Questões de Concurso
Para professor - inglês
Foram encontradas 30.607 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988643
Inglês
During a policy symposium on digital governance
in education, a senior advisor stated: “Teachers
are navigating unprecedented epistemological
shifts, and we must ensure that they receive
sustained institutional support if AI is to enhance
rather than erode pedagogical integrity.” (Excerpt
adapted from: MIT Technology Review [2023].
“How Generative AI Is Reshaping Education”) In formally reporting the advisor’s statement within an academic article written after the event, the grammatically accurate and contextually appropriate transformation would be:
“How Generative AI Is Reshaping Education”) In formally reporting the advisor’s statement within an academic article written after the event, the grammatically accurate and contextually appropriate transformation would be:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988642
Inglês
“In policy roundtables, numerous educators have
articulated that they wish institutional investment
in sustained AI training ______ more systematic,
less episodic, and insulated from shifting political
agendas.” (Excerpt adapted from: Harvard
Graduate School of Education [2023]. “Preparing
Teachers for an AI-Driven Future”) The verb form that correctly expresses present
regret concerning an unreal state is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988641
Inglês
“Teachers, ______ professional discernment and
pedagogical autonomy remain indispensable
within AI-augmented classrooms, must be
regarded not as peripheral implementers of policy
but as central agents in shaping ethically
responsible digital futures.” (Excerpt adapted
from: The Conversation [2024]. “Teachers Are
Key to Students’ AI Literacy”)
The correct relative determiner that completes the clause is:
The correct relative determiner that completes the clause is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988640
Inglês
“It has been widely acknowledged that, in the
absence of robust regulatory oversight, vast
repositories of student-generated data ______ in
ways that neither educators nor families are able
to scrutinize effectively.” (Excerpt adapted from:
World Economic Forum [2020]. “Shaping the
Future of Learning”)
The grammatically accurate passive construction expressing epistemic possibility is:
The grammatically accurate passive construction expressing epistemic possibility is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988639
Inglês
“Educational leaders must evaluate ______ the
epistemological transformations prompted by AImediated instruction ______ the ethical, legal, and
socio-economic ramifications that accompany its
systemic integration into formal schooling
structures.” (Excerpt adapted from: Brookings
Institution [2022]. “AI in Education: Promise and
Pitfalls”)
The correlative structure that ensures syntactic parallelism and semantic coordination between equivalent noun phrases is:
The correlative structure that ensures syntactic parallelism and semantic coordination between equivalent noun phrases is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988638
Inglês
“Over the past decade, adaptive AI-driven
assessment models ______ at an unprecedented
pace, progressively reshaping pedagogical
methodologies, accountability metrics, and
evaluative paradigms across diverse educational
jurisdictions.” (Excerpt adapted from: OECD [2021].
“AI and the Future of Skills”)
The verbal phrase that most accurately foregrounds continuity to the present moment is:
The verbal phrase that most accurately foregrounds continuity to the present moment is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988637
Inglês
“If generative AI systems ______ implemented
across public education systems without a
concomitant expansion of teacher training
frameworks and regulatory safeguards, the
resulting asymmetries in access and digital literacy
may well intensify pre-existing structural inequities
rather than mitigate them.” (Excerpt adapted from:
UNESCO [2023]. “Guidance for Generative AI in
Education and Research”)
The conditional construction that most appropriately conveys formal contingency in institutional discourse is:
The conditional construction that most appropriately conveys formal contingency in institutional discourse is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988636
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Throughout the text, the author progressively
moves from describing the rapid expansion of
generative AI in education (paragraph 1), to raising
ethical and pedagogical concerns (paragraph 2), to
identifying systemic gaps in training (paragraph 3),
and finally to advocating coordinated policy
investment (paragraphs 4 and 5). This progression
indicates that the author’s primary argumentative
strategy consists of:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988635
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In paragraph 1, the text refers to “these paradigm
shifts”. Considering the context of the passage,
the expression “paradigm shifts” is most nearly
synonymous with:
A ( ) incremental
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988634
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of
AI technology continues to outpace
implementation support and essential training for
teachers.” (paragraph 3)
The discourse marker “despite” is strategically employed to:
The discourse marker “despite” is strategically employed to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988633
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide
students as they grapple with the existential and
social implications of AI alongside practical
concerns for their own and students’ futures.”
(paragraph 2)
In this context, the adjective “existential” most precisely suggests issues that are:
In this context, the adjective “existential” most precisely suggests issues that are:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988632
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“Despite growing resources, the development of
AI technology continues to outpace
implementation support and essential training for
teachers. This widening gap between teacher
competencies and the demands of an AI-infused
classroom is unsustainable.” (paragraph 3)
Within the context in use, the word “unsustainable” most nearly conveys the idea that the situation is:
Within the context in use, the word “unsustainable” most nearly conveys the idea that the situation is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988631
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In the final paragraph, the author reinforces the
overall argument by emphasizing that:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988630
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Paragraph 4 advances the argument that effective
AI integration in schools depends on:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988629
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Paragraph 3 suggests that the central tension in
current AI implementation in education lies in:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988628
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
According to paragraph 2, the debate surrounding
AI in education extends beyond classroom
management and includes:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988627
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
The first paragraph frames teachers’ current
situation primarily as:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CPCON
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB
Provas:
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Artes)
|
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Ensino Religioso) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Geografia) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério Polivalente - Classe A |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Ciências) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe A (Educação Especial) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Educação Física) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (História) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Inglesa) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Portuguesa) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Matemática) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Psicopedagogo |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Suporte Pedagógico - Classe C |
Q3988491
Pedagogia
Segundo Zabala (1999, p. 11), “diferenciar os diversos tipos de conteúdo segundo sua natureza não é um trabalho academicista, mas algo oportuno na medida em que nos permite inferir como são aprendidos e, consequentemente, orienta-nos sobre o modo de ensiná-lo”. Dessa forma, considerando a tipologia de conteúdos apresentada pelo autor, assinale a alternativa cujos objetivos referenciais tenham como foco a aprendizagem de conteúdos procedimentais, exclusivamente.
Fonte: ZABALA, A. Como trabalhar os conteúdos procedimentais em aula. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1999.
Fonte: ZABALA, A. Como trabalhar os conteúdos procedimentais em aula. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1999.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CPCON
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB
Provas:
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Artes)
|
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Ensino Religioso) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Geografia) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério Polivalente - Classe A |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Ciências) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe A (Educação Especial) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Educação Física) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (História) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Inglesa) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Portuguesa) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Matemática) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Psicopedagogo |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Suporte Pedagógico - Classe C |
Q3988490
Pedagogia
Uma professora dos Anos Finais do Ensino Fundamental, ao comentar sobre sua prática em sala de aula, relatou: “Olha, na minha sala, eu sempre procuro trazer atividades diferentes para eles fazerem. Não fico só na explicação, não, porque acho cansativo, para mim e para eles. Peço que façam observações do que está acontecendo, anotem informações, organizem dados, comparem resultados e conversem sobre o que perceberam. Eles levantam hipóteses, testam suas ideias e depois compartilham o que descobriram, seja com a turma ou nos eventos da escola. Eu percebo que, desse jeito, eles participam mais, despertam a curiosidade e conseguem entender melhor o conteúdo”.
Considerando o contexto, à luz da Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC) e dos pressupostos da perspectiva construtivista de ensino e aprendizagem apresentados por Zabala (1998), analise as assertivas a seguir. Fonte: ZABALA, A. A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1998.
I- A prática relatada pela professora está alinhada a uma das Competências Gerais da BNCC, ao incorporar, em sala de aula, a abordagem própria das Ciências como estratégia estruturante do processo de ensino e aprendizagem.
II- A utilização de uma multiplicidade de estratégias de ensino, conforme relatado pela professora, é fundamental para o processo de ensino e aprendizagem, pois reconhece que os estudantes não aprendem da mesma maneira nem no mesmo ritmo e, portanto, não respondem igualmente às mesmas atividades.
III- Embora seja importante desenvolver diferentes atividades para oferecer aos estudantes condições favoráveis de aprendizagem, a avaliação deve considerar apenas o nível de compreensão que demonstram sobre o conteúdo, desconsiderando os esforços realizados.
É CORRETO o que se afirma em:
Considerando o contexto, à luz da Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC) e dos pressupostos da perspectiva construtivista de ensino e aprendizagem apresentados por Zabala (1998), analise as assertivas a seguir. Fonte: ZABALA, A. A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1998.
I- A prática relatada pela professora está alinhada a uma das Competências Gerais da BNCC, ao incorporar, em sala de aula, a abordagem própria das Ciências como estratégia estruturante do processo de ensino e aprendizagem.
II- A utilização de uma multiplicidade de estratégias de ensino, conforme relatado pela professora, é fundamental para o processo de ensino e aprendizagem, pois reconhece que os estudantes não aprendem da mesma maneira nem no mesmo ritmo e, portanto, não respondem igualmente às mesmas atividades.
III- Embora seja importante desenvolver diferentes atividades para oferecer aos estudantes condições favoráveis de aprendizagem, a avaliação deve considerar apenas o nível de compreensão que demonstram sobre o conteúdo, desconsiderando os esforços realizados.
É CORRETO o que se afirma em:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CPCON
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB
Provas:
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Artes)
|
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Ensino Religioso) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Geografia) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério Polivalente - Classe A |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Ciências) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe A (Educação Especial) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Educação Física) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (História) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Inglesa) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Portuguesa) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Matemática) |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Psicopedagogo |
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Suporte Pedagógico - Classe C |
Q3988489
Pedagogia
Sempre que era questionado por seus estudantes sobre aspectos do conteúdo ministrado em sala de aula, sobretudo quando buscavam relacioná-lo às próprias vivências, levantar dúvidas oriundas de suas experiências de vida ou confrontar o tema com seus entendimentos prévios, um professor tinha o hábito de responder: “Não vamos entrar no mérito da questão, porque não faz parte do nosso estudo”; “Isso não pertence a este assunto, veremos depois”; “Vocês pesquisam isso no celular depois”; ou ainda: “Não vamos entrar no mérito da questão agora. Vocês estudarão isso mais adiante”.
Considerando o contexto, à luz do conhecimento sobre as relações interativas estabelecidas em sala de aula e os pressupostos da perspectiva construtivista de ensino e aprendizagem apresentados por Zabala (1998), é CORRETO afirmar que:
Fonte: ZABALA, A. A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1998.
Considerando o contexto, à luz do conhecimento sobre as relações interativas estabelecidas em sala de aula e os pressupostos da perspectiva construtivista de ensino e aprendizagem apresentados por Zabala (1998), é CORRETO afirmar que:
Fonte: ZABALA, A. A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1998.
Conheça nossos planos