Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês

Foram encontradas 25.119 questões

Q3890580 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    So what languages do I know? I speak English, Spanish, Portuguese, a little French, and a little in a few others. But I would be a bit uncomfortable to say that I ‘know’ all of these languages. The reason for my discomfort is that language learning is such a slow, piece-by-piece process that it is hard to tell when someone has finally ‘arrived’.


    In fact, this idea of ‘arriving’ in language is misguided. Language, you see, is more of a journey than a destination, and most learners never feel comfortable saying they have arrived when asked about how much they know. This is especially true because, as in all educational pursuits, the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know.


    To illustrate, many of my Asian English learning students studying here in Arizona, U.S., are quite proficient in English. However, when people ask them if they speak English, here are the answers I most often hear:


    “I speak okay.”

    “I’m not so good.”

    “I don’t know.”


    The truth is that even these excellent English speakers often feel the distance between them and native-like proficiency. They have accents, they do not know certain words, and they constantly second-guess their grammar. The question “Do you speak a language?” comes out sounding, in their ears, a lot like “Have you mastered the language?”


    So how can my foreign students, who by all accounts are doing amazing things in the United States, still feel like they have not arrived? The truth is this: when we focus on mastering a language - perfect pronunciation, complete command of the vocabulary, ability to speak in any and every possible situation -, we are always going to feel insufficient, because by that measure, we all fall short. This way of learning a language is exhausting. A better question than “Do you know the language?” is this: “In the language you are learning, are you creating friendships and experiences?” What I am suggesting is that learners reframe their perspectives. If they are fueled by meeting others, trying new things, and making memories and friendships for themselves, they have a great shot.


    I believe that language learning is, at its core, about relationships and experiences – about connecting and learning from those connections. It is my belief that every story (even those who fail) can teach us something about language learning.


(DIXON, S. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado)

A teacher who agrees with Dixon’s arguments in the text will
Alternativas
Q3890579 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    So what languages do I know? I speak English, Spanish, Portuguese, a little French, and a little in a few others. But I would be a bit uncomfortable to say that I ‘know’ all of these languages. The reason for my discomfort is that language learning is such a slow, piece-by-piece process that it is hard to tell when someone has finally ‘arrived’.


    In fact, this idea of ‘arriving’ in language is misguided. Language, you see, is more of a journey than a destination, and most learners never feel comfortable saying they have arrived when asked about how much they know. This is especially true because, as in all educational pursuits, the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know.


    To illustrate, many of my Asian English learning students studying here in Arizona, U.S., are quite proficient in English. However, when people ask them if they speak English, here are the answers I most often hear:


    “I speak okay.”

    “I’m not so good.”

    “I don’t know.”


    The truth is that even these excellent English speakers often feel the distance between them and native-like proficiency. They have accents, they do not know certain words, and they constantly second-guess their grammar. The question “Do you speak a language?” comes out sounding, in their ears, a lot like “Have you mastered the language?”


    So how can my foreign students, who by all accounts are doing amazing things in the United States, still feel like they have not arrived? The truth is this: when we focus on mastering a language - perfect pronunciation, complete command of the vocabulary, ability to speak in any and every possible situation -, we are always going to feel insufficient, because by that measure, we all fall short. This way of learning a language is exhausting. A better question than “Do you know the language?” is this: “In the language you are learning, are you creating friendships and experiences?” What I am suggesting is that learners reframe their perspectives. If they are fueled by meeting others, trying new things, and making memories and friendships for themselves, they have a great shot.


    I believe that language learning is, at its core, about relationships and experiences – about connecting and learning from those connections. It is my belief that every story (even those who fail) can teach us something about language learning.


(DIXON, S. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado)

The construction “the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know” (paragraph 2) describes a relationship in which two elements change in proportion to each other.


A correct example of such double comparative is found in alternative:

Alternativas
Q3890578 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    So what languages do I know? I speak English, Spanish, Portuguese, a little French, and a little in a few others. But I would be a bit uncomfortable to say that I ‘know’ all of these languages. The reason for my discomfort is that language learning is such a slow, piece-by-piece process that it is hard to tell when someone has finally ‘arrived’.


    In fact, this idea of ‘arriving’ in language is misguided. Language, you see, is more of a journey than a destination, and most learners never feel comfortable saying they have arrived when asked about how much they know. This is especially true because, as in all educational pursuits, the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know.


    To illustrate, many of my Asian English learning students studying here in Arizona, U.S., are quite proficient in English. However, when people ask them if they speak English, here are the answers I most often hear:


    “I speak okay.”

    “I’m not so good.”

    “I don’t know.”


    The truth is that even these excellent English speakers often feel the distance between them and native-like proficiency. They have accents, they do not know certain words, and they constantly second-guess their grammar. The question “Do you speak a language?” comes out sounding, in their ears, a lot like “Have you mastered the language?”


    So how can my foreign students, who by all accounts are doing amazing things in the United States, still feel like they have not arrived? The truth is this: when we focus on mastering a language - perfect pronunciation, complete command of the vocabulary, ability to speak in any and every possible situation -, we are always going to feel insufficient, because by that measure, we all fall short. This way of learning a language is exhausting. A better question than “Do you know the language?” is this: “In the language you are learning, are you creating friendships and experiences?” What I am suggesting is that learners reframe their perspectives. If they are fueled by meeting others, trying new things, and making memories and friendships for themselves, they have a great shot.


    I believe that language learning is, at its core, about relationships and experiences – about connecting and learning from those connections. It is my belief that every story (even those who fail) can teach us something about language learning.


(DIXON, S. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado)

In the context of the second paragraph, the bolded word in “This is especially true ” refers to the fact that
Alternativas
Q3890577 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    So what languages do I know? I speak English, Spanish, Portuguese, a little French, and a little in a few others. But I would be a bit uncomfortable to say that I ‘know’ all of these languages. The reason for my discomfort is that language learning is such a slow, piece-by-piece process that it is hard to tell when someone has finally ‘arrived’.


    In fact, this idea of ‘arriving’ in language is misguided. Language, you see, is more of a journey than a destination, and most learners never feel comfortable saying they have arrived when asked about how much they know. This is especially true because, as in all educational pursuits, the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know.


    To illustrate, many of my Asian English learning students studying here in Arizona, U.S., are quite proficient in English. However, when people ask them if they speak English, here are the answers I most often hear:


    “I speak okay.”

    “I’m not so good.”

    “I don’t know.”


    The truth is that even these excellent English speakers often feel the distance between them and native-like proficiency. They have accents, they do not know certain words, and they constantly second-guess their grammar. The question “Do you speak a language?” comes out sounding, in their ears, a lot like “Have you mastered the language?”


    So how can my foreign students, who by all accounts are doing amazing things in the United States, still feel like they have not arrived? The truth is this: when we focus on mastering a language - perfect pronunciation, complete command of the vocabulary, ability to speak in any and every possible situation -, we are always going to feel insufficient, because by that measure, we all fall short. This way of learning a language is exhausting. A better question than “Do you know the language?” is this: “In the language you are learning, are you creating friendships and experiences?” What I am suggesting is that learners reframe their perspectives. If they are fueled by meeting others, trying new things, and making memories and friendships for themselves, they have a great shot.


    I believe that language learning is, at its core, about relationships and experiences – about connecting and learning from those connections. It is my belief that every story (even those who fail) can teach us something about language learning.


(DIXON, S. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado)

In the fragment from the first paragraph “it is hard to tell when someone has finally ‘arrived’”, the verb “arrive” is used metaphorically to mean that a language speaker
Alternativas
Q3890576 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    So what languages do I know? I speak English, Spanish, Portuguese, a little French, and a little in a few others. But I would be a bit uncomfortable to say that I ‘know’ all of these languages. The reason for my discomfort is that language learning is such a slow, piece-by-piece process that it is hard to tell when someone has finally ‘arrived’.


    In fact, this idea of ‘arriving’ in language is misguided. Language, you see, is more of a journey than a destination, and most learners never feel comfortable saying they have arrived when asked about how much they know. This is especially true because, as in all educational pursuits, the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know.


    To illustrate, many of my Asian English learning students studying here in Arizona, U.S., are quite proficient in English. However, when people ask them if they speak English, here are the answers I most often hear:


    “I speak okay.”

    “I’m not so good.”

    “I don’t know.”


    The truth is that even these excellent English speakers often feel the distance between them and native-like proficiency. They have accents, they do not know certain words, and they constantly second-guess their grammar. The question “Do you speak a language?” comes out sounding, in their ears, a lot like “Have you mastered the language?”


    So how can my foreign students, who by all accounts are doing amazing things in the United States, still feel like they have not arrived? The truth is this: when we focus on mastering a language - perfect pronunciation, complete command of the vocabulary, ability to speak in any and every possible situation -, we are always going to feel insufficient, because by that measure, we all fall short. This way of learning a language is exhausting. A better question than “Do you know the language?” is this: “In the language you are learning, are you creating friendships and experiences?” What I am suggesting is that learners reframe their perspectives. If they are fueled by meeting others, trying new things, and making memories and friendships for themselves, they have a great shot.


    I believe that language learning is, at its core, about relationships and experiences – about connecting and learning from those connections. It is my belief that every story (even those who fail) can teach us something about language learning.


(DIXON, S. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado)

As a teacher, you would be reading this text critically as long as you
Alternativas
Q3890575 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


Brian Tomlinson and Hitomi Masuhara, The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning


    Whenever we look for resources on materials development, it is difficult to find books which bring together theory and practice in an organic manner. This book does precisely that; it provides the practicality of materials development guides and the academic rigour of reports and research studies published in the field.


    Tomlinson and Masuhara’s book has three specific aims. First is to help teachers, researchers and students to know, understand and be constructively critical of what has been achieved to date; secondly to help them develop, adapt, use, review and research materials on their own. Finally, while talking most particularly to teachers, the authors highlight that they want the strong opinions and approaches presented in the book to inspire readers to think independently and to develop and apply innovative approaches on their own.


    These three aims seem to be very ambitious and that is the feeling you get when you read through the chapters. The book includes everything related to the theory and practice in materials development to date, and advocates that theory must inform practice and vice versa. Each of the fifteen chapters ends with a section which includes recommendations for teachers followed by a ‘What do you think?’ section to encourage them to reflect on their own contexts and teaching experience in them.


    Although at times the book seems overwhelming as it attempts to provide everything about materials in language learning, it successfully realizes its aim to address a wide audience from publishers, researchers to teachers.


(https://www.fortell.org. acessado em 02.10.2025. Adaptado)

The discourse marker “Although”, in the last paragraph, introduces the idea of
Alternativas
Q3890574 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


Brian Tomlinson and Hitomi Masuhara, The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning


    Whenever we look for resources on materials development, it is difficult to find books which bring together theory and practice in an organic manner. This book does precisely that; it provides the practicality of materials development guides and the academic rigour of reports and research studies published in the field.


    Tomlinson and Masuhara’s book has three specific aims. First is to help teachers, researchers and students to know, understand and be constructively critical of what has been achieved to date; secondly to help them develop, adapt, use, review and research materials on their own. Finally, while talking most particularly to teachers, the authors highlight that they want the strong opinions and approaches presented in the book to inspire readers to think independently and to develop and apply innovative approaches on their own.


    These three aims seem to be very ambitious and that is the feeling you get when you read through the chapters. The book includes everything related to the theory and practice in materials development to date, and advocates that theory must inform practice and vice versa. Each of the fifteen chapters ends with a section which includes recommendations for teachers followed by a ‘What do you think?’ section to encourage them to reflect on their own contexts and teaching experience in them.


    Although at times the book seems overwhelming as it attempts to provide everything about materials in language learning, it successfully realizes its aim to address a wide audience from publishers, researchers to teachers.


(https://www.fortell.org. acessado em 02.10.2025. Adaptado)

Mark the alternative in which the bolded word is a false cognate in the context.
Alternativas
Q3890573 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


Brian Tomlinson and Hitomi Masuhara, The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning


    Whenever we look for resources on materials development, it is difficult to find books which bring together theory and practice in an organic manner. This book does precisely that; it provides the practicality of materials development guides and the academic rigour of reports and research studies published in the field.


    Tomlinson and Masuhara’s book has three specific aims. First is to help teachers, researchers and students to know, understand and be constructively critical of what has been achieved to date; secondly to help them develop, adapt, use, review and research materials on their own. Finally, while talking most particularly to teachers, the authors highlight that they want the strong opinions and approaches presented in the book to inspire readers to think independently and to develop and apply innovative approaches on their own.


    These three aims seem to be very ambitious and that is the feeling you get when you read through the chapters. The book includes everything related to the theory and practice in materials development to date, and advocates that theory must inform practice and vice versa. Each of the fifteen chapters ends with a section which includes recommendations for teachers followed by a ‘What do you think?’ section to encourage them to reflect on their own contexts and teaching experience in them.


    Although at times the book seems overwhelming as it attempts to provide everything about materials in language learning, it successfully realizes its aim to address a wide audience from publishers, researchers to teachers.


(https://www.fortell.org. acessado em 02.10.2025. Adaptado)

As they include, at the end of every chapter, a section entitled ‘What do you think?’ directed particularly to teachers to help them reflect on their own contexts and teaching experience in them ( paragraph 3), the authors of the book are valuing teachers’  
Alternativas
Q3890572 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


Brian Tomlinson and Hitomi Masuhara, The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning


    Whenever we look for resources on materials development, it is difficult to find books which bring together theory and practice in an organic manner. This book does precisely that; it provides the practicality of materials development guides and the academic rigour of reports and research studies published in the field.


    Tomlinson and Masuhara’s book has three specific aims. First is to help teachers, researchers and students to know, understand and be constructively critical of what has been achieved to date; secondly to help them develop, adapt, use, review and research materials on their own. Finally, while talking most particularly to teachers, the authors highlight that they want the strong opinions and approaches presented in the book to inspire readers to think independently and to develop and apply innovative approaches on their own.


    These three aims seem to be very ambitious and that is the feeling you get when you read through the chapters. The book includes everything related to the theory and practice in materials development to date, and advocates that theory must inform practice and vice versa. Each of the fifteen chapters ends with a section which includes recommendations for teachers followed by a ‘What do you think?’ section to encourage them to reflect on their own contexts and teaching experience in them.


    Although at times the book seems overwhelming as it attempts to provide everything about materials in language learning, it successfully realizes its aim to address a wide audience from publishers, researchers to teachers.


(https://www.fortell.org. acessado em 02.10.2025. Adaptado)

According to the second paragraph, the authors of the book wish that, as far as teaching materials are concerned, the teacher-readers of the book become more 
Alternativas
Q3890571 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


Brian Tomlinson and Hitomi Masuhara, The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning


    Whenever we look for resources on materials development, it is difficult to find books which bring together theory and practice in an organic manner. This book does precisely that; it provides the practicality of materials development guides and the academic rigour of reports and research studies published in the field.


    Tomlinson and Masuhara’s book has three specific aims. First is to help teachers, researchers and students to know, understand and be constructively critical of what has been achieved to date; secondly to help them develop, adapt, use, review and research materials on their own. Finally, while talking most particularly to teachers, the authors highlight that they want the strong opinions and approaches presented in the book to inspire readers to think independently and to develop and apply innovative approaches on their own.


    These three aims seem to be very ambitious and that is the feeling you get when you read through the chapters. The book includes everything related to the theory and practice in materials development to date, and advocates that theory must inform practice and vice versa. Each of the fifteen chapters ends with a section which includes recommendations for teachers followed by a ‘What do you think?’ section to encourage them to reflect on their own contexts and teaching experience in them.


    Although at times the book seems overwhelming as it attempts to provide everything about materials in language learning, it successfully realizes its aim to address a wide audience from publishers, researchers to teachers.


(https://www.fortell.org. acessado em 02.10.2025. Adaptado)

From the theme, the compositional structure and stylistic choices, we understand this text is  
Alternativas
Q3890570 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    The term “language practice” refers to activities which involve repetition of the same language point or skill in an environment which is controlled by the framework of the activity. The purpose for language production and the language to be produced are usually predetermined by the task or the teacher. The intention is not to use the language for communication but to strengthen the ability to manipulate a particular language form or function.


    Activities centered on “language use”, on the other hand, involve the production of language in order to communicate. The purpose of the activity might be predetermined but the language which is used is determined by the learners.


(TOMLINSON, B. (ed). Material Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. 1998/2011. Adaptado)

An example of an activity aiming at language use, as described in text, is:
Alternativas
Q3890569 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    The term “language practice” refers to activities which involve repetition of the same language point or skill in an environment which is controlled by the framework of the activity. The purpose for language production and the language to be produced are usually predetermined by the task or the teacher. The intention is not to use the language for communication but to strengthen the ability to manipulate a particular language form or function.


    Activities centered on “language use”, on the other hand, involve the production of language in order to communicate. The purpose of the activity might be predetermined but the language which is used is determined by the learners.


(TOMLINSON, B. (ed). Material Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. 1998/2011. Adaptado)

O sufixo -en assume vários papéis e significados na língua inglesa.


A palavra que segue o mesmo processo de formação verificado em strengthen, no primeiro parágrafo do texto, é:

Alternativas
Q3890568 Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    The term “language practice” refers to activities which involve repetition of the same language point or skill in an environment which is controlled by the framework of the activity. The purpose for language production and the language to be produced are usually predetermined by the task or the teacher. The intention is not to use the language for communication but to strengthen the ability to manipulate a particular language form or function.


    Activities centered on “language use”, on the other hand, involve the production of language in order to communicate. The purpose of the activity might be predetermined but the language which is used is determined by the learners.


(TOMLINSON, B. (ed). Material Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. 1998/2011. Adaptado)

An example of an activity which aims at “language practice”, as described in the first paragraph, is:
Alternativas
Q3890567 Inglês

Leia o cartum a seguir.


Imagem associada para resolução da questão


(www.itchyfeetcomic.com)


Image and text help capture the humor in the cartoon, which derives from  

Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: Telebras Provas: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Advogado | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Administrativo | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Auditoria | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Comercial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Estatística | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Finanças | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Marketing | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Psicologia | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Contador | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Aeroespacial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Civil | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Rede | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Eletricista | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Telecomunicações |
Q3886734 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a core pillar of economic competitiveness, national security, and daily life. That reality is prompting governments worldwide to rethink their reliance on foreign technology providers. “Sovereign AI” has emerged as the strategic framework for nations aiming to take greater control over their AI capabilities — and telecommunications companies are finding themselves at the center of this shift.

       Sovereign AI, in this context, is essentially a nation‟s ability to independently develop, host, and govern artificial intelligence systems using domestic infrastructure, workforce, and business ecosystems. Instead of depending on foreign technology providers or cloud platforms, countries pursuing sovereign AI seek to build end-to-end domestic capabilities. The concept covers both physical computing infrastructure and control over the full data lifecycle. That includes building foundational models trained on local datasets or adapting external data to reflect specific languages, dialects, and cultural contexts.

        Multiple converging forces are pushing nations to prioritize sovereign AI capabilities. Data security concerns are near the top of the list. When AI systems, data storage, and computing infrastructure operate outside national borders, countries become exposed to foreign legal mandates and supply chain disruptions. For government decision-making and sensitive applications, that exposure creates unacceptable risk.

        National security considerations add further urgency. AI‟s expanding role in critical infrastructure, military systems, and defense operations makes governments especially focused on ensuring vital systems which are not dependent on potentially adversarial foreign technologies. Space-based intelligence and satellite systems reflect this broader sovereignty imperative.

Christian de Looper. How “sovereign AI” could shape telecom.
Internet:<https://www.rcrwireless.com>  (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


According to the text, commercial interests of telecommunication companies have forced nations to establish strategies generally known as sovereign AI.

Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: Telebras Provas: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Advogado | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Administrativo | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Auditoria | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Comercial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Estatística | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Finanças | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Marketing | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Psicologia | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Contador | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Aeroespacial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Civil | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Rede | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Eletricista | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Telecomunicações |
Q3886733 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a core pillar of economic competitiveness, national security, and daily life. That reality is prompting governments worldwide to rethink their reliance on foreign technology providers. “Sovereign AI” has emerged as the strategic framework for nations aiming to take greater control over their AI capabilities — and telecommunications companies are finding themselves at the center of this shift.

       Sovereign AI, in this context, is essentially a nation‟s ability to independently develop, host, and govern artificial intelligence systems using domestic infrastructure, workforce, and business ecosystems. Instead of depending on foreign technology providers or cloud platforms, countries pursuing sovereign AI seek to build end-to-end domestic capabilities. The concept covers both physical computing infrastructure and control over the full data lifecycle. That includes building foundational models trained on local datasets or adapting external data to reflect specific languages, dialects, and cultural contexts.

        Multiple converging forces are pushing nations to prioritize sovereign AI capabilities. Data security concerns are near the top of the list. When AI systems, data storage, and computing infrastructure operate outside national borders, countries become exposed to foreign legal mandates and supply chain disruptions. For government decision-making and sensitive applications, that exposure creates unacceptable risk.

        National security considerations add further urgency. AI‟s expanding role in critical infrastructure, military systems, and defense operations makes governments especially focused on ensuring vital systems which are not dependent on potentially adversarial foreign technologies. Space-based intelligence and satellite systems reflect this broader sovereignty imperative.

Christian de Looper. How “sovereign AI” could shape telecom.
Internet:<https://www.rcrwireless.com>  (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


In the first sentence of the second paragraph, the use of the word “ecosystems” indicates the existence of multiple processes and activities linked to business in a nation‟s domestic context. 

Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: Telebras Provas: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Advogado | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Administrativo | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Auditoria | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Comercial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Estatística | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Finanças | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Marketing | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Psicologia | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Contador | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Aeroespacial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Civil | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Rede | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Eletricista | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Telecomunicações |
Q3886732 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a core pillar of economic competitiveness, national security, and daily life. That reality is prompting governments worldwide to rethink their reliance on foreign technology providers. “Sovereign AI” has emerged as the strategic framework for nations aiming to take greater control over their AI capabilities — and telecommunications companies are finding themselves at the center of this shift.

       Sovereign AI, in this context, is essentially a nation‟s ability to independently develop, host, and govern artificial intelligence systems using domestic infrastructure, workforce, and business ecosystems. Instead of depending on foreign technology providers or cloud platforms, countries pursuing sovereign AI seek to build end-to-end domestic capabilities. The concept covers both physical computing infrastructure and control over the full data lifecycle. That includes building foundational models trained on local datasets or adapting external data to reflect specific languages, dialects, and cultural contexts.

        Multiple converging forces are pushing nations to prioritize sovereign AI capabilities. Data security concerns are near the top of the list. When AI systems, data storage, and computing infrastructure operate outside national borders, countries become exposed to foreign legal mandates and supply chain disruptions. For government decision-making and sensitive applications, that exposure creates unacceptable risk.

        National security considerations add further urgency. AI‟s expanding role in critical infrastructure, military systems, and defense operations makes governments especially focused on ensuring vital systems which are not dependent on potentially adversarial foreign technologies. Space-based intelligence and satellite systems reflect this broader sovereignty imperative.

Christian de Looper. How “sovereign AI” could shape telecom.
Internet:<https://www.rcrwireless.com>  (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


In the last sentence of the first paragraph, the words “themselves at” could be removed from the fragment without altering its overall meaning or affecting its coherence: telecommunications companies are finding the center of this shift.

Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: Telebras Provas: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Advogado | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Administrativo | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Auditoria | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Comercial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Estatística | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Finanças | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Marketing | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Psicologia | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Contador | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Aeroespacial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Civil | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Rede | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Eletricista | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Telecomunicações |
Q3886731 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a core pillar of economic competitiveness, national security, and daily life. That reality is prompting governments worldwide to rethink their reliance on foreign technology providers. “Sovereign AI” has emerged as the strategic framework for nations aiming to take greater control over their AI capabilities — and telecommunications companies are finding themselves at the center of this shift.

       Sovereign AI, in this context, is essentially a nation‟s ability to independently develop, host, and govern artificial intelligence systems using domestic infrastructure, workforce, and business ecosystems. Instead of depending on foreign technology providers or cloud platforms, countries pursuing sovereign AI seek to build end-to-end domestic capabilities. The concept covers both physical computing infrastructure and control over the full data lifecycle. That includes building foundational models trained on local datasets or adapting external data to reflect specific languages, dialects, and cultural contexts.

        Multiple converging forces are pushing nations to prioritize sovereign AI capabilities. Data security concerns are near the top of the list. When AI systems, data storage, and computing infrastructure operate outside national borders, countries become exposed to foreign legal mandates and supply chain disruptions. For government decision-making and sensitive applications, that exposure creates unacceptable risk.

        National security considerations add further urgency. AI‟s expanding role in critical infrastructure, military systems, and defense operations makes governments especially focused on ensuring vital systems which are not dependent on potentially adversarial foreign technologies. Space-based intelligence and satellite systems reflect this broader sovereignty imperative.

Christian de Looper. How “sovereign AI” could shape telecom.
Internet:<https://www.rcrwireless.com>  (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


It can be inferred from the text that seeking sovereign AI means, among other things, paying attention to features that are typical of human interactions and do not only concern technology.

Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: Telebras Provas: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Advogado | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Administrativo | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Auditoria | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Comercial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Estatística | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Finanças | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Marketing | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Psicologia | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Contador | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Aeroespacial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Civil | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Rede | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Eletricista | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Telecomunicações |
Q3886730 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a core pillar of economic competitiveness, national security, and daily life. That reality is prompting governments worldwide to rethink their reliance on foreign technology providers. “Sovereign AI” has emerged as the strategic framework for nations aiming to take greater control over their AI capabilities — and telecommunications companies are finding themselves at the center of this shift.

       Sovereign AI, in this context, is essentially a nation‟s ability to independently develop, host, and govern artificial intelligence systems using domestic infrastructure, workforce, and business ecosystems. Instead of depending on foreign technology providers or cloud platforms, countries pursuing sovereign AI seek to build end-to-end domestic capabilities. The concept covers both physical computing infrastructure and control over the full data lifecycle. That includes building foundational models trained on local datasets or adapting external data to reflect specific languages, dialects, and cultural contexts.

        Multiple converging forces are pushing nations to prioritize sovereign AI capabilities. Data security concerns are near the top of the list. When AI systems, data storage, and computing infrastructure operate outside national borders, countries become exposed to foreign legal mandates and supply chain disruptions. For government decision-making and sensitive applications, that exposure creates unacceptable risk.

        National security considerations add further urgency. AI‟s expanding role in critical infrastructure, military systems, and defense operations makes governments especially focused on ensuring vital systems which are not dependent on potentially adversarial foreign technologies. Space-based intelligence and satellite systems reflect this broader sovereignty imperative.

Christian de Looper. How “sovereign AI” could shape telecom.
Internet:<https://www.rcrwireless.com>  (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


The period mark that separates the first and the second sentences of the second paragraph could be correctly replaced with the words and hence, preceded by a comma: countries pursuing sovereign AI seek to build end-to-end domestic capabilities, and hence the concept covers both physical computing infrastructure and control over the full data lifecycle.

Alternativas
Ano: 2026 Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE Órgão: Telebras Provas: CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Advogado | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Administrativo | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Auditoria | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Comercial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Estatística | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Finanças | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Marketing | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Analista Superior - Subatividade: Psicologia | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Contador | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Aeroespacial | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Civil | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Rede | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro Eletricista | CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Telebras - Especialista em Gestão de Telecomunicações - Engenheiro - Subatividade: Engenheiro de Telecomunicações |
Q3886729 Inglês
        Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a core pillar of economic competitiveness, national security, and daily life. That reality is prompting governments worldwide to rethink their reliance on foreign technology providers. “Sovereign AI” has emerged as the strategic framework for nations aiming to take greater control over their AI capabilities — and telecommunications companies are finding themselves at the center of this shift.

       Sovereign AI, in this context, is essentially a nation‟s ability to independently develop, host, and govern artificial intelligence systems using domestic infrastructure, workforce, and business ecosystems. Instead of depending on foreign technology providers or cloud platforms, countries pursuing sovereign AI seek to build end-to-end domestic capabilities. The concept covers both physical computing infrastructure and control over the full data lifecycle. That includes building foundational models trained on local datasets or adapting external data to reflect specific languages, dialects, and cultural contexts.

        Multiple converging forces are pushing nations to prioritize sovereign AI capabilities. Data security concerns are near the top of the list. When AI systems, data storage, and computing infrastructure operate outside national borders, countries become exposed to foreign legal mandates and supply chain disruptions. For government decision-making and sensitive applications, that exposure creates unacceptable risk.

        National security considerations add further urgency. AI‟s expanding role in critical infrastructure, military systems, and defense operations makes governments especially focused on ensuring vital systems which are not dependent on potentially adversarial foreign technologies. Space-based intelligence and satellite systems reflect this broader sovereignty imperative.

Christian de Looper. How “sovereign AI” could shape telecom.
Internet:<https://www.rcrwireless.com>  (adapted). 

Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.


According to the text, data security is the greatest concern of the nations that are interested in promoting their own AI sovereignty.

Alternativas
Respostas
921: E
922: A
923: E
924: D
925: C
926: A
927: C
928: B
929: D
930: A
931: B
932: E
933: C
934: D
935: E
936: C
937: E
938: C
939: E
940: E