Questões Militares
Comentadas para oficial do quadro complementar
Foram encontradas 4.764 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692549
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
Why did the researchers mention the small sample size?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692548
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
Researchers highlighted the following main difference between using Google Search and Al chatbots for information
gathering:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692547
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
Based on the brain-only group’s later use of ChatGPT, researchers expressed the following hope:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692546
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
What did the EEG data suggest about ChatGPT users' executive control during essay writing?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692545
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
What distinguishes the Google Search group's results from those of the ChatGPT group?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692544
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
What outcome followed when the ChatGPT group was asked to re-write an essay without using ChatGPT?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692543
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
Which neural frequency bands were most active in the brain-only group, indicating cognitive engagement?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692542
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
How did the essays written by the ChatGPT group compare to those written by the other groups, according to the
teachers?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692541
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
What pattern was observed in the group that used ChatGPT throughout the study?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692540
Inglês
Texto associado
Text 1
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
By Andrew R. Chow
The study divided 54 subjects — 18 to 39 year-olds from the Boston area — into three groups, and asked them to
write several SAT essays using OpenAl's ChatGPT, Google’s search engine, and nothing at all, respectively. Researchers used an (electroencephalogram) EEG to record the writers’ brain activity across 32 regions, and found that of the
three groups, ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic,
and behavioral levels.” Over the course of several months, ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay, often
resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.
The paper suggests that the usage of (Large Language Model) LLMs could actually harm learning, especially for
younger users. The paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and its sample size is relatively small. But its paper’s main
author Nataliya Kosmyna felt it was important to release the findings to elevate concerns that as society increasingly
relies upon LLMs for immediate convenience, long-term brain development may be sacrificed in the process.
The group that wrote essays using ChatGPT all delivered extremely similar essays that lacked original thought,
relying on the same expressions and ideas. Two English teachers who assessed the essays called them largely
“soulless” The EEGs revealed low executive control and attentional engagement. And by their third essay, many of
the writers simply gave the prompt to ChatGPT and had it do almost all of the work. “It was more like, ‘just give me the
essay, refine this sentence, edit it, and 'm done,” Kosmyna says.
The brain-only group, conversely, showed the highest neural connectivity, especially in alpha, theta and delta bands,
which are associated with creativity ideation, memory load, and semantic processing. Researchers found this group
was more engaged and curious, and claimed ownership and expressed higher satisfaction with their essays.
The third group, which used Google Search, also expressed high satisfaction and active brain function. The
difference here is notable because many people now search for information within Al chatbots as opposed to Google
Search.
After writing the three essays, the subjects were then asked to re-write one of their previous efforts—but the
ChatGPT group had to do so without the tool, while the brain-only group could now use ChatGPT. The first group
remembered little of their own essays, and showed weaker alpha and theta brain waves, which likely reflected a
bypassing of deep memory processes.
The second group, in contrast, performed well, exhibiting a significant increase in brain connectivity across all EEG
frequency bands. This gives rise to the hope that Al, if used properly, could enhance learning as opposed to diminishing it.
Adapted from: TIME in [Accessed on 15th July 2025].
Which statement best summarizes the main concern raised by the study's lead author, Nataliya Kosmyna?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692538
Português
Texto associado
Disponível em https://epocanegocios.globo.com/tecnologia/noticia/2025/06/de-volta-ao-basico-soldados-finlandeses-recorrem-a-mapas-de-papel-para- aprender-a-lidar-com-bloqueios-de-gps.ghtml. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
Texto I
CANÇÃO DO EXPEDICIONÁRIO
Disponível em https://museuvirtualdafeb.eb.mil.br/cancao-expedicionario/. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO
Há 80 anos, em 8 de maio de 1945, a Europa calava seus canhões. Para o Brasil, essa data vai além da memoria global: ela eterniza a Força Expedicionária Brasileira (FEB) como um dos mais nobres símbolos de coragem e amor a pátria — um legado que inspira gerações e honra a historia do nosso paıs. O Dia da Vitoria, celebrado mundialmente em 8 de maio, representa a rendição incondicional das forcas do Eixo aos Aliados e o fim oficial da Segunda Guerra Mundial na Europa. No Brasil, e também o momento de honrar os 25 mil combatentes da FEB, que levaram o nome da pátria aos campos de batalha italianos e regressaram como heróis da liberdade.
Disponível em https://www.eb.mil.br/web/noticias/w/dia-da-vitoria-80-anos-depois-o-brasil-reverencia-seus-herois-da-liberdade-1. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
Texto II
De volta ao básico: soldados finlandeses recorrem a mapas de papel para aprender a lidar com bloqueios de GPS
Disponível em https://epocanegocios.globo.com/tecnologia/noticia/2025/06/de-volta-ao-basico-soldados-finlandeses-recorrem-a-mapas-de-papel-para- aprender-a-lidar-com-bloqueios-de-gps.ghtml. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
“O conflito na Ucrânia tem sido marcado por uma intensa guerra cibernética de ambos os lados. Tanto Kiev
quanto Moscou utilizam táticas como bloqueio de sinal, falsificação de GPS e outros métodos de interferência
remota para confundir e desativar o armamento inimigo.” (texto 2, linhas 6 a 8)
No excerto retirado do texto 2, observa-se uma progressão coesiva entre duas frases, mesmo sem o uso de conectivo. Considerando a relagdo semantica entre essas frases, assinale a alternativa que apresenta uma locução ou conjunção que poderia ser empregada pelo autor, mantendo o mesmo sentido do fragmento.
No excerto retirado do texto 2, observa-se uma progressão coesiva entre duas frases, mesmo sem o uso de conectivo. Considerando a relagdo semantica entre essas frases, assinale a alternativa que apresenta uma locução ou conjunção que poderia ser empregada pelo autor, mantendo o mesmo sentido do fragmento.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Exército
Órgão:
IME
Prova:
Exército - 2025 - IME - Oficial Engenheiro - Português/Inglês |
Q3692537
Português
Texto associado
Disponível em https://epocanegocios.globo.com/tecnologia/noticia/2025/06/de-volta-ao-basico-soldados-finlandeses-recorrem-a-mapas-de-papel-para- aprender-a-lidar-com-bloqueios-de-gps.ghtml. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
Texto I
CANÇÃO DO EXPEDICIONÁRIO
Disponível em https://museuvirtualdafeb.eb.mil.br/cancao-expedicionario/. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO
Há 80 anos, em 8 de maio de 1945, a Europa calava seus canhões. Para o Brasil, essa data vai além da memoria global: ela eterniza a Força Expedicionária Brasileira (FEB) como um dos mais nobres símbolos de coragem e amor a pátria — um legado que inspira gerações e honra a historia do nosso paıs. O Dia da Vitoria, celebrado mundialmente em 8 de maio, representa a rendição incondicional das forcas do Eixo aos Aliados e o fim oficial da Segunda Guerra Mundial na Europa. No Brasil, e também o momento de honrar os 25 mil combatentes da FEB, que levaram o nome da pátria aos campos de batalha italianos e regressaram como heróis da liberdade.
Disponível em https://www.eb.mil.br/web/noticias/w/dia-da-vitoria-80-anos-depois-o-brasil-reverencia-seus-herois-da-liberdade-1. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
Texto II
De volta ao básico: soldados finlandeses recorrem a mapas de papel para aprender a lidar com bloqueios de GPS
Disponível em https://epocanegocios.globo.com/tecnologia/noticia/2025/06/de-volta-ao-basico-soldados-finlandeses-recorrem-a-mapas-de-papel-para- aprender-a-lidar-com-bloqueios-de-gps.ghtml. Acesso em 11 set 25. (texto adaptado)
Nos trechos do texto 2: “Acho que, em um conflito real [...]" (linha 38) e “Ele acrescenta ainda que todos
precisam [...]” (linha 39), as palavras destacadas desempenham, considerado o contexto em que são empregadas, respectivamente, as seguintes funções gramaticais:
Q2263517
Direito Tributário
A sociedade limitada Y pretende aumentar o seu capital
social em R$ 500.000,00 (quinhentos mil reais), mediante
integralização de imóvel da propriedade do sócio Fulano
de Tal, em benefício de quem serão emitidas novas quotas. Ocorre, porém, que o imóvel possui valor venal de
R$ 1.000.000,00 (um milhão de reais). Sobre a incidência
do imposto municipal sobre transmissão onerosa de bens
imóveis (ITBI) na situação relatada é correto afirmar que
Q2263516
Direito Tributário
Suponha que uma empresa fictícia chamada “Empresa X” foi autuada pela autoridade fiscal por supostas
irregularidades tributárias. A autuação se refere a um
valor considerável de impostos devidos, que a empresa contestou alegando não ter cometido nenhuma infração. Após o processo administrativo fiscal, a decisão
foi mantida, sendo a empresa notificada deste fato. Não
tendo havido o pagamento no prazo regulamentar, o
crédito foi inscrito na Dívida Ativa pelo órgão competente, tendo sido, então, promovida a execução fiscal por
parte da procuradoria do ente público credor. Tendo sido
citada por edital na referida ação de execução fiscal,
após frustradas tentativas de citação por correio e por
oficial de justiça, dentro do prazo para pagamento ou
garantia da dívida, a empresa aderiu a plano de parcelamento, confessando integralmente a dívida e realizando
no ato o pagamento da primeira parcela por sua própria
iniciativa. A respeito desta situação hipotética é correto
afirmar, com base na legislação tributária, que
Q2263515
Direito Constitucional
Assinale a alternativa que contempla corretamente uma súmula do Supremo Tribunal Federal sobre habeas corpus.
Q2263514
Direito Processual Penal
Assinale a alternativa correta de acordo com os termos
do Código de Processo Penal.
Q2263512
Legislação da Justiça Militar
Nos termos da Lei nº 8.457/1992, com as alterações da
Lei nº 13.774/2018, é correto afirmar que
Q2263511
Direito Processual Penal Militar
Nos termos do Código de Processo Penal Militar e no que
concerne ao processo de deserção, é correto afirmar que,
consumado o crime de deserção, nos casos previstos na
lei penal militar,
Q2263510
Direito Processual Penal Militar
No que concerne à ação penal militar, é correto afirmar
que:
Q2263509
Direito Processual Penal Militar
Nos termos do Código de Processo Penal Militar e no que
concerne ao Inquérito Policial Militar, é correto afirmar que
Conheça nossos planos