Strangely, it’s not only people who are afraid of robots who are expressing such fears today; it is also some of the people who are most aggressively at the forefront of technological innovation. Elon Musk seemed to have had Mary Shelley’s story in mind when he warned a World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017 that sometimes “a scientist will get so engrossed in their work that they don’t really realize the ramifications of what they’re doing.”


Jennifer Banks. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can illuminate the debate over generative AI. In: Big Think. Internet: (adapted)

Based on the previous text, judge the following item. 


In the second sentence of the first paragraph, the excerpt “an ambition to penetrate the secrets of nature, heaven, and Earth” can be understood as an explanation for the “unrelenting ‘thirst of knowledge’” that drove Victor Frankenstein.


Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: COMVEST - UNICAMP Órgão: UNICAMP Prova: COMVEST - UNICAMP - 2024 - UNICAMP - Vestibular |
Q3107255 Biologia
Em 1913, Alfred Sturtevant – em seu estudo com Drosophila melanogaster (mosca-das-frutas) – estabeleceu o primeiro mapa genético capaz de determinar a posição relativa e a ordem de genes nessa espécie. O mapa genético do terceiro cromossomo da mosca mostra que os alelos da cor dos olhos (A/a), da cor do corpo (B/b) e das cerdas (C/c) estão ligados nessa sequência. Na figura a seguir, encontram-se as quantidades de gametas produzidos por uma mosca macho, considerando apenas o terceiro cromossomo.


Imagem associada para resolução da questão

Em vista das informações apresentadas, é correto afirmar que os cromossomos recombinantes apresentam 
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: COMVEST - UNICAMP Órgão: UNICAMP Prova: COMVEST - UNICAMP - 2024 - UNICAMP - Vestibular |
Q3107254 Biologia
Estima-se que mais de dois milhões de espécies habitem os oceanos; entretanto, somente 10% da vida oceânica é conhecida. Em janeiro de 2024, uma expedição na costa do Chile avaliou um trecho de 2.900 km2 de montanhas subaquáticas criadas por atividade vulcânica, o que resultou em uma região única com correntes marítimas e baixo teor de oxigênio, gerando um nível elevado de endemismo.
Em menos de um mês, a expedição documentou cem novas espécies animais de profundidade, incluindo corais, esponjas, lagostas, polvos, caravelas, águas-vivas, peixes, camarões, entre outros.
(Adaptado de https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/10/science/new-species-sea-discove ry.html. Acesso em 02/04/2024.)

Sobre essa expedição marinha, é correto afirmar que os animais
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: COMVEST - UNICAMP Órgão: UNICAMP Prova: COMVEST - UNICAMP - 2024 - UNICAMP - Vestibular |
Q3107253 Biologia
Considera-se que a evolução cria e sustenta a biodiversidade via mudanças adaptativas em características ecologicamente relevantes. A especiação é um processo contínuo que dá origem à diversidade biológica, e está intimamente associada a mudanças no fenótipo e à adaptação ao ambiente ecológico.
Assinale a alternativa correta.
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: COMVEST - UNICAMP Órgão: UNICAMP Prova: COMVEST - UNICAMP - 2024 - UNICAMP - Vestibular |
Q3107252 Biologia
A floração é um processo sensível ao fotoperíodo (período de luz em um dia) em algumas espécies, que podem ser classificadas como espécies de dia longo e espécies de dia curto. Há ainda as espécies neutras em relação ao fotoperíodo; no caso, a floração delas é independente dele.
Na figura a seguir, quatro condições de luminosidade são apresentadas, com as horas de luz indicadas pelas barras brancas e as horas de escuro indicadas pelas barras pretas: I) 8 horas de luz e 16 horas de escuro; II) 12 horas de luz e 12 horas de escuro; III) 16 horas de luz e 8 horas de escuro; e IV) 10 horas de luz e 14 horas de escuro. Para essa última condição (IV), há interrupção do período de escuro pelo fornecimento de luz por 2 horas.

Imagem associada para resolução da questão

Considerando uma espécie vegetal de dia longo, assinale a alternativa que indica as condições em que haverá floração.
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: COMVEST - UNICAMP Órgão: UNICAMP Prova: COMVEST - UNICAMP - 2024 - UNICAMP - Vestibular |
Q3107251 Biologia
A infecção por Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) resulta em maior acúmulo de muco nas vias aéreas, o que pode facilitar infecções fúngicas ou bacterianas em humanos, contribuindo para o aumento da severidade da doença e da mortalidade. A figura I ilustra o epitélio respiratório normal; a seta aponta uma importante estrutura. O funcionamento dessa estrutura é definido pela amplitude do movimento em função do tempo. A figura II demonstra os efeitos da infecção viral e suas alterações estruturais e funcionais nas células epiteliais.

Imagem associada para resolução da questão

É correto afirmar que as setas indicam
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: COMVEST - UNICAMP Órgão: UNICAMP Prova: COMVEST - UNICAMP - 2024 - UNICAMP - Vestibular |
Q3107250 Biologia
Em mulheres, ocorre a compactação e a inativação de um cromossomo X, formando uma estrutura pequena e densa, chamada de corpúsculo de Barr. Sabe-se que a inativação de um dos cromossomos X em embriões humanos é um processo fundamental para sua viabilidade.
(Adaptado de https://agencia.fapesp.br/inativacao-do-cromossomo-x-ocorre-mais-cedo- -em-humanos. Acesso em 02/04/2024.)

Assinale a alternativa que preenche corretamente as lacunas no excerto a seguir.

Em humanos, o sexo é determinado pela presença dos cromossomos sexuais X e Y, que são considerados parcialmente (i) _________. A inativação de um cromossomo X é um processo aleatório e foi demonstrado que os (ii) _________ no corpúsculo de Barr são inativos, o que significa que eles não serão (iii) _________. A inativação do cromossomo X é um processo de controle epigenético, que molda o funcionamento do (iv) _________ sem alterá-lo, e iguala a atividade gênica das mulheres à dos homens.
Alternativas
Ano: 2024 Banca: COMVEST - UNICAMP Órgão: UNICAMP Prova: COMVEST - UNICAMP - 2024 - UNICAMP - Vestibular |
Q3107249 Biologia
Rosana Paulino é uma artista visual brasileira e suas obras têm foco nas questões sociais, étnicas e de gênero. A obra a seguir foi exposta na 35ª Bienal de São Paulo (2023) e promove a integração da arte com a natureza brasileira, retratando um importante ecossistema costeiro.

Imagem associada para resolução da questão

Tendo em vista seus conhecimentos sobre biologia e considerando a obra apresentada, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Respostas
3541: C
3542: E
3543: C
3544: C
3545: E
3546: E
3547: E
3548: E
3549: E
3550: E
3551: E
3552: E
3553: C
3554: D
3555: B
3556: B
3557: A
3558: C
3559: C
3560: A