Questões de Vestibular Sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 6.336 questões
Q1263777
Inglês
From the lists presented below, select the only one
that has a sequence of different kinds of meat:
Q1263254
Inglês
Texto associado
Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer
industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since
the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in
Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are
also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per
year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times
more beer than the average German brewery.
This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local
brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is
consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of
scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit
for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny
German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies.
The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to
compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer.
Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what
American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to
Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect
gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on
the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories
with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale).
(Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)
According to the text, why does Germany export so little beer to the U.S.?
Q1263253
Inglês
Texto associado
Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer
industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since
the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in
Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are
also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per
year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times
more beer than the average German brewery.
This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local
brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is
consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of
scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit
for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny
German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies.
The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to
compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer.
Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what
American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to
Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect
gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on
the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories
with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale).
(Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)
How does Germany protect its beer industry, according to the text?
Q1263252
Inglês
Texto associado
Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer
industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since
the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in
Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are
also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per
year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times
more beer than the average German brewery.
This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local
brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is
consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of
scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit
for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny
German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies.
The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to
compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer.
Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what
American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to
Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect
gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on
the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories
with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale).
(Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)
Which of these statements DOES NOT CORRESPOND to information given in the text?
Q1263251
Inglês
Texto associado
Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer
industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since
the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in
Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are
also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per
year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times
more beer than the average German brewery.
This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local
brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is
consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of
scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit
for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny
German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies.
The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to
compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer.
Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what
American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to
Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect
gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on
the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories
with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale).
(Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)
Are the statements true (T) or false (F), according to the text?
( ) The United States produces less beer than Germany. ( ) The German steel industry is better organized than the German beer industry. ( ) The German metalworking industry is more productive than the American metalworking industry. ( ) In Germany there are more factories producing beer than in the United States. ( ) 43% of the beer sold in the United States is produced in Germany.
Mark the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
( ) The United States produces less beer than Germany. ( ) The German steel industry is better organized than the German beer industry. ( ) The German metalworking industry is more productive than the American metalworking industry. ( ) In Germany there are more factories producing beer than in the United States. ( ) 43% of the beer sold in the United States is produced in Germany.
Mark the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Q1263250
Inglês
Texto associado
Lucy’s Big Brother Reveals New Facets of her Species
First came Lucy. Then came Lucy’s baby, an infant of her species. Now comes Lucy’s “big brother”: the partial skeleton of a
large male of Australopithecus afarensis, unveiled this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The roughly
40% complete skeleton has been nicknamed Kadanuumuu, which means “big man” in the Afar language of the Afar Depression of
Ethiopia, where it was found. “It was huge – a big man, with long legs”, says lead author Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a
palaeoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio.
Dated to 3.6 million years ago, the new skeleton is almost half a million years older than Lucy and the second oldest
skeleton found of a possible human ancestor. It had long legs and a torso and a pelvis more like those of a modern human than an
African ape, showing that fully upright walking was in place at this early date, Haile-Selassie says. Although headless, the skeleton
also preserves parts not found before in Lucy’s species. “It is important because it provides the ribs and scapula”, says
palaeoanthropologist Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, Columbia.
In 2005, a sharp-eyed member of Haile-Selassie’s team, Alemayehu Asfaw, spotted a fragment of lower arm bone on the
ground at Woranso-Mille, about 48 kilometers north of Lucy’s grave at Hadar. Over the next 4 years, the team unearthed the
shoulder blade, collarbone, ribs, and neck vertebra, the first time those bones were found together in an A. afarensis adult. The
team also found a pelvis, an arm, and leg bones. Although they never found the skull or teeth, which are typically used to assign
species, the skeleton’s age and similarity to Lucy suggest that it belongs to her species, says co-author Owen Lovejoy of Kent State
University in Ohio.
The robust male stood between 1.5 and 1.7 meters tall, about 30% larger than Lucy. Isolated bones of other individuals
suggest that some males were even larger, so the new skeleton doesn’t settle a long-standing debate over just how much sexual
dimorphism there was in A. afarensis, Lovejoy says. The shoulder blade looks more like that of a gorilla and a modern human than
that of a chimpanzee. The curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib cage at the top and a barrel shape overall, similar to that
of modern humans and distinct from the more funnel-shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee, the authors say.
(Science Magazine, 25 June 2010.)
Why do palaeoanthropologists believe the skeleton may be a human ancestor?
Q1263249
Inglês
Texto associado
Lucy’s Big Brother Reveals New Facets of her Species
First came Lucy. Then came Lucy’s baby, an infant of her species. Now comes Lucy’s “big brother”: the partial skeleton of a
large male of Australopithecus afarensis, unveiled this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The roughly
40% complete skeleton has been nicknamed Kadanuumuu, which means “big man” in the Afar language of the Afar Depression of
Ethiopia, where it was found. “It was huge – a big man, with long legs”, says lead author Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a
palaeoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio.
Dated to 3.6 million years ago, the new skeleton is almost half a million years older than Lucy and the second oldest
skeleton found of a possible human ancestor. It had long legs and a torso and a pelvis more like those of a modern human than an
African ape, showing that fully upright walking was in place at this early date, Haile-Selassie says. Although headless, the skeleton
also preserves parts not found before in Lucy’s species. “It is important because it provides the ribs and scapula”, says
palaeoanthropologist Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, Columbia.
In 2005, a sharp-eyed member of Haile-Selassie’s team, Alemayehu Asfaw, spotted a fragment of lower arm bone on the
ground at Woranso-Mille, about 48 kilometers north of Lucy’s grave at Hadar. Over the next 4 years, the team unearthed the
shoulder blade, collarbone, ribs, and neck vertebra, the first time those bones were found together in an A. afarensis adult. The
team also found a pelvis, an arm, and leg bones. Although they never found the skull or teeth, which are typically used to assign
species, the skeleton’s age and similarity to Lucy suggest that it belongs to her species, says co-author Owen Lovejoy of Kent State
University in Ohio.
The robust male stood between 1.5 and 1.7 meters tall, about 30% larger than Lucy. Isolated bones of other individuals
suggest that some males were even larger, so the new skeleton doesn’t settle a long-standing debate over just how much sexual
dimorphism there was in A. afarensis, Lovejoy says. The shoulder blade looks more like that of a gorilla and a modern human than
that of a chimpanzee. The curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib cage at the top and a barrel shape overall, similar to that
of modern humans and distinct from the more funnel-shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee, the authors say.
(Science Magazine, 25 June 2010.)
Why do palaeoanthropologists believe the skeleton belongs to the species A. afarensis?
Q1263248
Inglês
Texto associado
Lucy’s Big Brother Reveals New Facets of her Species
First came Lucy. Then came Lucy’s baby, an infant of her species. Now comes Lucy’s “big brother”: the partial skeleton of a
large male of Australopithecus afarensis, unveiled this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The roughly
40% complete skeleton has been nicknamed Kadanuumuu, which means “big man” in the Afar language of the Afar Depression of
Ethiopia, where it was found. “It was huge – a big man, with long legs”, says lead author Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a
palaeoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio.
Dated to 3.6 million years ago, the new skeleton is almost half a million years older than Lucy and the second oldest
skeleton found of a possible human ancestor. It had long legs and a torso and a pelvis more like those of a modern human than an
African ape, showing that fully upright walking was in place at this early date, Haile-Selassie says. Although headless, the skeleton
also preserves parts not found before in Lucy’s species. “It is important because it provides the ribs and scapula”, says
palaeoanthropologist Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, Columbia.
In 2005, a sharp-eyed member of Haile-Selassie’s team, Alemayehu Asfaw, spotted a fragment of lower arm bone on the
ground at Woranso-Mille, about 48 kilometers north of Lucy’s grave at Hadar. Over the next 4 years, the team unearthed the
shoulder blade, collarbone, ribs, and neck vertebra, the first time those bones were found together in an A. afarensis adult. The
team also found a pelvis, an arm, and leg bones. Although they never found the skull or teeth, which are typically used to assign
species, the skeleton’s age and similarity to Lucy suggest that it belongs to her species, says co-author Owen Lovejoy of Kent State
University in Ohio.
The robust male stood between 1.5 and 1.7 meters tall, about 30% larger than Lucy. Isolated bones of other individuals
suggest that some males were even larger, so the new skeleton doesn’t settle a long-standing debate over just how much sexual
dimorphism there was in A. afarensis, Lovejoy says. The shoulder blade looks more like that of a gorilla and a modern human than
that of a chimpanzee. The curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib cage at the top and a barrel shape overall, similar to that
of modern humans and distinct from the more funnel-shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee, the authors say.
(Science Magazine, 25 June 2010.)
Where was the skeleton found?
Q1263247
Inglês
Texto associado
Lucy’s Big Brother Reveals New Facets of her Species
First came Lucy. Then came Lucy’s baby, an infant of her species. Now comes Lucy’s “big brother”: the partial skeleton of a
large male of Australopithecus afarensis, unveiled this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The roughly
40% complete skeleton has been nicknamed Kadanuumuu, which means “big man” in the Afar language of the Afar Depression of
Ethiopia, where it was found. “It was huge – a big man, with long legs”, says lead author Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a
palaeoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio.
Dated to 3.6 million years ago, the new skeleton is almost half a million years older than Lucy and the second oldest
skeleton found of a possible human ancestor. It had long legs and a torso and a pelvis more like those of a modern human than an
African ape, showing that fully upright walking was in place at this early date, Haile-Selassie says. Although headless, the skeleton
also preserves parts not found before in Lucy’s species. “It is important because it provides the ribs and scapula”, says
palaeoanthropologist Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, Columbia.
In 2005, a sharp-eyed member of Haile-Selassie’s team, Alemayehu Asfaw, spotted a fragment of lower arm bone on the
ground at Woranso-Mille, about 48 kilometers north of Lucy’s grave at Hadar. Over the next 4 years, the team unearthed the
shoulder blade, collarbone, ribs, and neck vertebra, the first time those bones were found together in an A. afarensis adult. The
team also found a pelvis, an arm, and leg bones. Although they never found the skull or teeth, which are typically used to assign
species, the skeleton’s age and similarity to Lucy suggest that it belongs to her species, says co-author Owen Lovejoy of Kent State
University in Ohio.
The robust male stood between 1.5 and 1.7 meters tall, about 30% larger than Lucy. Isolated bones of other individuals
suggest that some males were even larger, so the new skeleton doesn’t settle a long-standing debate over just how much sexual
dimorphism there was in A. afarensis, Lovejoy says. The shoulder blade looks more like that of a gorilla and a modern human than
that of a chimpanzee. The curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib cage at the top and a barrel shape overall, similar to that
of modern humans and distinct from the more funnel-shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee, the authors say.
(Science Magazine, 25 June 2010.)
Are the statements true (T) or false (F), according to the text?
( ) The new skeleton was really Lucy’s brother. ( ) The new skeleton is almost 100% complete. ( ) The new skeleton is larger than that of Lucy. ( ) The new skeleton is similar to a chimpanzee. ( ) The team spent four years excavating for bones.
Mark the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
( ) The new skeleton was really Lucy’s brother. ( ) The new skeleton is almost 100% complete. ( ) The new skeleton is larger than that of Lucy. ( ) The new skeleton is similar to a chimpanzee. ( ) The team spent four years excavating for bones.
Mark the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262859
Inglês
Disponível em: <http://commontragedies.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/mad-as-hell.jpg>Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.
The man in this cartoon is angry because
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262858
Inglês
Texto associado
BLACK, Richard. Arctic warmest in two millennia. Disponível em:<www.bbc.co.uk/ worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090904_witn_arctic.shtml>
Considering language use in the text, it’s correct to say:
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262857
Inglês
Texto associado
BLACK, Richard. Arctic warmest in two millennia. Disponível em:<www.bbc.co.uk/ worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090904_witn_arctic.shtml>
The only alternative in which the word or expression from the
text IS NOT correctly defined is
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262856
Inglês
Texto associado
BLACK, Richard. Arctic warmest in two millennia. Disponível em:<www.bbc.co.uk/ worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090904_witn_arctic.shtml>
Fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).
The text has answers to the following questions:
( ) Where was the present research published?
( ) How many scientists took part in the present expedition?
( ) What are Arctic high temperatures an indication of?
( ) When did the scientists produce evidence of the warming phenomenon in the Arctic?
According to the text, the correct sequence, from top to bottom,
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262855
Inglês
Texto associado
BLACK, Richard. Arctic warmest in two millennia. Disponível em:<www.bbc.co.uk/ worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090904_witn_arctic.shtml>
This text says that temperatures in the Arctic have
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262854
Inglês
Texto associado
COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>
“contemporary with the better-known Chavin and Cupisnique cultures.” (l. 24-25)
The word “better” in this sentence is the irregular degree of
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262853
Inglês
Texto associado
COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>
“The woman, named the ‘Lady of Pacopampa’ after the site in the northern highlands” (l. 5-7)
The expression in bold should be understood as
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262852
Inglês
Texto associado
COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>
It’s stated in the text:
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262851
Inglês
Texto associado
COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>
__________ the mummy was very old, the dead body _______
Based on the text, the alternative that completes the blanks correctly is
Ano: 2010
Banca:
UNICENTRO
Órgão:
UNICENTRO
Prova:
UNICENTRO - 2010 - UNICENTRO - Vestibular - Inglês 1 |
Q1262850
Inglês
Texto associado
COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>
Fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).
About the mummified woman, it’s correct to say:
( ) She was rather short.
( ) She was an elderly lady when she died.
( ) Her legs had been tied with a rope.
( ) She was much younger than most Peruvian mummies.
According to the text, the correct sequence, from top to bottom, is
Ano: 2010
Banca:
PUC - RS
Órgão:
PUC - RS
Prova:
PUC - RS - 2010 - PUC - RS - Vestibular - Prova 02 |
Q1262284
Inglês
Texto associado
INSTRUCTION: Answer question with information from text 2.
TEXT 2
The smell of rain on dry ground
QUINION, Michael. www.worldwidewords.org
(fragment)
The verb phrases turn out and give off, as in the
sentence It turns out that the oils are given off by
vegetation (lines 09 and 10) can be, respectively,
translated by
Conheça nossos planos