Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 25.780 questões
Q483296
Inglês
Texto associado
Here’s the first line of code ever written by a US president
Barack Obama just became the first US president to write a line of computer code (assuming George W. Bush never secretly indulged in PHP). At the White House yesterday, Obama sat down with students who were learning the fundamentals of JavaScript, the popular programming language used to create most web pages.
The line he wrote was:
moveForward(100);
“So I make the F in higher case?” Obama asked, correctly observing that JavaScript is case sensitive. “Semicolon?” (That semicolon is optional, but Obama apparently has a knack for recognizing JavaScript best practices.)
Obama was playing with a Code.org tutorial based on the popular Disney movie Frozen. In his line of code, the President called a function-moveForward-pre-defined by Code.org for the exercise.
Calling a function in JavaScript is simple: write its name exactly as it has been defined, followed by parentheses that contain its “arguments.” In this case, a single argument tells the program how many pixels to move a Frozen character forward. Because it’s measured in pixels, the argument has to be a number. If Obama had written moveForward(“three steps”), the program would have failed, offering only a cryptic error message and exposing the president to the near-perpetual state of frustration most software developers live in.
“This is Elsa?” Obama asked, referring to the movie’s main character.
Obama was promoting Computer Science Education Week and Code.org’s Hour of Code campaign, which encourages kids to try programming for at least one hour. “It turns out the concepts are not that complicated,” Obama told the students at the White House, though his attempt to explain it suggested otherwise:
“The basic concept behind coding is that you take zeros and ones, you take two numbers, yes or no, and those can be translated into electrical messages that then run through the computer…. So all it’s doing is it’s saying yes or no over and over again, and the computer’s powerful enough that it can read a really long set of instructions really quickly.”
Something like that.
Disponível em: http://qz.com/308904/heres-the-first-line-of-code-ever-written-by-a-us-president/
Quartz (9 de Dezembro de 2014) - Texto de Zachary M. Seward
Barack Obama just became the first US president to write a line of computer code (assuming George W. Bush never secretly indulged in PHP). At the White House yesterday, Obama sat down with students who were learning the fundamentals of JavaScript, the popular programming language used to create most web pages.
The line he wrote was:
moveForward(100);
“So I make the F in higher case?” Obama asked, correctly observing that JavaScript is case sensitive. “Semicolon?” (That semicolon is optional, but Obama apparently has a knack for recognizing JavaScript best practices.)
Obama was playing with a Code.org tutorial based on the popular Disney movie Frozen. In his line of code, the President called a function-moveForward-pre-defined by Code.org for the exercise.
Calling a function in JavaScript is simple: write its name exactly as it has been defined, followed by parentheses that contain its “arguments.” In this case, a single argument tells the program how many pixels to move a Frozen character forward. Because it’s measured in pixels, the argument has to be a number. If Obama had written moveForward(“three steps”), the program would have failed, offering only a cryptic error message and exposing the president to the near-perpetual state of frustration most software developers live in.
“This is Elsa?” Obama asked, referring to the movie’s main character.
Obama was promoting Computer Science Education Week and Code.org’s Hour of Code campaign, which encourages kids to try programming for at least one hour. “It turns out the concepts are not that complicated,” Obama told the students at the White House, though his attempt to explain it suggested otherwise:
“The basic concept behind coding is that you take zeros and ones, you take two numbers, yes or no, and those can be translated into electrical messages that then run through the computer…. So all it’s doing is it’s saying yes or no over and over again, and the computer’s powerful enough that it can read a really long set of instructions really quickly.”
Something like that.
Disponível em: http://qz.com/308904/heres-the-first-line-of-code-ever-written-by-a-us-president/
Quartz (9 de Dezembro de 2014) - Texto de Zachary M. Seward
Enquanto programava, Obama observou e questionou, respectivamente, os seguintes aspectos:
Q483295
Inglês
Texto associado
Here’s the first line of code ever written by a US president
Barack Obama just became the first US president to write a line of computer code (assuming George W. Bush never secretly indulged in PHP). At the White House yesterday, Obama sat down with students who were learning the fundamentals of JavaScript, the popular programming language used to create most web pages.
The line he wrote was:
moveForward(100);
“So I make the F in higher case?” Obama asked, correctly observing that JavaScript is case sensitive. “Semicolon?” (That semicolon is optional, but Obama apparently has a knack for recognizing JavaScript best practices.)
Obama was playing with a Code.org tutorial based on the popular Disney movie Frozen. In his line of code, the President called a function-moveForward-pre-defined by Code.org for the exercise.
Calling a function in JavaScript is simple: write its name exactly as it has been defined, followed by parentheses that contain its “arguments.” In this case, a single argument tells the program how many pixels to move a Frozen character forward. Because it’s measured in pixels, the argument has to be a number. If Obama had written moveForward(“three steps”), the program would have failed, offering only a cryptic error message and exposing the president to the near-perpetual state of frustration most software developers live in.
“This is Elsa?” Obama asked, referring to the movie’s main character.
Obama was promoting Computer Science Education Week and Code.org’s Hour of Code campaign, which encourages kids to try programming for at least one hour. “It turns out the concepts are not that complicated,” Obama told the students at the White House, though his attempt to explain it suggested otherwise:
“The basic concept behind coding is that you take zeros and ones, you take two numbers, yes or no, and those can be translated into electrical messages that then run through the computer…. So all it’s doing is it’s saying yes or no over and over again, and the computer’s powerful enough that it can read a really long set of instructions really quickly.”
Something like that.
Disponível em: http://qz.com/308904/heres-the-first-line-of-code-ever-written-by-a-us-president/
Quartz (9 de Dezembro de 2014) - Texto de Zachary M. Seward
Barack Obama just became the first US president to write a line of computer code (assuming George W. Bush never secretly indulged in PHP). At the White House yesterday, Obama sat down with students who were learning the fundamentals of JavaScript, the popular programming language used to create most web pages.
The line he wrote was:
moveForward(100);
“So I make the F in higher case?” Obama asked, correctly observing that JavaScript is case sensitive. “Semicolon?” (That semicolon is optional, but Obama apparently has a knack for recognizing JavaScript best practices.)
Obama was playing with a Code.org tutorial based on the popular Disney movie Frozen. In his line of code, the President called a function-moveForward-pre-defined by Code.org for the exercise.
Calling a function in JavaScript is simple: write its name exactly as it has been defined, followed by parentheses that contain its “arguments.” In this case, a single argument tells the program how many pixels to move a Frozen character forward. Because it’s measured in pixels, the argument has to be a number. If Obama had written moveForward(“three steps”), the program would have failed, offering only a cryptic error message and exposing the president to the near-perpetual state of frustration most software developers live in.
“This is Elsa?” Obama asked, referring to the movie’s main character.
Obama was promoting Computer Science Education Week and Code.org’s Hour of Code campaign, which encourages kids to try programming for at least one hour. “It turns out the concepts are not that complicated,” Obama told the students at the White House, though his attempt to explain it suggested otherwise:
“The basic concept behind coding is that you take zeros and ones, you take two numbers, yes or no, and those can be translated into electrical messages that then run through the computer…. So all it’s doing is it’s saying yes or no over and over again, and the computer’s powerful enough that it can read a really long set of instructions really quickly.”
Something like that.
Disponível em: http://qz.com/308904/heres-the-first-line-of-code-ever-written-by-a-us-president/
Quartz (9 de Dezembro de 2014) - Texto de Zachary M. Seward
A atividade desempenhada pelo Presidente Obama na Casa Branca foi:
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483204
Inglês
In the sentence of the text “Although commercial refueling stations will be necessary to support a substantial fleet of natural gas vehicles, home refueling may be the magic bullet that makes the vehicles practical” (lines 76-79), the word although implies facts that are
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483203
Inglês
According to the 9th paragraph in the text (lines 65-75), refueling stations in the United States
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483202
Inglês
The personal pronoun it in “so if it is burned in an engine designed to run on conventional fuel” (lines 55-56) refers to
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483201
Inglês
According to the 6th paragraph in the text (lines 43-52), one of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy goals for the fleet in the United States is average 54.5 miles per gallon
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483200
Inglês
The modal verb may in the fragment of the text “It may be years before the economic benefits of natural gas vehicles can be realized” (lines 35-36) is associated with the idea of
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483199
Inglês
In the 5th paragraph, limited by lines 35-42 in the text, the author defends the idea that
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483198
Inglês
The sentence of the text “But were production to increase significantly, economies of scale would bring prices down” (lines 28-29) has the same meaning as:
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483197
Inglês
According to the paragraph limited by lines 13-24 in the text, one can infer that
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483196
Inglês
In the statement “As of 2009, Argentina had more than 1.8 million in operation and almost 2,000 natural gas filling stations” (lines 4-6), the expression as of means:
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Serviço Social
|
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Administração |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Mecânica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Ciências Contábeis |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Comunicação/Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Produção |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia do Meio Ambiente |
CESGRANRIO - 2015 - Petrobras - Profissional Júnior - Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q483195
Inglês
The main purpose of the text is to
Ano: 2015
Banca:
RBO
Órgão:
CIJUN - SP
Prova:
RBO - 2015 - CIJUN - Analista Administrativo Compras e Licitações (Pleno) |
Q481074
Inglês
Mark the alternative with the incorrect adjective:
Ano: 2015
Banca:
RBO
Órgão:
CIJUN - SP
Prova:
RBO - 2015 - CIJUN - Analista Administrativo Compras e Licitações (Pleno) |
Q481073
Inglês
Read the sentences below:
I. The disadvantage OF working as an actor is that you can’t find a steady job.
II. We have just received an invitation TO her wedding.
III. The greatest difference BETWEEN both restaurants is their prices.
IV. Would you like to come FOR a walk? V. She lost weight after she went ON a severe diet.
Choose the only correct option, considering the use of correct prepositions:
I. The disadvantage OF working as an actor is that you can’t find a steady job.
II. We have just received an invitation TO her wedding.
III. The greatest difference BETWEEN both restaurants is their prices.
IV. Would you like to come FOR a walk? V. She lost weight after she went ON a severe diet.
Choose the only correct option, considering the use of correct prepositions:
Ano: 2015
Banca:
RBO
Órgão:
CIJUN - SP
Prova:
RBO - 2015 - CIJUN - Analista Administrativo Compras e Licitações (Pleno) |
Q481071
Inglês
Mark the sentence with the wrong position of the adverb:
Ano: 2015
Banca:
RBO
Órgão:
CIJUN - SP
Prova:
RBO - 2015 - CIJUN - Analista Administrativo Compras e Licitações (Pleno) |
Q481070
Inglês
Read the dialogues below:
I- Do you know I’m working at Macy’s now?
Oh, really? What do you do there?
I work part-time as a cashier.
II- Are you studying French this semester?
Yes, I am enjoying the course so much!
How often do you have classes?
Twice a week.
III- Where are you having lunch today?
At Laguna’s. Are you usually going there?
Yes, almost every day.
IV- What do you do in your free time?
I often go to the seaside.
Are you going there this weekend?
No, because I think it’s raining on Saturday.
Choose the only possible option, according to the correct use of simple present and/or present continuous tense in the dialogues above:
I- Do you know I’m working at Macy’s now?
Oh, really? What do you do there?
I work part-time as a cashier.
II- Are you studying French this semester?
Yes, I am enjoying the course so much!
How often do you have classes?
Twice a week.
III- Where are you having lunch today?
At Laguna’s. Are you usually going there?
Yes, almost every day.
IV- What do you do in your free time?
I often go to the seaside.
Are you going there this weekend?
No, because I think it’s raining on Saturday.
Choose the only possible option, according to the correct use of simple present and/or present continuous tense in the dialogues above:
Ano: 2015
Banca:
RBO
Órgão:
CIJUN - SP
Prova:
RBO - 2015 - CIJUN - Analista Administrativo Compras e Licitações (Pleno) |
Q481068
Inglês
Which reported question is correct?
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CETRO
Órgão:
AMAZUL
Provas:
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista em Desenvolvimento de Tecnologia Nuclear - Advogado
|
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista Administrativo |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Assistente Social |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Arquiteto |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Contador |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Cirurgião Dentista |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Auditor |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista de desenvolvimento de sistemas - Tecnólogo |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista de Recursos Humanos |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Tecnólogo em Logística |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Enfermeiro do Trabalho |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Psicologia |
Q479343
Inglês
Texto associado
Background
The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers. Over forty percent of the Navy's major combatant ships are nuclear-powered, and because of their demonstrated safety and reliability, these ships have access to seaports throughout the world. The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials. The Program has investigated many different fuel systems and reactor design features, and has designed, built, and operated over thirty different reactor designs in over twenty plant types to employ the most promising of these developments in practical applications. Improvements in naval reactor design have allowed increased power and energy to keep pace with the operational requirements of the modern nuclear fleet, while maintaining a conservative design approach that ensures reliability and safety to the crew, the public, and the environment. As just one example of the progress that has been made, the earliest reactor core designs in the NAUTILUS required refueling after about two years while modern reactor cores can last the life of a submarine, or over thirty years without refueling. These improvements have been the result of prudent, conservative engineering, backed by analysis, testing, and prototyping. The NNPP was also a pioneer in developing basic technologies and transferring technology to the civilian nuclear electric power industry. For example, the Program demonstrated the feasibility of commercial nuclear power generation in this country by designing, constructing and operating the Shipping port Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania and showing the feasibility of a thorium-based breeder reactor.
In: Report on Low Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactor Cores. Page 1. Report to Congress, January 2014. Office of Naval Reactors. US Dept. of Energy. DC 2058 http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe14.pdf
The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers. Over forty percent of the Navy's major combatant ships are nuclear-powered, and because of their demonstrated safety and reliability, these ships have access to seaports throughout the world. The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials. The Program has investigated many different fuel systems and reactor design features, and has designed, built, and operated over thirty different reactor designs in over twenty plant types to employ the most promising of these developments in practical applications. Improvements in naval reactor design have allowed increased power and energy to keep pace with the operational requirements of the modern nuclear fleet, while maintaining a conservative design approach that ensures reliability and safety to the crew, the public, and the environment. As just one example of the progress that has been made, the earliest reactor core designs in the NAUTILUS required refueling after about two years while modern reactor cores can last the life of a submarine, or over thirty years without refueling. These improvements have been the result of prudent, conservative engineering, backed by analysis, testing, and prototyping. The NNPP was also a pioneer in developing basic technologies and transferring technology to the civilian nuclear electric power industry. For example, the Program demonstrated the feasibility of commercial nuclear power generation in this country by designing, constructing and operating the Shipping port Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania and showing the feasibility of a thorium-based breeder reactor.
In: Report on Low Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactor Cores. Page 1. Report to Congress, January 2014. Office of Naval Reactors. US Dept. of Energy. DC 2058 http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe14.pdf
Read the passage taken of the text below.
“The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers.”
Choose the alternative in which the words can properly substitute the ones in bold and underlined, respectively.
“The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers.”
Choose the alternative in which the words can properly substitute the ones in bold and underlined, respectively.
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CETRO
Órgão:
AMAZUL
Provas:
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista em Desenvolvimento de Tecnologia Nuclear - Advogado
|
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista Administrativo |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Assistente Social |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Arquiteto |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Contador |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Cirurgião Dentista |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Auditor |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista de desenvolvimento de sistemas - Tecnólogo |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista de Recursos Humanos |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Tecnólogo em Logística |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Enfermeiro do Trabalho |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Psicologia |
Q479342
Inglês
Texto associado
Background
The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers. Over forty percent of the Navy's major combatant ships are nuclear-powered, and because of their demonstrated safety and reliability, these ships have access to seaports throughout the world. The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials. The Program has investigated many different fuel systems and reactor design features, and has designed, built, and operated over thirty different reactor designs in over twenty plant types to employ the most promising of these developments in practical applications. Improvements in naval reactor design have allowed increased power and energy to keep pace with the operational requirements of the modern nuclear fleet, while maintaining a conservative design approach that ensures reliability and safety to the crew, the public, and the environment. As just one example of the progress that has been made, the earliest reactor core designs in the NAUTILUS required refueling after about two years while modern reactor cores can last the life of a submarine, or over thirty years without refueling. These improvements have been the result of prudent, conservative engineering, backed by analysis, testing, and prototyping. The NNPP was also a pioneer in developing basic technologies and transferring technology to the civilian nuclear electric power industry. For example, the Program demonstrated the feasibility of commercial nuclear power generation in this country by designing, constructing and operating the Shipping port Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania and showing the feasibility of a thorium-based breeder reactor.
In: Report on Low Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactor Cores. Page 1. Report to Congress, January 2014. Office of Naval Reactors. US Dept. of Energy. DC 2058 http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe14.pdf
The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers. Over forty percent of the Navy's major combatant ships are nuclear-powered, and because of their demonstrated safety and reliability, these ships have access to seaports throughout the world. The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials. The Program has investigated many different fuel systems and reactor design features, and has designed, built, and operated over thirty different reactor designs in over twenty plant types to employ the most promising of these developments in practical applications. Improvements in naval reactor design have allowed increased power and energy to keep pace with the operational requirements of the modern nuclear fleet, while maintaining a conservative design approach that ensures reliability and safety to the crew, the public, and the environment. As just one example of the progress that has been made, the earliest reactor core designs in the NAUTILUS required refueling after about two years while modern reactor cores can last the life of a submarine, or over thirty years without refueling. These improvements have been the result of prudent, conservative engineering, backed by analysis, testing, and prototyping. The NNPP was also a pioneer in developing basic technologies and transferring technology to the civilian nuclear electric power industry. For example, the Program demonstrated the feasibility of commercial nuclear power generation in this country by designing, constructing and operating the Shipping port Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania and showing the feasibility of a thorium-based breeder reactor.
In: Report on Low Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactor Cores. Page 1. Report to Congress, January 2014. Office of Naval Reactors. US Dept. of Energy. DC 2058 http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe14.pdf
According to the text, the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program – NNPP
I. investigates more efficient fuels and reactors for the Navy.
II. is concerned about how to spend the financial resources received.
III. has also contributed with the civilian power industry.
The correct assertion(s) is(are)
I. investigates more efficient fuels and reactors for the Navy.
II. is concerned about how to spend the financial resources received.
III. has also contributed with the civilian power industry.
The correct assertion(s) is(are)
Ano: 2015
Banca:
CETRO
Órgão:
AMAZUL
Provas:
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista em Desenvolvimento de Tecnologia Nuclear - Advogado
|
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista Administrativo |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Assistente Social |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Arquiteto |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Contador |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Cirurgião Dentista |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Auditor |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista de desenvolvimento de sistemas - Tecnólogo |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Analista de Recursos Humanos |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Tecnólogo em Logística |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Enfermeiro do Trabalho |
CETRO - 2015 - AMAZUL - Psicologia |
Q479341
Inglês
Texto associado
Background
The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers. Over forty percent of the Navy's major combatant ships are nuclear-powered, and because of their demonstrated safety and reliability, these ships have access to seaports throughout the world. The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials. The Program has investigated many different fuel systems and reactor design features, and has designed, built, and operated over thirty different reactor designs in over twenty plant types to employ the most promising of these developments in practical applications. Improvements in naval reactor design have allowed increased power and energy to keep pace with the operational requirements of the modern nuclear fleet, while maintaining a conservative design approach that ensures reliability and safety to the crew, the public, and the environment. As just one example of the progress that has been made, the earliest reactor core designs in the NAUTILUS required refueling after about two years while modern reactor cores can last the life of a submarine, or over thirty years without refueling. These improvements have been the result of prudent, conservative engineering, backed by analysis, testing, and prototyping. The NNPP was also a pioneer in developing basic technologies and transferring technology to the civilian nuclear electric power industry. For example, the Program demonstrated the feasibility of commercial nuclear power generation in this country by designing, constructing and operating the Shipping port Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania and showing the feasibility of a thorium-based breeder reactor.
In: Report on Low Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactor Cores. Page 1. Report to Congress, January 2014. Office of Naval Reactors. US Dept. of Energy. DC 2058 http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe14.pdf
The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) started in 1948. Since that time, the NNPP has provided safe and effective propulsion systems to power submarines, surface combatants, and aircraft carriers. Today, nuclear propulsion enables virtually undetectable US Navy submarines, including the sea-based leg of the strategic triad, and provides essentially inexhaustible propulsion power independent of forward logistical support to both our submarines and aircraft carriers. Over forty percent of the Navy's major combatant ships are nuclear-powered, and because of their demonstrated safety and reliability, these ships have access to seaports throughout the world. The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials. The Program has investigated many different fuel systems and reactor design features, and has designed, built, and operated over thirty different reactor designs in over twenty plant types to employ the most promising of these developments in practical applications. Improvements in naval reactor design have allowed increased power and energy to keep pace with the operational requirements of the modern nuclear fleet, while maintaining a conservative design approach that ensures reliability and safety to the crew, the public, and the environment. As just one example of the progress that has been made, the earliest reactor core designs in the NAUTILUS required refueling after about two years while modern reactor cores can last the life of a submarine, or over thirty years without refueling. These improvements have been the result of prudent, conservative engineering, backed by analysis, testing, and prototyping. The NNPP was also a pioneer in developing basic technologies and transferring technology to the civilian nuclear electric power industry. For example, the Program demonstrated the feasibility of commercial nuclear power generation in this country by designing, constructing and operating the Shipping port Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania and showing the feasibility of a thorium-based breeder reactor.
In: Report on Low Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactor Cores. Page 1. Report to Congress, January 2014. Office of Naval Reactors. US Dept. of Energy. DC 2058 http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe14.pdf
Choose the alternative in which the bold and underlined word has the same grammar function as the one below.
“The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials.”
“The NNPP has consistently sought the best way to affordably meet Navy requirements by evaluating, developing, and delivering a variety of reactor types, fuel systems, and structural materials.”
Conheça nossos planos