In paragraph 1, the text refers to “these paradigm shifts”....

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Q3988635 Inglês
     With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom reality. The public, including many students, now has widespread access to GenAI tools and large language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use these tools with schoolwork. School boards have taken different approaches to regulating or integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers, meanwhile, find themselves responding to these paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and wider expectations AI raises.

     There are many questions about the purpose of education, including questions around academic integrity and how education can uphold fairness and equity. Questions include: How can students successfully navigate the use of these tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can schools prepare students for the future as organizations and institutions scramble to determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide students as they grapple with the existential and social implications of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this complex challenge alone — they need support and to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important role.

      There’s a growing international consensus echoed by calls to action that teachers are essential players as learners develop AI literacy. Despite growing resources, the development of AI technology continues to outpace implementation support and essential training for teachers. This widening gap between teacher competencies and the demands of an AI-infused classroom is unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers to guide the next generation in a world transformed by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide students and shape students’ critical and responsible engagement with this technology.

      Teachers cannot do this alone. Successfully integrating AI into education requires a concerted and collaborative effort from all stakeholders within the educational ecosystem. Together, these partners can help establish clear, strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate robust funding for essential tools and comprehensive training and research to foster innovative spaces where educators and researchers can experiment and study practices. Research is needed to assess the broader effects of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across all jurisdictions.

    Implementation should also consider teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities that teachers carry. What can be removed, and what robust supports can be provided so teachers can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to recognize that investing in teachers is one of the most powerful ways we can invest in our students and in a better future for all of us.


Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In paragraph 1, the text refers to “these paradigm shifts”. Considering the context of the passage, the expression “paradigm shifts” is most nearly synonymous with: A ( ) incremental 
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Gabarito: C

Fundamento decisivo: No parágrafo 1, “these paradigm shifts” retoma a passagem sobre a “new and ever-shifting classroom reality” criada pelo avanço da IA generativa e pelo novo comportamento de alunos e escolas. O contexto opõe essa mudança ampla a uma simples adaptação pontual, o que conduz ao gabarito C.

Tema central: sentido contextual
Análise das alternativas
A
Errada
Está errada porque reduz o sentido a ajustes graduais de procedimento. O texto descreve uma nova realidade de sala de aula e mudanças nas expectativas, funções docentes e organização educacional, o que vai além de adaptação incremental.
B
Errada
Está errada porque introduz a ideia de disrupção temporária. O texto apresenta um processo contínuo e crescente, marcado por avanço rápido da IA, realidade em constante mudança e necessidade duradoura de suporte e formação.
C
Certa
A alternativa C está correta porque “paradigm shifts”, no texto, indica mudanças profundas no modo como a educação funciona e nos seus pressupostos, não apenas um ajuste incremental ou uma modernização técnica. O contexto mostra uma alteração estrutural na realidade escolar diante da IA.
D
Errada
Está errada porque limita a questão a upgrades tecnológicos dentro de modelos pedagógicos preservados. O texto indica revisão de papéis, competências, políticas e finalidades da educação, ou seja, transformação do modelo subjacente, não simples modernização técnica.
Pegadinha da questão
A confusão real era tomar “paradigm shifts” como mera mudança tecnológica ou atualização de ferramentas, quando o contexto aponta para mudança de pressupostos e estruturas do sistema educacional.
Dica para questões semelhantes
  • Em vocabulário contextual, confirme o sentido pelo encadeamento de ideias do parágrafo e pelo desenvolvimento imediato do texto, não pelo termo isolado.
  • Quando o texto fala em nova realidade, mudança de papéis, impacto institucional e necessidade de novas políticas, o sentido tende a ser estrutural, não procedimental.
  • Expressões como “rapid advancement”, “ever-shifting” e “continues to outpace” ajudam a afastar alternativas que sugerem algo temporário ou passageiro.

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo