Questões de Vestibular Sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês

Foram encontradas 5.299 questões

Ano: 2017 Banca: COPS-UEL Órgão: UEL Prova: COPS-UEL - 2017 - UEL - Vestibular - Inglês |
Q1264904 Inglês

Life

Linus Pauling was born in Portland, Oregon, in the United States. His family came from a line of Prussian farmers, and his father worked as a pharmaceuticals salesman, among other things. After first studying at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, Linus Pauling earned his PhD from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, with which he maintained ties for the rest of his career. In the 1950s, Linus Pauling’s involvement in the anti-nuclear movement led to his being labeled a suspected communist, which resulted in his passport being revoked at times. Linus and Ava Helen Pauling had four children together.

Work

1954 Prize: The development of quantum mechanics during the 1920s had a great impact not only on the field of physics, but also on chemistry. During the 1930s Linus Pauling was among the pioneers who used quantum mechanics to understand and describe chemical bonding – that is, the way atoms join together to form molecules. Linus Pauling worked in a broad range of areas within chemistry. For example, he worked on the structures of biologically important chemical compounds. In 1951 he published the structure of the alpha helix, which is an important basic component of many proteins.

1962 Prize: The atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a turning point in Linus Pauling’s life. Together with other scientists he spoke and wrote against the nuclear arms race, and he was a driving force in the Pugwash movement. It sought to reduce the role of nuclear arms in international politics and was awarded the Peace Prize in 1995. In 1959, Linus Pauling drafted the famous “Hiroshima Appeal”, the concluding document issued after the Fifth World Conference against Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs. He was one of the prime movers who urged the nuclear powers the USA, the Soviet Union and Great Britain to conclude a nuclear test ban treaty, which entered into force on 10 October 1963. On the same day, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that Linus Pauling had been awarded the Peace Prize that had been held over from 1962. 

(Adaptado de: Linus Pauling - Facts. In: Nobelprize.org. (web) Nobel Media AB 2014.Disponível em:<http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1962/ pauling-facts.html.> . Acesso em: 2 jul. 2017.)

De acordo com o texto, Linus Pauling
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: COPS-UEL Órgão: UEL Prova: COPS-UEL - 2017 - UEL - Vestibular - Inglês |
Q1264903 Inglês

Life

Linus Pauling was born in Portland, Oregon, in the United States. His family came from a line of Prussian farmers, and his father worked as a pharmaceuticals salesman, among other things. After first studying at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, Linus Pauling earned his PhD from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, with which he maintained ties for the rest of his career. In the 1950s, Linus Pauling’s involvement in the anti-nuclear movement led to his being labeled a suspected communist, which resulted in his passport being revoked at times. Linus and Ava Helen Pauling had four children together.

Work

1954 Prize: The development of quantum mechanics during the 1920s had a great impact not only on the field of physics, but also on chemistry. During the 1930s Linus Pauling was among the pioneers who used quantum mechanics to understand and describe chemical bonding – that is, the way atoms join together to form molecules. Linus Pauling worked in a broad range of areas within chemistry. For example, he worked on the structures of biologically important chemical compounds. In 1951 he published the structure of the alpha helix, which is an important basic component of many proteins.

1962 Prize: The atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a turning point in Linus Pauling’s life. Together with other scientists he spoke and wrote against the nuclear arms race, and he was a driving force in the Pugwash movement. It sought to reduce the role of nuclear arms in international politics and was awarded the Peace Prize in 1995. In 1959, Linus Pauling drafted the famous “Hiroshima Appeal”, the concluding document issued after the Fifth World Conference against Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs. He was one of the prime movers who urged the nuclear powers the USA, the Soviet Union and Great Britain to conclude a nuclear test ban treaty, which entered into force on 10 October 1963. On the same day, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that Linus Pauling had been awarded the Peace Prize that had been held over from 1962. 

(Adaptado de: Linus Pauling - Facts. In: Nobelprize.org. (web) Nobel Media AB 2014.Disponível em:<http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1962/ pauling-facts.html.> . Acesso em: 2 jul. 2017.)

Sobre a vida de Linus Pauling, considere as afirmativas a seguir.


I. Manteve vínculo com o Instituto de Tecnologia da Califórnia onde defendeu sua tese de doutorado.

II. Graduou-se no Instituto de Tecnologia da Califórnia onde conheceu sua futura companheira, Ava Helen Pauling.

III. Foi deportado para a Prússia onde trabalhou na indústria farmacêutica com seu pai até a devolução de seu passaporte.

IV. Envolveu-se com o movimento contra os armamentos nucleares pelo qual foi taxado de comunista.


Assinale a alternativa correta.

Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: IFF Órgão: IFF Prova: IFF - 2017 - IFF - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre |
Q1264572 Inglês

Imagem associada para resolução da questão

<http://www.cartoonistgroup.com/subject/The-Climate+Change-Comics-and-Cartoons.php>. Acesso em: 17 set 2017.


A charge apresentada relaciona-se corretamente com a seguinte alternativa:

Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: IFF Órgão: IFF Prova: IFF - 2017 - IFF - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre |
Q1264571 Inglês

Irma and Harvey lay the costs of climate change denial at Trump’s door


The president’s dismissal of scientific research is doing nothing to protect the livelihoods of ordinary Americans. 

Bob Ward - Sunday 10 September 2017 



As the US comes to terms with its second major weather disaster within a month, an important question is whether the devastation caused by hurricanes Harvey and Irma will convince Donald Trump and his administration of the reality of climate change. 

The president’s luxurious Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida may escape Irma’s wrath, but with the deaths of so many Americans, and billions of dollars in damage to homes and businesses, the costs of climate change denial are beginning to pile up at the door of the White House. 

Just days before Harvey formed in the Atlantic last month, Trump signed an executive order to overturn a policy, introduced by his predecessor Barack Obama, to help American communities and businesses become more resilient against the risks of flooding, which are rising because of climate change. 

But the merciless assault on the US mainland by Harvey and Irma should be forcing the president to recognise the consequences of his arrogance and complacency in dismissing the research and analysis carried out by scientists. 

The flooded streets of Houston and the wind-ravaged homes of south Florida bear the unmistakable fingerprint of extreme weather made worse by manmade greenhouse gas emissions. 

A hurricane is a huge, rotating cluster of thunderstorms that forms above a sea surface that has a temperature of at least 26.5C. It is like a giant engine, transferring heat from the sea surface up into the atmosphere and generating strong winds and heavy rain in the process.

Climate change cannot be blamed for the hurricane count in any single season, nor for the occurrence of any single storm, but there are some ways in which it is making the consequences worse. 

Adapted from: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/10/hurricane-irma-harvey-climate-change-trump>. Acesso em: 17 set 2017. 


Observe as palavras grifadas nos trechos abaixo. Releia o texto atentamente e marque a alternativa em que a referência contextual está INCORRETA:
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: IFF Órgão: IFF Prova: IFF - 2017 - IFF - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre |
Q1264569 Inglês

Irma and Harvey lay the costs of climate change denial at Trump’s door


The president’s dismissal of scientific research is doing nothing to protect the livelihoods of ordinary Americans. 

Bob Ward - Sunday 10 September 2017 



As the US comes to terms with its second major weather disaster within a month, an important question is whether the devastation caused by hurricanes Harvey and Irma will convince Donald Trump and his administration of the reality of climate change. 

The president’s luxurious Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida may escape Irma’s wrath, but with the deaths of so many Americans, and billions of dollars in damage to homes and businesses, the costs of climate change denial are beginning to pile up at the door of the White House. 

Just days before Harvey formed in the Atlantic last month, Trump signed an executive order to overturn a policy, introduced by his predecessor Barack Obama, to help American communities and businesses become more resilient against the risks of flooding, which are rising because of climate change. 

But the merciless assault on the US mainland by Harvey and Irma should be forcing the president to recognise the consequences of his arrogance and complacency in dismissing the research and analysis carried out by scientists. 

The flooded streets of Houston and the wind-ravaged homes of south Florida bear the unmistakable fingerprint of extreme weather made worse by manmade greenhouse gas emissions. 

A hurricane is a huge, rotating cluster of thunderstorms that forms above a sea surface that has a temperature of at least 26.5C. It is like a giant engine, transferring heat from the sea surface up into the atmosphere and generating strong winds and heavy rain in the process.

Climate change cannot be blamed for the hurricane count in any single season, nor for the occurrence of any single storm, but there are some ways in which it is making the consequences worse. 

Adapted from: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/10/hurricane-irma-harvey-climate-change-trump>. Acesso em: 17 set 2017. 


De acordo com o texto, escolha a alternativa que fornece apenas informações corretas:
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: IFF Órgão: IFF Prova: IFF - 2017 - IFF - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre |
Q1264568 Inglês

Irma and Harvey lay the costs of climate change denial at Trump’s door


The president’s dismissal of scientific research is doing nothing to protect the livelihoods of ordinary Americans. 

Bob Ward - Sunday 10 September 2017 



As the US comes to terms with its second major weather disaster within a month, an important question is whether the devastation caused by hurricanes Harvey and Irma will convince Donald Trump and his administration of the reality of climate change. 

The president’s luxurious Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida may escape Irma’s wrath, but with the deaths of so many Americans, and billions of dollars in damage to homes and businesses, the costs of climate change denial are beginning to pile up at the door of the White House. 

Just days before Harvey formed in the Atlantic last month, Trump signed an executive order to overturn a policy, introduced by his predecessor Barack Obama, to help American communities and businesses become more resilient against the risks of flooding, which are rising because of climate change. 

But the merciless assault on the US mainland by Harvey and Irma should be forcing the president to recognise the consequences of his arrogance and complacency in dismissing the research and analysis carried out by scientists. 

The flooded streets of Houston and the wind-ravaged homes of south Florida bear the unmistakable fingerprint of extreme weather made worse by manmade greenhouse gas emissions. 

A hurricane is a huge, rotating cluster of thunderstorms that forms above a sea surface that has a temperature of at least 26.5C. It is like a giant engine, transferring heat from the sea surface up into the atmosphere and generating strong winds and heavy rain in the process.

Climate change cannot be blamed for the hurricane count in any single season, nor for the occurrence of any single storm, but there are some ways in which it is making the consequences worse. 

Adapted from: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/10/hurricane-irma-harvey-climate-change-trump>. Acesso em: 17 set 2017. 


Os jornais costumam destacar acontecimentos importantes que são veiculados diariamente na internet. O texto acima, retirado do “The Guardian”, relata o assunto mencionado nas alternativas abaixo, EXCETO:
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264479 Inglês

TEXTO:

Success is not measured by what you accomplish, but by the opposition you have encountered, and the courage with which you have maintained the struggle against overwhelming odds.

SUCCESS is not... Disponível em:<https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/o/ orisonswet166019.html>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017. 

According to this quote, people should
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264478 Inglês

BRITISH researchers... Disponível em:<http//www.nutraingredients.com /research/ Post-exercise-protein-…-Study>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017. Adaptado.

Considering language use in the text, it’s correct to say:
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264477 Inglês

BRITISH researchers... Disponível em:<http//www.nutraingredients.com /research/ Post-exercise-protein-…-Study>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017. Adaptado.

According to the text, consuming a whey protein drink after resistance exercise
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264475 Inglês

ADOLESCENCE is universally...Disponível em:<www.integraloptions.blogspot.com> . Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017.

Fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False). It’s stated in the text that


( ) teenagers usually have a carefree and adventurous behavior.

( ) most adolescents are reluctant to give up the safety of their homes.

( ) our social skills start developing during our teen years.

( ) adolescents are more than likely to avoid risky activities.


The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is

Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264474 Inglês

Disponível em:<https:letras.mus.br><.letras.mus.br>jackson-five>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017.

The sentence “If we don’t come together, my brother, it all can end very soon.” (v. 6) describes
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264473 Inglês

Disponível em:<https:letras.mus.br><.letras.mus.br>jackson-five>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017.

In the line “But instead we go and fight each other.” (v. 2), the song writer criticizes people’s
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264472 Inglês

Disponível em:<https:letras.mus.br><.letras.mus.br>jackson-five>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017.

In this excerpt from the song “We can change the world” by Michael Jackson and the Jackson 5, the song writer stresses the importance of
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264471 Inglês

SERIOUS injury could occur if the following safetyprecautions are not observed. Disponível em:<http://www.marpokinetics.com/pdf/vmx_manual.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017. Adaptado. 

The text says that
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UNEB Órgão: UNEB Prova: UNEB - 2017 - UNEB - Vestibular - Português/Inglês/Ciências |
Q1264470 Inglês

SERIOUS injury could occur if the following safetyprecautions are not observed. Disponível em:<http://www.marpokinetics.com/pdf/vmx_manual.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2017. Adaptado. 

This text expresses a
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UDESC Órgão: UDESC Prova: UDESC - 2017 - UDESC - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre (Manhã) |
Q1264139 Inglês

I have a confession. I’m addicted to reality TV. I can’t get enough of it.

Very soon the new series of ITV’s Love Island will be starting and I’m literally counting down the days until it’s on my TV screen. It’s a show that sends single people abroad to live in a luxurious villa in the sun. The audience at home then watches their highs and lows, their arguments and how their relationships and friendships form and fall apart.

Love Island is just the tip of a huge reality TV iceberg. Other popular British programmes (which I also love) include I’m a Celebrity ... Get me Out of Here!, Big Brother and Geordie Shore. All these shows have something in common: people seem to either love them or hate them.

Perhaps we love them so much because they actually use real people instead of characters. Series and films with actors are great to watch but they aren’t real and we’re aware of that. With reality TV we can become more invested and more interested because the ‘characters’ are real and (usually) not acting.

Maybe we love reality TV because the people featured more often than not show the extremes of our society. Shows featuring ‘normal’ people or non-celebrities often include people with intense personalities who are bound to clash. Big Brotherwhich follows the lives of people living in a house together away from the outside world, always includes contestants with a range of personalities. It can be fascinating for us viewers to watch real people who perhaps wouldn’t usually interact with each other as they try to live together.

However, reality TV isn’t popular with everyone. Some people consider it sad to watch it. I’ve often heard people say that if you watch reality TV, it’s a sign that your own life is boring. Why watch someone else’s life when you have your own to live? Why would you want to sit at home and watch someone else arguing about silly things on the TV?

Some people don’t like reality TV because they believe it doesn’t show true reality. The people in these programmes are regularly accused of acting and you often see a phrase flash up somewhere during the opening or closing credits informing that parts are scripted or set up. Viewers can feel cheated that the ‘reality’ they are watching isn’t completely real after all.

Whether you love or hate reality TV, it cannot be denied that this genre has increased in popularity over time, and while I understand it can be set up sometimes, I’m still so excited for Love Island to be back on our screens!

(Accessed on August 14th, 2017) http://learnenglishteens.britishcouncil.org/magazine By Megan Blogger
Match the columns.
1. Why isn´t reality TV popular with everyone? 2. What can you often see during the opening or closing credits? 3. What do the British shows have in common? 4. Why do they love reality show?
( ) People featured show the extremes of their society. ( ) People seem to either love them or hate them. ( ) Some people consider it sad to watch it. ( ) A phrase flash up somewhere informing that parts are scripted or set up.
Mark the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UDESC Órgão: UDESC Prova: UDESC - 2017 - UDESC - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre (Manhã) |
Q1264138 Inglês

I have a confession. I’m addicted to reality TV. I can’t get enough of it.

Very soon the new series of ITV’s Love Island will be starting and I’m literally counting down the days until it’s on my TV screen. It’s a show that sends single people abroad to live in a luxurious villa in the sun. The audience at home then watches their highs and lows, their arguments and how their relationships and friendships form and fall apart.

Love Island is just the tip of a huge reality TV iceberg. Other popular British programmes (which I also love) include I’m a Celebrity ... Get me Out of Here!, Big Brother and Geordie Shore. All these shows have something in common: people seem to either love them or hate them.

Perhaps we love them so much because they actually use real people instead of characters. Series and films with actors are great to watch but they aren’t real and we’re aware of that. With reality TV we can become more invested and more interested because the ‘characters’ are real and (usually) not acting.

Maybe we love reality TV because the people featured more often than not show the extremes of our society. Shows featuring ‘normal’ people or non-celebrities often include people with intense personalities who are bound to clash. Big Brotherwhich follows the lives of people living in a house together away from the outside world, always includes contestants with a range of personalities. It can be fascinating for us viewers to watch real people who perhaps wouldn’t usually interact with each other as they try to live together.

However, reality TV isn’t popular with everyone. Some people consider it sad to watch it. I’ve often heard people say that if you watch reality TV, it’s a sign that your own life is boring. Why watch someone else’s life when you have your own to live? Why would you want to sit at home and watch someone else arguing about silly things on the TV?

Some people don’t like reality TV because they believe it doesn’t show true reality. The people in these programmes are regularly accused of acting and you often see a phrase flash up somewhere during the opening or closing credits informing that parts are scripted or set up. Viewers can feel cheated that the ‘reality’ they are watching isn’t completely real after all.

Whether you love or hate reality TV, it cannot be denied that this genre has increased in popularity over time, and while I understand it can be set up sometimes, I’m still so excited for Love Island to be back on our screens!

(Accessed on August 14th, 2017) http://learnenglishteens.britishcouncil.org/magazine By Megan Blogger
Mark the question which can be answered by the Text.
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UDESC Órgão: UDESC Prova: UDESC - 2017 - UDESC - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre (Manhã) |
Q1264137 Inglês

I have a confession. I’m addicted to reality TV. I can’t get enough of it.

Very soon the new series of ITV’s Love Island will be starting and I’m literally counting down the days until it’s on my TV screen. It’s a show that sends single people abroad to live in a luxurious villa in the sun. The audience at home then watches their highs and lows, their arguments and how their relationships and friendships form and fall apart.

Love Island is just the tip of a huge reality TV iceberg. Other popular British programmes (which I also love) include I’m a Celebrity ... Get me Out of Here!, Big Brother and Geordie Shore. All these shows have something in common: people seem to either love them or hate them.

Perhaps we love them so much because they actually use real people instead of characters. Series and films with actors are great to watch but they aren’t real and we’re aware of that. With reality TV we can become more invested and more interested because the ‘characters’ are real and (usually) not acting.

Maybe we love reality TV because the people featured more often than not show the extremes of our society. Shows featuring ‘normal’ people or non-celebrities often include people with intense personalities who are bound to clash. Big Brotherwhich follows the lives of people living in a house together away from the outside world, always includes contestants with a range of personalities. It can be fascinating for us viewers to watch real people who perhaps wouldn’t usually interact with each other as they try to live together.

However, reality TV isn’t popular with everyone. Some people consider it sad to watch it. I’ve often heard people say that if you watch reality TV, it’s a sign that your own life is boring. Why watch someone else’s life when you have your own to live? Why would you want to sit at home and watch someone else arguing about silly things on the TV?

Some people don’t like reality TV because they believe it doesn’t show true reality. The people in these programmes are regularly accused of acting and you often see a phrase flash up somewhere during the opening or closing credits informing that parts are scripted or set up. Viewers can feel cheated that the ‘reality’ they are watching isn’t completely real after all.

Whether you love or hate reality TV, it cannot be denied that this genre has increased in popularity over time, and while I understand it can be set up sometimes, I’m still so excited for Love Island to be back on our screens!

(Accessed on August 14th, 2017) http://learnenglishteens.britishcouncil.org/magazine By Megan Blogger
The Text says that:
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UDESC Órgão: UDESC Prova: UDESC - 2017 - UDESC - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre (Manhã) |
Q1264136 Inglês

I have a confession. I’m addicted to reality TV. I can’t get enough of it.

Very soon the new series of ITV’s Love Island will be starting and I’m literally counting down the days until it’s on my TV screen. It’s a show that sends single people abroad to live in a luxurious villa in the sun. The audience at home then watches their highs and lows, their arguments and how their relationships and friendships form and fall apart.

Love Island is just the tip of a huge reality TV iceberg. Other popular British programmes (which I also love) include I’m a Celebrity ... Get me Out of Here!, Big Brother and Geordie Shore. All these shows have something in common: people seem to either love them or hate them.

Perhaps we love them so much because they actually use real people instead of characters. Series and films with actors are great to watch but they aren’t real and we’re aware of that. With reality TV we can become more invested and more interested because the ‘characters’ are real and (usually) not acting.

Maybe we love reality TV because the people featured more often than not show the extremes of our society. Shows featuring ‘normal’ people or non-celebrities often include people with intense personalities who are bound to clash. Big Brotherwhich follows the lives of people living in a house together away from the outside world, always includes contestants with a range of personalities. It can be fascinating for us viewers to watch real people who perhaps wouldn’t usually interact with each other as they try to live together.

However, reality TV isn’t popular with everyone. Some people consider it sad to watch it. I’ve often heard people say that if you watch reality TV, it’s a sign that your own life is boring. Why watch someone else’s life when you have your own to live? Why would you want to sit at home and watch someone else arguing about silly things on the TV?

Some people don’t like reality TV because they believe it doesn’t show true reality. The people in these programmes are regularly accused of acting and you often see a phrase flash up somewhere during the opening or closing credits informing that parts are scripted or set up. Viewers can feel cheated that the ‘reality’ they are watching isn’t completely real after all.

Whether you love or hate reality TV, it cannot be denied that this genre has increased in popularity over time, and while I understand it can be set up sometimes, I’m still so excited for Love Island to be back on our screens!

(Accessed on August 14th, 2017) http://learnenglishteens.britishcouncil.org/magazine By Megan Blogger
Mark the alternative which best substitutes consecutively the words in bold.
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: UDESC Órgão: UDESC Prova: UDESC - 2017 - UDESC - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre (Manhã) |
Q1264134 Inglês
The expression “get rid of ” means:
Alternativas
Respostas
2081: A
2082: B
2083: D
2084: B
2085: A
2086: C
2087: D
2088: A
2089: A
2090: A
2091: B
2092: D
2093: C
2094: C
2095: B
2096: A
2097: C
2098: E
2099: C
2100: D