Foram encontradas 3.454 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

www.qconcursos.com
Q3753585
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753585 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article uses several idiomatic expressions and collocations that are characteristic of British political and economic discourse. For example: "balancing the books" (managing finances to ensure income matches expenditure), "iron-clad fiscal rules" (extremely firm financial regulations), "bite the bullet" (make a difficult decision), and "the stakes could not be higher" (the consequences are extremely serious). Understanding these expressions is crucial for authentic comprehension of English texts. A teacher planning a lesson on idiomatic expressions from authentic political texts should consider both their literal and figurative meanings, as well as register and context. Which pedagogical approach would effectively help intermediate-level students understand and use such expressions appropriately?
Alternativas
Q3753584
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753584 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article discusses Chancellor Rachel Reeves' budget strategy and its political implications. Consider this passage: "Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable." The author's tone reveals an implicit assessment. Additionally, the text states: "The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer." Based on comprehensive analysis of explicit and implicit meanings, what can be accurately inferred about the author's perspective?
Alternativas
Q3753583
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753583 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach emphasizes meaningful communication and functional language use over mechanical grammar drills. Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), an extension of CLT, organizes instruction around tasks that reflect real-world language use. Using the article about UK budget policy, a teacher could design a task-based lesson where students engage with authentic content. The task cycle typically includes: pre-task (introducing topic and useful language), task (students complete the task in pairs/groups), planning (preparing to report to class), report (presenting findings), analysis (examining language features), and practice (focused work on language forms that emerged). Which lesson design exemplifies task-based principles while using this article?
Alternativas
Q3753582
Inglês Orações condicionais | Conditional Clauses ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753582 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
Examine this sentence from the article: "Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control." This sentence contains two conditional structures. The phrase "Even if effective" represents a concessive conditional (acknowledging a possibility while suggesting it may not change the outcome), while "if inflation is not brought under control" is a first conditional (real possibility in the future). Understanding conditional structures is essential for both comprehension and production in English. Which of the following statements correctly analyzes the conditional structures and their functions in academic and journalistic English?
Alternativas
Q3753581
Inglês Voz Ativa e Passiva | Passive and Active Voice , Verbos | Verbs , Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753581 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The text contains several instances of passive voice constructions. Examine this sentence: "Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices." This sentence uses passive voice with an infinitive construction. Understanding the transformation between active and passive voice, particularly with complex verb structures, is crucial for advanced writing. Which of the following correctly identifies the grammatical structure and appropriate active voice transformation?
Alternativas
Q3753578
Legislação Municipal Legislação do Município de São Miguel do Oeste (Santa Catarina) ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753578 Legislação Municipal
Analise as sentenças referentes aos direitos do servidor municipal previstos no Art. 90 da Lei Orgânica Municipal:

I.A lei garante férias anuais remuneradas com adicional de 2/4.
II.O servidor tem direito à licença-paternidade de 5 dias.
III.A jornada de trabalho deve seguir determinações legais, com repouso semanal remunerado preferencialmente aos domingos.

Está correto o que se afirma em:
Alternativas
Q3753575
Português Interpretação de Textos , Sintaxe ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753575 Português
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Como descobrir se o vídeo que você está vendo é real ou gerado por IA


Nos últimos meses, os geradores de vídeo baseados em inteligência artificial evoluíram a tal ponto que a confiança nas imagens captadas por câmeras começa a se abalar. O cenário inevitável é o de um público cada vez mais desconfiado: enganado repetidas vezes, o espectador passará a questionar tudo o que vê.

Por enquanto, ainda é possível identificar alguns sinais de que um vídeo pode não ser real. Um dos principais é a baixa qualidade da imagem: filmagens borradas, granuladas ou pixeladas podem indicar o uso de IA. Segundo o professor Hany Farid, da Universidade da Califórnia em Berkeley, especialista em forense digital, esse é um dos primeiros aspectos a observar.

As ferramentas de vídeo com IA continuarão a se aperfeiçoar, e esse tipo de orientação logo se tornará obsoleto. Ainda assim, por ora, vale a pena usá-la para evitar cair em vídeos falsos. O professor Matthew Stamm, da Universidade Drexel, lembra que imagens de má qualidade não são necessariamente falsas, mas que vídeos de IA costumam recorrer a essa aparência para disfarçar falhas visuais.

Esses vídeos apresentam inconsistências sutis — texturas de pele excessivamente lisas, padrões irregulares em cabelos ou roupas e movimentos improváveis de pequenos objetos. Quanto mais nítida a imagem, maiores as chances de perceber esses detalhes. Por isso, vídeos supostamente gravados por câmeras antigas ou de segurança podem esconder imperfeições típicas da IA.

Nos últimos meses, diversos vídeos gerados por IA enganaram milhões de pessoas. Um deles mostrava coelhos saltando sobre um trampolim; outro, um casal se apaixonando no metrô de Nova York; e um terceiro, um pastor pregando contra bilionários — todos falsos. Em comum, tinham a aparência amadora e a baixa resolução.

Hany Farid afirma que há três fatores essenciais para desconfiar: resolução, qualidade e duração. Os vídeos de IA costumam ser curtos — geralmente entre seis e dez segundos — porque sua produção é cara e mais propensa a falhas em trechos longos. Além disso, a baixa qualidade e a compressão propositais das imagens ajudam a mascarar os indícios de falsificação.

Enquanto isso, as grandes empresas de tecnologia investem bilhões para tornar a IA cada vez mais realista. De acordo com Stamm, as falhas visuais que hoje servem de pista tendem a desaparecer em pouco tempo. Ainda assim, os especialistas acreditam que novas técnicas de autenticação ajudarão a distinguir o que é real do que é criado artificialmente.

Farid e Stamm explicam que vídeos gerados ou modificados deixam rastros invisíveis — impressões digitais que podem ser detectadas com ferramentas estatísticas. Além disso, câmeras e programas de IA poderão, em breve, incorporar informações de origem diretamente nos arquivos, facilitando a verificação da autenticidade.

No passado, imagens e vídeos pareciam provas incontestáveis; hoje, podem ser facilmente manipulados. O essencial passa a ser quem criou o conteúdo, de onde ele veio e se foi verificado por fontes confiáveis. Trata-se, segundo Stamm, de um dos maiores desafios da segurança da informação no século atual — um problema recente, mas que mobiliza um número crescente de pesquisadores e profissionais em busca de soluções conjuntas entre tecnologia, educação e políticas públicas.


https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/cz0xp8p5vzmo.adaptado
Essas falhas podem desaparecer em pouco tempo, "ou" novas técnicas de autenticação ajudarão a distinguir o real do artificial.

De acordo com a relação estabelecida entre as orações, é
Alternativas
Q3753565
Pedagogia Legislação da Educação , Políticas Educacionais ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753565 Pedagogia
A Lei nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996, conhecida como Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional (LDB), estabelece os princípios, fins e estrutura da educação brasileira. Essa legislação define as responsabilidades dos entes federativos, os níveis e modalidades de ensino, bem como as bases para a gestão democrática e a valorização dos profissionais da educação. Além disso, a LDB reforça o direito de todos à educação e a necessidade de garantir igualdade de condições para o acesso e a permanência na escola.
Com base nesses fundamentos, analise as assertivas a seguir:

I.A LDB assegura que a educação é direito de todos e dever do Estado e da família, devendo ser promovida com base na igualdade de condições de acesso e permanência na escola.
II.O ensino deve ser ministrado sob o princípio da liberdade de aprender, ensinar, pesquisar e divulgar o pensamento, a arte e o saber.
III.A gestão democrática do ensino público é facultativa e restrita apenas às instituições de ensino superior privadas.
IV.A valorização dos profissionais da educação inclui formação continuada, plano de carreira e remuneração condigna.
V.A LDB determina que a educação escolar se desenvolve predominantemente no lar, dispensando a atuação institucional do Estado.

Está CORRETO o que se afirma em:
Alternativas
Q3753564
Pedagogia Legislação da Educação , Temas Educacionais Pedagógicos ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753564 Pedagogia
A profissão docente, no Brasil, está ancorada em marcos normativos que assegurem liberdade de ensinar, pluralismo de ideias e compromisso com a dignidade humana. Na prática cotidiana, tais princípios se traduzem em escolhas pedagógicas que respeitam a diversidade, promovem debates fundamentados e visam ao desenvolvimento integral dos estudantes. A ética profissional, assim, não se limita à conduta individual, mas envolve a responsabilidade social da escola e de seus trabalhadores. Diante desse quadro, avalie o papel ético do professor na construção de uma aprendizagem crítica, segundo a legislação e diretrizes nacionais.

I.O professor deve agir de forma autônoma e responsável, pautando-se pela ética e pela dignidade humana.
II.A prática docente deve priorizar a neutralidade política, sem promover debates críticos.
III.A atuação pedagógica deve estimular o respeito à diversidade e aos direitos humanos.
IV.O professor pode restringir conteúdos conforme suas convicções pessoais.
V.A ética docente implica compromisso com a transformação social e a cidadania.

Está CORRETO o que se afirma em:
Alternativas
Q3753563
Pedagogia Pesquisa em Educação ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753563 Pedagogia
A aprendizagem ativa em História pressupõe investigação, autoria e diálogo com a comunidade. Projetos que mobilizam arquivos escolares, acervos locais, relatos orais e espaços de memória aproximam o currículo das experiências dos estudantes. Ao produzir narrativas próprias, a turma exercita procedimentos de pesquisa, comunicação e argumentação. Considerando tais estratégias, qual prática pedagógica favorece o engajamento discente?
Alternativas
Q3753562
Pedagogia Temas Educacionais Pedagógicos ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753562 Pedagogia
No contexto da educação básica brasileira, o ensino de História tem sido convocado a superar a mera memorização de personagens e acontecimentos, articulando temporalidades, escalas e vozes diversas. Espera-se que a escola forme leitores críticos das experiências humanas no tempo, capazes de relacionar passado, presente e expectativas de futuro. Para tanto, metodologias investigativas e o uso de fontes variadas ampliam a compreensão de processos sociais. A partir dessa perspectiva, o estudante se percebe como sujeito histórico e participa da vida pública de modo informado. Considerando tais fundamentos, qual princípio orienta essa concepção pedagógica?
Alternativas
Q3753561
Pedagogia Avaliação Educacional ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753561 Pedagogia
A avaliação integra o processo de ensino e aprendizagem, produzindo informações para intervenções pedagógicas e tomada de decisão. Instrumentos diagnósticos identificam conhecimentos prévios, enquanto procedimentos formativos acompanham percursos, ajustando estratégias. Ao final, avaliações somativas sintetizam o desempenho em relação aos objetivos.

Considerando essas modalidades, qual característica diferencia a avaliação formativa?
Alternativas
Q3753560
Pedagogia Temas Educacionais Pedagógicos ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753560 Pedagogia
O ensino de História, ao tratar das ações humanas no tempo, deve favorecer a reflexão sobre valores, responsabilidades e escolhas coletivas. A prática pedagógica que articula História e ética busca promover o diálogo e a compreensão das diferentes perspectivas culturais e morais, estimulando o exercício da cidadania. De acordo com essa concepção, o papel do professor é criar espaços de debate e de análise crítica das experiências históricas.
Complete corretamente as lacunas do trecho a seguir:

"A prática docente em História deve _____ sobre dilemas morais e históricos em diferentes contextos, favorecendo o _____ e a construção de uma consciência cidadã fundamentada em valores democráticos."

Os termos que completam corretamente o texto são:
Alternativas
Q3753559
História História Geral ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753559 História
Narrativas históricas resultam de escolhas teóricas e metodológicas, apoiadas na crítica às fontes e na coerência argumentativa. Ao articular evidências e conceitos, o historiador sustenta interpretações que dialogam com outras leituras possíveis. Em ambiente escolar, valorizar esse processo torna transparente o caráter interpretativo do conhecimento histórico. Qual elemento é essencial para garantir legitimidade à narrativa?
Alternativas
Q3753558
História História Geral ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753558 História
As transições históricas entre formas de organização do trabalho e da produção alteraram cidades, territórios e relações sociais. Em diversas regiões, a passagem de economias majoritariamente agrárias para sistemas industriais reconfigurou o espaço urbano, ampliou mercados e introduziu novas tecnologias. Essas mudanças impactaram ritmos de vida, mobilidade populacional e valores culturais. Considerando tais transformações, qual característica marca a transição entre sociedades agrárias e industriais? 
Alternativas
Q3753557
Pedagogia Currículo (Teoria e Prática) , Planejamento Educacional ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753557 Pedagogia
O planejamento em História organiza objetivos, conteúdos, tempos e formas de avaliação, além de articular o componente curricular com outras áreas do conhecimento. Projetos interdisciplinares permitem abordar problemas socialmente relevantes e conectar saberes escolares à realidade dos estudantes. Ao orientar metodologias ativas, o professor favorece autonomia intelectual e pensamento crítico. Nessa perspectiva, qual finalidade deve conduzir o processo de planejamento?
Alternativas
Q3753556
Pedagogia Temas Educacionais Pedagógicos , Teorias e Práticas para o Ensino de História ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753556 Pedagogia
O patrimônio cultural, material e imaterial, expressa memórias, identidades e relações de pertencimento de diferentes coletividades. No ensino de História, sua abordagem deve evitar visões restritas a monumentos oficiais, contemplando também festas, saberes, línguas, culinárias e práticas de grupos diversos. Ao reconhecer e preservar tais referências, a escola promove educação patrimonial e respeito às diferenças. Qual abordagem melhor promove essa valorização?
Alternativas
Q3753555
História História Geral ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753555 História
A argumentação histórica constitui uma das competências centrais no ensino de História, pois envolve a capacidade de relacionar evidências, interpretar contextos e formular explicações fundamentadas. O trabalho com diferentes tipos de fontes — escritas, visuais, orais ou materiais — requer análise crítica e coerência lógica. Ao construir argumentos, o estudante deve evitar juízos de valor e priorizar interpretações baseadas em dados verificáveis e múltiplas perspectivas.
Com base nessas considerações, classifique as afirmativas a seguir como verdadeiras (V) ou falsas (F):

(__)A argumentação histórica deve articular evidências, contexto e interpretação fundamentada.
(__)Opiniões pessoais e morais podem substituir a análise de fontes como base da argumentação.
(__)A seleção de informações sem relação com o tema compromete a coerência histórica.
(__)A reprodução literal de documentos, sem análise, constitui exemplo de reflexão crítica.

A sequência CORRETA, de cima para baixo, é: 
Alternativas
Q3753554
Pedagogia Temas Educacionais Pedagógicos , Teorias e Práticas para o Ensino de História ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753554 Pedagogia
Ao problematizar conflitos, permanências e mudanças, o ensino de História contribui para que os estudantes compreendam direitos, deveres e mecanismos de participação social. O acesso crítico a diferentes fontes e narrativas incentiva o reconhecimento da pluralidade cultural e das desigualdades históricas. Nessa direção, a cidadania é entendida como exercício cotidiano, informado por valores democráticos e pela leitura de contextos. Considerando essa articulação entre conhecimento histórico e vida pública, a prática historiadora na educação básica está associada a que dimensão social?
Alternativas
Q3753553
História História Geral ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de História |
Q3753553 História
A industrialização introduziu maquinário, especialização do trabalho e novas formas de organização produtiva, alterando profundamente os ritmos de vida e sociabilidades. Cidades cresceram rapidamente, agregando mão de obra migrante e infraestrutura voltada à produção e aos serviços. Surgiram demandas por direitos trabalhistas e por regulação das condições laborais. Nesse quadro, qual aspecto expressa de modo sintético essas mudanças?
Alternativas
Respostas
641: D
642: A
643: D
644: A
645: B
646: A
647: D
648: D
649: C
650: B
651: D
652: B
653: B
654: B
655: A
656: B
657: C
658: B
659: C
660: B
www.qconcursos.com