Questões de Concurso Comentadas para professor - inglês

Foram encontradas 23.868 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

www.qconcursos.com
Q3238694
Português Interpretação de Textos , Noções Gerais de Compreensão e Interpretação de Texto ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: OBJETIVA Órgão: Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR Provas: OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Assistente Social A (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Arquiteto (20h e 40h) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Bibliotecário | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Bioquímico | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Contador | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Enfermeiro B - (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Engenheiro Agrimensor | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Engenheiro Agrônomo (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Engenheiro Ambiental | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Engenheiro Civil A | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Engenheiro Eletricista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Engenheiro Florestal | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Engenheiro Sanitarista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Farmacêutico (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Fisioterapeuta - 20h (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Historiador | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Cardiologista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Veterinário Sanitarista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Veterinário | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Nutricionista (20h e 40h) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Odontólogo ESF (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Odontólogo - 10h (Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Professor de Arte (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Professor de Educação Física - 40h | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Professor de Educação Física (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Clínico Geral ESF (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Clínico Geral (20h e 40h) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Dermatologista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico do Trabalho | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Ginecologista e Obstetra | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Nefrologista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Neurologista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Oftalmologista | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Pediatra | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Professor de Inglês (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Professor de Libras | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Professor PB20/Professor PB40 (Lageado e Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Psicólogo - 20h (Lageado e Sede)/Psicólogo - 40h (Sede) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Psicopedagogo (20h e 40h) | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Terapeuta Ocupacional | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Turismólogo | OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Rio Negro - PR - Médico Endocrinologista |
Q3238694 Português

        Quando aportou no México, em 1519, o espanhol Hernán Cortés foi coberto de presentes, oferecidos pelo Imperador Montezuma. Para os nativos, Cortés era Quetzacóatl, o deus dourado do ar que, segundo a lenda, havia partido anos antes, prometendo voltar. Segundo a crença, Quetzacóatl havia plantado cacaueiros como uma dádiva aos imperadores. Com a semente extraída da planta, acrescida de mel e baunilha, os astecas confeccionavam uma bebida considerada sagrada, o tchocolat. Para o povo asteca, o ouro e a prata valiam menos que as sementes de cacau — a moeda da época.


        De volta à Espanha, em 1528, Cortés levou consigo algumas mudas de cacaueiro, que plantou pelo caminho. Primeiro no Caribe — no Haiti e em Trinidad — e, depois, na África. Chegando à Espanha, ofereceu a Carlos V um pouco da bebida sagrada asteca, deixando o rei extasiado. Não tardou que o tchocolat se tornasse apreciado por toda a corte. Graças às plantações iniciadas por Cortés, seu país pôde manter o monopólio do produto por mais de um século. A receita, aprimorada com outros ingredientes (açúcar, vinho e amêndoas), era guardada em segredo pelos zelosos espanhóis. Inicialmente, apenas alguns mosteiros eram autorizados a produzi-lo, já com o nome espanhol chocolate.


        O chocolate era uma pasta espessa e de gosto amargo, apesar do açúcar adicionado pelos espanhóis. Para amenizar a inconveniência da massa granulada, difícil de digerir, o químico holandês Conraad Johannes van Houten começou a se interessar por um novo método de moagem das sementes, inventando, em 1828, uma prensa capaz de eliminar boa parte da gordura do vegetal. Assim, obteve o chocolate em pó, solúvel em água ou leite, mais agradável ao paladar.


        Mas o que fazer com a gordura sólida restante da prensagem? Vinte anos depois, os técnicos da empresa inglesa Fry & Sons adicionaram pasta de cacau e açúcar à massa gordurosa, confeccionando a primeira barra de chocolate do mundo — tão amarga, porém, quanto a bebida que lhe originou. Tempos depois, de uma das experiências do suíço Henri Nestlé (1814-1890), resultou um método de condensação do leite, processo que seria utilizado em seguida por outro suíço, Daniel Peter (1836-1919). Peter se interessou pela produção de chocolates quando percebeu que o uso do petróleo para iluminação estava, aos poucos, minando sua fábrica de velas de sebo. Sabendo da descoberta de Nestlé, ocorreu-lhe misturar o leite condensado para fazer a primeira barra de chocolate ao leite.


Marcelo Duarte – Guia dos Curiosos. Adaptado. 

Como já explicitado no título, o autor apresenta a história do chocolate. Segundo o texto, é INCORRETO afirmar que: 

Alternativas
Q3235092
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Vocabulário | Vocabulary ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235092 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    If styles are general characteristics that differentiate one individual from another, then strategies are those specific “attacks” that we make on a given problem, and that vary considerably within each individual. They are the momentby-moment techniques that we employ to solve “problems” posed by second language input and output. Chamot (2005, p. 112) defines strategies quite broadly as “procedures that facilitate a learning task. Strategies are most often conscious and goal driven.”

    As our knowledge of second language acquisition increased markedly during the 1970s, teachers and researchers came to realize that no single research finding and no single method of language teaching would usher in an era of universal success in teaching a second language. We saw that certain learners seemed to be successful regardless of methods or techniques of teaching. We began to see the importance of individual variation in language learning. Certain people appeared to be endowed with abilities to succeed; others lacked those abilities. This observation led Rubin (1975) and Stern (1975) to describe “good” language learners in terms of personal traits, styles, and strategies. Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982) later summarized fourteen such characteristics. Among other abilities, good language learners tend to:

1. Find their own way, taking charge of their learning

2. Be creative and develop a “feel” for the language by experimenting with its grammar and words

3. Make their own opportunities for practice in using the language inside and outside the classroom

4. Learn to live with uncertainty by continuing to talk or listen without understanding every word

5. Use linguistic knowledge, including knowledge of their first language, in learning a second language

6. Use contextual cues to help them in comprehension 

7. Learn to make intelligent guesses

8. Learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”

9. Learn different styles of speech and writing and learn to vary their language according to the formality of the situation.


(, H.Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
 Confidencial até o momento da aplicação.
In reading, the ability to “make intelligent guesses” is named
Alternativas
Q3235091
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235091 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    If styles are general characteristics that differentiate one individual from another, then strategies are those specific “attacks” that we make on a given problem, and that vary considerably within each individual. They are the momentby-moment techniques that we employ to solve “problems” posed by second language input and output. Chamot (2005, p. 112) defines strategies quite broadly as “procedures that facilitate a learning task. Strategies are most often conscious and goal driven.”

    As our knowledge of second language acquisition increased markedly during the 1970s, teachers and researchers came to realize that no single research finding and no single method of language teaching would usher in an era of universal success in teaching a second language. We saw that certain learners seemed to be successful regardless of methods or techniques of teaching. We began to see the importance of individual variation in language learning. Certain people appeared to be endowed with abilities to succeed; others lacked those abilities. This observation led Rubin (1975) and Stern (1975) to describe “good” language learners in terms of personal traits, styles, and strategies. Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982) later summarized fourteen such characteristics. Among other abilities, good language learners tend to:

1. Find their own way, taking charge of their learning

2. Be creative and develop a “feel” for the language by experimenting with its grammar and words

3. Make their own opportunities for practice in using the language inside and outside the classroom

4. Learn to live with uncertainty by continuing to talk or listen without understanding every word

5. Use linguistic knowledge, including knowledge of their first language, in learning a second language

6. Use contextual cues to help them in comprehension 

7. Learn to make intelligent guesses

8. Learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”

9. Learn different styles of speech and writing and learn to vary their language according to the formality of the situation.


(, H.Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
 Confidencial até o momento da aplicação.
Um professor do Ensino Fundamental preocupado em desenvolver no aluno a habilidade n.7 citada no texto de Brown, “Learn to make intelligent guesses”, deverá
Alternativas
Q3235090
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235090 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    If styles are general characteristics that differentiate one individual from another, then strategies are those specific “attacks” that we make on a given problem, and that vary considerably within each individual. They are the momentby-moment techniques that we employ to solve “problems” posed by second language input and output. Chamot (2005, p. 112) defines strategies quite broadly as “procedures that facilitate a learning task. Strategies are most often conscious and goal driven.”

    As our knowledge of second language acquisition increased markedly during the 1970s, teachers and researchers came to realize that no single research finding and no single method of language teaching would usher in an era of universal success in teaching a second language. We saw that certain learners seemed to be successful regardless of methods or techniques of teaching. We began to see the importance of individual variation in language learning. Certain people appeared to be endowed with abilities to succeed; others lacked those abilities. This observation led Rubin (1975) and Stern (1975) to describe “good” language learners in terms of personal traits, styles, and strategies. Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982) later summarized fourteen such characteristics. Among other abilities, good language learners tend to:

1. Find their own way, taking charge of their learning

2. Be creative and develop a “feel” for the language by experimenting with its grammar and words

3. Make their own opportunities for practice in using the language inside and outside the classroom

4. Learn to live with uncertainty by continuing to talk or listen without understanding every word

5. Use linguistic knowledge, including knowledge of their first language, in learning a second language

6. Use contextual cues to help them in comprehension 

7. Learn to make intelligent guesses

8. Learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”

9. Learn different styles of speech and writing and learn to vary their language according to the formality of the situation.


(, H.Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
 Confidencial até o momento da aplicação.
According to Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982), good language learners “learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”. To help their students develop such an ability, the English teacher may, among other classroom proposals,
Alternativas
Q3235089
Inglês Vocabulário | Vocabulary ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235089 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    If styles are general characteristics that differentiate one individual from another, then strategies are those specific “attacks” that we make on a given problem, and that vary considerably within each individual. They are the momentby-moment techniques that we employ to solve “problems” posed by second language input and output. Chamot (2005, p. 112) defines strategies quite broadly as “procedures that facilitate a learning task. Strategies are most often conscious and goal driven.”

    As our knowledge of second language acquisition increased markedly during the 1970s, teachers and researchers came to realize that no single research finding and no single method of language teaching would usher in an era of universal success in teaching a second language. We saw that certain learners seemed to be successful regardless of methods or techniques of teaching. We began to see the importance of individual variation in language learning. Certain people appeared to be endowed with abilities to succeed; others lacked those abilities. This observation led Rubin (1975) and Stern (1975) to describe “good” language learners in terms of personal traits, styles, and strategies. Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982) later summarized fourteen such characteristics. Among other abilities, good language learners tend to:

1. Find their own way, taking charge of their learning

2. Be creative and develop a “feel” for the language by experimenting with its grammar and words

3. Make their own opportunities for practice in using the language inside and outside the classroom

4. Learn to live with uncertainty by continuing to talk or listen without understanding every word

5. Use linguistic knowledge, including knowledge of their first language, in learning a second language

6. Use contextual cues to help them in comprehension 

7. Learn to make intelligent guesses

8. Learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”

9. Learn different styles of speech and writing and learn to vary their language according to the formality of the situation.


(, H.Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
 Confidencial até o momento da aplicação.
In the first two paragraphs, the pair of terms whose meanings are in evident contrast is: 
Alternativas
Q3235088
Inglês Verbos | Verbs ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235088 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    If styles are general characteristics that differentiate one individual from another, then strategies are those specific “attacks” that we make on a given problem, and that vary considerably within each individual. They are the momentby-moment techniques that we employ to solve “problems” posed by second language input and output. Chamot (2005, p. 112) defines strategies quite broadly as “procedures that facilitate a learning task. Strategies are most often conscious and goal driven.”

    As our knowledge of second language acquisition increased markedly during the 1970s, teachers and researchers came to realize that no single research finding and no single method of language teaching would usher in an era of universal success in teaching a second language. We saw that certain learners seemed to be successful regardless of methods or techniques of teaching. We began to see the importance of individual variation in language learning. Certain people appeared to be endowed with abilities to succeed; others lacked those abilities. This observation led Rubin (1975) and Stern (1975) to describe “good” language learners in terms of personal traits, styles, and strategies. Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982) later summarized fourteen such characteristics. Among other abilities, good language learners tend to:

1. Find their own way, taking charge of their learning

2. Be creative and develop a “feel” for the language by experimenting with its grammar and words

3. Make their own opportunities for practice in using the language inside and outside the classroom

4. Learn to live with uncertainty by continuing to talk or listen without understanding every word

5. Use linguistic knowledge, including knowledge of their first language, in learning a second language

6. Use contextual cues to help them in comprehension 

7. Learn to make intelligent guesses

8. Learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”

9. Learn different styles of speech and writing and learn to vary their language according to the formality of the situation.


(, H.Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
 Confidencial até o momento da aplicação.
Com relação ao uso de tempos verbais no texto, é correto afirmar que 
Alternativas
Q3235087
Inglês Preposições | Prepositions , Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235087 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


ELF: English as a lingua franca


    The Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English (VOICE), a collection of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) currently under construction, defines lingua franca as an additionally acquired language system that serves as a means of communication for speakers from different speech communities, who use it to communicate with each other but for whom it is not their native language.

    Early findings from the VOICE corpus tentatively identify a number of features which point to systematic lexicogrammatical differences between native-speaker English and ELF, for example dropping the third person present tense ‘s’ (e.g. she wear), omitting definite and indefinite articles, insertion of prepositions (e.g. can we discuss about this issue). These features are not a threat to comprehension, as they involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate. However, Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF. 

    The work of Jenkins (1996, 2000, 2004, 2005) has also been very influential in relation to the teaching of pronunciation for ELF. Her research finds that a number of items common to most native-speaker varieties of English were not necessary in successful ELF interactions; for example, the substitution of voiceless and voiced th with /t/ or /s/ and /d/ or /z/ (e.g. think became sink or tink, and this became dis or zis). Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.

    Problems may arise in the (perhaps unfair) equation between a reduced or ‘stripped down’ ELF syllabus and an impoverished experience of the L2. Indeed, it could be argued that learners of any language always end up producing less than the input they are exposed to, and that if that input itself is deliberately restricted, then even less will be the outcome.


(O’KEEFFE, A., MCCARTHY, M. & CARTER, R. From corpus to classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. Adaptado)
The VOICE has identified the insertion of prepositions as an emerging pattern in ELF. An example of such a linguistic deviation is found in alternative
Alternativas
Q3235086
Inglês Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects , Pronúncia e Som | Pronunciation and Sound ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235086 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


ELF: English as a lingua franca


    The Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English (VOICE), a collection of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) currently under construction, defines lingua franca as an additionally acquired language system that serves as a means of communication for speakers from different speech communities, who use it to communicate with each other but for whom it is not their native language.

    Early findings from the VOICE corpus tentatively identify a number of features which point to systematic lexicogrammatical differences between native-speaker English and ELF, for example dropping the third person present tense ‘s’ (e.g. she wear), omitting definite and indefinite articles, insertion of prepositions (e.g. can we discuss about this issue). These features are not a threat to comprehension, as they involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate. However, Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF. 

    The work of Jenkins (1996, 2000, 2004, 2005) has also been very influential in relation to the teaching of pronunciation for ELF. Her research finds that a number of items common to most native-speaker varieties of English were not necessary in successful ELF interactions; for example, the substitution of voiceless and voiced th with /t/ or /s/ and /d/ or /z/ (e.g. think became sink or tink, and this became dis or zis). Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.

    Problems may arise in the (perhaps unfair) equation between a reduced or ‘stripped down’ ELF syllabus and an impoverished experience of the L2. Indeed, it could be argued that learners of any language always end up producing less than the input they are exposed to, and that if that input itself is deliberately restricted, then even less will be the outcome.


(O’KEEFFE, A., MCCARTHY, M. & CARTER, R. From corpus to classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. Adaptado)
Das palavras a seguir, retiradas do texto, assinale aquela em que as vogais /ea/ em negrito possuem a mesma pronúncia encontrada na palavra feature.
Alternativas
Q3235085
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235085 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


ELF: English as a lingua franca


    The Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English (VOICE), a collection of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) currently under construction, defines lingua franca as an additionally acquired language system that serves as a means of communication for speakers from different speech communities, who use it to communicate with each other but for whom it is not their native language.

    Early findings from the VOICE corpus tentatively identify a number of features which point to systematic lexicogrammatical differences between native-speaker English and ELF, for example dropping the third person present tense ‘s’ (e.g. she wear), omitting definite and indefinite articles, insertion of prepositions (e.g. can we discuss about this issue). These features are not a threat to comprehension, as they involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate. However, Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF. 

    The work of Jenkins (1996, 2000, 2004, 2005) has also been very influential in relation to the teaching of pronunciation for ELF. Her research finds that a number of items common to most native-speaker varieties of English were not necessary in successful ELF interactions; for example, the substitution of voiceless and voiced th with /t/ or /s/ and /d/ or /z/ (e.g. think became sink or tink, and this became dis or zis). Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.

    Problems may arise in the (perhaps unfair) equation between a reduced or ‘stripped down’ ELF syllabus and an impoverished experience of the L2. Indeed, it could be argued that learners of any language always end up producing less than the input they are exposed to, and that if that input itself is deliberately restricted, then even less will be the outcome.


(O’KEEFFE, A., MCCARTHY, M. & CARTER, R. From corpus to classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. Adaptado)
Depreende-se das visões de Seidlhofer (2004) e Jenkins (2005), no segundo e terceiro parágrafos, e das posições da BNCC sobre a aprendizagem de inglês na escola brasileira, que uma frase como “She wear a blue uniform for school”, se pronunciada por um aprendiz brasileiro do ensino fundamental,
Alternativas
Q3235084
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235084 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


ELF: English as a lingua franca


    The Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English (VOICE), a collection of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) currently under construction, defines lingua franca as an additionally acquired language system that serves as a means of communication for speakers from different speech communities, who use it to communicate with each other but for whom it is not their native language.

    Early findings from the VOICE corpus tentatively identify a number of features which point to systematic lexicogrammatical differences between native-speaker English and ELF, for example dropping the third person present tense ‘s’ (e.g. she wear), omitting definite and indefinite articles, insertion of prepositions (e.g. can we discuss about this issue). These features are not a threat to comprehension, as they involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate. However, Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF. 

    The work of Jenkins (1996, 2000, 2004, 2005) has also been very influential in relation to the teaching of pronunciation for ELF. Her research finds that a number of items common to most native-speaker varieties of English were not necessary in successful ELF interactions; for example, the substitution of voiceless and voiced th with /t/ or /s/ and /d/ or /z/ (e.g. think became sink or tink, and this became dis or zis). Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.

    Problems may arise in the (perhaps unfair) equation between a reduced or ‘stripped down’ ELF syllabus and an impoverished experience of the L2. Indeed, it could be argued that learners of any language always end up producing less than the input they are exposed to, and that if that input itself is deliberately restricted, then even less will be the outcome.


(O’KEEFFE, A., MCCARTHY, M. & CARTER, R. From corpus to classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. Adaptado)
Read the two quotations by two researchers, commenting on some lexico-grammatical features of English as a lingua franca:

    “Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF.” (paragraph 2)
    “Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.” (paragraph 3)

From the two statements it is possible to understand that, in the teaching of English as a língua franca, a central issue concerning learners’ production of the English language is
Alternativas
Q3235083
Inglês Sinônimos | Synonyms ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235083 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


ELF: English as a lingua franca


    The Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English (VOICE), a collection of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) currently under construction, defines lingua franca as an additionally acquired language system that serves as a means of communication for speakers from different speech communities, who use it to communicate with each other but for whom it is not their native language.

    Early findings from the VOICE corpus tentatively identify a number of features which point to systematic lexicogrammatical differences between native-speaker English and ELF, for example dropping the third person present tense ‘s’ (e.g. she wear), omitting definite and indefinite articles, insertion of prepositions (e.g. can we discuss about this issue). These features are not a threat to comprehension, as they involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate. However, Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF. 

    The work of Jenkins (1996, 2000, 2004, 2005) has also been very influential in relation to the teaching of pronunciation for ELF. Her research finds that a number of items common to most native-speaker varieties of English were not necessary in successful ELF interactions; for example, the substitution of voiceless and voiced th with /t/ or /s/ and /d/ or /z/ (e.g. think became sink or tink, and this became dis or zis). Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.

    Problems may arise in the (perhaps unfair) equation between a reduced or ‘stripped down’ ELF syllabus and an impoverished experience of the L2. Indeed, it could be argued that learners of any language always end up producing less than the input they are exposed to, and that if that input itself is deliberately restricted, then even less will be the outcome.


(O’KEEFFE, A., MCCARTHY, M. & CARTER, R. From corpus to classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. Adaptado)
Na frase do segundo parágrafo “These features often involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate”, a palavra em negrito pode ser corretamente substituída por: 
Alternativas
Q3235082
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235082 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


ELF: English as a lingua franca


    The Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English (VOICE), a collection of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) currently under construction, defines lingua franca as an additionally acquired language system that serves as a means of communication for speakers from different speech communities, who use it to communicate with each other but for whom it is not their native language.

    Early findings from the VOICE corpus tentatively identify a number of features which point to systematic lexicogrammatical differences between native-speaker English and ELF, for example dropping the third person present tense ‘s’ (e.g. she wear), omitting definite and indefinite articles, insertion of prepositions (e.g. can we discuss about this issue). These features are not a threat to comprehension, as they involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate. However, Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF. 

    The work of Jenkins (1996, 2000, 2004, 2005) has also been very influential in relation to the teaching of pronunciation for ELF. Her research finds that a number of items common to most native-speaker varieties of English were not necessary in successful ELF interactions; for example, the substitution of voiceless and voiced th with /t/ or /s/ and /d/ or /z/ (e.g. think became sink or tink, and this became dis or zis). Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.

    Problems may arise in the (perhaps unfair) equation between a reduced or ‘stripped down’ ELF syllabus and an impoverished experience of the L2. Indeed, it could be argued that learners of any language always end up producing less than the input they are exposed to, and that if that input itself is deliberately restricted, then even less will be the outcome.


(O’KEEFFE, A., MCCARTHY, M. & CARTER, R. From corpus to classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. Adaptado)
English as a lingua franca can be differentiated from other languages or from other varieties of English in that it
Alternativas
Q3235081
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235081 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    Practice often receives an unfair treatment in the field of applied linguistics. Most laypeople simply assume that practice is a necessary condition for language learning without giving the concept much further thought, but many applied linguists deliberately avoid the term practice. For some, the word conjures up images of repetitive drills in the factories of foreign language learning, while for others it means fun and games to entertain students on Friday afternoons.

    Practice is by no means a dirty word in other domains of human endeavor, however. Parents dutifully take their kids to soccer practice, and professional athletes dutifully show up for team practice, sometimes even with recent injuries. Parents make their kids practice their piano skills at home, and the world’s most famous performers of classical music often practice for many hours a day, even if it makes their fingers hurt. If even idolized, spoiled, and highly paid celebrities are willing to put up with practice, why not language learners, teachers, or researchers?


(DEKEYSER, Robert. Practice in a second language. Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge, 2007. Adaptado)
In the context of the second paragraph, the extract “Parents dutifully take their kids to soccer practice, and professional athletes dutifully show up for team practice, sometimes even with recent injuries. Parents make their kids practice their piano skills at home, and the world’s most famous performers of classical music often practice for many hours a day, even if it makes their fingers hurt” aims at
Alternativas
Q3235080
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235080 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    Practice often receives an unfair treatment in the field of applied linguistics. Most laypeople simply assume that practice is a necessary condition for language learning without giving the concept much further thought, but many applied linguists deliberately avoid the term practice. For some, the word conjures up images of repetitive drills in the factories of foreign language learning, while for others it means fun and games to entertain students on Friday afternoons.

    Practice is by no means a dirty word in other domains of human endeavor, however. Parents dutifully take their kids to soccer practice, and professional athletes dutifully show up for team practice, sometimes even with recent injuries. Parents make their kids practice their piano skills at home, and the world’s most famous performers of classical music often practice for many hours a day, even if it makes their fingers hurt. If even idolized, spoiled, and highly paid celebrities are willing to put up with practice, why not language learners, teachers, or researchers?


(DEKEYSER, Robert. Practice in a second language. Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge, 2007. Adaptado)
In communicative language teaching (CLT), practice
Alternativas
Q3235079
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235079 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    Practice often receives an unfair treatment in the field of applied linguistics. Most laypeople simply assume that practice is a necessary condition for language learning without giving the concept much further thought, but many applied linguists deliberately avoid the term practice. For some, the word conjures up images of repetitive drills in the factories of foreign language learning, while for others it means fun and games to entertain students on Friday afternoons.

    Practice is by no means a dirty word in other domains of human endeavor, however. Parents dutifully take their kids to soccer practice, and professional athletes dutifully show up for team practice, sometimes even with recent injuries. Parents make their kids practice their piano skills at home, and the world’s most famous performers of classical music often practice for many hours a day, even if it makes their fingers hurt. If even idolized, spoiled, and highly paid celebrities are willing to put up with practice, why not language learners, teachers, or researchers?


(DEKEYSER, Robert. Practice in a second language. Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge, 2007. Adaptado)
“Images of repetitive drills in the factories of foreign language learning” (paragraph 1) can be most closely associated to
Alternativas
Q3235078
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Prova: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3235078 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    Practice often receives an unfair treatment in the field of applied linguistics. Most laypeople simply assume that practice is a necessary condition for language learning without giving the concept much further thought, but many applied linguists deliberately avoid the term practice. For some, the word conjures up images of repetitive drills in the factories of foreign language learning, while for others it means fun and games to entertain students on Friday afternoons.

    Practice is by no means a dirty word in other domains of human endeavor, however. Parents dutifully take their kids to soccer practice, and professional athletes dutifully show up for team practice, sometimes even with recent injuries. Parents make their kids practice their piano skills at home, and the world’s most famous performers of classical music often practice for many hours a day, even if it makes their fingers hurt. If even idolized, spoiled, and highly paid celebrities are willing to put up with practice, why not language learners, teachers, or researchers?


(DEKEYSER, Robert. Practice in a second language. Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge, 2007. Adaptado)
The first paragraph depicts the topic of “practice” in language learning as
Alternativas
Q3233828
Pedagogia Legislação da Educação , Plano Nacional de Educação (PNE) – Leis e seus objetivos ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Provas: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Artes | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Educação Física | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Especial | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3233828 Pedagogia
De acordo com a Lei no 13.005/2014 (Aprova o Plano Nacional de Educação – PNE e dá outras providências), a “promoção do princípio da gestão democrática da educação pública” e a “promoção humanística, científica, cultural e tecnológica do País” são
Alternativas
Q3233827
Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência - Lei nº 13.146 de 2015 Direitos Fundamentais no Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência , Direito à Educação , Acesso à Justiça à Pessoa com Deficiência ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Provas: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Artes | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Educação Física | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Especial | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3233827 Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência - Lei nº 13.146 de 2015
O artigo 28 da Lei no 13.146/2015 (Estatuto da pessoa com deficiência) estabelece algumas incumbências ao poder público. Uma delas busca especificamente “ampliar habilidades funcionais dos estudantes, promovendo sua autonomia e participação” por meio de
Alternativas
Q3233826
Pedagogia Legislação da Educação , Lei nº 9.394 de 1996 - Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional (LDBEN) e suas alterações ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Provas: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Artes | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Educação Física | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Especial | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3233826 Pedagogia
De acordo com o §2o do artigo 37 da Lei no 9.394/96 (Estabelece as diretrizes e bases da educação nacional), o Poder Público, no âmbito da educação de jovens e adultos, viabilizará e estimulará 
Alternativas
Q3233825
Pedagogia Principais Autores , Vygotsky ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: VUNESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP Provas: VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Artes | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Educação Física | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Especial | VUNESP - 2025 - Prefeitura de Itapevi - SP - Professor Educação Básica II - Inglês |
Q3233825 Pedagogia
Ivic (2010) afirma que “a sociabilidade da criança é o ponto de partida de suas interações sociais com o entorno”. O autor destaca como ponto essencial da concepção Vygotskyana o papel construtivo no desenvolvimento atribuído à interação social. Esse aspecto diz respeito à tese central de Vygotsky sobre 
Alternativas
Respostas
5061: C
5062: C
5063: E
5064: E
5065: B
5066: D
5067: B
5068: E
5069: D
5070: C
5071: A
5072: A
5073: B
5074: C
5075: E
5076: A
5077: A
5078: B
5079: E
5080: A
www.qconcursos.com