Questões de Concurso
Para cespe / cebraspe
Foram encontradas 364.527 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
A política externa da União Europeia (UE) e as relações desse bloco com o Brasil são importantes para a diplomacia brasileira, como mostra a recente negociação e assinatura do Acordo MERCOSUL-UE. Considerando os diversos aspectos desse assunto, julgue o item subsequente.
As salvaguardas previstas pelo Parlamento Europeu e pelo Conselho Europeu para produtos agropecuários e agroindustriais vinculados ao Acordo Provisório de Comércio entre MERCOSUL e UE, conforme indicação da Comissão Europeia, estabelecem, do ponto de vista do arcabouço normativo interno da UE, mecanismo de proteção a esses produtos com gatilhos de investigação com parâmetros próprios e restritivos, bem como monitoramento específico e ritos especiais, de maneira independente dos mecanismos previstos no âmbito do acordo.
Considerando a relevância da política externa dos EUA para o sistema internacional contemporâneo, julgue o próximo item.
Os acordos realizados pelos EUA com diferentes parceiros após a imposição das chamadas tarifas recíprocas, desde 2025, foram avaliados como formas de reforçar, no comércio e nos investimentos, o princípio da nação mais favorecida, defendido pelo Brasil ao longo de sua história diplomática.
Considerando a relevância da política externa dos EUA para o sistema internacional contemporâneo, julgue o próximo item.
A recente decisão da Suprema Corte dos EUA sobre as tarifas impostas desde 2025 pelo governo Donald Trump com base no Ato de Poderes Econômicos de Emergência Internacional, de 1977, foi logo seguida de edição de Ordem Executiva que impunha tarifas globais de 10% em substituição às tarifas anteriores.
Considerando a relevância da política externa dos EUA para o sistema internacional contemporâneo, julgue o próximo item.
A investigação, pelos EUA, contra o Brasil com base na Seção 232 da Lei de Expansão do Comércio de 1962 pode atingir a economia brasileira especificamente quanto ao mercado de etanol e à propriedade intelectual, além dos meios de pagamentos, em razão, por exemplo, da adoção do PIX.
Considerando a relevância da política externa dos EUA para o sistema internacional contemporâneo, julgue o próximo item.
O denominado corolário Trump à Doutrina Monroe flexibiliza a influência dos EUA sobre seu entorno estratégico no hemisfério e prioriza o estabelecimento de parcerias com economias de diferentes regiões do globo.
Sabendo que a Eurásia é importante para as relações internacionais, com implicações para a inserção das nações pelo globo, julgue o item a seguir.
Com destacada importância de China e Rússia em uma iniciativa eurasiática, a Organização para a Cooperação de Xangai visa fortalecer a confiança mútua, a amizade e a boa vizinhança entre seus Estados-membros e incentivar a cooperação em áreas como política, comércio, economia, ciência e tecnologia, cultura, educação, energia, transporte, turismo, proteção ambiental, além de garantir e manter conjuntamente a paz, a segurança e a estabilidade na região e promover uma nova ordem política e econômica internacional democrática, justa e racional.
Sabendo que a Eurásia é importante para as relações internacionais, com implicações para a inserção das nações pelo globo, julgue o item a seguir.
A Iniciativa da Civilização Global (ICG) apresentada em 2023 pela China pretende acelerar a implementação da Agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável, constituindo tema importante para o Brasil, que trabalha conjuntamente com esse país na busca de um desenvolvimento global mais robusto, sustentável e equilibrado, "sem deixar ninguém para trás".
Sabendo que a Eurásia é importante para as relações internacionais, com implicações para a inserção das nações pelo globo, julgue o item a seguir.
A Iniciativa de Governança Global, lançada pela China em 2025, almeja reforçar a centralidade do sistema ONU, destacando pilares como a igualdade soberana para a participação dos países nos assuntos globais; o Estado de direito internacional para um sistema de governança global justo e ordenado; o multilateralismo para maior solidariedade e cooperação entre todos os países; uma abordagem centrada nas pessoas para resultados universalmente benéficos e inclusivos; e resultados concretos para um processo de governança global pragmático e eficiente.
A respeito das diversas teorias e conceitos das relações internacionais e de aspectos da política externa brasileira, julgue o item seguinte.
Na discussão sobre hegemonia em relações internacionais, autores como Robert Cox destacam o consenso e a legitimidade por meio de ideias e valores, a exemplo do livre comércio, além do papel da coerção.
A respeito das diversas teorias e conceitos das relações internacionais e de aspectos da política externa brasileira, julgue o item seguinte.
A busca por recursos, mercados e influência em diversos territórios pode ser associada ao conceito de imperialismo, presente na formulação de diversos autores, entre os quais Lênin, que ressaltava o papel da exportação de capitais no desenvolvimento desigual ao redor do globo.
A respeito das diversas teorias e conceitos das relações internacionais e de aspectos da política externa brasileira, julgue o item seguinte.
A regulamentação apropriada das chamadas big techs pode salvaguardar os direitos humanos na esfera digital, promover a integridade da informação e proteger as indústrias criativas, tema no qual o Brasil se engajou, apoiando a iniciativa da China sobre a criação de uma Organização Internacional para Cooperação em Inteligência Artificial com foco nos países em desenvolvimento, bem como a Parceria Global em Inteligência Artificial no G7 e o Pacto Digital Global de 2024.
A respeito das diversas teorias e conceitos das relações internacionais e de aspectos da política externa brasileira, julgue o item seguinte.
Autores associados ao realismo ofensivo salientam a geopolítica e o problema da segurança e da disputa econômica no sistema anárquico internacional, no qual há constante busca por hegemonia e por contenção de potências emergentes.
The claim to reason or rationality is the ultimate validation of the affirmation and assertion of the human condition. Aristotle’s definition of man as "a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and the Amerindian. Little did he realise that his definition of "man" laid down the foundation for the struggle for reason between colonialists and colonized peoples.
Aristotle’s definition of man was deeply inscribed in the social ethos of those communities and societies which undertook the so-called voyages of discovery apparently driven by innocent curiosity. It seems then that the entire process of decolonisation has upheld and not jettisoned the questionable belief that "man is a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and of the Amerindian.
The term African philosophy renders the idea that history repeats itself easy to believe. The term tends to revive innate skepticism on the one hand and to stimulate ingrained condescension on the other. The skeptic, unswervingly committed to the will to remain ignorant, is simply dismissive of any possibility let alone the probability of African philosophy. Impelled by the will to dominate, the condescendor is often ready to entertain the probability of African philosophy provided the judgement pertaining to the experience, knowledge and truth about African philosophy is recognised as the sole and exclusive right of the condescendor. The self-appointed heirs to the right to reason have thus established themselves as the producers of all knowledge and the only holders of the truth.
Mogobe B. Ramose. African philosophy through Ubuntu.
Harare, Zimbabwe: Mond Books Publishers, 2005, pp. 5-6 (adapted).
Considering the preceding text, judge the following item.
The text can be correctly understood as a criticism of the attitude of the colonizers towards knowledge originally produced or found in non-white cultures.
The claim to reason or rationality is the ultimate validation of the affirmation and assertion of the human condition. Aristotle’s definition of man as "a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and the Amerindian. Little did he realise that his definition of "man" laid down the foundation for the struggle for reason between colonialists and colonized peoples.
Aristotle’s definition of man was deeply inscribed in the social ethos of those communities and societies which undertook the so-called voyages of discovery apparently driven by innocent curiosity. It seems then that the entire process of decolonisation has upheld and not jettisoned the questionable belief that "man is a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and of the Amerindian.
The term African philosophy renders the idea that history repeats itself easy to believe. The term tends to revive innate skepticism on the one hand and to stimulate ingrained condescension on the other. The skeptic, unswervingly committed to the will to remain ignorant, is simply dismissive of any possibility let alone the probability of African philosophy. Impelled by the will to dominate, the condescendor is often ready to entertain the probability of African philosophy provided the judgement pertaining to the experience, knowledge and truth about African philosophy is recognised as the sole and exclusive right of the condescendor. The self-appointed heirs to the right to reason have thus established themselves as the producers of all knowledge and the only holders of the truth.
Mogobe B. Ramose. African philosophy through Ubuntu.
Harare, Zimbabwe: Mond Books Publishers, 2005, pp. 5-6 (adapted).
Considering the preceding text, judge the following item.
At the end of the second paragraph, if the fragment "questionable belief" were replaced with questionable beliefs, the change would require "was" to be replaced with were for the sentence to remain grammatically correct.
The claim to reason or rationality is the ultimate validation of the affirmation and assertion of the human condition. Aristotle’s definition of man as "a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and the Amerindian. Little did he realise that his definition of "man" laid down the foundation for the struggle for reason between colonialists and colonized peoples.
Aristotle’s definition of man was deeply inscribed in the social ethos of those communities and societies which undertook the so-called voyages of discovery apparently driven by innocent curiosity. It seems then that the entire process of decolonisation has upheld and not jettisoned the questionable belief that "man is a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and of the Amerindian.
The term African philosophy renders the idea that history repeats itself easy to believe. The term tends to revive innate skepticism on the one hand and to stimulate ingrained condescension on the other. The skeptic, unswervingly committed to the will to remain ignorant, is simply dismissive of any possibility let alone the probability of African philosophy. Impelled by the will to dominate, the condescendor is often ready to entertain the probability of African philosophy provided the judgement pertaining to the experience, knowledge and truth about African philosophy is recognised as the sole and exclusive right of the condescendor. The self-appointed heirs to the right to reason have thus established themselves as the producers of all knowledge and the only holders of the truth.
Mogobe B. Ramose. African philosophy through Ubuntu.
Harare, Zimbabwe: Mond Books Publishers, 2005, pp. 5-6 (adapted).
Considering the preceding text, judge the following item.
In the third sentence of the first paragraph, the fragment "Little did he realise" emphasizes the fact that Aristotle had no idea of the consequences of his definition of "man".
The claim to reason or rationality is the ultimate validation of the affirmation and assertion of the human condition. Aristotle’s definition of man as "a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and the Amerindian. Little did he realise that his definition of "man" laid down the foundation for the struggle for reason between colonialists and colonized peoples.
Aristotle’s definition of man was deeply inscribed in the social ethos of those communities and societies which undertook the so-called voyages of discovery apparently driven by innocent curiosity. It seems then that the entire process of decolonisation has upheld and not jettisoned the questionable belief that "man is a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and of the Amerindian.
The term African philosophy renders the idea that history repeats itself easy to believe. The term tends to revive innate skepticism on the one hand and to stimulate ingrained condescension on the other. The skeptic, unswervingly committed to the will to remain ignorant, is simply dismissive of any possibility let alone the probability of African philosophy. Impelled by the will to dominate, the condescendor is often ready to entertain the probability of African philosophy provided the judgement pertaining to the experience, knowledge and truth about African philosophy is recognised as the sole and exclusive right of the condescendor. The self-appointed heirs to the right to reason have thus established themselves as the producers of all knowledge and the only holders of the truth.
Mogobe B. Ramose. African philosophy through Ubuntu.
Harare, Zimbabwe: Mond Books Publishers, 2005, pp. 5-6 (adapted).
Considering the preceding text, judge the following item.
Due to the grammatical function the pronoun "which" has in the first sentence of the second paragraph, it would be grammatically correct to add a comma after "societies".
The claim to reason or rationality is the ultimate validation of the affirmation and assertion of the human condition. Aristotle’s definition of man as "a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and the Amerindian. Little did he realise that his definition of "man" laid down the foundation for the struggle for reason between colonialists and colonized peoples.
Aristotle’s definition of man was deeply inscribed in the social ethos of those communities and societies which undertook the so-called voyages of discovery apparently driven by innocent curiosity. It seems then that the entire process of decolonisation has upheld and not jettisoned the questionable belief that "man is a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and of the Amerindian.
The term African philosophy renders the idea that history repeats itself easy to believe. The term tends to revive innate skepticism on the one hand and to stimulate ingrained condescension on the other. The skeptic, unswervingly committed to the will to remain ignorant, is simply dismissive of any possibility let alone the probability of African philosophy. Impelled by the will to dominate, the condescendor is often ready to entertain the probability of African philosophy provided the judgement pertaining to the experience, knowledge and truth about African philosophy is recognised as the sole and exclusive right of the condescendor. The self-appointed heirs to the right to reason have thus established themselves as the producers of all knowledge and the only holders of the truth.
Mogobe B. Ramose. African philosophy through Ubuntu.
Harare, Zimbabwe: Mond Books Publishers, 2005, pp. 5-6 (adapted).
Considering the preceding text, judge the following item.
The third sentence of the last paragraph has a similar meaning to Those who are skeptic and who have an unremitting desire to remain ignorant play down the idea that there could be an African philosophy.
In 1977, during his first official visit abroad as President of the United States, Jimmy Carter was betrayed by the language barrier and the choices of his translator. In the course of meeting his Polish counterpart, Edward Gierek, the translator was on hand to provide a translation of his president’s words into Polish. Unfortunately, his translations could, perhaps, have not been farther from the truth of what Carter said.
Announcing that he was extremely glad to be in Poland for his first trip abroad, the translator somehow managed to mistranslate the friendly statement into the announcement of seeming defection by the American President, turning "I left the United States this morning" into "I left the United States, never to return". Furthermore, Carter’s warm statement of his visit to the nation was bizarrely mistranslated into the comment that President Carter "was happy to grasp at Poland’s private parts". Following up this colossal mistake, the interpreter then successively translated Carter’s expression of a hope to learn more about the Polish people’s "desires for the future" into "I desire the Poles carnally". Adding insult to injury, during Carter’s toast at a state banquet later during the same trip, a different interpreter providing a translation could not understand the American President’s Georgia accent and consequently chose to simply not translate his words at all rather than offer an inaccurate depiction. In hindsight, the latter interpreter opted for the better path in the face of confusion.
17 Mishandled International Events Throughout History.
Internet: <historycollection.com> (adapted).
About the previous text, judge the item bellow.
It would be acceptable to infer from the text that the first translator it mentioned was an American rather than a Polish citizen.
In 1977, during his first official visit abroad as President of the United States, Jimmy Carter was betrayed by the language barrier and the choices of his translator. In the course of meeting his Polish counterpart, Edward Gierek, the translator was on hand to provide a translation of his president’s words into Polish. Unfortunately, his translations could, perhaps, have not been farther from the truth of what Carter said.
Announcing that he was extremely glad to be in Poland for his first trip abroad, the translator somehow managed to mistranslate the friendly statement into the announcement of seeming defection by the American President, turning "I left the United States this morning" into "I left the United States, never to return". Furthermore, Carter’s warm statement of his visit to the nation was bizarrely mistranslated into the comment that President Carter "was happy to grasp at Poland’s private parts". Following up this colossal mistake, the interpreter then successively translated Carter’s expression of a hope to learn more about the Polish people’s "desires for the future" into "I desire the Poles carnally". Adding insult to injury, during Carter’s toast at a state banquet later during the same trip, a different interpreter providing a translation could not understand the American President’s Georgia accent and consequently chose to simply not translate his words at all rather than offer an inaccurate depiction. In hindsight, the latter interpreter opted for the better path in the face of confusion.
17 Mishandled International Events Throughout History.
Internet: <historycollection.com> (adapted).
About the previous text, judge the item bellow.
With the expression "Adding insult to injury" (fourth sentence of the second paragraph), the author suggests that Carter took the first translator’s mistakes as a case of injury.
In 1977, during his first official visit abroad as President of the United States, Jimmy Carter was betrayed by the language barrier and the choices of his translator. In the course of meeting his Polish counterpart, Edward Gierek, the translator was on hand to provide a translation of his president’s words into Polish. Unfortunately, his translations could, perhaps, have not been farther from the truth of what Carter said.
Announcing that he was extremely glad to be in Poland for his first trip abroad, the translator somehow managed to mistranslate the friendly statement into the announcement of seeming defection by the American President, turning "I left the United States this morning" into "I left the United States, never to return". Furthermore, Carter’s warm statement of his visit to the nation was bizarrely mistranslated into the comment that President Carter "was happy to grasp at Poland’s private parts". Following up this colossal mistake, the interpreter then successively translated Carter’s expression of a hope to learn more about the Polish people’s "desires for the future" into "I desire the Poles carnally". Adding insult to injury, during Carter’s toast at a state banquet later during the same trip, a different interpreter providing a translation could not understand the American President’s Georgia accent and consequently chose to simply not translate his words at all rather than offer an inaccurate depiction. In hindsight, the latter interpreter opted for the better path in the face of confusion.
17 Mishandled International Events Throughout History.
Internet: <historycollection.com> (adapted).
About the previous text, judge the item bellow.
The meaning of the fourth sentence of the second paragraph would remain the same if "could not" were replaced with failed to as long as "chose" were also replaced with to choose.
Conheça nossos planos