Questões de Concurso Comentadas para professor - letras

Questões Discursivas

Foram encontradas 2.110 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3640535 Português

Leia o texto a seguir:


Nasa exibirá pouso com primeira amostra de asteroide coletada no espaço; veja quando


OSIRIS-REx é a terceira missão do Programa Novas Fronteiras da Nasa, gerenciado pelo Marshall Space Flight Center da Nasa em Huntsville, Alabama, para a Diretoria de Missões Científicas da agência em Washington 


São Paulo - A primeira amostra de asteroide coletada no espaço pela Agência Aeroespacial dos Estados Unidos (Nasa) chegará à Terra no domingo, 24. O pouso, segundo a Nasa, será acompanhado de perto pela agência, com cobertura ao vivo.


"O pouso da cápsula da espaçonave OSIRIS-REx (Origens, Interpretação Espectral, Identificação de Recursos e Segurança - Regolith Explorer) com amostras do asteroide chamado Bennu começará às 10h EDT (11 horas, pelo horário de Brasília) e irá ao ar pela TV Nasa, no aplicativo da Nasa e no site da agência".


Em seguida, será realizada uma coletiva de imprensa, quando a cápsula de amostra chegar a uma sala no campo de treinamento militar.


"Para entregar com sucesso uma amostra do asteroide Bennu próximo da Terra, os operadores de espaçonaves precisam garantir que a OSIRIS-REx viaje na velocidade e direção corretas para liberar a cápsula de amostra na atmosfera, pousando-a no campo de testes e treinamento do Departamento de Defesa dos EUA em Utah", disse a Nasa.


Segundo a agência, a liderança da missão discutirá os resultados das manobras de trajetória final da espaçonave e as expectativas para a entrada, descida e pouso da cápsula, além dos planos para operações de recuperação no deserto ocidental de Utah.


O OSIRIS-REx é a terceira missão do Programa Novas Fronteiras da Nasa, gerenciado pelo Marshall Space Flight Center da Nasa em Huntsville, Alabama, para a Diretoria de Missões Científicas da agência em Washington.


"Quando chegar, a espaçonave OSIRIS-REx liberará a cápsula com a amostra do asteroide para um pouso seguro no deserto de Utah. O material primitivo de Bennu – rochas e poeira recolhidas da superfície do asteroide em 2020 – oferecerá a gerações de cientistas uma janela para a época em que o Sol e os planetas se formavam há cerca de 4,5 mil milhões de anos", acrescenta a Nasa.


Fonte: https://odia.ig.com.br/mundo-e-ciencia/2023/09/6711886-nasa-exibira-pouso-com-primeira-amostra-de-asteroide-coletada-no-espaco-veja-quando.html. Acesso em 21/09/2023

No texto, a palavra ASTEROIDE não está acentuada porque:
Alternativas
Q3640534 Português

Leia o texto a seguir:


Nasa exibirá pouso com primeira amostra de asteroide coletada no espaço; veja quando


OSIRIS-REx é a terceira missão do Programa Novas Fronteiras da Nasa, gerenciado pelo Marshall Space Flight Center da Nasa em Huntsville, Alabama, para a Diretoria de Missões Científicas da agência em Washington 


São Paulo - A primeira amostra de asteroide coletada no espaço pela Agência Aeroespacial dos Estados Unidos (Nasa) chegará à Terra no domingo, 24. O pouso, segundo a Nasa, será acompanhado de perto pela agência, com cobertura ao vivo.


"O pouso da cápsula da espaçonave OSIRIS-REx (Origens, Interpretação Espectral, Identificação de Recursos e Segurança - Regolith Explorer) com amostras do asteroide chamado Bennu começará às 10h EDT (11 horas, pelo horário de Brasília) e irá ao ar pela TV Nasa, no aplicativo da Nasa e no site da agência".


Em seguida, será realizada uma coletiva de imprensa, quando a cápsula de amostra chegar a uma sala no campo de treinamento militar.


"Para entregar com sucesso uma amostra do asteroide Bennu próximo da Terra, os operadores de espaçonaves precisam garantir que a OSIRIS-REx viaje na velocidade e direção corretas para liberar a cápsula de amostra na atmosfera, pousando-a no campo de testes e treinamento do Departamento de Defesa dos EUA em Utah", disse a Nasa.


Segundo a agência, a liderança da missão discutirá os resultados das manobras de trajetória final da espaçonave e as expectativas para a entrada, descida e pouso da cápsula, além dos planos para operações de recuperação no deserto ocidental de Utah.


O OSIRIS-REx é a terceira missão do Programa Novas Fronteiras da Nasa, gerenciado pelo Marshall Space Flight Center da Nasa em Huntsville, Alabama, para a Diretoria de Missões Científicas da agência em Washington.


"Quando chegar, a espaçonave OSIRIS-REx liberará a cápsula com a amostra do asteroide para um pouso seguro no deserto de Utah. O material primitivo de Bennu – rochas e poeira recolhidas da superfície do asteroide em 2020 – oferecerá a gerações de cientistas uma janela para a época em que o Sol e os planetas se formavam há cerca de 4,5 mil milhões de anos", acrescenta a Nasa.


Fonte: https://odia.ig.com.br/mundo-e-ciencia/2023/09/6711886-nasa-exibira-pouso-com-primeira-amostra-de-asteroide-coletada-no-espaco-veja-quando.html. Acesso em 21/09/2023

No trecho “Segundo a agência, a liderança da missão discutirá os resultados das manobras de trajetória final da espaçonave e as expectativas para a entrada, descida e pouso da cápsula [...]” (5º parágrafo), a expressão destacada serve para:
Alternativas
Q3640533 Português

Leia o texto a seguir:


Nasa exibirá pouso com primeira amostra de asteroide coletada no espaço; veja quando


OSIRIS-REx é a terceira missão do Programa Novas Fronteiras da Nasa, gerenciado pelo Marshall Space Flight Center da Nasa em Huntsville, Alabama, para a Diretoria de Missões Científicas da agência em Washington 


São Paulo - A primeira amostra de asteroide coletada no espaço pela Agência Aeroespacial dos Estados Unidos (Nasa) chegará à Terra no domingo, 24. O pouso, segundo a Nasa, será acompanhado de perto pela agência, com cobertura ao vivo.


"O pouso da cápsula da espaçonave OSIRIS-REx (Origens, Interpretação Espectral, Identificação de Recursos e Segurança - Regolith Explorer) com amostras do asteroide chamado Bennu começará às 10h EDT (11 horas, pelo horário de Brasília) e irá ao ar pela TV Nasa, no aplicativo da Nasa e no site da agência".


Em seguida, será realizada uma coletiva de imprensa, quando a cápsula de amostra chegar a uma sala no campo de treinamento militar.


"Para entregar com sucesso uma amostra do asteroide Bennu próximo da Terra, os operadores de espaçonaves precisam garantir que a OSIRIS-REx viaje na velocidade e direção corretas para liberar a cápsula de amostra na atmosfera, pousando-a no campo de testes e treinamento do Departamento de Defesa dos EUA em Utah", disse a Nasa.


Segundo a agência, a liderança da missão discutirá os resultados das manobras de trajetória final da espaçonave e as expectativas para a entrada, descida e pouso da cápsula, além dos planos para operações de recuperação no deserto ocidental de Utah.


O OSIRIS-REx é a terceira missão do Programa Novas Fronteiras da Nasa, gerenciado pelo Marshall Space Flight Center da Nasa em Huntsville, Alabama, para a Diretoria de Missões Científicas da agência em Washington.


"Quando chegar, a espaçonave OSIRIS-REx liberará a cápsula com a amostra do asteroide para um pouso seguro no deserto de Utah. O material primitivo de Bennu – rochas e poeira recolhidas da superfície do asteroide em 2020 – oferecerá a gerações de cientistas uma janela para a época em que o Sol e os planetas se formavam há cerca de 4,5 mil milhões de anos", acrescenta a Nasa.


Fonte: https://odia.ig.com.br/mundo-e-ciencia/2023/09/6711886-nasa-exibira-pouso-com-primeira-amostra-de-asteroide-coletada-no-espaco-veja-quando.html. Acesso em 21/09/2023

O objetivo principal do texto é:
Alternativas
Q3592296 Inglês
11 minutes of daily exercise could have a positive impact on your health, large study shows

By Kristen Rogers, CNN

Updated 1145 GMT (1945 HKT) March 1, 2023


(CNN)When you can't fit your entire workout into a busy day, do you think there's no point in doing anything at all? You should rethink that mindset. Just 11 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic activity per day could lower your risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease or premature death, a large new study has found.

Aerobic activities include walking, dancing, running, jogging, cycling and swimming. You can gauge the intensity level of an activity by your heart rate and how hard you're breathing as you move. Generally, being able to talk but not sing during an activity would make it moderate intensity. Vigorous intensity is marked by the inability to carry on a conversation.

Higher levels of physical activity have been associated with lower rates of premature death and chronic disease, according to past research. But how the risk levels for these outcomes are affected by the amount of exercise someone gets has been more difficult to determine. To explore this impact, scientists largely from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom looked at data from 196 studies, amounting to more than 30 million adult participants who were followed for 10 years on average. The results of this latest study were published Tuesday in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

The study mainly focused on participants who had done the minimum recommended amount of 150 minutes of exercise per week, or 22 minutes per day. Compared with inactive participants, adults who had done 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity per week had a 31% lower risk of dying from any cause, a 29% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and a 15% lower risk of dying from cancer.

The same amount of exercise was linked with a 27% lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease and 12% lower risk when it came to cancer.

"This is a compelling systematic review of existing research," said CNN Medical Analyst Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and public health professor at George Washington University, who wasn't involved in the research. "We already knew that there was a strong correlation between increased physical activity and reduced risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer and premature death. This research confirms it, and furthermore states that a smaller amount than the 150 minutes of recommended exercise a week can help."

Even people who got just half the minimum recommended amount of physical activity benefited. Accumulating 75 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week - about 11 minutes of activity per day - was associated with a 23% lower risk of early death. Getting active for 75 minutes on a weekly basis was also enough to reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease by 17% and cancer by 7%.

Beyond 150 minutes per week, any additional benefits were smaller.

"If you are someone who finds the idea of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity a week a bit daunting, then our findings should be good news," said study author Dr. Soren Brage, group leader of the Physical Activity Epidemiology group in the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, in a news release. "This is also a good starting position - if you find that 75 minutes a week is manageable, then you could try stepping it up gradually to the full recommended amount."

The authors' findings affirm the World Health Organization's position that doing some physical activity is better than doing none, even if you don't get the recommended amounts of exercise.

"One in 10 premature deaths could have been prevented if everyone achieved even half the recommended level of physical activity," the authors wrote in the study. Additionally, "10.9% and 5.2% of all incident cases of CVD (cardiovascular disease) and cancer would have been prevented."

Important note: If you experience pain while exercising, stop immediately. Check with your doctor before beginning any new exercise program.

A little exercise every day.

The authors didn't have details on the specific types of physical activity the participants did. But some experts do have thoughts on how physical activity could reduce risk for chronic diseases and premature death.

"There are many potential mechanisms including the improvement and maintenance of body composition, insulin resistance and physical function because of a wide variety of favorable influences of aerobic activity," said Haruki Momma, an associate professor of medicine and science in sports and exercise at Tohoku University in Japan. Momma wasn't involved in the research.

Benefits could also include improvement to immune function, lung and heart health, inflammation levels, hypertension, cholesterol, and amount of body fat, said Eleanor Watts, a postdoctoral fellow in the division of cancer epidemiology and genetics at the National Cancer Institute. Watts wasn't involved in the research.

"These translate into lower risk of getting chronic diseases," said Peter Katzmarzyk, associate executive director for population and public health sciences at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Katzmarzyk wasn't involved in the research.

The fact that participants who did only half the minimum recommended amount of exercise still experienced benefits doesn't mean people shouldn't aim for more exercise, but rather that "perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good," Wen said. "Some is better than none."

To get up to 150 minutes of physical activity per week, find activities you enjoy, Wen said. "You are far more likely to engage in something you love doing than something you have to make yourself do."

And when it comes to how you fit in your exercise, you can think outside the box.

"Moderate activity doesn't have to involve what we normally think of (as) exercise, such as sports or running," said study coauthor Leandro Garcia, a lecturer in the school of medicine, dentistry and biomedical sciences at Queen's University Belfast, in a news release. "Sometimes, replacing some habits is all that is needed.

"For example, try to walk or cycle to your work or study place instead of using a car, or engage in active play with your kids or grand kids. Doing activities that you enjoy and that are easy to include in your weekly routine is an excellent way to become more active."



ncee-ddeeahh-rskkwwelnessindex.html health/moderate-physical-activity-cancer-death-risk-wellness/index.html
Baseado na leitura do texto, pode-se afirmar que:
Alternativas
Q3592295 Inglês
11 minutes of daily exercise could have a positive impact on your health, large study shows

By Kristen Rogers, CNN

Updated 1145 GMT (1945 HKT) March 1, 2023


(CNN)When you can't fit your entire workout into a busy day, do you think there's no point in doing anything at all? You should rethink that mindset. Just 11 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic activity per day could lower your risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease or premature death, a large new study has found.

Aerobic activities include walking, dancing, running, jogging, cycling and swimming. You can gauge the intensity level of an activity by your heart rate and how hard you're breathing as you move. Generally, being able to talk but not sing during an activity would make it moderate intensity. Vigorous intensity is marked by the inability to carry on a conversation.

Higher levels of physical activity have been associated with lower rates of premature death and chronic disease, according to past research. But how the risk levels for these outcomes are affected by the amount of exercise someone gets has been more difficult to determine. To explore this impact, scientists largely from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom looked at data from 196 studies, amounting to more than 30 million adult participants who were followed for 10 years on average. The results of this latest study were published Tuesday in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

The study mainly focused on participants who had done the minimum recommended amount of 150 minutes of exercise per week, or 22 minutes per day. Compared with inactive participants, adults who had done 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity per week had a 31% lower risk of dying from any cause, a 29% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and a 15% lower risk of dying from cancer.

The same amount of exercise was linked with a 27% lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease and 12% lower risk when it came to cancer.

"This is a compelling systematic review of existing research," said CNN Medical Analyst Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and public health professor at George Washington University, who wasn't involved in the research. "We already knew that there was a strong correlation between increased physical activity and reduced risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer and premature death. This research confirms it, and furthermore states that a smaller amount than the 150 minutes of recommended exercise a week can help."

Even people who got just half the minimum recommended amount of physical activity benefited. Accumulating 75 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week - about 11 minutes of activity per day - was associated with a 23% lower risk of early death. Getting active for 75 minutes on a weekly basis was also enough to reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease by 17% and cancer by 7%.

Beyond 150 minutes per week, any additional benefits were smaller.

"If you are someone who finds the idea of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity a week a bit daunting, then our findings should be good news," said study author Dr. Soren Brage, group leader of the Physical Activity Epidemiology group in the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, in a news release. "This is also a good starting position - if you find that 75 minutes a week is manageable, then you could try stepping it up gradually to the full recommended amount."

The authors' findings affirm the World Health Organization's position that doing some physical activity is better than doing none, even if you don't get the recommended amounts of exercise.

"One in 10 premature deaths could have been prevented if everyone achieved even half the recommended level of physical activity," the authors wrote in the study. Additionally, "10.9% and 5.2% of all incident cases of CVD (cardiovascular disease) and cancer would have been prevented."

Important note: If you experience pain while exercising, stop immediately. Check with your doctor before beginning any new exercise program.

A little exercise every day.

The authors didn't have details on the specific types of physical activity the participants did. But some experts do have thoughts on how physical activity could reduce risk for chronic diseases and premature death.

"There are many potential mechanisms including the improvement and maintenance of body composition, insulin resistance and physical function because of a wide variety of favorable influences of aerobic activity," said Haruki Momma, an associate professor of medicine and science in sports and exercise at Tohoku University in Japan. Momma wasn't involved in the research.

Benefits could also include improvement to immune function, lung and heart health, inflammation levels, hypertension, cholesterol, and amount of body fat, said Eleanor Watts, a postdoctoral fellow in the division of cancer epidemiology and genetics at the National Cancer Institute. Watts wasn't involved in the research.

"These translate into lower risk of getting chronic diseases," said Peter Katzmarzyk, associate executive director for population and public health sciences at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Katzmarzyk wasn't involved in the research.

The fact that participants who did only half the minimum recommended amount of exercise still experienced benefits doesn't mean people shouldn't aim for more exercise, but rather that "perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good," Wen said. "Some is better than none."

To get up to 150 minutes of physical activity per week, find activities you enjoy, Wen said. "You are far more likely to engage in something you love doing than something you have to make yourself do."

And when it comes to how you fit in your exercise, you can think outside the box.

"Moderate activity doesn't have to involve what we normally think of (as) exercise, such as sports or running," said study coauthor Leandro Garcia, a lecturer in the school of medicine, dentistry and biomedical sciences at Queen's University Belfast, in a news release. "Sometimes, replacing some habits is all that is needed.

"For example, try to walk or cycle to your work or study place instead of using a car, or engage in active play with your kids or grand kids. Doing activities that you enjoy and that are easy to include in your weekly routine is an excellent way to become more active."



ncee-ddeeahh-rskkwwelnessindex.html health/moderate-physical-activity-cancer-death-risk-wellness/index.html
Na oração "You are far more likely to engage in something you love doing than something you have to make yourself do", o termo yourself é:
Alternativas
Q3592294 Inglês
11 minutes of daily exercise could have a positive impact on your health, large study shows

By Kristen Rogers, CNN

Updated 1145 GMT (1945 HKT) March 1, 2023


(CNN)When you can't fit your entire workout into a busy day, do you think there's no point in doing anything at all? You should rethink that mindset. Just 11 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic activity per day could lower your risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease or premature death, a large new study has found.

Aerobic activities include walking, dancing, running, jogging, cycling and swimming. You can gauge the intensity level of an activity by your heart rate and how hard you're breathing as you move. Generally, being able to talk but not sing during an activity would make it moderate intensity. Vigorous intensity is marked by the inability to carry on a conversation.

Higher levels of physical activity have been associated with lower rates of premature death and chronic disease, according to past research. But how the risk levels for these outcomes are affected by the amount of exercise someone gets has been more difficult to determine. To explore this impact, scientists largely from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom looked at data from 196 studies, amounting to more than 30 million adult participants who were followed for 10 years on average. The results of this latest study were published Tuesday in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

The study mainly focused on participants who had done the minimum recommended amount of 150 minutes of exercise per week, or 22 minutes per day. Compared with inactive participants, adults who had done 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity per week had a 31% lower risk of dying from any cause, a 29% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and a 15% lower risk of dying from cancer.

The same amount of exercise was linked with a 27% lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease and 12% lower risk when it came to cancer.

"This is a compelling systematic review of existing research," said CNN Medical Analyst Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and public health professor at George Washington University, who wasn't involved in the research. "We already knew that there was a strong correlation between increased physical activity and reduced risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer and premature death. This research confirms it, and furthermore states that a smaller amount than the 150 minutes of recommended exercise a week can help."

Even people who got just half the minimum recommended amount of physical activity benefited. Accumulating 75 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week - about 11 minutes of activity per day - was associated with a 23% lower risk of early death. Getting active for 75 minutes on a weekly basis was also enough to reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease by 17% and cancer by 7%.

Beyond 150 minutes per week, any additional benefits were smaller.

"If you are someone who finds the idea of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity a week a bit daunting, then our findings should be good news," said study author Dr. Soren Brage, group leader of the Physical Activity Epidemiology group in the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, in a news release. "This is also a good starting position - if you find that 75 minutes a week is manageable, then you could try stepping it up gradually to the full recommended amount."

The authors' findings affirm the World Health Organization's position that doing some physical activity is better than doing none, even if you don't get the recommended amounts of exercise.

"One in 10 premature deaths could have been prevented if everyone achieved even half the recommended level of physical activity," the authors wrote in the study. Additionally, "10.9% and 5.2% of all incident cases of CVD (cardiovascular disease) and cancer would have been prevented."

Important note: If you experience pain while exercising, stop immediately. Check with your doctor before beginning any new exercise program.

A little exercise every day.

The authors didn't have details on the specific types of physical activity the participants did. But some experts do have thoughts on how physical activity could reduce risk for chronic diseases and premature death.

"There are many potential mechanisms including the improvement and maintenance of body composition, insulin resistance and physical function because of a wide variety of favorable influences of aerobic activity," said Haruki Momma, an associate professor of medicine and science in sports and exercise at Tohoku University in Japan. Momma wasn't involved in the research.

Benefits could also include improvement to immune function, lung and heart health, inflammation levels, hypertension, cholesterol, and amount of body fat, said Eleanor Watts, a postdoctoral fellow in the division of cancer epidemiology and genetics at the National Cancer Institute. Watts wasn't involved in the research.

"These translate into lower risk of getting chronic diseases," said Peter Katzmarzyk, associate executive director for population and public health sciences at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Katzmarzyk wasn't involved in the research.

The fact that participants who did only half the minimum recommended amount of exercise still experienced benefits doesn't mean people shouldn't aim for more exercise, but rather that "perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good," Wen said. "Some is better than none."

To get up to 150 minutes of physical activity per week, find activities you enjoy, Wen said. "You are far more likely to engage in something you love doing than something you have to make yourself do."

And when it comes to how you fit in your exercise, you can think outside the box.

"Moderate activity doesn't have to involve what we normally think of (as) exercise, such as sports or running," said study coauthor Leandro Garcia, a lecturer in the school of medicine, dentistry and biomedical sciences at Queen's University Belfast, in a news release. "Sometimes, replacing some habits is all that is needed.

"For example, try to walk or cycle to your work or study place instead of using a car, or engage in active play with your kids or grand kids. Doing activities that you enjoy and that are easy to include in your weekly routine is an excellent way to become more active."



ncee-ddeeahh-rskkwwelnessindex.html health/moderate-physical-activity-cancer-death-risk-wellness/index.html
De acordo com o texto, qual das afirmações a seguir está incorreta?
Alternativas
Q3592293 Inglês
11 minutes of daily exercise could have a positive impact on your health, large study shows

By Kristen Rogers, CNN

Updated 1145 GMT (1945 HKT) March 1, 2023


(CNN)When you can't fit your entire workout into a busy day, do you think there's no point in doing anything at all? You should rethink that mindset. Just 11 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic activity per day could lower your risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease or premature death, a large new study has found.

Aerobic activities include walking, dancing, running, jogging, cycling and swimming. You can gauge the intensity level of an activity by your heart rate and how hard you're breathing as you move. Generally, being able to talk but not sing during an activity would make it moderate intensity. Vigorous intensity is marked by the inability to carry on a conversation.

Higher levels of physical activity have been associated with lower rates of premature death and chronic disease, according to past research. But how the risk levels for these outcomes are affected by the amount of exercise someone gets has been more difficult to determine. To explore this impact, scientists largely from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom looked at data from 196 studies, amounting to more than 30 million adult participants who were followed for 10 years on average. The results of this latest study were published Tuesday in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

The study mainly focused on participants who had done the minimum recommended amount of 150 minutes of exercise per week, or 22 minutes per day. Compared with inactive participants, adults who had done 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity per week had a 31% lower risk of dying from any cause, a 29% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and a 15% lower risk of dying from cancer.

The same amount of exercise was linked with a 27% lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease and 12% lower risk when it came to cancer.

"This is a compelling systematic review of existing research," said CNN Medical Analyst Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and public health professor at George Washington University, who wasn't involved in the research. "We already knew that there was a strong correlation between increased physical activity and reduced risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer and premature death. This research confirms it, and furthermore states that a smaller amount than the 150 minutes of recommended exercise a week can help."

Even people who got just half the minimum recommended amount of physical activity benefited. Accumulating 75 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week - about 11 minutes of activity per day - was associated with a 23% lower risk of early death. Getting active for 75 minutes on a weekly basis was also enough to reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease by 17% and cancer by 7%.

Beyond 150 minutes per week, any additional benefits were smaller.

"If you are someone who finds the idea of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity a week a bit daunting, then our findings should be good news," said study author Dr. Soren Brage, group leader of the Physical Activity Epidemiology group in the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, in a news release. "This is also a good starting position - if you find that 75 minutes a week is manageable, then you could try stepping it up gradually to the full recommended amount."

The authors' findings affirm the World Health Organization's position that doing some physical activity is better than doing none, even if you don't get the recommended amounts of exercise.

"One in 10 premature deaths could have been prevented if everyone achieved even half the recommended level of physical activity," the authors wrote in the study. Additionally, "10.9% and 5.2% of all incident cases of CVD (cardiovascular disease) and cancer would have been prevented."

Important note: If you experience pain while exercising, stop immediately. Check with your doctor before beginning any new exercise program.

A little exercise every day.

The authors didn't have details on the specific types of physical activity the participants did. But some experts do have thoughts on how physical activity could reduce risk for chronic diseases and premature death.

"There are many potential mechanisms including the improvement and maintenance of body composition, insulin resistance and physical function because of a wide variety of favorable influences of aerobic activity," said Haruki Momma, an associate professor of medicine and science in sports and exercise at Tohoku University in Japan. Momma wasn't involved in the research.

Benefits could also include improvement to immune function, lung and heart health, inflammation levels, hypertension, cholesterol, and amount of body fat, said Eleanor Watts, a postdoctoral fellow in the division of cancer epidemiology and genetics at the National Cancer Institute. Watts wasn't involved in the research.

"These translate into lower risk of getting chronic diseases," said Peter Katzmarzyk, associate executive director for population and public health sciences at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Katzmarzyk wasn't involved in the research.

The fact that participants who did only half the minimum recommended amount of exercise still experienced benefits doesn't mean people shouldn't aim for more exercise, but rather that "perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good," Wen said. "Some is better than none."

To get up to 150 minutes of physical activity per week, find activities you enjoy, Wen said. "You are far more likely to engage in something you love doing than something you have to make yourself do."

And when it comes to how you fit in your exercise, you can think outside the box.

"Moderate activity doesn't have to involve what we normally think of (as) exercise, such as sports or running," said study coauthor Leandro Garcia, a lecturer in the school of medicine, dentistry and biomedical sciences at Queen's University Belfast, in a news release. "Sometimes, replacing some habits is all that is needed.

"For example, try to walk or cycle to your work or study place instead of using a car, or engage in active play with your kids or grand kids. Doing activities that you enjoy and that are easy to include in your weekly routine is an excellent way to become more active."



ncee-ddeeahh-rskkwwelnessindex.html health/moderate-physical-activity-cancer-death-risk-wellness/index.html
A oração "Some is better than none", observa-se:
Alternativas
Q3592292 Inglês
11 minutes of daily exercise could have a positive impact on your health, large study shows

By Kristen Rogers, CNN

Updated 1145 GMT (1945 HKT) March 1, 2023


(CNN)When you can't fit your entire workout into a busy day, do you think there's no point in doing anything at all? You should rethink that mindset. Just 11 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic activity per day could lower your risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease or premature death, a large new study has found.

Aerobic activities include walking, dancing, running, jogging, cycling and swimming. You can gauge the intensity level of an activity by your heart rate and how hard you're breathing as you move. Generally, being able to talk but not sing during an activity would make it moderate intensity. Vigorous intensity is marked by the inability to carry on a conversation.

Higher levels of physical activity have been associated with lower rates of premature death and chronic disease, according to past research. But how the risk levels for these outcomes are affected by the amount of exercise someone gets has been more difficult to determine. To explore this impact, scientists largely from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom looked at data from 196 studies, amounting to more than 30 million adult participants who were followed for 10 years on average. The results of this latest study were published Tuesday in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

The study mainly focused on participants who had done the minimum recommended amount of 150 minutes of exercise per week, or 22 minutes per day. Compared with inactive participants, adults who had done 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity per week had a 31% lower risk of dying from any cause, a 29% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and a 15% lower risk of dying from cancer.

The same amount of exercise was linked with a 27% lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease and 12% lower risk when it came to cancer.

"This is a compelling systematic review of existing research," said CNN Medical Analyst Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and public health professor at George Washington University, who wasn't involved in the research. "We already knew that there was a strong correlation between increased physical activity and reduced risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer and premature death. This research confirms it, and furthermore states that a smaller amount than the 150 minutes of recommended exercise a week can help."

Even people who got just half the minimum recommended amount of physical activity benefited. Accumulating 75 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week - about 11 minutes of activity per day - was associated with a 23% lower risk of early death. Getting active for 75 minutes on a weekly basis was also enough to reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease by 17% and cancer by 7%.

Beyond 150 minutes per week, any additional benefits were smaller.

"If you are someone who finds the idea of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity a week a bit daunting, then our findings should be good news," said study author Dr. Soren Brage, group leader of the Physical Activity Epidemiology group in the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge, in a news release. "This is also a good starting position - if you find that 75 minutes a week is manageable, then you could try stepping it up gradually to the full recommended amount."

The authors' findings affirm the World Health Organization's position that doing some physical activity is better than doing none, even if you don't get the recommended amounts of exercise.

"One in 10 premature deaths could have been prevented if everyone achieved even half the recommended level of physical activity," the authors wrote in the study. Additionally, "10.9% and 5.2% of all incident cases of CVD (cardiovascular disease) and cancer would have been prevented."

Important note: If you experience pain while exercising, stop immediately. Check with your doctor before beginning any new exercise program.

A little exercise every day.

The authors didn't have details on the specific types of physical activity the participants did. But some experts do have thoughts on how physical activity could reduce risk for chronic diseases and premature death.

"There are many potential mechanisms including the improvement and maintenance of body composition, insulin resistance and physical function because of a wide variety of favorable influences of aerobic activity," said Haruki Momma, an associate professor of medicine and science in sports and exercise at Tohoku University in Japan. Momma wasn't involved in the research.

Benefits could also include improvement to immune function, lung and heart health, inflammation levels, hypertension, cholesterol, and amount of body fat, said Eleanor Watts, a postdoctoral fellow in the division of cancer epidemiology and genetics at the National Cancer Institute. Watts wasn't involved in the research.

"These translate into lower risk of getting chronic diseases," said Peter Katzmarzyk, associate executive director for population and public health sciences at Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Katzmarzyk wasn't involved in the research.

The fact that participants who did only half the minimum recommended amount of exercise still experienced benefits doesn't mean people shouldn't aim for more exercise, but rather that "perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good," Wen said. "Some is better than none."

To get up to 150 minutes of physical activity per week, find activities you enjoy, Wen said. "You are far more likely to engage in something you love doing than something you have to make yourself do."

And when it comes to how you fit in your exercise, you can think outside the box.

"Moderate activity doesn't have to involve what we normally think of (as) exercise, such as sports or running," said study coauthor Leandro Garcia, a lecturer in the school of medicine, dentistry and biomedical sciences at Queen's University Belfast, in a news release. "Sometimes, replacing some habits is all that is needed.

"For example, try to walk or cycle to your work or study place instead of using a car, or engage in active play with your kids or grand kids. Doing activities that you enjoy and that are easy to include in your weekly routine is an excellent way to become more active."



ncee-ddeeahh-rskkwwelnessindex.html health/moderate-physical-activity-cancer-death-risk-wellness/index.html
De acordo com o texto, apenas 11 minutos de atividade aeróbica de intensidade moderada a vigorosa por dia podem reduzir o risco de:
Alternativas
Q3592291 Inglês
Will Vladimir Putin ever face a war crimes trial?

Published by Robert Plummer

BBC News


Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued a warrant for President Vladimir Putin's arrest, it is no more than the first step in a very long process.

The United Nations clearly believes there is sufficient evidence to accuse the Russian leader of war crimes in Ukraine.

However the practical and logistical problems in pursuing such a case are immense.

This is what the process of bringing Mr Putin to justice could look like.

Can President Putin be arrested?

At present, the Russian leader enjoys unchallenged power in his native land, so there is no prospect of the Kremlin handing him over to the ICC.

As long as he stays put in Russia, he faces no risk of being arrested.

Mr Putin could be detained if he leaves the country. But, given the fact that his freedom of movement is already severely limited by international sanctions against him, he is unlikely to show up in a country that would want to put him on trial.

Since Russian troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022, he has visited just eight countries. Seven of those would be considered by him to be part of Russia's "near abroad" - that is, they were constituent parts of the Soviet Union before it collapsed at the end of 1991.

His only recent destination that does not fall into this category is Iran, which he visited in July last year to meet the theocracy's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.

Since Iran has helped the Russian war effort by supplying drones and other military hardware, any repeat visit to Tehran would be unlikely to place Mr Putin in any jeopardy.

What war crimes is Russia accused of?

Will Putin actually face trial?

There are at least two big obstacles to that. Firstly, Russia does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC.

The court was established in 2002 by a treaty known as the Rome Statute.

This statute lays down that it is the duty of every state to exercise its own criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. The ICC can only intervene where a state is unable or unwilling to carry out the investigation and prosecute perpetrators.

In all, 123 states have agreed to abide by it, but there are some significant exceptions, including Russia. 

Some countries, including Ukraine, have signed the treaty, but not ratified it. You can see a full list of countries that are party to the Rome Statute here.

So you can see that the legal position is already getting shaky.

And secondly, although it's not unknown for trials to be held without the defendant in the dock, that's not an option here. The ICC does not conduct trials in absentia, so that avenue is closed off too.

Who else has faced this kind of trial?

The idea of trying people for crimes against humanity pre-dates the existence of the ICC.

It began in 1945 after World War Two with the Nuremberg Trials, which were held to punish key members of the hierarchy in Nazi Germany for the Holocaust and other atrocities.

Those included Nazi leader Adolf Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess, who was sentenced to life imprisonment and died by his own hand in 1987.

Of course, Mr Putin has not actually been charged with crimes against humanity, even though US Vice-President Kamala Harris has argued that he should be.

And if he were, that would pose another legal dilemma as the UN itself says, "crimes against humanity have not yet been codified in a dedicated treaty of international law, unlike genocide and war crimes, although there are efforts to do so."

Other bespoke bodies have sought to convict those accused of war crimes. That includes the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, a UN organisation that existed from 1993 to 2017.

During that time, it convicted and sentenced 90 people. But arguably the most notorious of those indicted, former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, died of a heart attack in 2006 while in detention.

As for the ICC itself, it has so far indicted 40 individuals apart from Mr Putin, all from African countries. Of those, 17 people have been detained at The Hague, 10 have been convicted of crimes and four have been acquitted.

What does this mean for the war in Ukraine?

The arrest warrant is being seen as a signal from the international community that what is taking place in Ukraine is against international law.

The court says the reason it is going public with these warrants is that these crimes are continuing. In doing so, it is trying to deter further crimes taking place.

But, the main reaction from Russia so far has been to dismiss the warrants as meaningless.

In fact, the Kremlin denies its forces have committed any atrocities in Ukraine, and Mr Putin's spokesman called the ICC's decision "outrageous and unacceptable".

Faced with such defiance, it seems unlikely that the ICC's actions will have any impact on Russia's war in Ukraine - and Mr Putin's "special military operation" will continue to grind mercilessly on.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64994992
Na oração "His only recent destination that does not fall into this category is Iran.", a palavra "His" é um:
Alternativas
Q3592290 Inglês
Will Vladimir Putin ever face a war crimes trial?

Published by Robert Plummer

BBC News


Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued a warrant for President Vladimir Putin's arrest, it is no more than the first step in a very long process.

The United Nations clearly believes there is sufficient evidence to accuse the Russian leader of war crimes in Ukraine.

However the practical and logistical problems in pursuing such a case are immense.

This is what the process of bringing Mr Putin to justice could look like.

Can President Putin be arrested?

At present, the Russian leader enjoys unchallenged power in his native land, so there is no prospect of the Kremlin handing him over to the ICC.

As long as he stays put in Russia, he faces no risk of being arrested.

Mr Putin could be detained if he leaves the country. But, given the fact that his freedom of movement is already severely limited by international sanctions against him, he is unlikely to show up in a country that would want to put him on trial.

Since Russian troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022, he has visited just eight countries. Seven of those would be considered by him to be part of Russia's "near abroad" - that is, they were constituent parts of the Soviet Union before it collapsed at the end of 1991.

His only recent destination that does not fall into this category is Iran, which he visited in July last year to meet the theocracy's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.

Since Iran has helped the Russian war effort by supplying drones and other military hardware, any repeat visit to Tehran would be unlikely to place Mr Putin in any jeopardy.

What war crimes is Russia accused of?

Will Putin actually face trial?

There are at least two big obstacles to that. Firstly, Russia does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC.

The court was established in 2002 by a treaty known as the Rome Statute.

This statute lays down that it is the duty of every state to exercise its own criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. The ICC can only intervene where a state is unable or unwilling to carry out the investigation and prosecute perpetrators.

In all, 123 states have agreed to abide by it, but there are some significant exceptions, including Russia. 

Some countries, including Ukraine, have signed the treaty, but not ratified it. You can see a full list of countries that are party to the Rome Statute here.

So you can see that the legal position is already getting shaky.

And secondly, although it's not unknown for trials to be held without the defendant in the dock, that's not an option here. The ICC does not conduct trials in absentia, so that avenue is closed off too.

Who else has faced this kind of trial?

The idea of trying people for crimes against humanity pre-dates the existence of the ICC.

It began in 1945 after World War Two with the Nuremberg Trials, which were held to punish key members of the hierarchy in Nazi Germany for the Holocaust and other atrocities.

Those included Nazi leader Adolf Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess, who was sentenced to life imprisonment and died by his own hand in 1987.

Of course, Mr Putin has not actually been charged with crimes against humanity, even though US Vice-President Kamala Harris has argued that he should be.

And if he were, that would pose another legal dilemma as the UN itself says, "crimes against humanity have not yet been codified in a dedicated treaty of international law, unlike genocide and war crimes, although there are efforts to do so."

Other bespoke bodies have sought to convict those accused of war crimes. That includes the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, a UN organisation that existed from 1993 to 2017.

During that time, it convicted and sentenced 90 people. But arguably the most notorious of those indicted, former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, died of a heart attack in 2006 while in detention.

As for the ICC itself, it has so far indicted 40 individuals apart from Mr Putin, all from African countries. Of those, 17 people have been detained at The Hague, 10 have been convicted of crimes and four have been acquitted.

What does this mean for the war in Ukraine?

The arrest warrant is being seen as a signal from the international community that what is taking place in Ukraine is against international law.

The court says the reason it is going public with these warrants is that these crimes are continuing. In doing so, it is trying to deter further crimes taking place.

But, the main reaction from Russia so far has been to dismiss the warrants as meaningless.

In fact, the Kremlin denies its forces have committed any atrocities in Ukraine, and Mr Putin's spokesman called the ICC's decision "outrageous and unacceptable".

Faced with such defiance, it seems unlikely that the ICC's actions will have any impact on Russia's war in Ukraine - and Mr Putin's "special military operation" will continue to grind mercilessly on.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64994992
Após a leitura do texto, assinale a alternativa incorreta.
Alternativas
Q3592289 Inglês
Will Vladimir Putin ever face a war crimes trial?

Published by Robert Plummer

BBC News


Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued a warrant for President Vladimir Putin's arrest, it is no more than the first step in a very long process.

The United Nations clearly believes there is sufficient evidence to accuse the Russian leader of war crimes in Ukraine.

However the practical and logistical problems in pursuing such a case are immense.

This is what the process of bringing Mr Putin to justice could look like.

Can President Putin be arrested?

At present, the Russian leader enjoys unchallenged power in his native land, so there is no prospect of the Kremlin handing him over to the ICC.

As long as he stays put in Russia, he faces no risk of being arrested.

Mr Putin could be detained if he leaves the country. But, given the fact that his freedom of movement is already severely limited by international sanctions against him, he is unlikely to show up in a country that would want to put him on trial.

Since Russian troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022, he has visited just eight countries. Seven of those would be considered by him to be part of Russia's "near abroad" - that is, they were constituent parts of the Soviet Union before it collapsed at the end of 1991.

His only recent destination that does not fall into this category is Iran, which he visited in July last year to meet the theocracy's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.

Since Iran has helped the Russian war effort by supplying drones and other military hardware, any repeat visit to Tehran would be unlikely to place Mr Putin in any jeopardy.

What war crimes is Russia accused of?

Will Putin actually face trial?

There are at least two big obstacles to that. Firstly, Russia does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC.

The court was established in 2002 by a treaty known as the Rome Statute.

This statute lays down that it is the duty of every state to exercise its own criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. The ICC can only intervene where a state is unable or unwilling to carry out the investigation and prosecute perpetrators.

In all, 123 states have agreed to abide by it, but there are some significant exceptions, including Russia. 

Some countries, including Ukraine, have signed the treaty, but not ratified it. You can see a full list of countries that are party to the Rome Statute here.

So you can see that the legal position is already getting shaky.

And secondly, although it's not unknown for trials to be held without the defendant in the dock, that's not an option here. The ICC does not conduct trials in absentia, so that avenue is closed off too.

Who else has faced this kind of trial?

The idea of trying people for crimes against humanity pre-dates the existence of the ICC.

It began in 1945 after World War Two with the Nuremberg Trials, which were held to punish key members of the hierarchy in Nazi Germany for the Holocaust and other atrocities.

Those included Nazi leader Adolf Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess, who was sentenced to life imprisonment and died by his own hand in 1987.

Of course, Mr Putin has not actually been charged with crimes against humanity, even though US Vice-President Kamala Harris has argued that he should be.

And if he were, that would pose another legal dilemma as the UN itself says, "crimes against humanity have not yet been codified in a dedicated treaty of international law, unlike genocide and war crimes, although there are efforts to do so."

Other bespoke bodies have sought to convict those accused of war crimes. That includes the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, a UN organisation that existed from 1993 to 2017.

During that time, it convicted and sentenced 90 people. But arguably the most notorious of those indicted, former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, died of a heart attack in 2006 while in detention.

As for the ICC itself, it has so far indicted 40 individuals apart from Mr Putin, all from African countries. Of those, 17 people have been detained at The Hague, 10 have been convicted of crimes and four have been acquitted.

What does this mean for the war in Ukraine?

The arrest warrant is being seen as a signal from the international community that what is taking place in Ukraine is against international law.

The court says the reason it is going public with these warrants is that these crimes are continuing. In doing so, it is trying to deter further crimes taking place.

But, the main reaction from Russia so far has been to dismiss the warrants as meaningless.

In fact, the Kremlin denies its forces have committed any atrocities in Ukraine, and Mr Putin's spokesman called the ICC's decision "outrageous and unacceptable".

Faced with such defiance, it seems unlikely that the ICC's actions will have any impact on Russia's war in Ukraine - and Mr Putin's "special military operation" will continue to grind mercilessly on.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64994992
A oração "Some countries, including Ukraine, have signed the treaty" encontra-se no:
Alternativas
Q3592288 Inglês
Will Vladimir Putin ever face a war crimes trial?

Published by Robert Plummer

BBC News


Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued a warrant for President Vladimir Putin's arrest, it is no more than the first step in a very long process.

The United Nations clearly believes there is sufficient evidence to accuse the Russian leader of war crimes in Ukraine.

However the practical and logistical problems in pursuing such a case are immense.

This is what the process of bringing Mr Putin to justice could look like.

Can President Putin be arrested?

At present, the Russian leader enjoys unchallenged power in his native land, so there is no prospect of the Kremlin handing him over to the ICC.

As long as he stays put in Russia, he faces no risk of being arrested.

Mr Putin could be detained if he leaves the country. But, given the fact that his freedom of movement is already severely limited by international sanctions against him, he is unlikely to show up in a country that would want to put him on trial.

Since Russian troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022, he has visited just eight countries. Seven of those would be considered by him to be part of Russia's "near abroad" - that is, they were constituent parts of the Soviet Union before it collapsed at the end of 1991.

His only recent destination that does not fall into this category is Iran, which he visited in July last year to meet the theocracy's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.

Since Iran has helped the Russian war effort by supplying drones and other military hardware, any repeat visit to Tehran would be unlikely to place Mr Putin in any jeopardy.

What war crimes is Russia accused of?

Will Putin actually face trial?

There are at least two big obstacles to that. Firstly, Russia does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC.

The court was established in 2002 by a treaty known as the Rome Statute.

This statute lays down that it is the duty of every state to exercise its own criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. The ICC can only intervene where a state is unable or unwilling to carry out the investigation and prosecute perpetrators.

In all, 123 states have agreed to abide by it, but there are some significant exceptions, including Russia. 

Some countries, including Ukraine, have signed the treaty, but not ratified it. You can see a full list of countries that are party to the Rome Statute here.

So you can see that the legal position is already getting shaky.

And secondly, although it's not unknown for trials to be held without the defendant in the dock, that's not an option here. The ICC does not conduct trials in absentia, so that avenue is closed off too.

Who else has faced this kind of trial?

The idea of trying people for crimes against humanity pre-dates the existence of the ICC.

It began in 1945 after World War Two with the Nuremberg Trials, which were held to punish key members of the hierarchy in Nazi Germany for the Holocaust and other atrocities.

Those included Nazi leader Adolf Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess, who was sentenced to life imprisonment and died by his own hand in 1987.

Of course, Mr Putin has not actually been charged with crimes against humanity, even though US Vice-President Kamala Harris has argued that he should be.

And if he were, that would pose another legal dilemma as the UN itself says, "crimes against humanity have not yet been codified in a dedicated treaty of international law, unlike genocide and war crimes, although there are efforts to do so."

Other bespoke bodies have sought to convict those accused of war crimes. That includes the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, a UN organisation that existed from 1993 to 2017.

During that time, it convicted and sentenced 90 people. But arguably the most notorious of those indicted, former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, died of a heart attack in 2006 while in detention.

As for the ICC itself, it has so far indicted 40 individuals apart from Mr Putin, all from African countries. Of those, 17 people have been detained at The Hague, 10 have been convicted of crimes and four have been acquitted.

What does this mean for the war in Ukraine?

The arrest warrant is being seen as a signal from the international community that what is taking place in Ukraine is against international law.

The court says the reason it is going public with these warrants is that these crimes are continuing. In doing so, it is trying to deter further crimes taking place.

But, the main reaction from Russia so far has been to dismiss the warrants as meaningless.

In fact, the Kremlin denies its forces have committed any atrocities in Ukraine, and Mr Putin's spokesman called the ICC's decision "outrageous and unacceptable".

Faced with such defiance, it seems unlikely that the ICC's actions will have any impact on Russia's war in Ukraine - and Mr Putin's "special military operation" will continue to grind mercilessly on.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64994992
Após a leitura do texto, pode-se afirmar que:
Alternativas
Q3592287 Inglês
Will Vladimir Putin ever face a war crimes trial?

Published by Robert Plummer

BBC News


Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued a warrant for President Vladimir Putin's arrest, it is no more than the first step in a very long process.

The United Nations clearly believes there is sufficient evidence to accuse the Russian leader of war crimes in Ukraine.

However the practical and logistical problems in pursuing such a case are immense.

This is what the process of bringing Mr Putin to justice could look like.

Can President Putin be arrested?

At present, the Russian leader enjoys unchallenged power in his native land, so there is no prospect of the Kremlin handing him over to the ICC.

As long as he stays put in Russia, he faces no risk of being arrested.

Mr Putin could be detained if he leaves the country. But, given the fact that his freedom of movement is already severely limited by international sanctions against him, he is unlikely to show up in a country that would want to put him on trial.

Since Russian troops invaded Ukraine in February 2022, he has visited just eight countries. Seven of those would be considered by him to be part of Russia's "near abroad" - that is, they were constituent parts of the Soviet Union before it collapsed at the end of 1991.

His only recent destination that does not fall into this category is Iran, which he visited in July last year to meet the theocracy's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.

Since Iran has helped the Russian war effort by supplying drones and other military hardware, any repeat visit to Tehran would be unlikely to place Mr Putin in any jeopardy.

What war crimes is Russia accused of?

Will Putin actually face trial?

There are at least two big obstacles to that. Firstly, Russia does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC.

The court was established in 2002 by a treaty known as the Rome Statute.

This statute lays down that it is the duty of every state to exercise its own criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. The ICC can only intervene where a state is unable or unwilling to carry out the investigation and prosecute perpetrators.

In all, 123 states have agreed to abide by it, but there are some significant exceptions, including Russia. 

Some countries, including Ukraine, have signed the treaty, but not ratified it. You can see a full list of countries that are party to the Rome Statute here.

So you can see that the legal position is already getting shaky.

And secondly, although it's not unknown for trials to be held without the defendant in the dock, that's not an option here. The ICC does not conduct trials in absentia, so that avenue is closed off too.

Who else has faced this kind of trial?

The idea of trying people for crimes against humanity pre-dates the existence of the ICC.

It began in 1945 after World War Two with the Nuremberg Trials, which were held to punish key members of the hierarchy in Nazi Germany for the Holocaust and other atrocities.

Those included Nazi leader Adolf Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess, who was sentenced to life imprisonment and died by his own hand in 1987.

Of course, Mr Putin has not actually been charged with crimes against humanity, even though US Vice-President Kamala Harris has argued that he should be.

And if he were, that would pose another legal dilemma as the UN itself says, "crimes against humanity have not yet been codified in a dedicated treaty of international law, unlike genocide and war crimes, although there are efforts to do so."

Other bespoke bodies have sought to convict those accused of war crimes. That includes the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, a UN organisation that existed from 1993 to 2017.

During that time, it convicted and sentenced 90 people. But arguably the most notorious of those indicted, former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, died of a heart attack in 2006 while in detention.

As for the ICC itself, it has so far indicted 40 individuals apart from Mr Putin, all from African countries. Of those, 17 people have been detained at The Hague, 10 have been convicted of crimes and four have been acquitted.

What does this mean for the war in Ukraine?

The arrest warrant is being seen as a signal from the international community that what is taking place in Ukraine is against international law.

The court says the reason it is going public with these warrants is that these crimes are continuing. In doing so, it is trying to deter further crimes taking place.

But, the main reaction from Russia so far has been to dismiss the warrants as meaningless.

In fact, the Kremlin denies its forces have committed any atrocities in Ukraine, and Mr Putin's spokesman called the ICC's decision "outrageous and unacceptable".

Faced with such defiance, it seems unlikely that the ICC's actions will have any impact on Russia's war in Ukraine - and Mr Putin's "special military operation" will continue to grind mercilessly on.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-64994992
A partir da leitura do texto, pode-se afirmar que:
Alternativas
Q3591036 Noções de Informática
Em relação ao pacote Office da Microsoft, qual o software criado e próprio para exercer as funções de preencher texto com uma imagem, definir, criar molduras para imagem, inserir vídeos do YouTube na apresentação, habilitar o play automático em vídeos, gerar lorem ipsum em caixas de texto, criar botões clicáveis e combinar formas:
Alternativas
Q3591032 Legislação dos Municípios do Estado de Goiás
Com base na Lei Orgânica de Porangatu, analise as assertivas e assinale a incorreta:
Alternativas
Q3591031 Português
Leia o texto e, a seguir, responda à questão.


Pneu furado

Luís Fernando Veríssimo


   O carro estava encostado no meio-fio, com um pneu furado. De pé ao lado do carro, olhando desconsoladamente para o pneu, uma moça muito bonitinha.

   Tão bonitinha que atrás parou outro carro e dele desceu um homem dizendo “Pode deixar”. Ele trocaria o pneu.

     ─ Você tem macaco? ─ perguntou o homem.

     ─ Não ─ respondeu a moça.

     ─ Tudo bem, eu tenho ─ disse o homem ─ Você tem estepe?

     ─ Não ─ disse a moça.

     ─ Vamos usar o meu ─ disse o homem.

    E pôs-se a trabalhar, trocando o pneu, sob o olhar da moça.

   Terminou no momento em que chegava o ônibus que a moça estava esperando. Ele ficou ali, suando, de boca aberta, vendo o ônibus se afastar.

   Dali a pouco chegou o dono do carro.

    ─ Puxa, você trocou o pneu pra mim. Muito obrigado.

   ─ É. Eu… Eu não posso ver pneu furado. Tenho que trocar.

   ─ Coisa estranha.

   ─ É uma compulsão. Sei lá.


Disponível em: https://armazemdetexto.blogspot.com/2017/12/texto-pneu-furado-luisfernando.html. Acesso em 15 ago. 2023.
No trecho “─ Puxa, você trocou o pneu pra mim. Muito obrigado.”, pode-se afirmar que o termo “pra” é um exemplo de linguagem
Alternativas
Q3591030 Literatura

Leia o texto e, a seguir, responda a questão.



LEMBRANÇA DE MORRER


Álvares de Azevedo


Quando em meu peito rebentar-se a fibra,


Que o espírito enlaça à dor vivente,


Não derramem por mim nenhuma lágrima


Em pálpebra demente.



E nem desfolhem na matéria impura


A flor do vale que adormece ao vento:


Não quero que uma nota de alegria


Se cale por meu triste passamento.



Eu deixo a vida como deixa o tédio


Do deserto, o poento caminheiro,


... Como as horas de um longo pesadelo


Que se desfaz ao dobre de um sineiro;



Como o desterro de minh’alma errante,


Onde fogo insensato a consumia:


Só levo uma saudade... é desses tempos


Que amorosa ilusão embelecia.



Só levo uma saudade... é dessas sombras


Que eu sentia velar nas noites minhas...


De ti, ó minha mãe, pobre coitada,


Que por minha tristeza te definhas!



De meu pai... de meus únicos amigos,


Pouco - bem poucos... e que não zombavam


Quando, em noites de febre endoudecido,


Minhas pálidas crenças duvidavam.


Se uma lágrima as pálpebras me inunda,


Se um suspiro nos seios treme ainda,


É pela virgem que sonhei... que nunca


Aos lábios me encostou a face linda!



Só tu à mocidade sonhadora


Do pálido poeta deste flores...


Se viveu, foi por ti! e de esperança


De na vida gozar de teus amores.



Beijarei a verdade santa e nua,


Verei cristalizar-se o sonho amigo...


Ó minha virgem dos errantes sonhos,


Filha do céu, eu vou amar contigo!



Descansem o meu leito solitário


Na floresta dos homens esquecida,


À sombra de uma cruz, e escrevam nela:


Foi poeta - sonhou - e amou na vida.



Sombras do vale, noites da montanha


Que minha alma cantou e amava tanto,


Protegei o meu corpo abandonado,


E no silêncio derramai-lhe canto!



Mas quando preludia ave d’aurora


E quando à meia-noite o céu repousa,


Arvoredos do bosque, abri os ramos...


Deixai a lua pratear-me a lousa!



Disponível em: https://brasilescola.uol.com.br/literatura/a-segundageracao-romantismo.htm1- Acesso em 10 ago. 2023. 













O tema deste poema é 
Alternativas
Q3591029 Literatura

Leia o texto e, a seguir, responda a questão.



LEMBRANÇA DE MORRER


Álvares de Azevedo


Quando em meu peito rebentar-se a fibra,


Que o espírito enlaça à dor vivente,


Não derramem por mim nenhuma lágrima


Em pálpebra demente.



E nem desfolhem na matéria impura


A flor do vale que adormece ao vento:


Não quero que uma nota de alegria


Se cale por meu triste passamento.



Eu deixo a vida como deixa o tédio


Do deserto, o poento caminheiro,


... Como as horas de um longo pesadelo


Que se desfaz ao dobre de um sineiro;



Como o desterro de minh’alma errante,


Onde fogo insensato a consumia:


Só levo uma saudade... é desses tempos


Que amorosa ilusão embelecia.



Só levo uma saudade... é dessas sombras


Que eu sentia velar nas noites minhas...


De ti, ó minha mãe, pobre coitada,


Que por minha tristeza te definhas!



De meu pai... de meus únicos amigos,


Pouco - bem poucos... e que não zombavam


Quando, em noites de febre endoudecido,


Minhas pálidas crenças duvidavam.


Se uma lágrima as pálpebras me inunda,


Se um suspiro nos seios treme ainda,


É pela virgem que sonhei... que nunca


Aos lábios me encostou a face linda!



Só tu à mocidade sonhadora


Do pálido poeta deste flores...


Se viveu, foi por ti! e de esperança


De na vida gozar de teus amores.



Beijarei a verdade santa e nua,


Verei cristalizar-se o sonho amigo...


Ó minha virgem dos errantes sonhos,


Filha do céu, eu vou amar contigo!



Descansem o meu leito solitário


Na floresta dos homens esquecida,


À sombra de uma cruz, e escrevam nela:


Foi poeta - sonhou - e amou na vida.



Sombras do vale, noites da montanha


Que minha alma cantou e amava tanto,


Protegei o meu corpo abandonado,


E no silêncio derramai-lhe canto!



Mas quando preludia ave d’aurora


E quando à meia-noite o céu repousa,


Arvoredos do bosque, abri os ramos...


Deixai a lua pratear-me a lousa!



Disponível em: https://brasilescola.uol.com.br/literatura/a-segundageracao-romantismo.htm1- Acesso em 10 ago. 2023. 













O poema “Lembrança de Morrer”, do livro Lira dos 20 anos, de Álvares de Azevedo, pertence ao romantismo da segunda geração porque
Alternativas
Q3591026 Português
Leia o texto e, a seguir, responda à questão.


Machado de Assis e a choradeira dos críticos

Danilo Venticinque


    Lançar versões simplificadas de clássicos da literatura é uma prática comum em qualquer país do mundo. A inexplicável polêmica sobre a adaptação de O alienista para leitores jovens confirmou uma verdade tão antiga quanto a obra de Machado de Assis: a crítica literária brasileira tem o péssimo hábito de só abrir a boca para reclamar.

     Há exceções, é claro. Mas acompanhei o empoeirado "debate" sobre a questão com tanta preguiça que, em vez de apontar os culpados e inocentes, prefiro jogar as carapuças para o alto. Azar de quem decidir vesti-las.

    Para quem não está por dentro da discussão (que inveja!), ofereço aqui uma versão resumida e simplificada dos fatos. Na semana passada, os críticos literários brasileiros despertaram de suas catacumbas ao ler a notícia de que a escritora Patrícia Secco lançaria versões adaptadas de O alienista, de Machado de Assis, e A pata da gazela, de José de Alencar. As duas obras serão distribuídas de graça pelo Instituto Brasil Leitor, com uma tiragem total de 600 mil exemplares. O objetivo é tornar clássicos da literatura brasileira mais acessíveis para quem não tem o hábito de ler.

    Num país em que metade da população não leu uma só página de um livro nos últimos três meses e a média de tempo dedicado à leitura por dia é seis minutos, qualquer iniciativa para divulgar a literatura deveria ser bem-vinda. Mesmo se a qualidade das adaptações de Patrícia se revelar duvidosa, é impossível que a distribuição de centenas de milhares de livros tenha algum impacto negativo.

  Como já era previsto, porém, a iniciativa provocou indignação. Surgiu um abaixo-assinado para impedir o lançamento da edição simplificada. Alguns disseram que ela deturparia a obra original. Outros, que a leitura das obras na versão adaptada tiraria dos leitores a oportunidade de enriquecer seu vocabulário. Houve até quem dissesse que as adaptações em si nem são uma ideia tão ruim, mas que Machado era intocável.

  Entre essas justificativas para a revolta, é difícil dizer qual é a mais fraca. Os defensores da "integridade" da obra parecem acreditar que o lançamento da versão adaptada teria algum efeito destrutivo sobre o original. O raciocínio é absurdo. Obras literárias inspiram paródias e adaptações desde sempre. Em vez de destruir a obra, cada nova versão ajuda a divulgá-la e aumentar seu alcance. Os livros de Machado de Assis não serão banidos das livrarias e da internet. Eles sempre estarão disponíveis para quem preferir lê-los no original. Não há motivo para histeria. Acreditar que as versões simplificadas de Machado de Assis emburrecerão a população é igualmente errôneo. Quem defende esse argumento parte do pressuposto de que vivemos num país de leitores ávidos de Machado de Assis que, por pura preguiça, trocarão a versão original pela adaptação e deixarão de enriquecer seu vocabulário. Nada mais distante da realidade. A grande maioria dos alunos foge da leitura obrigatória depois de esbarrar na primeira palavra difícil e recorre a resumos (ou à cola) para acertar a meia dúzia de questões dedicadas a Machado nas provas escolares. Muitos jamais dão outra chance aos clássicos da literatura. Uma versão simplificada poderia diminuir o choque e prepará-los para descobrir a obra original mais tarde, quando estiverem prontos.

   Por fim, não há nenhuma justificativa para a crença de que Machado de Assis é intocável e não deve ser adaptado. As livrarias estão cheias de adaptações de Shakespeare, Homero e outros clássicos indiscutíveis da literatura. Se eles podem ser adaptados, por que não Machado?

   O que mais me chama atenção no discurso de quem critica as adaptações de Machado de Assis é a falta de propostas. Se adaptar Machado de Assis é uma heresia, o que deve ser feito para incentivar a leitura no Brasil? A resposta de todos os defensores da integridade da literatura brasileira aparentemente é a mesma. Devemos obrigar estudantes a ler Machado de Assis na versão original e assistir, orgulhosos, ao surgimento de uma nova geração de leitores cultos e apaixonados pelos clássicos.

  Parece promissor. Mas é isso o que as nossas escolas já fazem há décadas. Não funciona. Aliás, Machado de Assis provavelmente detestaria saber que suas obras-primas são desperdiçadas em adolescentes que, em sua maioria, não têm paciência nem maturidade para entendê-las. 

   As versões originais de Machado de Assis sempre serão melhores do que qualquer adaptação. Disso, não há dúvida. O que os críticos puristas precisam entender é que a questão não é essa. Não existe uma disputa entre a versão original e a simplificada. A versão original já está disponível em inúmeros formatos para estudantes que, por diversos motivos, não passam das primeiras páginas. Para eles, a escolha é entre ler uma versão adaptada e simplesmente não ler. Uma adaptação, por mais rasteira que seja, pode ajudá-los a criar o hábito da leitura. É pouco. Mas é melhor do que nada.


Disponível em: https://epoca.globo.com/colunas-e-blogs/daniloventicinque/noticia/2014/05/machado-de-assis-e-bchoradeira-dos-criticosb.html. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2023. 
O autor do texto defende a opinião de que 
Alternativas
Q3591025 Português
Leia o texto e, a seguir, responda à questão.


Machado de Assis e a choradeira dos críticos

Danilo Venticinque


    Lançar versões simplificadas de clássicos da literatura é uma prática comum em qualquer país do mundo. A inexplicável polêmica sobre a adaptação de O alienista para leitores jovens confirmou uma verdade tão antiga quanto a obra de Machado de Assis: a crítica literária brasileira tem o péssimo hábito de só abrir a boca para reclamar.

     Há exceções, é claro. Mas acompanhei o empoeirado "debate" sobre a questão com tanta preguiça que, em vez de apontar os culpados e inocentes, prefiro jogar as carapuças para o alto. Azar de quem decidir vesti-las.

    Para quem não está por dentro da discussão (que inveja!), ofereço aqui uma versão resumida e simplificada dos fatos. Na semana passada, os críticos literários brasileiros despertaram de suas catacumbas ao ler a notícia de que a escritora Patrícia Secco lançaria versões adaptadas de O alienista, de Machado de Assis, e A pata da gazela, de José de Alencar. As duas obras serão distribuídas de graça pelo Instituto Brasil Leitor, com uma tiragem total de 600 mil exemplares. O objetivo é tornar clássicos da literatura brasileira mais acessíveis para quem não tem o hábito de ler.

    Num país em que metade da população não leu uma só página de um livro nos últimos três meses e a média de tempo dedicado à leitura por dia é seis minutos, qualquer iniciativa para divulgar a literatura deveria ser bem-vinda. Mesmo se a qualidade das adaptações de Patrícia se revelar duvidosa, é impossível que a distribuição de centenas de milhares de livros tenha algum impacto negativo.

  Como já era previsto, porém, a iniciativa provocou indignação. Surgiu um abaixo-assinado para impedir o lançamento da edição simplificada. Alguns disseram que ela deturparia a obra original. Outros, que a leitura das obras na versão adaptada tiraria dos leitores a oportunidade de enriquecer seu vocabulário. Houve até quem dissesse que as adaptações em si nem são uma ideia tão ruim, mas que Machado era intocável.

  Entre essas justificativas para a revolta, é difícil dizer qual é a mais fraca. Os defensores da "integridade" da obra parecem acreditar que o lançamento da versão adaptada teria algum efeito destrutivo sobre o original. O raciocínio é absurdo. Obras literárias inspiram paródias e adaptações desde sempre. Em vez de destruir a obra, cada nova versão ajuda a divulgá-la e aumentar seu alcance. Os livros de Machado de Assis não serão banidos das livrarias e da internet. Eles sempre estarão disponíveis para quem preferir lê-los no original. Não há motivo para histeria. Acreditar que as versões simplificadas de Machado de Assis emburrecerão a população é igualmente errôneo. Quem defende esse argumento parte do pressuposto de que vivemos num país de leitores ávidos de Machado de Assis que, por pura preguiça, trocarão a versão original pela adaptação e deixarão de enriquecer seu vocabulário. Nada mais distante da realidade. A grande maioria dos alunos foge da leitura obrigatória depois de esbarrar na primeira palavra difícil e recorre a resumos (ou à cola) para acertar a meia dúzia de questões dedicadas a Machado nas provas escolares. Muitos jamais dão outra chance aos clássicos da literatura. Uma versão simplificada poderia diminuir o choque e prepará-los para descobrir a obra original mais tarde, quando estiverem prontos.

   Por fim, não há nenhuma justificativa para a crença de que Machado de Assis é intocável e não deve ser adaptado. As livrarias estão cheias de adaptações de Shakespeare, Homero e outros clássicos indiscutíveis da literatura. Se eles podem ser adaptados, por que não Machado?

   O que mais me chama atenção no discurso de quem critica as adaptações de Machado de Assis é a falta de propostas. Se adaptar Machado de Assis é uma heresia, o que deve ser feito para incentivar a leitura no Brasil? A resposta de todos os defensores da integridade da literatura brasileira aparentemente é a mesma. Devemos obrigar estudantes a ler Machado de Assis na versão original e assistir, orgulhosos, ao surgimento de uma nova geração de leitores cultos e apaixonados pelos clássicos.

  Parece promissor. Mas é isso o que as nossas escolas já fazem há décadas. Não funciona. Aliás, Machado de Assis provavelmente detestaria saber que suas obras-primas são desperdiçadas em adolescentes que, em sua maioria, não têm paciência nem maturidade para entendê-las. 

   As versões originais de Machado de Assis sempre serão melhores do que qualquer adaptação. Disso, não há dúvida. O que os críticos puristas precisam entender é que a questão não é essa. Não existe uma disputa entre a versão original e a simplificada. A versão original já está disponível em inúmeros formatos para estudantes que, por diversos motivos, não passam das primeiras páginas. Para eles, a escolha é entre ler uma versão adaptada e simplesmente não ler. Uma adaptação, por mais rasteira que seja, pode ajudá-los a criar o hábito da leitura. É pouco. Mas é melhor do que nada.


Disponível em: https://epoca.globo.com/colunas-e-blogs/daniloventicinque/noticia/2014/05/machado-de-assis-e-bchoradeira-dos-criticosb.html. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2023. 
No trecho, “As livrarias estão cheias de adaptações de Shakespeare, Homero e outros clássicos indiscutíveis da literatura. Se eles podem ser adaptados, por que não Machado?”, a palavra “Machado” corresponde a uma
Alternativas
Respostas
961: B
962: A
963: D
964: D
965: B
966: A
967: B
968: C
969: B
970: C
971: C
972: B
973: C
974: B
975: C
976: A
977: D
978: D
979: B
980: A