Questões de Concurso
Comentadas sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês
Foram encontradas 8.692 questões
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP
Prova:
FGV - 2026 - Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP - Professor II - Inglês |
Q3998579
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text II and answer the following question.
Text II
They were nearly born on a bus, Estha and Rahel. The car in
which Babà, their father, was taking Ammu, their mother, to
hospital in Shillong to have them, broke down on the winding teaestate road in Assam. They abandoned the car and flagged down a
crowded State Transport bus. With the queer compassion of the
very poor for the comparatively well off, or perhaps only because
they saw how hugely pregnant Ammu was, seated passengers
made room for the couple, and for the rest of the journey Estha
and Rahel’s father had to hold their mother’s stomach (with them
in it) to prevent it from wobbling. That was before they were
divorced and Ammu came back to live in Kerala.
According to Estha, if they’d been born on the bus, they’d have
got free bus rides for the rest of their lives. It wasn’t clear where
he’d got this information from, or how he knew these things, but
for years the twins harbored a faint resentment against their
parents for having diddled them out of a lifetime of free bus rides.
From: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/158400/the-god-of-smallthings-by-arundhati-roy/9780735273283/excerpt
The pronoun in “They abandoned the car and flagged down a
crowded State Transport bus” (1st paragraph) refers to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP
Prova:
FGV - 2026 - Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP - Professor II - Inglês |
Q3998578
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text II and answer the following question.
Text II
They were nearly born on a bus, Estha and Rahel. The car in
which Babà, their father, was taking Ammu, their mother, to
hospital in Shillong to have them, broke down on the winding teaestate road in Assam. They abandoned the car and flagged down a
crowded State Transport bus. With the queer compassion of the
very poor for the comparatively well off, or perhaps only because
they saw how hugely pregnant Ammu was, seated passengers
made room for the couple, and for the rest of the journey Estha
and Rahel’s father had to hold their mother’s stomach (with them
in it) to prevent it from wobbling. That was before they were
divorced and Ammu came back to live in Kerala.
According to Estha, if they’d been born on the bus, they’d have
got free bus rides for the rest of their lives. It wasn’t clear where
he’d got this information from, or how he knew these things, but
for years the twins harbored a faint resentment against their
parents for having diddled them out of a lifetime of free bus rides.
From: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/158400/the-god-of-smallthings-by-arundhati-roy/9780735273283/excerpt
The phrase “winding estate road” (1st paragraph) describes the
road as being:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP
Prova:
FGV - 2026 - Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP - Professor II - Inglês |
Q3998577
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text II and answer the following question.
Text II
They were nearly born on a bus, Estha and Rahel. The car in
which Babà, their father, was taking Ammu, their mother, to
hospital in Shillong to have them, broke down on the winding teaestate road in Assam. They abandoned the car and flagged down a
crowded State Transport bus. With the queer compassion of the
very poor for the comparatively well off, or perhaps only because
they saw how hugely pregnant Ammu was, seated passengers
made room for the couple, and for the rest of the journey Estha
and Rahel’s father had to hold their mother’s stomach (with them
in it) to prevent it from wobbling. That was before they were
divorced and Ammu came back to live in Kerala.
According to Estha, if they’d been born on the bus, they’d have
got free bus rides for the rest of their lives. It wasn’t clear where
he’d got this information from, or how he knew these things, but
for years the twins harbored a faint resentment against their
parents for having diddled them out of a lifetime of free bus rides.
From: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/158400/the-god-of-smallthings-by-arundhati-roy/9780735273283/excerpt
The idiom in “seated passengers made room for the couple”
(1st paragraph) means the passengers:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP
Prova:
FGV - 2026 - Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP - Professor II - Inglês |
Q3998576
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text II and answer the following question.
Text II
They were nearly born on a bus, Estha and Rahel. The car in
which Babà, their father, was taking Ammu, their mother, to
hospital in Shillong to have them, broke down on the winding teaestate road in Assam. They abandoned the car and flagged down a
crowded State Transport bus. With the queer compassion of the
very poor for the comparatively well off, or perhaps only because
they saw how hugely pregnant Ammu was, seated passengers
made room for the couple, and for the rest of the journey Estha
and Rahel’s father had to hold their mother’s stomach (with them
in it) to prevent it from wobbling. That was before they were
divorced and Ammu came back to live in Kerala.
According to Estha, if they’d been born on the bus, they’d have
got free bus rides for the rest of their lives. It wasn’t clear where
he’d got this information from, or how he knew these things, but
for years the twins harbored a faint resentment against their
parents for having diddled them out of a lifetime of free bus rides.
From: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/158400/the-god-of-smallthings-by-arundhati-roy/9780735273283/excerpt
In the end of the text, it is clear the twins:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP
Prova:
FGV - 2026 - Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP - Professor II - Inglês |
Q3998575
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text II and answer the following question.
Text II
They were nearly born on a bus, Estha and Rahel. The car in
which Babà, their father, was taking Ammu, their mother, to
hospital in Shillong to have them, broke down on the winding teaestate road in Assam. They abandoned the car and flagged down a
crowded State Transport bus. With the queer compassion of the
very poor for the comparatively well off, or perhaps only because
they saw how hugely pregnant Ammu was, seated passengers
made room for the couple, and for the rest of the journey Estha
and Rahel’s father had to hold their mother’s stomach (with them
in it) to prevent it from wobbling. That was before they were
divorced and Ammu came back to live in Kerala.
According to Estha, if they’d been born on the bus, they’d have
got free bus rides for the rest of their lives. It wasn’t clear where
he’d got this information from, or how he knew these things, but
for years the twins harbored a faint resentment against their
parents for having diddled them out of a lifetime of free bus rides.
From: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/158400/the-god-of-smallthings-by-arundhati-roy/9780735273283/excerpt
The situation described in the first paragraph reflects:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP
Prova:
FGV - 2026 - Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP - Professor II - Inglês |
Q3998566
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text I and answer the question that follows.
Text I
Multiliteracy: the new basic skill for the 21st century classroom
We increasingly engage with texts that draw meaning beyond
written words from other sources. Images, sound, video clips and
gestures (alone and in combination) all play central roles in how
we communicate and interpret content.
This multimedia approach is especially evident in online
platforms and social media, where a single piece of content may
blend written language with videos, graphics, photos and other
visual elements. This change requires us to rethink what we mean
by literacy.
Nearly 30 years ago, a group of scholars, the New London
Group, recognised the need for a broader understanding of
literacy after observing a growing gap between the literacy needs
students faced outside of school and the print-based practices still
dominant in classrooms.
They introduced a concept of multiliteracies which
acknowledges that we now engage with texts that use multiple
modes of communication. We engage with these texts in different
media environments, each with their own practices and strategies.
The concept incorporates the literacy skills needed to acquire,
interpret, produce and evaluate the multimodal and multimedia
texts we encounter today.
For literacy education, this shift means updating classroom
aims, content and activities. The group developed a pedagogical
framework to help schools respond to the growing inequalities and
rapid changes in technology and the textual landscape.
The process starts with examining pupils’ everyday literacy
practices and experiences together. Then these practices are
approached analytically by introducing a metalanguage for
discussing the resources they use to create meaning. Students can
use this metalanguage to critically evaluate their literacy practices
which helps them understand how different modes of
communication work and how to use them effectively.
The pedagogy of multiliteracies also emphasises the design
and production of multimodal texts and collaborative learning in
linguistically and culturally diverse groups, rather than individual
reading activities. […]
Multiliteracies are already included in many European
curricula, and the European framework for key competencies for
lifelong learning defines literacy in a way that aligns with the
concept of multiliteracies. These policy documents and guidelines
provide a foundation for integrating multiliteracies into literacy
education.
Yet, research shows that there is still work to be done to
incorporate teaching multimodal literacy practices into
mainstream literacy education. While many teachers do include
multimodal texts in their classroom activities, tensions between
multimodal and traditional practices still exist.
Studies point out the huge challenges teachers face when they
adapt their teaching to the redefined literacies, and there are
concerns about teachers’ preparedness to teach multiliteracies.
They need support with training and appropriate materials. Teacher educators and policy makers must ensure that teachers
have substantial and concrete support.
Adapted from https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/en/discover/expertviews/multiliteracy-new-basic-skill-21st-century-classroom
Analyse the assertions below based on Text I:
I. The pedagogy of multiliteracies privileges individual reading tasks.
II. European curricula are unaware of the new multimedia approach discussed in the text.
III. Teacher assistance must be considered when a pedagogy of multiliteracies is implemented.
Choose the correct answer:
I. The pedagogy of multiliteracies privileges individual reading tasks.
II. European curricula are unaware of the new multimedia approach discussed in the text.
III. Teacher assistance must be considered when a pedagogy of multiliteracies is implemented.
Choose the correct answer:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP
Prova:
FGV - 2026 - Prefeitura de São José dos Campos - SP - Professor II - Inglês |
Q3998565
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text I and answer the question that follows.
Text I
Multiliteracy: the new basic skill for the 21st century classroom
We increasingly engage with texts that draw meaning beyond
written words from other sources. Images, sound, video clips and
gestures (alone and in combination) all play central roles in how
we communicate and interpret content.
This multimedia approach is especially evident in online
platforms and social media, where a single piece of content may
blend written language with videos, graphics, photos and other
visual elements. This change requires us to rethink what we mean
by literacy.
Nearly 30 years ago, a group of scholars, the New London
Group, recognised the need for a broader understanding of
literacy after observing a growing gap between the literacy needs
students faced outside of school and the print-based practices still
dominant in classrooms.
They introduced a concept of multiliteracies which
acknowledges that we now engage with texts that use multiple
modes of communication. We engage with these texts in different
media environments, each with their own practices and strategies.
The concept incorporates the literacy skills needed to acquire,
interpret, produce and evaluate the multimodal and multimedia
texts we encounter today.
For literacy education, this shift means updating classroom
aims, content and activities. The group developed a pedagogical
framework to help schools respond to the growing inequalities and
rapid changes in technology and the textual landscape.
The process starts with examining pupils’ everyday literacy
practices and experiences together. Then these practices are
approached analytically by introducing a metalanguage for
discussing the resources they use to create meaning. Students can
use this metalanguage to critically evaluate their literacy practices
which helps them understand how different modes of
communication work and how to use them effectively.
The pedagogy of multiliteracies also emphasises the design
and production of multimodal texts and collaborative learning in
linguistically and culturally diverse groups, rather than individual
reading activities. […]
Multiliteracies are already included in many European
curricula, and the European framework for key competencies for
lifelong learning defines literacy in a way that aligns with the
concept of multiliteracies. These policy documents and guidelines
provide a foundation for integrating multiliteracies into literacy
education.
Yet, research shows that there is still work to be done to
incorporate teaching multimodal literacy practices into
mainstream literacy education. While many teachers do include
multimodal texts in their classroom activities, tensions between
multimodal and traditional practices still exist.
Studies point out the huge challenges teachers face when they
adapt their teaching to the redefined literacies, and there are
concerns about teachers’ preparedness to teach multiliteracies.
They need support with training and appropriate materials. Teacher educators and policy makers must ensure that teachers
have substantial and concrete support.
Adapted from https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/en/discover/expertviews/multiliteracy-new-basic-skill-21st-century-classroom
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE
(F).
( ) Understanding a text depends solely on the words the writer provides.
( ) The New London Group realized schools had to address realworld literacy demands.
( ) Problems in reconciling multimodal and traditional practices still remain.
The statements are, respectively:
( ) Understanding a text depends solely on the words the writer provides.
( ) The New London Group realized schools had to address realworld literacy demands.
( ) Problems in reconciling multimodal and traditional practices still remain.
The statements are, respectively:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994713
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
The text states that social media has "recalibrated"
traditional parameters of faithfulness. Within the
framework of Computer-Mediated Communication
(CMC), this most accurately implies that:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994712
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
In the sentence: "The 'secrecy criterion' is a litmus test;
nevertheless, some critics argue it leads to
surveillance." the connector "nevertheless" introduces
a relation of:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994707
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
In the phrase "They argue that the expansion of the
'cheating' umbrella..." (paragraph 3), the pronoun
"They" refers back to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994700
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
According to the final paragraph, the BNCC's
perspective on teaching English through themes like
"micro-cheating" aims to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994699
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
The expression "occupy a contentious 'grey area'"
(paragraph 1) most accurately conveys that such
behaviors are:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994698
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
Based on the text, the "secrecy criterion" functions
primarily as:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CPCON
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB
Prova:
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Inglesa) |
Q3993529
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for question
Students using A.I. over humans to learn English (23rd December 2024)
More and more students in Japan are using artificial intelligence (AI) to learn English and other languages. The language learning app Duolingo conducted a survey on how students study languages. More than 4,700 Japanese students answered questions about their language-learning habits. The survey found that the number of people using ChatGPT and other AI tools increased by more than 80 per cent in 2024. AI was particularly popular with younger people. The researchers said more young people used AI than took face-to-face lessons. However, some people in their 20s were not totally happy with AI lessons. They said AI lacked natural responses and was a little boring.
Duolingo said: "We're in the midst of an AI revolution.…Technology has long had an impact on language learning." It found that apps were the most popular method in Japan to learn languages. English was the most studied language, followed by Korean. People are studying Korean "to understand the language as spoken by…favourite artists and celebrities." Duolingo said around 58 per cent of people who took the survey used language-learning apps. This was followed by video streaming platforms like YouTube and Netflix (37%), textbooks (36%) and online lessons (16%). The number of people going to a language school is decreasing. Just 13.8 per cent of people went to classes with a teacher.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/12/19/japan/chatgpt-english-lessons/
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20241218/p2a/00m/0li/017000c
https://blog.duolingo.com/2024-duolingo-language-report/
Which of the following statements best synthesizes the trends and sentiments regarding language learning tools in Japan as described
in the text?
Ano: 2026
Banca:
Avança SP
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Louveira - SP
Prova:
Avança SP - 2026 - Prefeitura de Louveira - SP - Professor de Inglês |
Q3989976
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question.
The Tipping Point.
Last week at my neighborhood coffee shop, the barista flipped that dreaded tablet toward me. Three tip options glared back: 18%. 22%. 25%. For a $3.50 latte I was picking up. That took thirty seconds to make. I’ve hit my breaking point with tipping culture.
Growing up, tipping was simple: 15–20% for sitdown restaurants, maybe your hairdresser. Now it’s an expected tax on every transaction. The frozen yogurt shop where I serve myself wants 20%. Self-checkout kiosks are asking for tips. This is insane.
When I traveled Europe last summer, I paid exactly what was on the menu. No guilt, no calculations, no awkward pressure. Servers were paid living wages and the service was excellent.
Meanwhile, I’m expected to subsidize corporate America’s refusal to pay fair wages while their CEOs pocket millions in bonuses.
It’s 2025, and American tipping culture has spiraled out of control. It’s hurting workers, stressing customers, and letting profitable businesses guilt-trip their own customers into covering payroll. When I worked retail years ago, my employer paid my full wage. I didn’t expect customers to subsidize my paycheck because my boss decided to pocket the difference. Yet somehow in 2025, we’ve normalized corporations outsourcing their payroll responsibility to guilt-ridden customers. 72% of U.S. adults say tipping is expected in more places today than it was five years ago. But even as Americans say they’re being asked to tip more often, only about a third say it’s extremely or very easy to know whether (34%) or how much (33%) to tip for various services.
[...] The confusion is real and it’s intentional. Companies benefit from our uncertainty because confused customers tend to over-tip rather than risk social judgment.
Murdock, Jeff. Why Is Tipping Culture Out of Control in 2025? Medium. 16 Jun. 2025. Disponível em:<https://medium.com/@frat1309/why-is-tipping-cultureout-of-control-in-2025-im-done-subsidizing-corporategreed-76ba74887b82>
Based on the text, how does the author's
experience in Europe contrast with his
experience in America?
Ano: 2026
Banca:
Avança SP
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Louveira - SP
Prova:
Avança SP - 2026 - Prefeitura de Louveira - SP - Professor de Inglês |
Q3989975
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question.
The Tipping Point.
Last week at my neighborhood coffee shop, the barista flipped that dreaded tablet toward me. Three tip options glared back: 18%. 22%. 25%. For a $3.50 latte I was picking up. That took thirty seconds to make. I’ve hit my breaking point with tipping culture.
Growing up, tipping was simple: 15–20% for sitdown restaurants, maybe your hairdresser. Now it’s an expected tax on every transaction. The frozen yogurt shop where I serve myself wants 20%. Self-checkout kiosks are asking for tips. This is insane.
When I traveled Europe last summer, I paid exactly what was on the menu. No guilt, no calculations, no awkward pressure. Servers were paid living wages and the service was excellent.
Meanwhile, I’m expected to subsidize corporate America’s refusal to pay fair wages while their CEOs pocket millions in bonuses.
It’s 2025, and American tipping culture has spiraled out of control. It’s hurting workers, stressing customers, and letting profitable businesses guilt-trip their own customers into covering payroll. When I worked retail years ago, my employer paid my full wage. I didn’t expect customers to subsidize my paycheck because my boss decided to pocket the difference. Yet somehow in 2025, we’ve normalized corporations outsourcing their payroll responsibility to guilt-ridden customers. 72% of U.S. adults say tipping is expected in more places today than it was five years ago. But even as Americans say they’re being asked to tip more often, only about a third say it’s extremely or very easy to know whether (34%) or how much (33%) to tip for various services.
[...] The confusion is real and it’s intentional. Companies benefit from our uncertainty because confused customers tend to over-tip rather than risk social judgment.
Murdock, Jeff. Why Is Tipping Culture Out of Control in 2025? Medium. 16 Jun. 2025. Disponível em:<https://medium.com/@frat1309/why-is-tipping-cultureout-of-control-in-2025-im-done-subsidizing-corporategreed-76ba74887b82>
In the excerpt “72% of U.S. adults say tipping is
expected in more places today than it was five
years ago.”, the comparative structure expresses:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
Avança SP
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Louveira - SP
Prova:
Avança SP - 2026 - Prefeitura de Louveira - SP - Professor de Inglês |
Q3989972
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question.
The Tipping Point.
Last week at my neighborhood coffee shop, the barista flipped that dreaded tablet toward me. Three tip options glared back: 18%. 22%. 25%. For a $3.50 latte I was picking up. That took thirty seconds to make. I’ve hit my breaking point with tipping culture.
Growing up, tipping was simple: 15–20% for sitdown restaurants, maybe your hairdresser. Now it’s an expected tax on every transaction. The frozen yogurt shop where I serve myself wants 20%. Self-checkout kiosks are asking for tips. This is insane.
When I traveled Europe last summer, I paid exactly what was on the menu. No guilt, no calculations, no awkward pressure. Servers were paid living wages and the service was excellent.
Meanwhile, I’m expected to subsidize corporate America’s refusal to pay fair wages while their CEOs pocket millions in bonuses.
It’s 2025, and American tipping culture has spiraled out of control. It’s hurting workers, stressing customers, and letting profitable businesses guilt-trip their own customers into covering payroll. When I worked retail years ago, my employer paid my full wage. I didn’t expect customers to subsidize my paycheck because my boss decided to pocket the difference. Yet somehow in 2025, we’ve normalized corporations outsourcing their payroll responsibility to guilt-ridden customers. 72% of U.S. adults say tipping is expected in more places today than it was five years ago. But even as Americans say they’re being asked to tip more often, only about a third say it’s extremely or very easy to know whether (34%) or how much (33%) to tip for various services.
[...] The confusion is real and it’s intentional. Companies benefit from our uncertainty because confused customers tend to over-tip rather than risk social judgment.
Murdock, Jeff. Why Is Tipping Culture Out of Control in 2025? Medium. 16 Jun. 2025. Disponível em:<https://medium.com/@frat1309/why-is-tipping-cultureout-of-control-in-2025-im-done-subsidizing-corporategreed-76ba74887b82>
In the sentence “I’ve hit my breaking point with
tipping culture.”, the expression “hit my
breaking point” is closest in meaning to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988646
Inglês
“In many Brazilian public universities, English
instruction has historically prioritized the
development of strategic reading abilities,
enabling learners to extract relevant information
from academic texts in their fields, rather than
pursuing full oral fluency.” (Excerpt adapted from:
Celani [1988]; Ramos [2005]. “Brazilian ESP
tradition”)
The pedagogical orientation described aligns most closely with:
The pedagogical orientation described aligns most closely with:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988636
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Throughout the text, the author progressively
moves from describing the rapid expansion of
generative AI in education (paragraph 1), to raising
ethical and pedagogical concerns (paragraph 2), to
identifying systemic gaps in training (paragraph 3),
and finally to advocating coordinated policy
investment (paragraphs 4 and 5). This progression
indicates that the author’s primary argumentative
strategy consists of:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988635
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In paragraph 1, the text refers to “these paradigm
shifts”. Considering the context of the passage,
the expression “paradigm shifts” is most nearly
synonymous with:
A ( ) incremental
Conheça nossos planos