Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês

Foram encontradas 25.289 questões

Q3790628 Inglês
Em narrativas contemporâneas, a fusão entre voz narrativa e consciência da personagem, sem marcas explícitas de citação, caracteriza: 
Alternativas
Q3790627 Inglês
Considere o enunciado:
The policy will significantly reshape how teachers evaluate multimodal assignments.
O advérbio significantly tem escopo sobre: 
Alternativas
Q3790626 Inglês
No período She revised the draft thoroughly, whereas the committee moved on without further discussion, a conjunção whereas estabelece relação de:  
Alternativas
Q3790625 Inglês
Assinale a alternativa em que a preposição responde adequadamente às restrições lexicais do verbo:  
Alternativas
Q3790624 Inglês
Considere a frase: The teacher’s mentors’ feedback was incorporated into the final proposal. A construção indica:
Alternativas
Q3790623 Inglês
No contexto de um relatório acadêmico sobre evasão escolar, o enunciado Researchers are still trying to pin down the variables that intensify dropout rates emprega pin down com o sentido de:  
Alternativas
Q3790622 Inglês
Ao analisar a frase By next semester, the school will have been implementing the new curriculum for two years, o professor deve reconhecer que o tempo verbal expressa: 
Alternativas
Q3790621 Inglês
Em um texto regulatório, a sentença Teachers must report any incident within 24 hours expressa: 
Alternativas
Q3790620 Inglês
Leia o trecho:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:  
Alternativas
Q3790619 Inglês
Um texto produzido por uma ONG internacional combina: (1) dados estatísticos, (2) depoimentos de comunidades vulneráveis, (3) infográficos interativos e (4) recomendações políticas dirigidas a governos. A classificação adequada, considerando função social e composição discursiva, é: 
Alternativas
Q3790616 Inglês
Considerando que a BNCC concebe o inglês como prática de linguagem atravessada por multiletramentos, assinale a alternativa que melhor traduz essa concepção, entendendo-a como articulação entre repertórios culturais, modos de significação e participação social.  
Alternativas
Q3790615 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
In the third paragraph, the author suggests that AI invites us to confront, with uncomfortable clarity, the parts of ourselves we outsource. Considering the metaphorical structure and the argumentative movement of the text as a whole, the most accurate interpretation is that this statement: 
Alternativas
Q3790614 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
From a global reading of the text, one may infer that the author views the human–AI relationship as:  
Alternativas
Q3790613 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
Which interpretation most closely aligns with the central argument of the final paragraph?  
Alternativas
Q3790612 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
In the third paragraph, the author states that AI mirrors human beings. In context, this metaphor implies that:  
Alternativas
Q3790611 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
Considering the author’s portrayal of AI as a force that subtly rearranges human habits, choose the option that best captures the paradox suggested in the second paragraph regarding autonomy and decision-making. 
Alternativas
Q3790092 Inglês
An Adverb Phrase (AdvP) consists of an adverb acting as the head, potentially accompanied by pre-modifiers and post-modifiers that qualify or intensify its meaning within the clause. Select the option where the underlined section constitutes a complete Adverb Phrase functioning as a pre-modifier of an adjective.
Alternativas
Q3790091 Inglês
Genre analysis in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) involves understanding the communicative purposes, schematic structures, and linguistic features specific to discourse communities. Regarding the characteristics of the "Academic Abstract" genre, mark T for true and F for false:

(__) An academic abstract typically follows the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) in a condensed form to provide a comprehensive overview of the study.
(__) The primary communicative purpose of an abstract is to persuade the reader to buy the product described in the text, using informal language and slang.
(__) Linguistic features of abstracts often include the use of the present perfect tense to refer to past research (Gap) and the simple past to describe the specific methods used in the current study.
(__) Abstracts are characterized by a high lexical density and nominalization, allowing for the packing of complex information into a limited word count.

After analysis, select the alternative that presents the correct sequence of the items above, from top to bottom:
Alternativas
Q3790090 Inglês
In the context of descriptive writing, the "Royal Order of Adjectives" dictates the cumulative sequence of multiple adjectives modifying a single head noun to ensure naturalness and cohesion. Considering a sentence that describes a specific artifact found in a museum, choose the alternative that correctly orders the adjectives according to the standard grammatical hierarchy (Opinion-Size-Age-Shape-Color-Origin-Material).
Alternativas
Q3790089 Inglês
The Noun Phrase (NP) can be expanded through pre-modification and post-modification, allowing for the packing of dense information characteristic of academic registers. Choose the option that correctly identifies the Head Noun and its Post-modifier in the sentence: "The proposal submitted by the committee was rejected."
Alternativas
Respostas
2341: B
2342: A
2343: C
2344: A
2345: B
2346: C
2347: D
2348: C
2349: C
2350: A
2351: B
2352: B
2353: D
2354: C
2355: A
2356: B
2357: D
2358: C
2359: B
2360: B