Selecionar segmento
Estude com questões de diferentes segmentos
Atenção: Isso limpará todos os campos já preenchidos no filtro!
Foram encontradas 6.435 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988639
Inglês
“Educational leaders must evaluate ______ the
epistemological transformations prompted by AImediated instruction ______ the ethical, legal, and
socio-economic ramifications that accompany its
systemic integration into formal schooling
structures.” (Excerpt adapted from: Brookings
Institution [2022]. “AI in Education: Promise and
Pitfalls”)
The correlative structure that ensures syntactic parallelism and semantic coordination between equivalent noun phrases is:
The correlative structure that ensures syntactic parallelism and semantic coordination between equivalent noun phrases is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988638
Inglês
“Over the past decade, adaptive AI-driven
assessment models ______ at an unprecedented
pace, progressively reshaping pedagogical
methodologies, accountability metrics, and
evaluative paradigms across diverse educational
jurisdictions.” (Excerpt adapted from: OECD [2021].
“AI and the Future of Skills”)
The verbal phrase that most accurately foregrounds continuity to the present moment is:
The verbal phrase that most accurately foregrounds continuity to the present moment is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988637
Inglês
“If generative AI systems ______ implemented
across public education systems without a
concomitant expansion of teacher training
frameworks and regulatory safeguards, the
resulting asymmetries in access and digital literacy
may well intensify pre-existing structural inequities
rather than mitigate them.” (Excerpt adapted from:
UNESCO [2023]. “Guidance for Generative AI in
Education and Research”)
The conditional construction that most appropriately conveys formal contingency in institutional discourse is:
The conditional construction that most appropriately conveys formal contingency in institutional discourse is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988636
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Throughout the text, the author progressively
moves from describing the rapid expansion of
generative AI in education (paragraph 1), to raising
ethical and pedagogical concerns (paragraph 2), to
identifying systemic gaps in training (paragraph 3),
and finally to advocating coordinated policy
investment (paragraphs 4 and 5). This progression
indicates that the author’s primary argumentative
strategy consists of:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988635
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In paragraph 1, the text refers to “these paradigm
shifts”. Considering the context of the passage,
the expression “paradigm shifts” is most nearly
synonymous with:
A ( ) incremental
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988634
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of
AI technology continues to outpace
implementation support and essential training for
teachers.” (paragraph 3)
The discourse marker “despite” is strategically employed to:
The discourse marker “despite” is strategically employed to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988633
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide
students as they grapple with the existential and
social implications of AI alongside practical
concerns for their own and students’ futures.”
(paragraph 2)
In this context, the adjective “existential” most precisely suggests issues that are:
In this context, the adjective “existential” most precisely suggests issues that are:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988632
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“Despite growing resources, the development of
AI technology continues to outpace
implementation support and essential training for
teachers. This widening gap between teacher
competencies and the demands of an AI-infused
classroom is unsustainable.” (paragraph 3)
Within the context in use, the word “unsustainable” most nearly conveys the idea that the situation is:
Within the context in use, the word “unsustainable” most nearly conveys the idea that the situation is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988631
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In the final paragraph, the author reinforces the
overall argument by emphasizing that:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988630
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Paragraph 4 advances the argument that effective
AI integration in schools depends on:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988629
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Paragraph 3 suggests that the central tension in
current AI implementation in education lies in:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988628
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
According to paragraph 2, the debate surrounding
AI in education extends beyond classroom
management and includes:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988627
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
The first paragraph frames teachers’ current
situation primarily as:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauá - SP
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Mauá - SP - Técnico em Contabilidade |
Q3954347
Contabilidade Geral
As demonstrações contábeis são relatórios estruturados
que visam fornecer informações sobre a posição
financeira e o desempenho da entidade para auxiliar os
usuários na tomada de decisões. Acerca das finalidades
específicas de cada demonstração, registre (V), para as
afirmativas verdadeiras, e (F), para as falsas.
(__) O Relatório da Administração possui caráter discursivo e permite que os gestores expliquem os resultados alcançados e os projetos futuros, não se confundindo com as demonstrações financeiras propriamente ditas.
(__) A Demonstração do Resultado do Exercício tem por finalidade precípua evidenciar o fluxo financeiro de entradas e saídas de caixa, determinando a liquidez imediata da organização ao fim do período.
(__) As Notas Explicativas são parte integrante das demonstrações e visam fornecer informações adicionais que não foram apresentadas no corpo dos relatórios, mas que são relevantes para a compreensão destes.
(__) A Demonstração do Valor Adicionado é obrigatória para todas as sociedades limitadas de pequeno porte, visando detalhar a margem de lucro operacional bruto destinada ao pagamento de dividendos mínimos.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
(__) O Relatório da Administração possui caráter discursivo e permite que os gestores expliquem os resultados alcançados e os projetos futuros, não se confundindo com as demonstrações financeiras propriamente ditas.
(__) A Demonstração do Resultado do Exercício tem por finalidade precípua evidenciar o fluxo financeiro de entradas e saídas de caixa, determinando a liquidez imediata da organização ao fim do período.
(__) As Notas Explicativas são parte integrante das demonstrações e visam fornecer informações adicionais que não foram apresentadas no corpo dos relatórios, mas que são relevantes para a compreensão destes.
(__) A Demonstração do Valor Adicionado é obrigatória para todas as sociedades limitadas de pequeno porte, visando detalhar a margem de lucro operacional bruto destinada ao pagamento de dividendos mínimos.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauá - SP
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Mauá - SP - Técnico em Contabilidade |
Q3954346
Contabilidade Pública
A administração do patrimônio público envolve o
controle físico e contábil de bens móveis e imóveis,
garantindo que o inventário reflita a realidade dos ativos
disponíveis para a prestação de serviços. Acerca do
controle e responsabilidade sobre os bens públicos,
registre (V), para as afirmativas verdadeiras, e (F), para
as falsas.
(__) O inventário anual é o instrumento que visa comprovar a existência física dos bens e a conformidade com os registros contábeis, auxiliando na identificação de agentes responsáveis.
(__) A depreciação de bens imóveis é facultativa para órgãos da administração direta, devendo ser registrada apenas quando houver intenção expressa de alienação do patrimônio no exercício.
(__) Bens de consumo em estoque no almoxarifado devem ser mensurados e baixados pelo critério do custo médio ponderado, refletindo o consumo efetivo no momento da requisição.
(__) A responsabilidade pelo patrimônio público recai sobre o Técnico em Contabilidade, sendo vedada a imputação de culpa a gestores que não possuam formação na área.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
(__) O inventário anual é o instrumento que visa comprovar a existência física dos bens e a conformidade com os registros contábeis, auxiliando na identificação de agentes responsáveis.
(__) A depreciação de bens imóveis é facultativa para órgãos da administração direta, devendo ser registrada apenas quando houver intenção expressa de alienação do patrimônio no exercício.
(__) Bens de consumo em estoque no almoxarifado devem ser mensurados e baixados pelo critério do custo médio ponderado, refletindo o consumo efetivo no momento da requisição.
(__) A responsabilidade pelo patrimônio público recai sobre o Técnico em Contabilidade, sendo vedada a imputação de culpa a gestores que não possuam formação na área.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauá - SP
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Mauá - SP - Técnico em Contabilidade |
Q3954345
Contabilidade Pública
A Contabilidade Aplicada ao Setor Público utiliza o Plano
de Contas Aplicado ao Setor Público para registrar os
atos e fatos de forma padronizada. Sob o enfoque
patrimonial, o reconhecimento dos eventos deve seguir
princípios que garantam a integridade do balanço.
Acerca das variações patrimoniais, registre (V), para as
afirmativas verdadeiras, e (F), para as falsas.
(__) As Variações Patrimoniais Aumentativas devem ser reconhecidas pelo regime de competência, ocorrendo no momento em que há o incremento de um ativo ou a redução de um passivo.
(__) O recebimento de um bem imóvel por meio de doação sem encargos constitui um fato permutativo orçamentário, não gerando qualquer impacto no saldo das variações patrimoniais do ente.
(__) O empenho da despesa orçamentária, por si só, não caracteriza o fato gerador para o reconhecimento imediato de Variação Patrimonial Diminutiva no sistema patrimonial.
(__) O Plano de Contas Aplicado ao Setor Público é obrigatório para todos os entes da Federação, permitindo a consolidação das contas públicas nacionais e a transparência sobre a situação econômica do Estado.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
(__) As Variações Patrimoniais Aumentativas devem ser reconhecidas pelo regime de competência, ocorrendo no momento em que há o incremento de um ativo ou a redução de um passivo.
(__) O recebimento de um bem imóvel por meio de doação sem encargos constitui um fato permutativo orçamentário, não gerando qualquer impacto no saldo das variações patrimoniais do ente.
(__) O empenho da despesa orçamentária, por si só, não caracteriza o fato gerador para o reconhecimento imediato de Variação Patrimonial Diminutiva no sistema patrimonial.
(__) O Plano de Contas Aplicado ao Setor Público é obrigatório para todos os entes da Federação, permitindo a consolidação das contas públicas nacionais e a transparência sobre a situação econômica do Estado.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauá - SP
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Mauá - SP - Técnico em Contabilidade |
Q3954344
Análise de Balanços
A análise da estrutura patrimonial permite avaliar a
solvência e o grau de dependência da entidade em
relação a recursos externos. No Balanço Patrimonial, a
relação entre as fontes de financiamento e as aplicações
de recursos define o perfil de risco da organização.
Assinale o procedimento técnico que reflete
corretamente uma análise da estrutura de capital.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauá - SP
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Mauá - SP - Técnico em Contabilidade |
Q3954343
Noções de Informática
A modernização da gestão contábil passa pelo uso de
sistemas integrados e ferramentas de análise de dados
que garantem a agilidade e a segurança das informações.
Acerca do uso de ferramentas digitais, registre (V), para
as afirmativas verdadeiras, e (F), para as falsas.
(__) O uso de planilhas eletrônicas pode auxiliar na geração de informações de custos, desde que sejam garantidas a conformidade e a rastreabilidade dos dados com a contabilidade oficial.
(__) Softwares de Business Intelligence são proibidos na administração pública, não podendo ser utilizados para análise de dados contábeis ou patrimoniais, ainda que atendam a requisitos de segurança da informação e integrem-se aos sistemas oficiais de gestão.
(__) O Excel Avançado permite a automação de conciliações bancárias, reduzindo erros manuais e aumentando a confiabilidade dos saldos apresentados no Balanço Patrimonial.
(__) A segurança da informação em sistemas contábeis digitais dispensa o controle de senhas individuais quando o órgão utiliza uma rede local protegida por firewall físico.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
(__) O uso de planilhas eletrônicas pode auxiliar na geração de informações de custos, desde que sejam garantidas a conformidade e a rastreabilidade dos dados com a contabilidade oficial.
(__) Softwares de Business Intelligence são proibidos na administração pública, não podendo ser utilizados para análise de dados contábeis ou patrimoniais, ainda que atendam a requisitos de segurança da informação e integrem-se aos sistemas oficiais de gestão.
(__) O Excel Avançado permite a automação de conciliações bancárias, reduzindo erros manuais e aumentando a confiabilidade dos saldos apresentados no Balanço Patrimonial.
(__) A segurança da informação em sistemas contábeis digitais dispensa o controle de senhas individuais quando o órgão utiliza uma rede local protegida por firewall físico.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a sequência correta.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauá - SP
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Mauá - SP - Técnico em Contabilidade |
Q3954342
Contabilidade Pública
A Lei nº 4.320/1964 estabelece as normas gerais de
direito financeiro para elaboração e controle dos
orçamentos e balanços da União, dos Estados, dos
Municípios e do Distrito Federal. Analise as afirmativas a
seguir.
I. As Receitas de Capital são aquelas provenientes da realização de recursos financeiros oriundos da constituição de dívidas, da conversão de bens e direitos em espécie ou de transferências de capital.
II. A Lei de Orçamento compreenderá todas as receitas, inclusive as de movimentos de fundos que não pertençam ao Estado, visando o cumprimento integral do Princípio da Universalidade.
III. O Balanço Patrimonial demonstrará o Ativo Financeiro, o Ativo Permanente, o Passivo Financeiro, o Passivo Permanente e o Patrimônio Líquido, evidenciando o superávit ou déficit financeiro.
Está correto o que se afirma em:
I. As Receitas de Capital são aquelas provenientes da realização de recursos financeiros oriundos da constituição de dívidas, da conversão de bens e direitos em espécie ou de transferências de capital.
II. A Lei de Orçamento compreenderá todas as receitas, inclusive as de movimentos de fundos que não pertençam ao Estado, visando o cumprimento integral do Princípio da Universalidade.
III. O Balanço Patrimonial demonstrará o Ativo Financeiro, o Ativo Permanente, o Passivo Financeiro, o Passivo Permanente e o Patrimônio Líquido, evidenciando o superávit ou déficit financeiro.
Está correto o que se afirma em:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauá - SP
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Mauá - SP - Técnico em Contabilidade |
Q3954341
Administração Financeira e Orçamentária
A Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal estabelece mecanismos
de controle e transparência voltados à gestão
responsável dos recursos públicos, com impactos diretos
sobre as despesas em saúde e educação. No âmbito da
gestão fiscal responsável, assinale a diretriz técnica
correta que deve ser observada em cumprimento à
referida lei.
Conheça nossos planos