Questões Militares Sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês

Foram encontradas 2.321 questões

Q4280332 Inglês

O retrato


Aldous Huxley



A leitura do conto "O retrato" nos permite afirmar que:
Alternativas
Q4280324 Inglês

O retrato


Aldous Huxley



Ao fazer referência ao pintor Giangolini (27°§), o sr. Bigger:
Alternativas
Q4280321 Inglês

O retrato


Aldous Huxley



Em sua maior parte, o conto de Huxley é construído através de diálogos. Assinale a opção em que o trecho NÃO apresenta termo ou expressão típica da modalidade oral da língua.
Alternativas
Q4277333 Inglês

What Scott's Antarctic expedition reveals about our seas today


[1] Sea urchins preserved in glass jars in Dr Hugh Carter's desk in the Natural History Museum were coilected from the depths of the Southern Ocean by polar teams led by Sir Ernest Shackleton, Capt Robert Falcon Scott and the Norwegian Carsten Borchgrevink in the 19th and 20th centuries. They tell a tale of heroic exploration and scientific endeavour.

[

2] Now, more than a century later, a new project led by Carter has gathered samples that could be compared with those found on the expeditions that took place more than a century ago. Carter, the Natural History Museum's (NHM) curator of marine invertebrates, hopes the preserved Antarctic urchins, 50 in all, will help tell a different, increasingly urgent story of modern times: how changes in the world's southernmost waters may be affecting marine life.


[3] In January, the biologist undertook a six-week long research trip to visit the exact sites sampled by Borchgrevink's Southern Cross, Shackleton's Discovery and Scott's ill-fated Terra Nova expedition between 1898 and 1913.


[4] In the Antarctic, which is warming at twice the global average, a lack of baseline scientific data makes it difficult to assess the physical and biological changes that have occurred over time.


[5] Carter's theory is that comparing the "tests" or shell of the urchins (a type of invertebrate known as echinoderms, which include starfish and sea cucumbers) in the NHM's collection with modern samples will help reveal more about the impact of ocean acidification, often called the "evil twin" of the climate crisis.


[6] Acidification is caused when carbon díoxide is rapidly absorbed into the ocean, where it then reacts with water molecules leading to a fall in the pH of the seawater.


[7] Preliminary findings on Carter's ship, the deep water research vessel the RV Tangaroa, appeared to confirm his worst fears.


[8] "We know that the ocean has been getting more acidic but in most cases we don't know what the impacts are," he says. "We had a suspicion that [due to ocean acidification] you would get less calcium carbonate in the water. This would make it harder to build a body if that body is made from calcium carbonate."


[9] Corals, sea snails, oysters and small single-celled organisms called foraminifera, a component of plankton, all rely on calcium carbonate to build shells. Calcium carbonate dissolves in acid very easily, so the more acid, the harder it is for animals such as these to survive.


[10] While the tests of the historical urchins on Carter's desk were "robust and healthy", those brought to the surface in January were thinner and more fragile in comparison, so much so that they were crushed by the force of the hose used to clean them.


[11] "All the ones we collected were fragile and some of them collapsed," says Carter. "From initial appearances, the modern specimens we collected have weaker tests than the historical ones, but we need to do more work to establish to what degree and exactly what is causing this.


[12] The biological implications of an acidifying ocean could be enormous, adds Carter. "It could make the seas unliveable for things with a calcium skeleton."


[13] During the expedition, the impact of the climate crisis was tangible; some of the study sites were only accessible because of melting ice. And it coincided with stark findings that the level of global sea ice fell to its lowest recorded level, a symptom of our warming planet.


[14] But there were positive findings on the expedition, too. Carter saw as many as 150 whales on his trip, as well as what he described as "crazy levels" of wildlife on the western edge of Coulman island, which had 17 species of starfish in just 100 metres, the same number found in all of the UK's shallow waters.


[15] "It is a thrill to know that the environment is not as bad in some parts of the world as it could be," he says. "It's the only bit of the world you don't see any plastic or human impacts from fishing."


[16] Prof Craig Stevens, an oceanographer who co-led the Tangaroa expedition, described their work as "sweet and sour".


[17] "This lack of ice is having knock-on effects for not only the regional ocean but the whole planet. This work is very sweet and sour. It is amazing to get the opportunity to advance the science, but at the same time, we are catching glimpses of a future for the planet that we really want to avoid. It brings home in a very tangible way the need to limit emissions of climate-affecting gases."



(Adapted from: www.theguardian.com)

Mark the correct option according to text II.
Alternativas
Q4277332 Inglês

What Scott's Antarctic expedition reveals about our seas today


[1] Sea urchins preserved in glass jars in Dr Hugh Carter's desk in the Natural History Museum were coilected from the depths of the Southern Ocean by polar teams led by Sir Ernest Shackleton, Capt Robert Falcon Scott and the Norwegian Carsten Borchgrevink in the 19th and 20th centuries. They tell a tale of heroic exploration and scientific endeavour.

[

2] Now, more than a century later, a new project led by Carter has gathered samples that could be compared with those found on the expeditions that took place more than a century ago. Carter, the Natural History Museum's (NHM) curator of marine invertebrates, hopes the preserved Antarctic urchins, 50 in all, will help tell a different, increasingly urgent story of modern times: how changes in the world's southernmost waters may be affecting marine life.


[3] In January, the biologist undertook a six-week long research trip to visit the exact sites sampled by Borchgrevink's Southern Cross, Shackleton's Discovery and Scott's ill-fated Terra Nova expedition between 1898 and 1913.


[4] In the Antarctic, which is warming at twice the global average, a lack of baseline scientific data makes it difficult to assess the physical and biological changes that have occurred over time.


[5] Carter's theory is that comparing the "tests" or shell of the urchins (a type of invertebrate known as echinoderms, which include starfish and sea cucumbers) in the NHM's collection with modern samples will help reveal more about the impact of ocean acidification, often called the "evil twin" of the climate crisis.


[6] Acidification is caused when carbon díoxide is rapidly absorbed into the ocean, where it then reacts with water molecules leading to a fall in the pH of the seawater.


[7] Preliminary findings on Carter's ship, the deep water research vessel the RV Tangaroa, appeared to confirm his worst fears.


[8] "We know that the ocean has been getting more acidic but in most cases we don't know what the impacts are," he says. "We had a suspicion that [due to ocean acidification] you would get less calcium carbonate in the water. This would make it harder to build a body if that body is made from calcium carbonate."


[9] Corals, sea snails, oysters and small single-celled organisms called foraminifera, a component of plankton, all rely on calcium carbonate to build shells. Calcium carbonate dissolves in acid very easily, so the more acid, the harder it is for animals such as these to survive.


[10] While the tests of the historical urchins on Carter's desk were "robust and healthy", those brought to the surface in January were thinner and more fragile in comparison, so much so that they were crushed by the force of the hose used to clean them.


[11] "All the ones we collected were fragile and some of them collapsed," says Carter. "From initial appearances, the modern specimens we collected have weaker tests than the historical ones, but we need to do more work to establish to what degree and exactly what is causing this.


[12] The biological implications of an acidifying ocean could be enormous, adds Carter. "It could make the seas unliveable for things with a calcium skeleton."


[13] During the expedition, the impact of the climate crisis was tangible; some of the study sites were only accessible because of melting ice. And it coincided with stark findings that the level of global sea ice fell to its lowest recorded level, a symptom of our warming planet.


[14] But there were positive findings on the expedition, too. Carter saw as many as 150 whales on his trip, as well as what he described as "crazy levels" of wildlife on the western edge of Coulman island, which had 17 species of starfish in just 100 metres, the same number found in all of the UK's shallow waters.


[15] "It is a thrill to know that the environment is not as bad in some parts of the world as it could be," he says. "It's the only bit of the world you don't see any plastic or human impacts from fishing."


[16] Prof Craig Stevens, an oceanographer who co-led the Tangaroa expedition, described their work as "sweet and sour".


[17] "This lack of ice is having knock-on effects for not only the regional ocean but the whole planet. This work is very sweet and sour. It is amazing to get the opportunity to advance the science, but at the same time, we are catching glimpses of a future for the planet that we really want to avoid. It brings home in a very tangible way the need to limit emissions of climate-affecting gases."



(Adapted from: www.theguardian.com)

Professor Craig Stevens described their work as "sweet and sour" (paragraphs 16 and 17) because its components include both: 
Alternativas
Q4277330 Inglês
To Type or to Write, That Is the Question
At the highest level of learning, should you type or
write by hand?


[1] Research by Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) compared students who typed lecture notes on laptops with those who wrote them by hand during the same time.

[2] In terms of immediate results, laptop users typed and recorded more words during the lectures, and their notes were aimost word-for-word transcripts of the lectures. The initial assumption was that this would ultimately be beneficial for these students compared with those who were handwriting their notes.

[3] After the lectures, the two groups of students in this study were tested on the information presented. The results showed that students who wrote by hand during lectures scored significantly higher on the tests than those who typed.

[4] The immediate question was: "Why was this the case?" Muelier and Oppenheimer (2014) found that students who handwrote their notes were consistently engaged in higherlevel thinking. This meant that throughout their lectures, these students were actively listening and intellectually analyzing what to record. This led to higher knowledge-based outcomes.

[5] Luo et al. (2018) found that handwritten notes contained more meaningful content (such as deeper thought and greater intellectual structure), resulting in higher scores on knowledge-based tests.

[6] Morehead et al. (2019) confirmed that the benefits of handwriting are most evident when students are assessed on higher-order conceptual understanding rather than on memorizing facts.

[7] These studies confirm that handwriting is an essential cognitive process and a highly beneficial intellectual activity that enhances learning at advanced levels of education and that begins from the first day of school and continues thereafter.


Handwriting Helps to Advance Knowledge and Enhance Ideas


[8] This evidence from university classrooms illustrates a broader principle: handwriting for note-taking is a deeper thinking skill. When students write by hand, they actively select and synthesize information.

[9] This process requires them to decide what is essential, how ideas connect, and how best to represent them in their own words. The research indicates that this type of engagement develops, advances, and enhances critical thinking (defined as the ability to analyze, evaluate, and make reasoned, detailed judgments), because handwriting forces students to process information conceptually rather than transcribe it verbatim.

[10] The research also indicates that this process helps to develop higher-order thinking, which involves analyzing, applying, synthesizing, and evaluating information. This then develops a deeper knowledge potential. Additionally, as confirmed by classroom studies and evidence from neuroscience, handwriting activates broader brain networks than typing.

[11] Building on this, some studies explain that the ongoing substitution of handwriting by typewriting in almost every educational setting may seem somewhat misguided, as it could negatively affect the learning process.

[12] However, Van der Weel and Van der Meer (2024) emphasise the importance of staying current in this everchanging digital world. With this in mind, they state that children must, first and foremost, learn handwriting. Only after they are absoiutely proficient, especially at complex narrative handwriting, should typing be considered.


(Adapted from: https://www.psychologytoday.com)
According to the text, Mueller and Oppenheimer discovered that:
Alternativas
Q4277329 Inglês
To Type or to Write, That Is the Question
At the highest level of learning, should you type or
write by hand?


[1] Research by Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) compared students who typed lecture notes on laptops with those who wrote them by hand during the same time.

[2] In terms of immediate results, laptop users typed and recorded more words during the lectures, and their notes were aimost word-for-word transcripts of the lectures. The initial assumption was that this would ultimately be beneficial for these students compared with those who were handwriting their notes.

[3] After the lectures, the two groups of students in this study were tested on the information presented. The results showed that students who wrote by hand during lectures scored significantly higher on the tests than those who typed.

[4] The immediate question was: "Why was this the case?" Muelier and Oppenheimer (2014) found that students who handwrote their notes were consistently engaged in higherlevel thinking. This meant that throughout their lectures, these students were actively listening and intellectually analyzing what to record. This led to higher knowledge-based outcomes.

[5] Luo et al. (2018) found that handwritten notes contained more meaningful content (such as deeper thought and greater intellectual structure), resulting in higher scores on knowledge-based tests.

[6] Morehead et al. (2019) confirmed that the benefits of handwriting are most evident when students are assessed on higher-order conceptual understanding rather than on memorizing facts.

[7] These studies confirm that handwriting is an essential cognitive process and a highly beneficial intellectual activity that enhances learning at advanced levels of education and that begins from the first day of school and continues thereafter.


Handwriting Helps to Advance Knowledge and Enhance Ideas


[8] This evidence from university classrooms illustrates a broader principle: handwriting for note-taking is a deeper thinking skill. When students write by hand, they actively select and synthesize information.

[9] This process requires them to decide what is essential, how ideas connect, and how best to represent them in their own words. The research indicates that this type of engagement develops, advances, and enhances critical thinking (defined as the ability to analyze, evaluate, and make reasoned, detailed judgments), because handwriting forces students to process information conceptually rather than transcribe it verbatim.

[10] The research also indicates that this process helps to develop higher-order thinking, which involves analyzing, applying, synthesizing, and evaluating information. This then develops a deeper knowledge potential. Additionally, as confirmed by classroom studies and evidence from neuroscience, handwriting activates broader brain networks than typing.

[11] Building on this, some studies explain that the ongoing substitution of handwriting by typewriting in almost every educational setting may seem somewhat misguided, as it could negatively affect the learning process.

[12] However, Van der Weel and Van der Meer (2024) emphasise the importance of staying current in this everchanging digital world. With this in mind, they state that children must, first and foremost, learn handwriting. Only after they are absoiutely proficient, especially at complex narrative handwriting, should typing be considered.


(Adapted from: https://www.psychologytoday.com)
In the extract "the ongoing substitution of handwriting by typewriting in almost every educational setting may seem somewhat misquided" (paragraph 11), the word "misquided" means: 
Alternativas
Q4277328 Inglês
To Type or to Write, That Is the Question
At the highest level of learning, should you type or
write by hand?


[1] Research by Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) compared students who typed lecture notes on laptops with those who wrote them by hand during the same time.

[2] In terms of immediate results, laptop users typed and recorded more words during the lectures, and their notes were aimost word-for-word transcripts of the lectures. The initial assumption was that this would ultimately be beneficial for these students compared with those who were handwriting their notes.

[3] After the lectures, the two groups of students in this study were tested on the information presented. The results showed that students who wrote by hand during lectures scored significantly higher on the tests than those who typed.

[4] The immediate question was: "Why was this the case?" Muelier and Oppenheimer (2014) found that students who handwrote their notes were consistently engaged in higherlevel thinking. This meant that throughout their lectures, these students were actively listening and intellectually analyzing what to record. This led to higher knowledge-based outcomes.

[5] Luo et al. (2018) found that handwritten notes contained more meaningful content (such as deeper thought and greater intellectual structure), resulting in higher scores on knowledge-based tests.

[6] Morehead et al. (2019) confirmed that the benefits of handwriting are most evident when students are assessed on higher-order conceptual understanding rather than on memorizing facts.

[7] These studies confirm that handwriting is an essential cognitive process and a highly beneficial intellectual activity that enhances learning at advanced levels of education and that begins from the first day of school and continues thereafter.


Handwriting Helps to Advance Knowledge and Enhance Ideas


[8] This evidence from university classrooms illustrates a broader principle: handwriting for note-taking is a deeper thinking skill. When students write by hand, they actively select and synthesize information.

[9] This process requires them to decide what is essential, how ideas connect, and how best to represent them in their own words. The research indicates that this type of engagement develops, advances, and enhances critical thinking (defined as the ability to analyze, evaluate, and make reasoned, detailed judgments), because handwriting forces students to process information conceptually rather than transcribe it verbatim.

[10] The research also indicates that this process helps to develop higher-order thinking, which involves analyzing, applying, synthesizing, and evaluating information. This then develops a deeper knowledge potential. Additionally, as confirmed by classroom studies and evidence from neuroscience, handwriting activates broader brain networks than typing.

[11] Building on this, some studies explain that the ongoing substitution of handwriting by typewriting in almost every educational setting may seem somewhat misguided, as it could negatively affect the learning process.

[12] However, Van der Weel and Van der Meer (2024) emphasise the importance of staying current in this everchanging digital world. With this in mind, they state that children must, first and foremost, learn handwriting. Only after they are absoiutely proficient, especially at complex narrative handwriting, should typing be considered.


(Adapted from: https://www.psychologytoday.com)
After tests were applied to students, the results demonstrated that students who wrote by hand during the lectures: 
Alternativas
Q4275854 Inglês
New Al System could prevent vessel collisions by reducing dependence on ship Captain


Researchers at Texas A&M University have created an intelligent Al system that can help prevent accidents and collisions at sea. Named 'Ship Collision Avoidance of Machine Learning and Radar Technology for Stationary Entities and Avoidance', or SMART-SEA, the platform works to decrease the dependence on ship captains.


The project team was led by Dr Mirjan Fürth, an assistant professor of ocean engineering, who was awarded a contract by the US Department of the Interior (DOI) and the US Department of Energy (DOE) through the Ocean Energy Safety Institute (OESI). It is not completely an autonomous system, rather it provides 'a human-in-theloop', who gives real-time instructions based on maritime traffic,weather and other factors.


This makes navigation safer and easier for the crew, transiting crucial or dangerous waterways by providing additional information and instructions. Collisions between vessels and accidents like ships hitting stationary structures like rigs or lighthouses are becoming common, and most are caused by human error. This Al system will help eliminate that, stated the project team.


Massive vessels have a lot of forward momentum that their shipping distances are measured in miles rather than metres. They also turn very slowly, meaning that any collision has to factor in this slow movement while also adjusting for sensor time lags, ocean current impacts and several other factors.


The Al system has been developed keeping all the above-mentioned factors in mind and is extremely accurate. The research team also said that the system combines raw radar imaging data with machine learning, enabling it to identify moving objects even in bad weather with limited visibility.


The machine learning algorithm detects stationary objects as well from a large distance. The system uses computational fluid dynamics models and machine learning, which have been previously trained on vessel motions, the team added. The system does all of this while complying with International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS).


(From: <https://www.marineinsight.com/.../new-ai-systemcould.../>)
Mark the correct option to fill in the blank.

The analysts didn't know which platform to choose from. Both platforms seemed to have a _____ integration with the other tools.
Alternativas
Q4275853 Inglês
New Al System could prevent vessel collisions by reducing dependence on ship Captain


Researchers at Texas A&M University have created an intelligent Al system that can help prevent accidents and collisions at sea. Named 'Ship Collision Avoidance of Machine Learning and Radar Technology for Stationary Entities and Avoidance', or SMART-SEA, the platform works to decrease the dependence on ship captains.


The project team was led by Dr Mirjan Fürth, an assistant professor of ocean engineering, who was awarded a contract by the US Department of the Interior (DOI) and the US Department of Energy (DOE) through the Ocean Energy Safety Institute (OESI). It is not completely an autonomous system, rather it provides 'a human-in-theloop', who gives real-time instructions based on maritime traffic,weather and other factors.


This makes navigation safer and easier for the crew, transiting crucial or dangerous waterways by providing additional information and instructions. Collisions between vessels and accidents like ships hitting stationary structures like rigs or lighthouses are becoming common, and most are caused by human error. This Al system will help eliminate that, stated the project team.


Massive vessels have a lot of forward momentum that their shipping distances are measured in miles rather than metres. They also turn very slowly, meaning that any collision has to factor in this slow movement while also adjusting for sensor time lags, ocean current impacts and several other factors.


The Al system has been developed keeping all the above-mentioned factors in mind and is extremely accurate. The research team also said that the system combines raw radar imaging data with machine learning, enabling it to identify moving objects even in bad weather with limited visibility.


The machine learning algorithm detects stationary objects as well from a large distance. The system uses computational fluid dynamics models and machine learning, which have been previously trained on vessel motions, the team added. The system does all of this while complying with International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS).


(From: <https://www.marineinsight.com/.../new-ai-systemcould.../>)
Which of the following statements represents the relationship between the Al system and the ship Captain, as decribed in the text above?
Alternativas
Q4275852 Inglês
Read the text and answer the question that follow it.


Balancing Al and Critical Thinking for the Military Leaders of Tomorrow


Al is becoming increasingly embedded in daily life, transforming the way we work, communicate, and make decisions. From virtual assistants and personalized recommendations to smart home devices and automated customer service, Al streamlines everyday tasks and enhances convenience. As Al continues to evolve, its role in our livelihoods will only expand, making it an essential tool for productivity and innovation. Rather than resisting this technology, we should embrace it. Al has the potential to enhance and expand our knowledge, enabling more informed decision-making.

For future military leaders, it is critical that education and training prioritize independent thinking and decisive action rather than an overreliance on Al-driven systems. Leaders must develop the confidence to question Al outputs, evaluate their accuracy, and consider multiple perspectives before making informed decisions, rather than blindly accepting computer-generated recommendations. Al struggles in unpredictable, high-stakes environments where training data is insufficient to cover every potential contingency. Future conflicts will demand leaders who can adapt in real time, assess emerging threats, and execute decisions based on experience, judgment, and battlefield awareness - not just what a computer system suggests. To maintain a strategic edge and operational superiority, military leaders must cultivate a disciplined decision-making process that integrates Al as a tool while ensuring that human intuition, adaptability, and ethical reasoning remain at the forefront of command decisions. Though the possibilities of Al are vast and impressive, it is crucial to remember that its role should not be replace, but to complement human intelligence.

The rapid evolution of Al presents both a strategic advantage and a formidable challenge in shaping the next generation of military leaders. Al can enhance decisionmaking, optimize operations, and expand battlefield awareness, yet it must remain a force multiplier - not a replacement for human intellect. The true test of future leadership lies in striking the right balance: leveraging Al's capabilities while preserving the independent thought, adaptability, and critical reasoning essential for command in today's volatile geopolitical environment. In an era where peer adversaries are racing to develop their own Aldriven strategies, our leaders must be prepared to out-think, not just out-tech, the competition. Al should sharpen human cognition, not dull it - because the future of warfare will be won by those who can command both machine intelligence and the power of the human mind.


(Abridged from <https://mwi.westpoint.edu/warfare-at-thespeed-of-thought-balancing-ai-and-critical-thinking-for-themilitary-leaders-of-tomorrow/>)
Read the statements about the text and decide whether they are true (T) or false (F). Then mark the correct sequence.

( ) Al is increasingly immersed in most aspects of daily life, such as communications and conveniences.
( ) Future military leaders should not rely solely on Al for decision-making, as its output may not be precise.
( ) Questioning Al outputs and evaluating their accuracy are skills that ought to be developed in military training.
( ) Relying primarily on Al may optimise decision-making in high-stake environments.
( ) Al should be seen as an essential tool to out-tech and out-think potential enemies.
Alternativas
Q4275851 Inglês
Read the text and answer the question that follow it.


Balancing Al and Critical Thinking for the Military Leaders of Tomorrow


Al is becoming increasingly embedded in daily life, transforming the way we work, communicate, and make decisions. From virtual assistants and personalized recommendations to smart home devices and automated customer service, Al streamlines everyday tasks and enhances convenience. As Al continues to evolve, its role in our livelihoods will only expand, making it an essential tool for productivity and innovation. Rather than resisting this technology, we should embrace it. Al has the potential to enhance and expand our knowledge, enabling more informed decision-making.

For future military leaders, it is critical that education and training prioritize independent thinking and decisive action rather than an overreliance on Al-driven systems. Leaders must develop the confidence to question Al outputs, evaluate their accuracy, and consider multiple perspectives before making informed decisions, rather than blindly accepting computer-generated recommendations. Al struggles in unpredictable, high-stakes environments where training data is insufficient to cover every potential contingency. Future conflicts will demand leaders who can adapt in real time, assess emerging threats, and execute decisions based on experience, judgment, and battlefield awareness - not just what a computer system suggests. To maintain a strategic edge and operational superiority, military leaders must cultivate a disciplined decision-making process that integrates Al as a tool while ensuring that human intuition, adaptability, and ethical reasoning remain at the forefront of command decisions. Though the possibilities of Al are vast and impressive, it is crucial to remember that its role should not be replace, but to complement human intelligence.

The rapid evolution of Al presents both a strategic advantage and a formidable challenge in shaping the next generation of military leaders. Al can enhance decisionmaking, optimize operations, and expand battlefield awareness, yet it must remain a force multiplier - not a replacement for human intellect. The true test of future leadership lies in striking the right balance: leveraging Al's capabilities while preserving the independent thought, adaptability, and critical reasoning essential for command in today's volatile geopolitical environment. In an era where peer adversaries are racing to develop their own Aldriven strategies, our leaders must be prepared to out-think, not just out-tech, the competition. Al should sharpen human cognition, not dull it - because the future of warfare will be won by those who can command both machine intelligence and the power of the human mind.


(Abridged from <https://mwi.westpoint.edu/warfare-at-thespeed-of-thought-balancing-ai-and-critical-thinking-for-themilitary-leaders-of-tomorrow/>)
Concerning the vocabulary underlined in the text and their meaning in context, we can only affirm that: 
Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: PM-SP Prova: VUNESP - 2026 - PM-SP - Cadete PM |
Q4246616 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


FIFA’s exorbitant World Cup tickets could backfire

    Gianni Infantino, the boss of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), calls football’s governing body the world’s provider of happiness. At the 2026 World Cup in North America, that happiness comes at a price. The cheapest tickets for group-stage games1 averaged $200; those for the final went for higher than $2,000. The data presented in the chart suggest this year’s World Cup is the most expensive cultural event ever.


Captura_de tela 2026-08-21 092706.png (430×275)


   World Cup tickets are usually priced well below what the market might accept. Throughout the tournament’s history demand has tended to surpass supply. Rather than charge more, FIFA has kept prices at levels ordinary fans could afford and distributed seats through lotteries. Broadcasting and sponsorship rights mattered far more to the organisation’s finances than matchday receipts.
    In 2026 it is different. For the first time FIFA has taken direct control of ticketing, rather than outsourcing to local organisers. It has embraced dynamic pricing, whereby prices rise in line with demand, and opened an official resale marketplace, from which it takes a 15% share from both the buyer and the seller. Even after adjusting for inflation, World Cup tickets across the United States, Canada and Mexico cost more than twice as much as they did in Qatar in 2022.
    Even if higher prices compensate for weaker sales, FIFA risks damaging the product itself — which could, in turn, hurt its more lucrative revenue streams2. Full stadiums create the noise and tension that make matches irresistible on TV and other screens. FIFA faced embarrassment last year during the Club World Cup, when spectators were reportedly moved towards television cameras at sparsely attended matches. Studies have shown that wealthier fans are quieter and less overtly passionate about their teams.


(www.economist.com, 18.05.2026. Adaptado.)


1 group-stage games: jogos da fase de grupos. Rodada inicial da Copa do Mundo na qual as nações participantes são divididas em grupos menores para disputar o torneio.

2  revenue streams: fontes de receita.
O quarto parágrafo do texto 
Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: PM-SP Prova: VUNESP - 2026 - PM-SP - Cadete PM |
Q4246615 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


FIFA’s exorbitant World Cup tickets could backfire

    Gianni Infantino, the boss of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), calls football’s governing body the world’s provider of happiness. At the 2026 World Cup in North America, that happiness comes at a price. The cheapest tickets for group-stage games1 averaged $200; those for the final went for higher than $2,000. The data presented in the chart suggest this year’s World Cup is the most expensive cultural event ever.


Captura_de tela 2026-08-21 092706.png (430×275)


   World Cup tickets are usually priced well below what the market might accept. Throughout the tournament’s history demand has tended to surpass supply. Rather than charge more, FIFA has kept prices at levels ordinary fans could afford and distributed seats through lotteries. Broadcasting and sponsorship rights mattered far more to the organisation’s finances than matchday receipts.
    In 2026 it is different. For the first time FIFA has taken direct control of ticketing, rather than outsourcing to local organisers. It has embraced dynamic pricing, whereby prices rise in line with demand, and opened an official resale marketplace, from which it takes a 15% share from both the buyer and the seller. Even after adjusting for inflation, World Cup tickets across the United States, Canada and Mexico cost more than twice as much as they did in Qatar in 2022.
    Even if higher prices compensate for weaker sales, FIFA risks damaging the product itself — which could, in turn, hurt its more lucrative revenue streams2. Full stadiums create the noise and tension that make matches irresistible on TV and other screens. FIFA faced embarrassment last year during the Club World Cup, when spectators were reportedly moved towards television cameras at sparsely attended matches. Studies have shown that wealthier fans are quieter and less overtly passionate about their teams.


(www.economist.com, 18.05.2026. Adaptado.)


1 group-stage games: jogos da fase de grupos. Rodada inicial da Copa do Mundo na qual as nações participantes são divididas em grupos menores para disputar o torneio.

2  revenue streams: fontes de receita.
In the excerpt from the third paragraph “It has embraced dynamic pricing, whereby prices rise in line with demand”, the underlined phrase presents
Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: PM-SP Prova: VUNESP - 2026 - PM-SP - Cadete PM |
Q4246614 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


FIFA’s exorbitant World Cup tickets could backfire

    Gianni Infantino, the boss of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), calls football’s governing body the world’s provider of happiness. At the 2026 World Cup in North America, that happiness comes at a price. The cheapest tickets for group-stage games1 averaged $200; those for the final went for higher than $2,000. The data presented in the chart suggest this year’s World Cup is the most expensive cultural event ever.


Captura_de tela 2026-08-21 092706.png (430×275)


   World Cup tickets are usually priced well below what the market might accept. Throughout the tournament’s history demand has tended to surpass supply. Rather than charge more, FIFA has kept prices at levels ordinary fans could afford and distributed seats through lotteries. Broadcasting and sponsorship rights mattered far more to the organisation’s finances than matchday receipts.
    In 2026 it is different. For the first time FIFA has taken direct control of ticketing, rather than outsourcing to local organisers. It has embraced dynamic pricing, whereby prices rise in line with demand, and opened an official resale marketplace, from which it takes a 15% share from both the buyer and the seller. Even after adjusting for inflation, World Cup tickets across the United States, Canada and Mexico cost more than twice as much as they did in Qatar in 2022.
    Even if higher prices compensate for weaker sales, FIFA risks damaging the product itself — which could, in turn, hurt its more lucrative revenue streams2. Full stadiums create the noise and tension that make matches irresistible on TV and other screens. FIFA faced embarrassment last year during the Club World Cup, when spectators were reportedly moved towards television cameras at sparsely attended matches. Studies have shown that wealthier fans are quieter and less overtly passionate about their teams.


(www.economist.com, 18.05.2026. Adaptado.)


1 group-stage games: jogos da fase de grupos. Rodada inicial da Copa do Mundo na qual as nações participantes são divididas em grupos menores para disputar o torneio.

2  revenue streams: fontes de receita.
No trecho do segundo parágrafo “Rather than charge more, FIFA has kept prices at levels ordinary fans could afford”, a frase sublinhada pode ser substituída, sem alteração de sentido, por:
Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: PM-SP Prova: VUNESP - 2026 - PM-SP - Cadete PM |
Q4246613 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


FIFA’s exorbitant World Cup tickets could backfire

    Gianni Infantino, the boss of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), calls football’s governing body the world’s provider of happiness. At the 2026 World Cup in North America, that happiness comes at a price. The cheapest tickets for group-stage games1 averaged $200; those for the final went for higher than $2,000. The data presented in the chart suggest this year’s World Cup is the most expensive cultural event ever.


Captura_de tela 2026-08-21 092706.png (430×275)


   World Cup tickets are usually priced well below what the market might accept. Throughout the tournament’s history demand has tended to surpass supply. Rather than charge more, FIFA has kept prices at levels ordinary fans could afford and distributed seats through lotteries. Broadcasting and sponsorship rights mattered far more to the organisation’s finances than matchday receipts.
    In 2026 it is different. For the first time FIFA has taken direct control of ticketing, rather than outsourcing to local organisers. It has embraced dynamic pricing, whereby prices rise in line with demand, and opened an official resale marketplace, from which it takes a 15% share from both the buyer and the seller. Even after adjusting for inflation, World Cup tickets across the United States, Canada and Mexico cost more than twice as much as they did in Qatar in 2022.
    Even if higher prices compensate for weaker sales, FIFA risks damaging the product itself — which could, in turn, hurt its more lucrative revenue streams2. Full stadiums create the noise and tension that make matches irresistible on TV and other screens. FIFA faced embarrassment last year during the Club World Cup, when spectators were reportedly moved towards television cameras at sparsely attended matches. Studies have shown that wealthier fans are quieter and less overtly passionate about their teams.


(www.economist.com, 18.05.2026. Adaptado.)


1 group-stage games: jogos da fase de grupos. Rodada inicial da Copa do Mundo na qual as nações participantes são divididas em grupos menores para disputar o torneio.

2  revenue streams: fontes de receita.
O trecho do texto que tem sua informação contemplada em um dos gráficos é:
Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: PM-SP Prova: VUNESP - 2026 - PM-SP - Cadete PM |
Q4246612 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


FIFA’s exorbitant World Cup tickets could backfire

    Gianni Infantino, the boss of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), calls football’s governing body the world’s provider of happiness. At the 2026 World Cup in North America, that happiness comes at a price. The cheapest tickets for group-stage games1 averaged $200; those for the final went for higher than $2,000. The data presented in the chart suggest this year’s World Cup is the most expensive cultural event ever.


Captura_de tela 2026-08-21 092706.png (430×275)


   World Cup tickets are usually priced well below what the market might accept. Throughout the tournament’s history demand has tended to surpass supply. Rather than charge more, FIFA has kept prices at levels ordinary fans could afford and distributed seats through lotteries. Broadcasting and sponsorship rights mattered far more to the organisation’s finances than matchday receipts.
    In 2026 it is different. For the first time FIFA has taken direct control of ticketing, rather than outsourcing to local organisers. It has embraced dynamic pricing, whereby prices rise in line with demand, and opened an official resale marketplace, from which it takes a 15% share from both the buyer and the seller. Even after adjusting for inflation, World Cup tickets across the United States, Canada and Mexico cost more than twice as much as they did in Qatar in 2022.
    Even if higher prices compensate for weaker sales, FIFA risks damaging the product itself — which could, in turn, hurt its more lucrative revenue streams2. Full stadiums create the noise and tension that make matches irresistible on TV and other screens. FIFA faced embarrassment last year during the Club World Cup, when spectators were reportedly moved towards television cameras at sparsely attended matches. Studies have shown that wealthier fans are quieter and less overtly passionate about their teams.


(www.economist.com, 18.05.2026. Adaptado.)


1 group-stage games: jogos da fase de grupos. Rodada inicial da Copa do Mundo na qual as nações participantes são divididas em grupos menores para disputar o torneio.

2  revenue streams: fontes de receita.
In the excerpt from the first paragraph “At the 2026 World Cup in North America, that happiness comes at a price”, the underlined expression is equivalent, in Portuguese, to the idiom:
Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: PM-SP Prova: VUNESP - 2026 - PM-SP - Cadete PM |
Q4246611 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


FIFA’s exorbitant World Cup tickets could backfire

    Gianni Infantino, the boss of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), calls football’s governing body the world’s provider of happiness. At the 2026 World Cup in North America, that happiness comes at a price. The cheapest tickets for group-stage games1 averaged $200; those for the final went for higher than $2,000. The data presented in the chart suggest this year’s World Cup is the most expensive cultural event ever.


Captura_de tela 2026-08-21 092706.png (430×275)


   World Cup tickets are usually priced well below what the market might accept. Throughout the tournament’s history demand has tended to surpass supply. Rather than charge more, FIFA has kept prices at levels ordinary fans could afford and distributed seats through lotteries. Broadcasting and sponsorship rights mattered far more to the organisation’s finances than matchday receipts.
    In 2026 it is different. For the first time FIFA has taken direct control of ticketing, rather than outsourcing to local organisers. It has embraced dynamic pricing, whereby prices rise in line with demand, and opened an official resale marketplace, from which it takes a 15% share from both the buyer and the seller. Even after adjusting for inflation, World Cup tickets across the United States, Canada and Mexico cost more than twice as much as they did in Qatar in 2022.
    Even if higher prices compensate for weaker sales, FIFA risks damaging the product itself — which could, in turn, hurt its more lucrative revenue streams2. Full stadiums create the noise and tension that make matches irresistible on TV and other screens. FIFA faced embarrassment last year during the Club World Cup, when spectators were reportedly moved towards television cameras at sparsely attended matches. Studies have shown that wealthier fans are quieter and less overtly passionate about their teams.


(www.economist.com, 18.05.2026. Adaptado.)


1 group-stage games: jogos da fase de grupos. Rodada inicial da Copa do Mundo na qual as nações participantes são divididas em grupos menores para disputar o torneio.

2  revenue streams: fontes de receita.
The text mainly intends to
Alternativas
Q4231868 Inglês

Read text VI to answer question.


The internet went into overdrive when the song "Heart on My Sleeve" first dropped in 2023. Fans were on cloud nine, fully convinced that Drake and The Weeknd had just casually dropped a surprise collaboration. Social media lit up with excitement as listeners praised the track, thinking it was another hit from two of music's biggest creators - and could a whole album be on the way?


But as the song racked up millions of streams on TikTok, the truth surfaced this wasn't a new Drake and The Weeknd collab. In fact, it wasn't them at all. The track was created by a TikTok user, Ghostwriter977, using artificial intelligence to perfectly mimic the two artists' voices. The revelation sent shockwaves across the industry, raising eyebrows and questions about the role of AI in music.


AI-generated music is a polarizing topic; depending on who you ask, it's either the next big innovation or a cultural catastrophe waiting to happen. There's no doubt that artificial intelligence is changing the music industry, but the question remains: is it a tool to unlock new creative frontiers, or is it a threat to the authenticity and soul of music as we know it?


These technologically capable algorithms compose everything from background music to full-fledged songs. Some argue it's an incredible tool for musicians and producers, offering new ways to experiment with sound, composition, and genre - even overcoming writer's block. AI can generate infinite variations of a melody, compose background scores for films, or even write lyrics based on given parameters. AI is more than just a tool for those pushing boundaries - it's a creative partner. It allows artists to break away from traditional musical structures and unlocks a world of possibilities.


But here's the flip side: AI doesn't understand human emotion. It doesn't have the lived experiences that often give music its soul. While an AI can generate a technically proficient melody, can it truly capture the emotional depth of a musician pouring their heart into a track? Critics argue that AI-generated music can feel hollow, lacking the emotion and intention that comes from a human touch. Sure, AI can replicate patterns, styles, and formulas, but does it truly understand why certain notes make us feel a certain way? Many fear that relying too heavily on AI will lead to a flood of cookie-cutter music devoid of real emotion or authenticity.


Looking out for tomorrow, what does AI mean for the future of creativity? Are we moving toward a world where algorithms outpace human artists, churning out music by the minute? This raises concerns for musicians, producers, and even DJs, who worry about their roles being replaced by technology, much like other industries where automation has taken over.


As AI continues to evolve, artists and creators will have to find ways to use AI as a tool while ensuring that the heart of music its ability to move, inspire, and connect remains in human hands. Ultimately, AI-generated music can be a powerful partner, but without careful consideration, it may turn the art of music into just another algorithmic output.


Adapted from https://council.rollingstone.com/blog/

Read text VII to answer question.


Imagem associada para resolução da questão


The Versificator - acrylic on canvas 600mm x 600mm


The title for this painting comes from George Orwell's dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty Four and refers to a fictional device employed by Ingsoc, the ruling party of Oceania. Its primary purpose is to act as a 'writing machine' to produce both literature and music, whose target audience is the working-class people. The Versificator provides a means of creating output without having any of the party members actually engaged in a creative thought, as it can be seen in the excerpt from Orwell's book:


"The tune had been haunting London for weeks past. It was one of countless similar songs published for the benefit of the proles by a sub-section of the Music Department. The words of these songs were composed without any human intervention whatever on an instrument known as a Versificator. But the woman sang so tunefully as to turn the dreadful rubbish into an almost pleasant sound."


Adapted from: https://www.shardcore.org/spx/2023/11/08/the-versificator/



It is possible to state that both modern Artificial Intelligence and the Versificator machine, in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four, are capable of writing songs that:

Alternativas
Q4231867 Inglês

Read text VII to answer question.



The Versificator - acrylic on canvas 600mm x 600mm


The title for this painting comes from George Orwell's dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty Four and refers to a fictional device employed by Ingsoc, the ruling party of Oceania. Its primary purpose is to act as a 'writing machine' to produce both literature and music, whose target audience is the working-class people. The Versificator provides a means of creating output without having any of the party members actually engaged in a creative thought, as it can be seen in the excerpt from Orwell's book:


"The tune had been haunting London for weeks past. It was one of countless similar songs published for the benefit of the proles by a sub-section of the Music Department. The words of these songs were composed without any human intervention whatever on an instrument known as a Versificator. But the woman sang so tunefully as to turn the dreadful rubbish into an almost pleasant sound."


Adapted from: https://www.shardcore.org/spx/2023/11/08/the-versificator/

It is possible to affirm that:
Alternativas
Respostas
1: A
2: E
3: B
4: A
5: E
6: E
7: C
8: B
9: B
10: D
11: A
12: C
13: B
14: C
15: A
16: B
17: E
18: D
19: C
20: D