Questões Militares Sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês

Foram encontradas 2.315 questões

Q545981 Inglês
Assinale a opção que mais se aproxima da ideia central do texto.
Alternativas
Q545980 Inglês
A mensagem transmitida pela charge NÃO denota
Alternativas
Q545979 Inglês
A palavra breakthrough, na charge, tem o mesmo sentido de
Alternativas
Q545977 Inglês
De acordo com o texto,
Alternativas
Q545976 Inglês
De acordo com o texto,
Alternativas
Q545975 Inglês
Indique a opção CORRETA.
Alternativas
Q545974 Inglês
Marque o título que melhor contempla o tema do texto.
Alternativas
Q545972 Inglês
a measure of aggression (linha 5), encroachment (linha 6), roughing the kicker (linha 6) e digital representations of players (linha 13) têm, respectivamente, valor semântico de:
Alternativas
Q545970 Inglês
Assinale a opção CORRETA.
Alternativas
Q545969 Inglês
De acordo com o título e o subtítulo do texto, avatares
Alternativas
Q545968 Inglês
A questão refere-se ao seguinte texto publicitário: 





O texto informa que Bernie Ecclestone
Alternativas
Q545966 Inglês
A questão refere-se ao seguinte texto publicitário: 





Assinale uma característica, associada à Fórmula 1, que NÃO foi considerada como essencial pelo anunciante.
Alternativas
Q545965 Inglês
A questão refere-se ao seguinte texto publicitário: 





Assinale a opção que preenche corretamente a lacuna (I) e que indica o tipo de serviço ofertado pelo anunciante.
Alternativas
Q545964 Inglês
Segundo o texto, um dos impactos que a TV a cabo trouxe para a vida das mulheres indianas foi que elas
Alternativas
Q545963 Inglês
Sobre a presença da TV no mundo, o texto informa que,
Alternativas
Q545962 Inglês
De acordo com o texto, o argumento que melhor justifica o título TV Will Save the World é:
Alternativas
Q529023 Inglês

                         The Big Destructiveness Of The Tiny Bribe


                                                                                         Alexandra Wrage 03.01.2010


      The smallest bribes can be the most vexing. Not suitcases full of money and transfers to offshore accounts, but the thousands of everyday payments people make to Indian building inspectors, Chinese customs officials and Nigerian airport functionaries, just to get things done. They’re payments for routine government services that a government official is legally obliged to perform but for which he’s hoping to skim off a little extra.

      Unlike more serious bribes, these very modest payouts, formally known as “facilitating payments”, are not against the laws of the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand or South Korea, when made abroad. They’re illegal for Great Britain, but the Serious Fraud Office there has taken the extraordinary public position that they’re unlikely to give rise to a prosecution.

      Why don’t governments that lead the fight against large-scale bribery fall in line with what is already the practice of many major companies? They don’t want to outlaw such small-scale graft in foreign places, they say, because they don’t have the manpower to prosecute violators. By that logic, communities with just enough resources to handle murder and armed robbery would give a green light to shoplifting. You’d think a government could at least go after a few high-profile cases to set an example and a precedent. Permitting these smaller payments has to impede the effort to crack down on the larger ones. Companies know this.

      “Facilitating” bribes are not tips. Tipping is voluntary, and you decide to do it after a service has been rendered. You don’t pay it at the outset to induce the waiter to bring the food, and you can always go somewhere else to eat next time should the service be bad. Nor are they welfare for underpaid civil servants. If government workers are underpaid, we should compensate them for the cost of customs inspections or airport security by aboveboard means, through taxation and so forth. Payment to individuals not only slows service but also encourages entrepreneurial civil servants to increase their income by creating more and greater obstacles.

      Nor are they a mere distraction from the fight against bigger bribes. Rather, they fuel the problem. Junior officials who look for small bribes rise to higher positions by paying off those above them. Corruption creates pyramids of illegal payments flowing upward. Legalizing the base of the pyramid gives it a strong and lasting foundation.

       Nor are these payments legal where they’re made. They may not be banned by the wealthy countries mentioned above, but they are outlawed in the countries where they’re actually a problem. Do developed countries want to say they wouldn’t tolerate such payments at home but don’t care if they’re made abroad? And since they’re illegal in the countries where they’re paid, companies can’t put them on their books. The classic cover for a bribe is to call it a “consulting fee”, but that is a books and records violation that is illegal in any country.


                                                                                                             (www.forbes.com. Adaptado.)

No trecho do quinto parágrafo – Nor are they welfare for underpaid civil servants. – a palavra they refere-se a

Alternativas
Q529018 Inglês

                         The Big Destructiveness Of The Tiny Bribe


                                                                                         Alexandra Wrage 03.01.2010


      The smallest bribes can be the most vexing. Not suitcases full of money and transfers to offshore accounts, but the thousands of everyday payments people make to Indian building inspectors, Chinese customs officials and Nigerian airport functionaries, just to get things done. They’re payments for routine government services that a government official is legally obliged to perform but for which he’s hoping to skim off a little extra.

      Unlike more serious bribes, these very modest payouts, formally known as “facilitating payments”, are not against the laws of the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand or South Korea, when made abroad. They’re illegal for Great Britain, but the Serious Fraud Office there has taken the extraordinary public position that they’re unlikely to give rise to a prosecution.

      Why don’t governments that lead the fight against large-scale bribery fall in line with what is already the practice of many major companies? They don’t want to outlaw such small-scale graft in foreign places, they say, because they don’t have the manpower to prosecute violators. By that logic, communities with just enough resources to handle murder and armed robbery would give a green light to shoplifting. You’d think a government could at least go after a few high-profile cases to set an example and a precedent. Permitting these smaller payments has to impede the effort to crack down on the larger ones. Companies know this.

      “Facilitating” bribes are not tips. Tipping is voluntary, and you decide to do it after a service has been rendered. You don’t pay it at the outset to induce the waiter to bring the food, and you can always go somewhere else to eat next time should the service be bad. Nor are they welfare for underpaid civil servants. If government workers are underpaid, we should compensate them for the cost of customs inspections or airport security by aboveboard means, through taxation and so forth. Payment to individuals not only slows service but also encourages entrepreneurial civil servants to increase their income by creating more and greater obstacles.

      Nor are they a mere distraction from the fight against bigger bribes. Rather, they fuel the problem. Junior officials who look for small bribes rise to higher positions by paying off those above them. Corruption creates pyramids of illegal payments flowing upward. Legalizing the base of the pyramid gives it a strong and lasting foundation.

       Nor are these payments legal where they’re made. They may not be banned by the wealthy countries mentioned above, but they are outlawed in the countries where they’re actually a problem. Do developed countries want to say they wouldn’t tolerate such payments at home but don’t care if they’re made abroad? And since they’re illegal in the countries where they’re paid, companies can’t put them on their books. The classic cover for a bribe is to call it a “consulting fee”, but that is a books and records violation that is illegal in any country.


                                                                                                             (www.forbes.com. Adaptado.)

O tema principal do texto é:
Alternativas
Q245778 Inglês
Read the following statements about designing speaking techniques. Then, mark the correct alternative.

I. Use techniques that focus on form only.
II. Provide extrinsically motivating techniques.
III. Encourage the use of authentic language.
IV. Provide appropriate feedback and correction.
V. Encourage the development of listening strategies.
Alternativas
Q245777 Inglês
Pair work is common in most English classroom. Write "T" (true) or "F" (false) next each statement about the use of pair work and choose the alternative that shows the correct sequence.

( ) It increases the amount of speaking time any one student gets in the class.
( ) It does not allow teacher time to work with one or two pairs while the others continue working.
( ) It is not always popular with students.
( ) It is relatively difficult to organize.
( ) Students in pairs can often veer away from the point of the exercise.
Alternativas
Respostas
2141: E
2142: E
2143: D
2144: D
2145: C
2146: C
2147: D
2148: D
2149: D
2150: B
2151: A
2152: B
2153: C
2154: B
2155: B
2156: A
2157: B
2158: D
2159: C
2160: C