Questões de Concurso Para tribunal de contas e controladoria

Foram encontradas 49.739 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3906476 Controle Externo

Julgue o item a seguir, acerca dos tipos e das formas de controle. 


Pedido de informações dirigido por uma das casas do Congresso Nacional ou por qualquer de suas comissões a ministros de Estado e a titulares de órgãos diretamente subordinados à Presidência da República tem natureza de controle político, sendo tipificada como crime de responsabilidade a recusa injustificada de atendimento do pedido.

Alternativas
Q3906475 Controle Externo

Julgue o item a seguir, acerca dos tipos e das formas de controle. 


O controle de legalidade incide sobre a oportunidade e a conveniência do ato administrativo, sendo reservado, em regra, à própria administração pública, que o exerce por meio da prerrogativa da revogação.

Alternativas
Q3906474 Controle Externo

Julgue o item a seguir, acerca dos tipos e das formas de controle. 


O controle administrativo, exercido de ofício pela administração pública, geralmente por meio do poder de recurso hierárquico, permite a órgão superior anular ou revogar atos praticados por órgão inferior, em decorrência do poder hierárquico.

Alternativas
Q3906473 Controle Externo

Julgue o item a seguir, acerca dos tipos e das formas de controle. 


A criação de comissões parlamentares de inquérito (CPI) no Congresso Nacional para a apuração de fato determinado, por prazo certo, é uma ferramenta de controle político que depende da aprovação da maioria absoluta dos membros da casa onde ficará instalada a CPI.

Alternativas
Q3906472 Raciocínio Lógico
        Ao analisar um relatório de fiscalização sobre a contratação de serviços de tecnologia da informação por um órgão federal, uma equipe de auditoria de um tribunal de contas identificou que a justificativa para a adoção de determinado modelo de contratação apoiava-se em afirmações genéricas, tais como “esse modelo é o mais moderno disponível no mercado” e “todos os órgãos públicos relevantes já o utilizam”. Além disso, durante a defesa apresentada pela administração, argumentou-se que eventuais falhas no planejamento seriam irrelevantes, pois “o desempenho da solução tecnológica supera amplamente qualquer risco residual”. Diante disso, essa equipe de auditoria precisou avaliar a consistência lógica dos argumentos apresentados, identificar possíveis falácias e assegurar que a comunicação dos achados fosse clara, objetiva e tecnicamente fundamentada, de modo a garantir o cumprimento dos princípios da legalidade, legitimidade, economicidade e eficiência.

A partir da situação hipotética apresentada, julgue o item a seguir.


Uma justificativa segundo a qual determinada ação administrativa “é a melhor alternativa possível porque não foram identificadas outras opções viáveis”, sem a apresentação do processo analítico que fundamentou a exclusão das demais alternativas, pode configurar uma falácia.

Alternativas
Q3906471 Raciocínio Lógico
        Ao analisar um relatório de fiscalização sobre a contratação de serviços de tecnologia da informação por um órgão federal, uma equipe de auditoria de um tribunal de contas identificou que a justificativa para a adoção de determinado modelo de contratação apoiava-se em afirmações genéricas, tais como “esse modelo é o mais moderno disponível no mercado” e “todos os órgãos públicos relevantes já o utilizam”. Além disso, durante a defesa apresentada pela administração, argumentou-se que eventuais falhas no planejamento seriam irrelevantes, pois “o desempenho da solução tecnológica supera amplamente qualquer risco residual”. Diante disso, essa equipe de auditoria precisou avaliar a consistência lógica dos argumentos apresentados, identificar possíveis falácias e assegurar que a comunicação dos achados fosse clara, objetiva e tecnicamente fundamentada, de modo a garantir o cumprimento dos princípios da legalidade, legitimidade, economicidade e eficiência.

A partir da situação hipotética apresentada, julgue o item a seguir.


Ao rejeitar a relevância das falhas de planejamento sob o argumento de que „o desempenho da solução tecnológica supera amplamente qualquer risco residual‟, a administração utiliza um argumento logicamente válido, pois desloca o foco da análise para critérios de eficiência, em conformidade com o papel institucional de gestão pública.

Alternativas
Q3906470 Auditoria
        Ao analisar um relatório de fiscalização sobre a contratação de serviços de tecnologia da informação por um órgão federal, uma equipe de auditoria de um tribunal de contas identificou que a justificativa para a adoção de determinado modelo de contratação apoiava-se em afirmações genéricas, tais como “esse modelo é o mais moderno disponível no mercado” e “todos os órgãos públicos relevantes já o utilizam”. Além disso, durante a defesa apresentada pela administração, argumentou-se que eventuais falhas no planejamento seriam irrelevantes, pois “o desempenho da solução tecnológica supera amplamente qualquer risco residual”. Diante disso, essa equipe de auditoria precisou avaliar a consistência lógica dos argumentos apresentados, identificar possíveis falácias e assegurar que a comunicação dos achados fosse clara, objetiva e tecnicamente fundamentada, de modo a garantir o cumprimento dos princípios da legalidade, legitimidade, economicidade e eficiência.

A partir da situação hipotética apresentada, julgue o item a seguir.


Ao aplicar o senso crítico na análise da justificativa „esse modelo é o mais moderno disponível no mercado‟, o auditor deve reconhecer que a alegação é insuficiente por ela não demonstrar a relação entre modernidade e adequação às necessidades da contratação.

Alternativas
Q3906469 Raciocínio Lógico
        Ao analisar um relatório de fiscalização sobre a contratação de serviços de tecnologia da informação por um órgão federal, uma equipe de auditoria de um tribunal de contas identificou que a justificativa para a adoção de determinado modelo de contratação apoiava-se em afirmações genéricas, tais como “esse modelo é o mais moderno disponível no mercado” e “todos os órgãos públicos relevantes já o utilizam”. Além disso, durante a defesa apresentada pela administração, argumentou-se que eventuais falhas no planejamento seriam irrelevantes, pois “o desempenho da solução tecnológica supera amplamente qualquer risco residual”. Diante disso, essa equipe de auditoria precisou avaliar a consistência lógica dos argumentos apresentados, identificar possíveis falácias e assegurar que a comunicação dos achados fosse clara, objetiva e tecnicamente fundamentada, de modo a garantir o cumprimento dos princípios da legalidade, legitimidade, economicidade e eficiência.

A partir da situação hipotética apresentada, julgue o item a seguir.


A utilização de terminologia técnica precisa na análise do auditor garante a comunicação eficiente de seus argumentos.

Alternativas
Q3906468 Raciocínio Lógico
        Ao analisar um relatório de fiscalização sobre a contratação de serviços de tecnologia da informação por um órgão federal, uma equipe de auditoria de um tribunal de contas identificou que a justificativa para a adoção de determinado modelo de contratação apoiava-se em afirmações genéricas, tais como “esse modelo é o mais moderno disponível no mercado” e “todos os órgãos públicos relevantes já o utilizam”. Além disso, durante a defesa apresentada pela administração, argumentou-se que eventuais falhas no planejamento seriam irrelevantes, pois “o desempenho da solução tecnológica supera amplamente qualquer risco residual”. Diante disso, essa equipe de auditoria precisou avaliar a consistência lógica dos argumentos apresentados, identificar possíveis falácias e assegurar que a comunicação dos achados fosse clara, objetiva e tecnicamente fundamentada, de modo a garantir o cumprimento dos princípios da legalidade, legitimidade, economicidade e eficiência.

A partir da situação hipotética apresentada, julgue o item a seguir.


Constitui um exemplo de argumento apelativo a afirmação: “Todos os órgãos públicos relevantes já utilizam esse modelo de contratação, logo essa é a escolha mais adequada.”.

Alternativas
Q3906467 Raciocínio Lógico
        Ao analisar um relatório de fiscalização sobre a contratação de serviços de tecnologia da informação por um órgão federal, uma equipe de auditoria de um tribunal de contas identificou que a justificativa para a adoção de determinado modelo de contratação apoiava-se em afirmações genéricas, tais como “esse modelo é o mais moderno disponível no mercado” e “todos os órgãos públicos relevantes já o utilizam”. Além disso, durante a defesa apresentada pela administração, argumentou-se que eventuais falhas no planejamento seriam irrelevantes, pois “o desempenho da solução tecnológica supera amplamente qualquer risco residual”. Diante disso, essa equipe de auditoria precisou avaliar a consistência lógica dos argumentos apresentados, identificar possíveis falácias e assegurar que a comunicação dos achados fosse clara, objetiva e tecnicamente fundamentada, de modo a garantir o cumprimento dos princípios da legalidade, legitimidade, economicidade e eficiência.

A partir da situação hipotética apresentada, julgue o item a seguir.


Suponha que a equipe de auditoria tenha optado por apresentar em seu relatório suas conclusões finais de maneira concisa, sem expor a linha argumentativa que levou a tais conclusões. Nesse caso, tal prática atende ao critério de comunicação eficiente de argumentos, desde que tais conclusões estejam tecnicamente corretas.

Alternativas
Q3906466 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changer in the public sector that is significantly improving financial accountability and governance. The implementation of AI technologies can lead to improved decision making, more efficient operations, and increased accountability and transparency in financial operations. For example, the integrity of financial systems has been notably enhanced through the application of artificial intelligence in areas such as fraud detection, regulatory compliance, and risk assessment. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence systems also introduces some challenges, including the need for strong frameworks to ensure accountability and trust in these systems, as well as ethical considerations and problems related to data governance. Furthermore, integrating artificial intelligence within the public sector needs a comprehensive strategy that involves ethical considerations and scientific progress.

        It is important to address potential issues that are related to algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability in order to build public trust in government operations that are driven by AI. Therefore, it is important to develop ethical guidelines and governance frameworks that guide the appropriate use of artificial intelligence in financial decision making, ensuring that these technologies serve the public good. The relationship between AI, financial responsibility, and governance is a key area for the formulation of policies, as governments seek to use the potential of AI while maintaining democratic values and public trust.

Ceray Aldemir and Tuğba Uçma Uysal. Artificial Intelligence for Financial Accountability and
Governance in the Public Sector: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges.
Internet: < www.mdpi.com> (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


It is correct to infer from the text that democratic values and public trust can be jeopardized by the use of AI within the public sector if specific measures are not taken.

Alternativas
Q3906465 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changer in the public sector that is significantly improving financial accountability and governance. The implementation of AI technologies can lead to improved decision making, more efficient operations, and increased accountability and transparency in financial operations. For example, the integrity of financial systems has been notably enhanced through the application of artificial intelligence in areas such as fraud detection, regulatory compliance, and risk assessment. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence systems also introduces some challenges, including the need for strong frameworks to ensure accountability and trust in these systems, as well as ethical considerations and problems related to data governance. Furthermore, integrating artificial intelligence within the public sector needs a comprehensive strategy that involves ethical considerations and scientific progress.

        It is important to address potential issues that are related to algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability in order to build public trust in government operations that are driven by AI. Therefore, it is important to develop ethical guidelines and governance frameworks that guide the appropriate use of artificial intelligence in financial decision making, ensuring that these technologies serve the public good. The relationship between AI, financial responsibility, and governance is a key area for the formulation of policies, as governments seek to use the potential of AI while maintaining democratic values and public trust.

Ceray Aldemir and Tuğba Uçma Uysal. Artificial Intelligence for Financial Accountability and
Governance in the Public Sector: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges.
Internet: < www.mdpi.com> (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


It would harm the coherence of the text if the first and the second sentences of the second paragraph were exchanged in position.

Alternativas
Q3906464 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changer in the public sector that is significantly improving financial accountability and governance. The implementation of AI technologies can lead to improved decision making, more efficient operations, and increased accountability and transparency in financial operations. For example, the integrity of financial systems has been notably enhanced through the application of artificial intelligence in areas such as fraud detection, regulatory compliance, and risk assessment. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence systems also introduces some challenges, including the need for strong frameworks to ensure accountability and trust in these systems, as well as ethical considerations and problems related to data governance. Furthermore, integrating artificial intelligence within the public sector needs a comprehensive strategy that involves ethical considerations and scientific progress.

        It is important to address potential issues that are related to algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability in order to build public trust in government operations that are driven by AI. Therefore, it is important to develop ethical guidelines and governance frameworks that guide the appropriate use of artificial intelligence in financial decision making, ensuring that these technologies serve the public good. The relationship between AI, financial responsibility, and governance is a key area for the formulation of policies, as governments seek to use the potential of AI while maintaining democratic values and public trust.

Ceray Aldemir and Tuğba Uçma Uysal. Artificial Intelligence for Financial Accountability and
Governance in the Public Sector: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges.
Internet: < www.mdpi.com> (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


In their text, the authors condemn the use of AI within the public sector mainly because of their concerns about the ethical guidelines that are already in force to regulate this kind of technology. 

Alternativas
Q3906463 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changer in the public sector that is significantly improving financial accountability and governance. The implementation of AI technologies can lead to improved decision making, more efficient operations, and increased accountability and transparency in financial operations. For example, the integrity of financial systems has been notably enhanced through the application of artificial intelligence in areas such as fraud detection, regulatory compliance, and risk assessment. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence systems also introduces some challenges, including the need for strong frameworks to ensure accountability and trust in these systems, as well as ethical considerations and problems related to data governance. Furthermore, integrating artificial intelligence within the public sector needs a comprehensive strategy that involves ethical considerations and scientific progress.

        It is important to address potential issues that are related to algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability in order to build public trust in government operations that are driven by AI. Therefore, it is important to develop ethical guidelines and governance frameworks that guide the appropriate use of artificial intelligence in financial decision making, ensuring that these technologies serve the public good. The relationship between AI, financial responsibility, and governance is a key area for the formulation of policies, as governments seek to use the potential of AI while maintaining democratic values and public trust.

Ceray Aldemir and Tuğba Uçma Uysal. Artificial Intelligence for Financial Accountability and
Governance in the Public Sector: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges.
Internet: < www.mdpi.com> (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


In the first paragraph of the text, the phrase “these systems” (in the fourth sentence) is referring back to both “financial systems” (in the third sentence) and “artificial intelligence systems” (in the fourth sentence).

Alternativas
Q3906462 Inglês
        Electoral accountability is a distinctively democratic form of accountability. Since officials typically seek reelection or election to a higher office, this potential sanction is regarded as a powerful inducement for them to explain their actions to electorates and serve their electorates‟ interests. In this conventional view, much of the activity of elected officials takes place “in the shadow of elections,” with the awareness that potential opponents may publicize their actions, if these seem likely to be unpopular with their electorates.

        On the other hand, some recent work suggests that even in democracies, there is much less retrospective electoral accountability than the conventional view suggests. In a sense, this failure should not be surprising in light of democratic theory. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill emphasized in the mid-19th century the importance, for effective control of government, of alert and involved citizens. Alexis de Tocqueville observed that “the inhabitant of New England is attached to his township not so much because he was born there as because he sees in that township a free and strong corporation that he is a part of and that is worth his trouble to seek to direct.” Democracy, in Tocqueville‟s view, also relies on the existence of multiple voluntary associations, linked to political associations in multiple ways. In the words of John Stuart Mill, “the rights and interests of every or any person are only secure from being disregarded when the person is himself able, and habitually disposed, to stand up for them.”

Robert O. Keohane. The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.
Internet:<Repository.law.umich.edu> (adapted).

Considering the preceding text, judge the following item. 


The text mentions authors to whom the concept of accountability appeared in the 1800s due to the necessity of effective control of government.

Alternativas
Q3906461 Inglês
        Electoral accountability is a distinctively democratic form of accountability. Since officials typically seek reelection or election to a higher office, this potential sanction is regarded as a powerful inducement for them to explain their actions to electorates and serve their electorates‟ interests. In this conventional view, much of the activity of elected officials takes place “in the shadow of elections,” with the awareness that potential opponents may publicize their actions, if these seem likely to be unpopular with their electorates.

        On the other hand, some recent work suggests that even in democracies, there is much less retrospective electoral accountability than the conventional view suggests. In a sense, this failure should not be surprising in light of democratic theory. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill emphasized in the mid-19th century the importance, for effective control of government, of alert and involved citizens. Alexis de Tocqueville observed that “the inhabitant of New England is attached to his township not so much because he was born there as because he sees in that township a free and strong corporation that he is a part of and that is worth his trouble to seek to direct.” Democracy, in Tocqueville‟s view, also relies on the existence of multiple voluntary associations, linked to political associations in multiple ways. In the words of John Stuart Mill, “the rights and interests of every or any person are only secure from being disregarded when the person is himself able, and habitually disposed, to stand up for them.”

Robert O. Keohane. The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.
Internet:<Repository.law.umich.edu> (adapted).

Considering the preceding text, judge the following item. 


In the second sentence of the first paragraph, the word “Since” establishes a point in time that indicates when officials begin to “seek reelection or election to a higher office”.

Alternativas
Q3906460 Inglês
        Electoral accountability is a distinctively democratic form of accountability. Since officials typically seek reelection or election to a higher office, this potential sanction is regarded as a powerful inducement for them to explain their actions to electorates and serve their electorates‟ interests. In this conventional view, much of the activity of elected officials takes place “in the shadow of elections,” with the awareness that potential opponents may publicize their actions, if these seem likely to be unpopular with their electorates.

        On the other hand, some recent work suggests that even in democracies, there is much less retrospective electoral accountability than the conventional view suggests. In a sense, this failure should not be surprising in light of democratic theory. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill emphasized in the mid-19th century the importance, for effective control of government, of alert and involved citizens. Alexis de Tocqueville observed that “the inhabitant of New England is attached to his township not so much because he was born there as because he sees in that township a free and strong corporation that he is a part of and that is worth his trouble to seek to direct.” Democracy, in Tocqueville‟s view, also relies on the existence of multiple voluntary associations, linked to political associations in multiple ways. In the words of John Stuart Mill, “the rights and interests of every or any person are only secure from being disregarded when the person is himself able, and habitually disposed, to stand up for them.”

Robert O. Keohane. The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.
Internet:<Repository.law.umich.edu> (adapted).

Considering the preceding text, judge the following item. 


It is correct to infer from the ideas conveyed in the second paragraph of the text that the degree of effectiveness of electoral accountability varies according to the engagement of citizens in politics.

Alternativas
Q3906459 Inglês
        Electoral accountability is a distinctively democratic form of accountability. Since officials typically seek reelection or election to a higher office, this potential sanction is regarded as a powerful inducement for them to explain their actions to electorates and serve their electorates‟ interests. In this conventional view, much of the activity of elected officials takes place “in the shadow of elections,” with the awareness that potential opponents may publicize their actions, if these seem likely to be unpopular with their electorates.

        On the other hand, some recent work suggests that even in democracies, there is much less retrospective electoral accountability than the conventional view suggests. In a sense, this failure should not be surprising in light of democratic theory. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill emphasized in the mid-19th century the importance, for effective control of government, of alert and involved citizens. Alexis de Tocqueville observed that “the inhabitant of New England is attached to his township not so much because he was born there as because he sees in that township a free and strong corporation that he is a part of and that is worth his trouble to seek to direct.” Democracy, in Tocqueville‟s view, also relies on the existence of multiple voluntary associations, linked to political associations in multiple ways. In the words of John Stuart Mill, “the rights and interests of every or any person are only secure from being disregarded when the person is himself able, and habitually disposed, to stand up for them.”

Robert O. Keohane. The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.
Internet:<Repository.law.umich.edu> (adapted).

Considering the preceding text, judge the following item. 


In the last sentence of the text, the pronoun „them‟ refers to „the rights and interests of every or any person.‟ 

Alternativas
Q3906458 Inglês
        Electoral accountability is a distinctively democratic form of accountability. Since officials typically seek reelection or election to a higher office, this potential sanction is regarded as a powerful inducement for them to explain their actions to electorates and serve their electorates‟ interests. In this conventional view, much of the activity of elected officials takes place “in the shadow of elections,” with the awareness that potential opponents may publicize their actions, if these seem likely to be unpopular with their electorates.

        On the other hand, some recent work suggests that even in democracies, there is much less retrospective electoral accountability than the conventional view suggests. In a sense, this failure should not be surprising in light of democratic theory. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill emphasized in the mid-19th century the importance, for effective control of government, of alert and involved citizens. Alexis de Tocqueville observed that “the inhabitant of New England is attached to his township not so much because he was born there as because he sees in that township a free and strong corporation that he is a part of and that is worth his trouble to seek to direct.” Democracy, in Tocqueville‟s view, also relies on the existence of multiple voluntary associations, linked to political associations in multiple ways. In the words of John Stuart Mill, “the rights and interests of every or any person are only secure from being disregarded when the person is himself able, and habitually disposed, to stand up for them.”

Robert O. Keohane. The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.
Internet:<Repository.law.umich.edu> (adapted).

Considering the preceding text, judge the following item. 


As used in the text, the expression „in the shadow of elections‟ (in the third sentence of the first paragraph) indicates that the activity of elected officials is influenced by their interest in the next election results.

Alternativas
Q3906457 Inglês
        Electoral accountability is a distinctively democratic form of accountability. Since officials typically seek reelection or election to a higher office, this potential sanction is regarded as a powerful inducement for them to explain their actions to electorates and serve their electorates‟ interests. In this conventional view, much of the activity of elected officials takes place “in the shadow of elections,” with the awareness that potential opponents may publicize their actions, if these seem likely to be unpopular with their electorates.

        On the other hand, some recent work suggests that even in democracies, there is much less retrospective electoral accountability than the conventional view suggests. In a sense, this failure should not be surprising in light of democratic theory. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill emphasized in the mid-19th century the importance, for effective control of government, of alert and involved citizens. Alexis de Tocqueville observed that “the inhabitant of New England is attached to his township not so much because he was born there as because he sees in that township a free and strong corporation that he is a part of and that is worth his trouble to seek to direct.” Democracy, in Tocqueville‟s view, also relies on the existence of multiple voluntary associations, linked to political associations in multiple ways. In the words of John Stuart Mill, “the rights and interests of every or any person are only secure from being disregarded when the person is himself able, and habitually disposed, to stand up for them.”

Robert O. Keohane. The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.
Internet:<Repository.law.umich.edu> (adapted).

Considering the preceding text, judge the following item. 


The passage „that he is a part of and that is worth his trouble to seek to direct‟ (in the fourth sentence of the second paragraph), describes the relationship between „the inhabitant of New England‟ and „a free and strong corporation‟, which is „his township‟.

Alternativas
Respostas
161: C
162: E
163: C
164: E
165: C
166: E
167: C
168: E
169: C
170: E
171: C
172: E
173: E
174: E
175: E
176: E
177: C
178: C
179: C
180: C