🎯 Saiba o que estudar

Avançado com Treinador a partir de R$ 0,76/dia

Questões de Concurso Sobre ensino da língua estrangeira inglesa em inglês

Questões Discursivas

Foram encontradas 2.181 questões

Q3953939 Inglês
        Attitudes to classroom conversation and casual chat have varied over the years. In the heyday of audiolingualism, one writer, Louis Alexander, warned that the traditional conversation lesson is of no value at all if the student is not ready for it. The student must first be trained to use patterns in carefully graded aural-oral drills. Only in this way will he finally learn to speak.The chat stage of the lesson, if it occurred at all, was simply there as a curtain raiser to the main event – the controlled practice of sentence patterns. Until recently, one London language school was still advising its students that the teacher and the student must not chat during the lesson. They must only ask and answer the questions in the book. Chatting is a waste of time. Such a view sits uncomfortably with the finding that conversation, i.e. casual talk that is primarily interpersonal, is by far the most common and the most widespread function of speaking. Moreover, there is a school of thought that argues that, in L1 acquisition, the development of conversational skills precedes the development of language itself. As Evelyn Hatch put it, language learning evolves out oflearning how to carry on conversations, i.e. out of learning how to communicate. By extension, it has been argued that conversation in English as second or foreign language is not the result of language learning, but it is the site where learning occurs. lt is also, of course, a fact that many language learners feel that their most urgent need is to develop conversational competence, and they regularly choose conversation as their principal objective when answering needs analysis surveys. For this reason, many language schools offer conversation classes as a way of complementing more traditional, grammar-focused, classes. However, these offer a challenge to teachers and course designers since it is difficult to plan or programme something as inherently unstructured and spontaneous as casual conversation. As one writer puts it, genuine conversational interactions cannot be the outcome of planned lesson agendas, they have to emerge - and so, by definition, cannot be planned. One way that teachers get round this is to organize conversation classes around a set of themes. Ideally, these should be negotiated with the learners in advance, through the use of a questionnaire or by means of a consensus debate. Themerelated texts can be used to trigger conversation, either in open class or in groups. Or individual students take turns to make a short presentation on the pre-selected topic, which is then followed by open discussion. Pre-planned lesson content can take the form of teaching useful conversational formulas and routines, such as how to open and dose conversations, how to interrupt, change the subject, ask for clarification, and so on.
THORNBURY, Scott. How to Teach Speaking. Cambridge: Longman, 2005, pp. 110-1. (Adapted).
In this excerpt, the author states that “By extension, it has been argued that conversation in English as second or foreign language is not the result of language learning, but it is the site where learning occurs”.
After reading the passage as a whole, choose the best alternative that explains how to cope with this matter. 
Alternativas
Q3953931 Inglês
The humanistic approach to boost self-confidence in English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ oral skills
        […] Oral communication skills are crucial in the process of learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL), with many students wrestling with a lack of self-confidence when it is time to speak in English, whether in academic or personal situations. Speaking is a skill that requires a high level of self-confidence. Lack of confidence will affect students’ learning process because talking in English requires not being shy or rude.
        Grammar and vocabulary are tools that are often used over fluency and proficiency in traditional methods, which has resulted in this problem. When in educational environments there is a neglect of the socio-emotional part at the time of the teaching-learning process, there is a series of negative consequences, such as introversion and lack of motivation to participate in classes […].
        The central question that this research aims to address is how the Humanistic Approach can be used to enhance learners' selfconfidence in EFL contexts. This research work explores the potential of the humanistic approach to increase the self-confidence of English as a foreign language learner, focusing specifically on the development of their oral skills. By investigating the theoretical underpinnings, methodologies, and teacher perceptions, this study aims to provide educators with information about a type of teaching that will help them approach learners and foster a supportive learner-centered environment that can lead to significant improvements in both confidence and oral skills […].
        In the past, when emphasis began to be placed on teaching English as a foreign language, traditional methods were used, which did not produce results in the emergence of meaningful knowledge, as there was no emphasis on interaction with students and the use of appropriate strategies for teaching a new language [...].
        The humanistic approach, based on the principles of empathy, individualization and self-realization, offers a transformative way to address these challenges. By placing the learner at the center of the educational process and fostering an environment of trust and encouragement, this approach emphasizes emotional well-being in language acquisition [...].
        Humanistic Approach, rooted in the principles of Carl Rogers (1969), emphasizes a holistic teaching methodology, focused on fostering a supportive, inclusive and learner-centered learning environment. This approach focuses on students as the authors of their own knowledge, with students having the agency to explore and acquire meaningful knowledge according to their experiences, with the teacher being more of a guide who provides instructions and creates an appropriate and harmonious environment for an effective teaching and learning process, taking into account the affective and social needs of each individual […]. 
Available in: https://repositorio.upse.edu.ec/items/5caf2c50-6627-4f44-87f2-9220acfb1cc8. Acess on: Jan. 25, 2026.
According to the text, 
Alternativas
Q3953928 Inglês
    lt is often a delicate decision as to how to provide learners with feedback on their errors when their attention is primarily focused on the content of what they are saying, rather than on the way they are saying it. Interrupting learners ‘in full flight’ to give them corrections seems to run counter to the need to let them experience autonomy. If the teacher is constantly intervening to assist their performance, whether by providing unknown words or correcting their errors, they can hardly be said to be self-regulating. And it may have the counterproductive effect of inhibiting fluency by forcing learners’ attention on to accuracy. Nevertheless, many teachers feel uncomfortable about ‘letting errors go’, even in fluency activities, and there is support for the view that maintaining a focus on form – that is, on formal accuracy – is good for learners in the long run. lt is important, therefore, that such a focus should be effected at minimal cost to the speaker’s sense of being in control. What is agreed is that in cases of correction of oral fluency, the teacher’s corrections, while explicit, are unobtrusive, and these are picked up by the learners with no real loss of fluency: ln the above extract, the teacher's interventions should be economical and effective, and the conversational flow should not threatened. However, it could be argued that such overt monitoring deprives the learners of opportunities to take more responsibility for their own monitoring and selfrepair. This is especially the case with regard to their mistakes, as opposed to their errors. By mistake is meant the learners’ momentary failure to apply what they already know, due mainly to the demands of online processing. An error, on the other hand, represents a gap in the speaker’s knowledge of the system. Mistakes can usually be self-corrected, but errors cannot. A deft hint to the learner that they have used a present verb form instead of a past one, for example, may be all that is needed to encourage selfcorrection. And self-correction, even if prompted by the teacher, is one step nearer self-regulation and the ultimate goal of full autonomy. Sometimes, however, the learner’s message is simply unintelligible, and some kind of more obtrusive intervention is necessary to repair the breakdown. ln this case, an intervention that is perceived by the learner as repair is likely to be less inhibiting than one that is perceived of as correction. Repair is facilitative, while correction can be construed negatively, as judgmental. In repairing, the teacher's intervention takes the form of a conversational repair, one that is consistent with the meaning-orientation of the interaction
THORNBURY, Scott. How to Teach Speaking. Cambridge: Longman, 2005, pp. 91-2. (Adapted).
One of the main problems when dealing with oral fluency is to know if a student should be corrected when interacting or after it. After reading this passage about feedback and correction in fluency, select the alternative that agrees with the point of view discussed in the passage.
Alternativas
Q3953468 Inglês

O ensino de Inglês Instrumental (ESP) foca nas necessidades específicas do aprendiz em sua área de atuação. Considerando os princípios do ESP, assinale a alternativa CORRETA

Alternativas
Q3953459 Inglês
As preposições em inglês apresentam desafios devido à sua polissemia e uso idiomático. Considerando o uso padrão das preposições de tempo e lugar, assinale a alternativa CORRETA.
Alternativas
Q3953458 Inglês
A distinção entre a modalidade oral e escrita do inglês envolve variações na complexidade gramatical e na densidade lexical. Assim, analise as afirmativas a seguir.
I. A escrita acadêmica tende a apresentar elevada densidade lexical, com uso recorrente de nominalizações para condensar informações e relações conceituais.
II. A fala espontânea caracteriza-se pelo uso frequente de estruturas coordenadas, repetições e marcadores discursivos, como hesitadores (fillers).
III. A escrita, especialmente em gêneros acadêmicos, tende a apresentar maior complexidade sintática, com uso mais frequente de subordinação e cláusulas embutidas, enquanto a fala organiza-se de forma incremental e mais coordenada.
IV. A escrita apresenta maior uso de pronomes pessoais e de deícticos espaciais do que a fala presencial, em razão da necessidade de referência imediata ao contexto situacional.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta somente a(s) proposição(ões) CORRETA(S):
Alternativas
Q3946986 Inglês
        Digital technologies have transformed the way English is taught and learned, offering educators and students more dynamic and flexible ways to engage with language. According to recent research, tools such as computer-assisted instruction, mobile devices, and online multimedia platforms enable both teachers and learners to access a wide variety of resources — from interactive exercises, videos, and audio recordings to adaptive learning modules. 


        These tools facilitate exposure to real language input, allow for repetition and individual pacing, and help learners practise all four language skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) beyond the constraints of the traditional classroom schedule. 


        Moreover, the integration of technology in English-language instruction tends to increase student motivation and engagement. Studies report that when classrooms incorporate digital media and interactive tasks, students often show greater participation, interest, and willingness to communicate — factors that contribute to better learning outcomes.


        In contexts where technology offers immediate feedback or allows for collaborative online work, learners also benefit from more autonomy and personalized learning paths, which can boost confidence and foster a more learner-centered environment. 


       However, effective technology integration depends on thoughtful planning, teacher training, and pedagogical balance. The literature warns that simply having access to digital tools does not guarantee improved learning; educators must design meaningful tasks, adapt materials appropriately, and support learners' needs. 


          Furthermore, in settings where access to devices or internet is limited, or where teachers lack sufficient training, the potential benefits may not be realized — which underlines the importance of institutional support and professional development for successful implementation. 



Source: Günüç, S. (2023). Technology Integration in English Language Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics. Nishat Tasneem (2024). The Impact of Technology-Enhanced EFL Reading Classes on Learners' Performances and Participations. International Journal of English Learning and Applied Linguistics.

According to the text, what is one key benefit of integrating digital technologies into English-language teaching?


Alternativas
Q3944853 Inglês
Teacher Qualifications, Professionalism, Competencies, and Benchmarks


To achieve professionalism, English language teachers (both native English-speaking teachers [NESTs] and nonnative English-speaking teachers [NNESTs]) need to gain competence in disciplinary content knowledge about the nature of language, language learning, and language teaching, as well as pedagogical content knowledge regarding teaching strategies that they can use to make their teaching contextually appropriate and effective. Teachers also need to achieve the ability to use English effectively for different purposes, and acquire knowledge about English that gives them the skills to analyze and explain the language. In addition, teachers need to engage in reflective activities and classroom-based research as part of developing teacher qualifications, in order to be able to make a connection between these bodies of knowledge and their practice and continue their professional development. Benchmarks developed to measure teachers' English language proficiency need to reflect local needs and constraints as well as respond to the role of English as a lingua franca.


Content extracted and adapted from:

DOĞANÇAY-AKTUNA, Seran; HARDMAN, Joel. Teacher qualifications, professionalism, competencies, and benchmarks: Nonnative English-speaking teachers (NNESTs). 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0034
The mention of “English as a lingua franca”, in Text 2, suggests that English:
Alternativas
Q3944852 Inglês
Teacher Qualifications, Professionalism, Competencies, and Benchmarks


To achieve professionalism, English language teachers (both native English-speaking teachers [NESTs] and nonnative English-speaking teachers [NNESTs]) need to gain competence in disciplinary content knowledge about the nature of language, language learning, and language teaching, as well as pedagogical content knowledge regarding teaching strategies that they can use to make their teaching contextually appropriate and effective. Teachers also need to achieve the ability to use English effectively for different purposes, and acquire knowledge about English that gives them the skills to analyze and explain the language. In addition, teachers need to engage in reflective activities and classroom-based research as part of developing teacher qualifications, in order to be able to make a connection between these bodies of knowledge and their practice and continue their professional development. Benchmarks developed to measure teachers' English language proficiency need to reflect local needs and constraints as well as respond to the role of English as a lingua franca.


Content extracted and adapted from:

DOĞANÇAY-AKTUNA, Seran; HARDMAN, Joel. Teacher qualifications, professionalism, competencies, and benchmarks: Nonnative English-speaking teachers (NNESTs). 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0034
Professionalism in English Language Teaching requires some competencies. Based on Text 2, analyze the following statements and choose the CORRECT alternative whose proposition(s) is/are true.
I. Dealing with IA technologies.
II. Disciplinary content knowledge.
III. Pedagogical knowledge.
IV. Research publication.
V. Translation skills.
Alternativas
Q3936710 Inglês
Study the affirmatives below about Language and English Language Teaching, focusing on conceptions of language, language as a social practice, and communicative competences.
1. Writing in English is limited to producing grammatically correct sentences, without considering purpose or audience.
2. Language can be understood only as a system of grammatical rules, independent of social context.
3. Effective English language teaching encourages meaningful communication and real-life language use.
4. The concept of language as a social practice emphasizes interaction, meaning-making, and context.
5. Oral comprehension (listening) is developed only through explicit grammar instruction.
Choose the alternative which presents the correct affirmatives.
Alternativas
Q3936707 Inglês
Analyze the sentences below about reading strategies, text genres, communicative approaches, and reading activities.
1. The activity that best integrates listening and speaking skills is role-plays based on audio or video input.
2. The reading strategy Scanning, is most effective when a learner wants to identify the main idea of a text quickly.
3. Teachers should consider the purpose, audience, and structure of each genre when working with different text genres in reading activities.
4. In process-oriented writing, the stage that typically involves feedback and revision is drafting.
5. According to communicative approaches, errors in oral production should be viewed as part of the learning process.
Choose the alternative which contains the correct affirmatives.
Alternativas
Q3936705 Inglês
The linguistic aspects of the English language refer to the main components that describe how English is structured, used, and understood.
Decide if the following affirmatives about the linguistic aspects of the English language are true ( T ) or false ( F ).
( ) Teaching vocabulary in isolation, without context, generally promotes deeper communicative competence.
( ) Phonetics is concerned with the physical production and perception of speech sounds, while phonology studies how these sounds function within a language system.
( ) Semantics and pragmatics are closely related, but pragmatics focuses more on meaning in real communicative situations.
( ) Vocabulary knowledge includes only knowing word meanings but also understanding collocations, register, and usage.
( ) English has a relatively fixed word order, which makes syntax an important aspect for meaning construction.
Choose the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Alternativas
Q3935008 Inglês
Regarding the teaching of English in the BNCC, it is correct to state that: 
Alternativas
Q3935007 Inglês
Choose the alternative where the use of ARTICLES is correct: 
Alternativas
Q3934998 Inglês
A BNCC propõe que o ensino de Língua Inglesa no Ensino Fundamental deve focar em:  
Alternativas
Q3925164 Inglês
Considering the current official Brazilian curriculum policy documents, the classroom scenario that best reflects the pedagogical implications of the theoretical shift from English as a Foreign Language (EFL) to English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) is:
Alternativas
Q3925163 Inglês
In applying Larsen-Freeman’s 3D approach to teaching a specific grammatical structure like the passive voice, the pedagogical sequence that best illustrates the integration of Form, Meaning, and Use while addressing the Challenge Principle is
Alternativas
Q3925161 Inglês

In the contemporary English classroom, the integration of digital technologies and the AI revolution have fundamentally reshaped the dynamics of instruction and the status of the student.


The statement that best describes learner protagonism and the role of the teacher in this digital era is:

Alternativas
Q3925156 Inglês

Text II


De-encapsulated Bilingual Education in Brazil: Multicultural Breakfasts and Translanguaging Kids


In Brazil, when we talk about bilingual education, we are talking about two very different realities. Children and youth from minoritarian and underprivileged groups such as immigrant, indigenous or deaf communities make up one group, as Antonieta Megale (2019) points out. The other is children of wealthy people who learn another language to further enhance their privileged participation in society. Brazilians seem to cultivate a notion of monolingualism and, although there are more than 200 languages spoken in the country (Maher, 2013), they seem to be made invisible, which reinforces a denial of cultural diversity in the country (Monte Mór, 2002). We believe that education should provide expansive new modes of effective participation in society to offer students the chance to increasingly develop forms of insertion in the world and means to transform their mobility. The expansion of mobility should imply the creation of language practices at school which can lead to the reflection of life through a large range of possibilities of understanding concepts, content and knowledge through diverse sources as well as through various semiotic resources and multiple languages. As part of the Global South, Brazilians must figure out ways of teaching in a multilingual perspective to lessen human suffering, as suggested by Ofelia García (2019). Thus, bilingual education in Brazil should involve breaking with modules imposed by educational parameters or cultural biases, which impose a mono-ideology that makes it difficult to move in the direction of a multi/ intercultural perspective. Turning to the challenges presented by globalization, especially in a country with extreme social differences such as Brazil, we must become critically aware of the ways in which schools position themselves regarding local and global issues. When teaching and learning practices enable connections between such issues and the learners’ different realities and needs, change and transformation are more likely to occur.


Aiming at showing how some schools in Brazil are striving to implement multicultural and multilingual practices, distancing themselves from the prescribed curriculum and the traditional separation between languages, we will describe an example taken from Multicultural Breakfasts, a research project carried out at Esfera Escola Internacional, a bilingual school in São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil. The methodology was based on critical collaborative research (Magalhães, 2011), in which researchers are included as active participants in the search for shared solutions. Discourse analysis was used to reveal how language was materialized in the participant’s interactions. Although the majority of the students at Esfera are Brazilian, about 15% are from other countries, thus creating a diverse linguistic landscape. Four teachers, coordinators and students made up the research group for the year. The school follows an inquiry-based curriculum, which is organized through transdisciplinary projects in the primary years. To begin their inquiries and provoke questions for exploration, the students read migration stories of children from around the world. They later explored their own family stories of travel and change, and connected them to how the Brazilian people were formed. Making room for further questioning and critical thinking, the students also looked at how migration movements have been affecting people and places in Brazil and the world today. As a performance task, the students invited their parents to breakfast at school, with typical dishes from their countries of origin, and presented their new understandings using different resources and the languages of their preference.


The Multicultural Breakfasts’ example helps us understand how dynamic language practices and de-encapsulation can support teaching and learning, while also enabling agency and social transformation. Ofelia García (2009, p. 9) asserts that “Bilingual education in the twenty-first century must be reimagined and expanded, as it takes its rightful place as a meaningful way to educate all children and language learners in the world today.” She proposes that the dynamic language practices that take place in the social environment should have a place in bilingual schools, to enhance learning and transform conditions of social injustice. The complex networks of language practices in which children interact today are no longer supported by linear language instruction. Knowing how to interact dynamically and collaboratively in this new reality is a challenge faced by the new generations and, consequently, a goal for bilingual schools. The traditional notions of languages as distinct and pure systems should be replaced by fluid visions of language for a society in constant movement, as pointed out by Jan Blommaert (2012). When two or more people who don’t share a common language interact, they sometimes rely on language fragments or diverse semiotic resources to communicate. There is a scenario of intense mixture of languages, in which different repertoires are necessary.


Similarly, the dynamic framework (García, 2009) considers language as repertoire, created through the lived experience of language (Busch, 2012; 2015). It presupposes language not as something one owns, but as something one does. In this perspective, interaction is based on the integration and not separation of languages and resources, an understanding associated with the notion of translanguaging. In the Multicultural Breakfast sessions, translanguaging is made visible through the various resources mentioned by participants in their interaction with researchers, including, for instance, the use of technology to assist communication and understanding. Translanguaging is characterized by the interconnected ways in which individuals select and use their language resources from a unitary linguistic repertoire to negotiate and create meaning. Translanguaging can be understood both as a theoretical lens and a pedagogical approach, when teachers intentionally plan for and use fluid language practices in the classroom. In this sense, translanguaging also lends itself to de-encapsulation, according to Sara Vogel and Ofelia García (2017).


The distance between how the curriculum is presented in schools and how it can be explored in real life has motivated studies in the field of de-encapsulation (Liberali et al., 2015, Liberali, 2019b). Traditionally, schoolwork generates individual changes in ways of knowing and being. From the perspective of de-encapsulation, these changes occur collectively and through a variety of cultural artifacts. This process of de-encapsulation allows for school curriculum to be understood as opportunities for problem posing and solving, creating enhanced possibilities for learning outside of the disciplines, the teaching resources and the school itself (Liberali 2019a, 2019b). De-encapsulation builds on the notion of an ecology of knowledges (Santos, 2006) as central to environments where creativity, innovation and transformation flourish. De-encapsulated practices challenge pre-established truths and value multiculturalism, through an open and continuous process of construction and deconstruction, which results from the interactions between people of different cultural backgrounds. It is not limited to the acceptance of various cultures but is characterized by a movement of appreciation and approximation between them, a disposition which should also be addressed in schools (Freire, 2003). The Multicultural Breakfasts project can be viewed through the lens of de-encapsulation, as it aimed to approximate learners to the real world, through events that connected to the reasons for exploration and immigration. While exploring these concepts collaboratively, learners also learned about the formation of the Brazilian people and addressed national standards. De-encapsulation is not only about creating context and connection, but also how different perspectives are valued, in an intentional effort to create meaning and enable agency and transformation.



CLEMENSHA, S.; LIBERALI, F. De-encapsulated Bilingual Education in Brazil: Multicultural Breakfasts and Translanguaging Kids. ReVista, 19 (2), 2020. Available at: https:// revista.drclas.harvard.edu/de-encapsulated-bilingual-education -in-brazil. Retrieved on: January 6, 2026. Adapted.

Translanguaging and code-switching differ from each other because
Alternativas
Q3925154 Inglês

A teacher is planning a unit on Climate Change for a high school English class. He believes that integrating communicative skills (listening, reading, speaking, and writing) rather than focusing on isolated, correctness-driven linguistic tasks can be far more effective.


The approach that correctly illustrates this view is

Alternativas
Respostas
121: B
122: A
123: A
124: B
125: D
126: B
127: B
128: B
129: C
130: D
131: C
132: D
133: E
134: D
135: E
136: A
137: B
138: A
139: B
140: B