Selecionar segmento
Estude com questões de diferentes segmentos
Atenção: Isso limpará todos os campos já preenchidos no filtro!
Foram encontradas 3.428 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128636
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the poem to answer the following question:
Indicate the phonological poetic device spotted in “Because it was grassy and wanted wear”:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128635
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the poem to answer the following question:
The fundamental theme of the poem can be pointed out in:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128634
Inglês
The reference to “New Nightmare” alongside “Scream” was stressed out by a teacher with the goal to demonstrate:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128633
Inglês
Students were asked to read the text thoroughly and and answer the following questions about the movie “Scream”:
• Who was the director?
• What is the release date?
• Who played the characters?
• Who wrote the script?
This activity is an example of:
• Who was the director?
• What is the release date?
• Who played the characters?
• Who wrote the script?
This activity is an example of:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128632
Inglês
An English teacher handed this text to his/her students with the following sentence highlighted. Analyze his criteria to do so:
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell… I frankly would never have believed it.
Which item presents the standard form of the sentence structure in question ?
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128631
Inglês
An English teacher handed this text to his/her students with the following sentence highlighted. Analyze his criteria to do so:
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell… I frankly would never have believed it.
I. Use of spoken and informal language.
II. Non-standard use of past unreal conditional structure.
III. Commas to enhance formality.
IV.Conversational tone as a way to create a sense of familiarity.
The correct items are:
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell… I frankly would never have believed it.
I. Use of spoken and informal language.
II. Non-standard use of past unreal conditional structure.
III. Commas to enhance formality.
IV.Conversational tone as a way to create a sense of familiarity.
The correct items are:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128630
Inglês
Texto associado
Read thoroughly to answer the following question.
Had the great pleasure of introducing my 14-year-old son to one of my favorite movies tonight. I saw SCREAM five times
when it was released theatrically in 1996. I was a freshman in college and working part-time at my hometown movie theater,
Cineplex Odeon in Bowie, Maryland, and I remember loving it so much that I would sometimes spend my 15-minute breaks in
the back of the theater just to admire the filmmaking.
The movie absolutely knocked the wind out of me in '96, and I'm pleased to report that it still works beautifully for me
today.
SCREAM is a riff on the high-school slasher film, where a group of friends are picked off one-by-one by a masked killer. The
difference is that both the killer and the intended victims are aware of (and in some cases well-versed in) the very movies that
created this genre, and try to use those tropes as a means of attack, or a way to survive. This kind of meta-genre deconstruction
was pretty revolutionary in 1996, but SCREAM succeeds at being an exceptional slasher film even as it takes the genre apart,
and that is truly miraculous to behold.
Kevin Williamson's script is crackling with wit, humor, and deep respect and love for the genre. Craven's direction is fluid,
confident, and full of brilliant misdirection – it feels like watching close-up magic, and his slight of hand is balanced with some
truly inspired set pieces and beautiful cinematography. The cast is wonderful, and I found myself smiling about just how
affectionately I remember these characters. When the movie started, I didn't think “oh there's Neve Campbell, and there's Matt
Lillard” – I was thinking “There's Sid, there's Stu.”
It's easy to forgot how revolutionary and astonishing the iconic opening sequence was, and I marvel now at the extended
party set-piece, which takes up almost the entirety of the second half of the film. Just wonderful stuff.
SCREAM is a gleeful, brilliant deconstruction of the genre itself, breaking it apart with profound respect and love, and
celebrating the very tropes it is exposing. There's a reason it had such impact on release, and that the franchise is still finding
some fuel in the tank nearly three decades later. It's also a time capsule of the late 90's, and reminds me so much of my youth
– I grinned when the sheriff asks Billy Loomis “Why do you have a cellular telephone, son?” This was, at the time, not an
unreasonable question. It's a different world, but horror still works just as well.
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy
meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell... I frankly
would never have believed it. I've now gotten to personally thank those artists for the impact this film had on me, and that in
and of itself only further blurs the lines between movies and reality – a sensation I faintly felt watching NEW NIGHTMARE in
1994, and felt completely with SCREAM. What a wild world this is.
This movie was formative for me, and changed the way I looked at what was possible in the genre. I loved it when I was
18, and I loved it tonight. And, my son also loved it... so a great evening all around.
(Available: https://letterboxd.com/flanaganfilm/films/reviews/ Accessed in: November/2024.)
Analyze the following statements:
I. Praising technical features of the movie indicates the author’s appreciation for it.
II. “Scream” deeply influenced the author’s professional and personal growth.
III. The author is in disbelief on his current relationship with some cast and crew members of the film.
IV.The author finds connection only with his youth in regard to the movie script.
All of them are true, EXCEPT:
I. Praising technical features of the movie indicates the author’s appreciation for it.
II. “Scream” deeply influenced the author’s professional and personal growth.
III. The author is in disbelief on his current relationship with some cast and crew members of the film.
IV.The author finds connection only with his youth in regard to the movie script.
All of them are true, EXCEPT:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128629
Inglês
Texto associado
Read thoroughly to answer the following question.
Had the great pleasure of introducing my 14-year-old son to one of my favorite movies tonight. I saw SCREAM five times
when it was released theatrically in 1996. I was a freshman in college and working part-time at my hometown movie theater,
Cineplex Odeon in Bowie, Maryland, and I remember loving it so much that I would sometimes spend my 15-minute breaks in
the back of the theater just to admire the filmmaking.
The movie absolutely knocked the wind out of me in '96, and I'm pleased to report that it still works beautifully for me
today.
SCREAM is a riff on the high-school slasher film, where a group of friends are picked off one-by-one by a masked killer. The
difference is that both the killer and the intended victims are aware of (and in some cases well-versed in) the very movies that
created this genre, and try to use those tropes as a means of attack, or a way to survive. This kind of meta-genre deconstruction
was pretty revolutionary in 1996, but SCREAM succeeds at being an exceptional slasher film even as it takes the genre apart,
and that is truly miraculous to behold.
Kevin Williamson's script is crackling with wit, humor, and deep respect and love for the genre. Craven's direction is fluid,
confident, and full of brilliant misdirection – it feels like watching close-up magic, and his slight of hand is balanced with some
truly inspired set pieces and beautiful cinematography. The cast is wonderful, and I found myself smiling about just how
affectionately I remember these characters. When the movie started, I didn't think “oh there's Neve Campbell, and there's Matt
Lillard” – I was thinking “There's Sid, there's Stu.”
It's easy to forgot how revolutionary and astonishing the iconic opening sequence was, and I marvel now at the extended
party set-piece, which takes up almost the entirety of the second half of the film. Just wonderful stuff.
SCREAM is a gleeful, brilliant deconstruction of the genre itself, breaking it apart with profound respect and love, and
celebrating the very tropes it is exposing. There's a reason it had such impact on release, and that the franchise is still finding
some fuel in the tank nearly three decades later. It's also a time capsule of the late 90's, and reminds me so much of my youth
– I grinned when the sheriff asks Billy Loomis “Why do you have a cellular telephone, son?” This was, at the time, not an
unreasonable question. It's a different world, but horror still works just as well.
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy
meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell... I frankly
would never have believed it. I've now gotten to personally thank those artists for the impact this film had on me, and that in
and of itself only further blurs the lines between movies and reality – a sensation I faintly felt watching NEW NIGHTMARE in
1994, and felt completely with SCREAM. What a wild world this is.
This movie was formative for me, and changed the way I looked at what was possible in the genre. I loved it when I was
18, and I loved it tonight. And, my son also loved it... so a great evening all around.
(Available: https://letterboxd.com/flanaganfilm/films/reviews/ Accessed in: November/2024.)
The word “riff” in paragraph 3 is best replaced by:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128628
Inglês
Texto associado
Read thoroughly to answer the following question.
Had the great pleasure of introducing my 14-year-old son to one of my favorite movies tonight. I saw SCREAM five times
when it was released theatrically in 1996. I was a freshman in college and working part-time at my hometown movie theater,
Cineplex Odeon in Bowie, Maryland, and I remember loving it so much that I would sometimes spend my 15-minute breaks in
the back of the theater just to admire the filmmaking.
The movie absolutely knocked the wind out of me in '96, and I'm pleased to report that it still works beautifully for me
today.
SCREAM is a riff on the high-school slasher film, where a group of friends are picked off one-by-one by a masked killer. The
difference is that both the killer and the intended victims are aware of (and in some cases well-versed in) the very movies that
created this genre, and try to use those tropes as a means of attack, or a way to survive. This kind of meta-genre deconstruction
was pretty revolutionary in 1996, but SCREAM succeeds at being an exceptional slasher film even as it takes the genre apart,
and that is truly miraculous to behold.
Kevin Williamson's script is crackling with wit, humor, and deep respect and love for the genre. Craven's direction is fluid,
confident, and full of brilliant misdirection – it feels like watching close-up magic, and his slight of hand is balanced with some
truly inspired set pieces and beautiful cinematography. The cast is wonderful, and I found myself smiling about just how
affectionately I remember these characters. When the movie started, I didn't think “oh there's Neve Campbell, and there's Matt
Lillard” – I was thinking “There's Sid, there's Stu.”
It's easy to forgot how revolutionary and astonishing the iconic opening sequence was, and I marvel now at the extended
party set-piece, which takes up almost the entirety of the second half of the film. Just wonderful stuff.
SCREAM is a gleeful, brilliant deconstruction of the genre itself, breaking it apart with profound respect and love, and
celebrating the very tropes it is exposing. There's a reason it had such impact on release, and that the franchise is still finding
some fuel in the tank nearly three decades later. It's also a time capsule of the late 90's, and reminds me so much of my youth
– I grinned when the sheriff asks Billy Loomis “Why do you have a cellular telephone, son?” This was, at the time, not an
unreasonable question. It's a different world, but horror still works just as well.
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy
meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell... I frankly
would never have believed it. I've now gotten to personally thank those artists for the impact this film had on me, and that in
and of itself only further blurs the lines between movies and reality – a sensation I faintly felt watching NEW NIGHTMARE in
1994, and felt completely with SCREAM. What a wild world this is.
This movie was formative for me, and changed the way I looked at what was possible in the genre. I loved it when I was
18, and I loved it tonight. And, my son also loved it... so a great evening all around.
(Available: https://letterboxd.com/flanaganfilm/films/reviews/ Accessed in: November/2024.)
In paragraph 2, the following match the same meaning EXCEPT:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128627
Inglês
Texto associado
Read thoroughly to answer the following question.
Had the great pleasure of introducing my 14-year-old son to one of my favorite movies tonight. I saw SCREAM five times
when it was released theatrically in 1996. I was a freshman in college and working part-time at my hometown movie theater,
Cineplex Odeon in Bowie, Maryland, and I remember loving it so much that I would sometimes spend my 15-minute breaks in
the back of the theater just to admire the filmmaking.
The movie absolutely knocked the wind out of me in '96, and I'm pleased to report that it still works beautifully for me
today.
SCREAM is a riff on the high-school slasher film, where a group of friends are picked off one-by-one by a masked killer. The
difference is that both the killer and the intended victims are aware of (and in some cases well-versed in) the very movies that
created this genre, and try to use those tropes as a means of attack, or a way to survive. This kind of meta-genre deconstruction
was pretty revolutionary in 1996, but SCREAM succeeds at being an exceptional slasher film even as it takes the genre apart,
and that is truly miraculous to behold.
Kevin Williamson's script is crackling with wit, humor, and deep respect and love for the genre. Craven's direction is fluid,
confident, and full of brilliant misdirection – it feels like watching close-up magic, and his slight of hand is balanced with some
truly inspired set pieces and beautiful cinematography. The cast is wonderful, and I found myself smiling about just how
affectionately I remember these characters. When the movie started, I didn't think “oh there's Neve Campbell, and there's Matt
Lillard” – I was thinking “There's Sid, there's Stu.”
It's easy to forgot how revolutionary and astonishing the iconic opening sequence was, and I marvel now at the extended
party set-piece, which takes up almost the entirety of the second half of the film. Just wonderful stuff.
SCREAM is a gleeful, brilliant deconstruction of the genre itself, breaking it apart with profound respect and love, and
celebrating the very tropes it is exposing. There's a reason it had such impact on release, and that the franchise is still finding
some fuel in the tank nearly three decades later. It's also a time capsule of the late 90's, and reminds me so much of my youth
– I grinned when the sheriff asks Billy Loomis “Why do you have a cellular telephone, son?” This was, at the time, not an
unreasonable question. It's a different world, but horror still works just as well.
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy
meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell... I frankly
would never have believed it. I've now gotten to personally thank those artists for the impact this film had on me, and that in
and of itself only further blurs the lines between movies and reality – a sensation I faintly felt watching NEW NIGHTMARE in
1994, and felt completely with SCREAM. What a wild world this is.
This movie was formative for me, and changed the way I looked at what was possible in the genre. I loved it when I was
18, and I loved it tonight. And, my son also loved it... so a great evening all around.
(Available: https://letterboxd.com/flanaganfilm/films/reviews/ Accessed in: November/2024.)
In paragraph 5, why does the author mention the opening scene as “iconic”?
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128626
Inglês
Texto associado
Read thoroughly to answer the following question.
Had the great pleasure of introducing my 14-year-old son to one of my favorite movies tonight. I saw SCREAM five times
when it was released theatrically in 1996. I was a freshman in college and working part-time at my hometown movie theater,
Cineplex Odeon in Bowie, Maryland, and I remember loving it so much that I would sometimes spend my 15-minute breaks in
the back of the theater just to admire the filmmaking.
The movie absolutely knocked the wind out of me in '96, and I'm pleased to report that it still works beautifully for me
today.
SCREAM is a riff on the high-school slasher film, where a group of friends are picked off one-by-one by a masked killer. The
difference is that both the killer and the intended victims are aware of (and in some cases well-versed in) the very movies that
created this genre, and try to use those tropes as a means of attack, or a way to survive. This kind of meta-genre deconstruction
was pretty revolutionary in 1996, but SCREAM succeeds at being an exceptional slasher film even as it takes the genre apart,
and that is truly miraculous to behold.
Kevin Williamson's script is crackling with wit, humor, and deep respect and love for the genre. Craven's direction is fluid,
confident, and full of brilliant misdirection – it feels like watching close-up magic, and his slight of hand is balanced with some
truly inspired set pieces and beautiful cinematography. The cast is wonderful, and I found myself smiling about just how
affectionately I remember these characters. When the movie started, I didn't think “oh there's Neve Campbell, and there's Matt
Lillard” – I was thinking “There's Sid, there's Stu.”
It's easy to forgot how revolutionary and astonishing the iconic opening sequence was, and I marvel now at the extended
party set-piece, which takes up almost the entirety of the second half of the film. Just wonderful stuff.
SCREAM is a gleeful, brilliant deconstruction of the genre itself, breaking it apart with profound respect and love, and
celebrating the very tropes it is exposing. There's a reason it had such impact on release, and that the franchise is still finding
some fuel in the tank nearly three decades later. It's also a time capsule of the late 90's, and reminds me so much of my youth
– I grinned when the sheriff asks Billy Loomis “Why do you have a cellular telephone, son?” This was, at the time, not an
unreasonable question. It's a different world, but horror still works just as well.
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy
meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell... I frankly
would never have believed it. I've now gotten to personally thank those artists for the impact this film had on me, and that in
and of itself only further blurs the lines between movies and reality – a sensation I faintly felt watching NEW NIGHTMARE in
1994, and felt completely with SCREAM. What a wild world this is.
This movie was formative for me, and changed the way I looked at what was possible in the genre. I loved it when I was
18, and I loved it tonight. And, my son also loved it... so a great evening all around.
(Available: https://letterboxd.com/flanaganfilm/films/reviews/ Accessed in: November/2024.)
In paragraph 3, what exactly does the author consider “revolutionary” about the movie “Scream”?
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128625
Inglês
Texto associado
Read thoroughly to answer the following question.
Had the great pleasure of introducing my 14-year-old son to one of my favorite movies tonight. I saw SCREAM five times
when it was released theatrically in 1996. I was a freshman in college and working part-time at my hometown movie theater,
Cineplex Odeon in Bowie, Maryland, and I remember loving it so much that I would sometimes spend my 15-minute breaks in
the back of the theater just to admire the filmmaking.
The movie absolutely knocked the wind out of me in '96, and I'm pleased to report that it still works beautifully for me
today.
SCREAM is a riff on the high-school slasher film, where a group of friends are picked off one-by-one by a masked killer. The
difference is that both the killer and the intended victims are aware of (and in some cases well-versed in) the very movies that
created this genre, and try to use those tropes as a means of attack, or a way to survive. This kind of meta-genre deconstruction
was pretty revolutionary in 1996, but SCREAM succeeds at being an exceptional slasher film even as it takes the genre apart,
and that is truly miraculous to behold.
Kevin Williamson's script is crackling with wit, humor, and deep respect and love for the genre. Craven's direction is fluid,
confident, and full of brilliant misdirection – it feels like watching close-up magic, and his slight of hand is balanced with some
truly inspired set pieces and beautiful cinematography. The cast is wonderful, and I found myself smiling about just how
affectionately I remember these characters. When the movie started, I didn't think “oh there's Neve Campbell, and there's Matt
Lillard” – I was thinking “There's Sid, there's Stu.”
It's easy to forgot how revolutionary and astonishing the iconic opening sequence was, and I marvel now at the extended
party set-piece, which takes up almost the entirety of the second half of the film. Just wonderful stuff.
SCREAM is a gleeful, brilliant deconstruction of the genre itself, breaking it apart with profound respect and love, and
celebrating the very tropes it is exposing. There's a reason it had such impact on release, and that the franchise is still finding
some fuel in the tank nearly three decades later. It's also a time capsule of the late 90's, and reminds me so much of my youth
– I grinned when the sheriff asks Billy Loomis “Why do you have a cellular telephone, son?” This was, at the time, not an
unreasonable question. It's a different world, but horror still works just as well.
If I would have told my 18 year-old self that someday I'd work with (and become great friends with) Matthew Lillard, enjoy
meals and social deduction games with Kevin Williamson, and have a relaxed, casual dinner with Neve Campbell... I frankly
would never have believed it. I've now gotten to personally thank those artists for the impact this film had on me, and that in
and of itself only further blurs the lines between movies and reality – a sensation I faintly felt watching NEW NIGHTMARE in
1994, and felt completely with SCREAM. What a wild world this is.
This movie was formative for me, and changed the way I looked at what was possible in the genre. I loved it when I was
18, and I loved it tonight. And, my son also loved it... so a great evening all around.
(Available: https://letterboxd.com/flanaganfilm/films/reviews/ Accessed in: November/2024.)
Texts vary in style and structure when it comes to their objectives. The intended message and genre conventions in the
previous text classify it as a:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128624
Francês
Dans les phrases ci-dessous cochez la seule où le passé composé n’est pas utilisé correctement:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128623
Francês
Dans les phrases ci-dessous cochez la seule où la négation n’est pas utilisée correctement:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128622
Francês
Dans les phrases ci-dessous cochez la seule réponse où le pronom relatif n’est pas utilisé correctement:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128621
Francês
Dans les phrases ci-dessous cochez la seule où le pronom indirecte n’est pas utilisé correctement:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128620
Francês
Dans les phrases ci-dessous cochez la seule où le pronom Y n’est pas utilisé correctement:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128619
Francês
Dans les phrases ci-dessous cochez la seule où le pronom EN n’est pas utilisé correctement:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128618
Francês
Les phrases ci-dessous indiquent la durée du temps. Cochez celle qui n’est pas correcte:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
SEED-PR
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2024 - SEED-PR - Professor - Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Francês - Edital nº 138 |
Q3128617
Francês
Texto associado
Répondez le question d’après le texte ci-dessous.
Finlande: voyage au pays du bonheur
En 2024, ce pays scandinave a été élu “le plus heureux du monde” pour la 7ème année consécutive. Voyager en Finlande peut-il
contribuer au bonheur? Découverte!
Le Rapport mondial sur le bonheur est une mesure du bonheur publiée chaque année par l’ONU depuis 2012. Il est basé
sur l’évaluation que les gens font de leur bonheur, ainsi que sur des données économiques et sociales. Six facteurs sont analysés:
le soutien relationnel, le revenu, la santé, la liberté, la générosité et l’absence de corruption. Un échantillon d'environ 2000
personnes par pays est interrogé. Les nations nordiques arrivent en tête des dix premières places puisque le Danemark, l’Islande
et la Suède suivent la Finlande. La France est 27ème
.
Jennifer de Paola est docteur en psychologie, spécialisée sur le bonheur à l’Université d’Helsinki. Pour elle, “la proximité
avec la nature et le bon equilibre entre travail et vie privée constituent la clé de la satisfaction des Finlandais”. Ce pays était
pourtant connu jusque dans les années 1980 pour un taux de suicide et de dépression très important. “C’est pour cette raison
que le gouvernement a investi dans des campagnes dédiées à la prévention”, explique la chercheuse.
“Parmi les mesures, il y a l'accès aux traitements, afin que chacun puisse bénéficier de soins de santé mentale grâce à l'aide
sociale. Le Rapport mondial sur le bonheur indique aujourd’hui un bon degré de confiance dans les institutions, une longue
espérance de vie (de qualité), la liberté de s'exprimer et de faire des choix de vie, un PIB élevé, un haut niveau d'altruisme et un
soutien social apporté par les personnes qui nous entourent.”
– Jennifer de Paola.
Cinq éléments clés expliquent notamment le classement de la Finlande: le bien-être, un régime alimentaire cohérent avec
les saisons, des liens étroits avec la nature, l’appréciation des arts et une atmosphère locale conviviale. Un voyage en Finlande
peut être l’occasion de flirter avec ces éléments qui rendent heureux…
Le pays est avant tout apprécié pour sa sécurité: la Finlande est l’une des destinations les plus sûres. S’ils sont réputés pour
leur politesse qui peut virer à l’introversion, les Finlandais n’en sont pas moins accueillants. Sécurité, politesse et chaleur
humaine, une combinaison estimée des voyageurs…
La culture du sauna est aussi un point fort de la destination, qui compte 3 millions de saunas pour une population pour 5
millions d’habitants. Pour son aspect traditionnel et ses bienfaits sur le corps et le moral, le sauna est inscrit au Patrimoine
culturel de l’UNESCO. Tout visiteur appréciera de terminer ses journées de découverte dans la douce chaleur d’un sauna!
C’est du côté de la nature que la Finlande se distingue plus encore. Le pays a promulgué un “droit d’accès à la nature”, où
tout le monde est libre de profiter de la nature de manière responsable. Ainsi la cueillette des baies et des champignons
sauvages et la pêche à la ligne sont libres toute l’année. Mais ce sont surtout ses paysages emplis de forêts dans tout le pays,
les 40 parcs nationaux et leurs superbes sentiers de randonnées qui ravissent les visiteurs. Et, alors que les journées sans fin
sont les stars de l’été, en hiver, les aurores boréales font chavirer les cœurs des voyageurs. En Laponie, on peut voir des aurores
boréales 200 nuits par an…
Avec ces atouts, il y a de bonnes chances qu’un voyage en Finlande apporte bien de la joie!
(Disponible: https://voyage.tv5monde.com/fr/finlande-voyage-au-pays-du-bonheur. Accès: 09/11/2024.)
Dans le texte, on trouve les nombres ci-dessous. Cochez la réponse qui n’est pas correcte:
Conheça nossos planos