Questões de Concurso Para letras

Foram encontradas 301.969 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q4212869 Português
Dia Nacional do Livro Infantil: entenda a importância da leitura para o desenvolvimento e a alfabetização

     O Dia Nacional do Livro Infantil é celebrado no dia 18 de abril. A data é uma referência ao nascimento do escritor Monteiro Lobato, considerado o pai da literatura infantil brasileira. A oportunidade homenageia o autor e reforça o papel do livro infantil na formação das crianças. Incentivar a leitura desde os primeiros anos de vida potencializa o processo de desenvolvimento integral das crianças. Para além de preparar melhor para a alfabetização dos pequenos, a vivência com os livros, narrativas e ilustrações auxilia na formação de vínculos afetivos com a leitura, como também amplia o vocabulário e desenvolvimento de habilidades cognitivas importantes para as crianças.
     “O contato com o livro e a leitura é uma das experiências mais ricas na vida de um indivíduo, pois abre portas para todas as áreas do conhecimento. Quando ele acontece de forma prazerosa desde cedo, a criança desenvolve a atenção, a memória e a concentração, amplia o vocabulário e o repertório, fortalece a imaginação, desenvolve a criatividade, o raciocínio lógico, escreve melhor e se expressa melhor”, afirma a pedagoga Maria Cardoso.
     A partir da leitura, com o passar do tempo, as crianças conseguem expor de forma mais objetiva e consistente seus pensamentos e emoções, o que é importante tanto na infância quanto na vida adulta, considera a especialista.
     Maria destaca que livros com ilustrações coloridas, textos curtos e formatos variados (como obras feitas de tecido, plástico ou papelão) ajudam a tornar a experiência mais acessível e lúdica. 
    “É importante que, no momento de contar as histórias dos livros infantis, o adulto utilize entonação de voz diferente conforme os personagens, mostre as figuras e nomeie os objetos. Esses detalhes possibilitam uma melhor experiência para a criança, além de despertar mais interesse. A partir dos 2 anos, já é possível pedir para a criança participar da história, recontando a parte que ouviu e criando uma nova história por meio das imagens presentes no livro”, afirma.
     Estimular a leitura na infância ajuda o cérebro da criança a se preparar melhor para o processo de alfabetização. Maria Cardoso lista abaixo benefícios da leitura:
     O gosto pela leitura: uma criança que tem acesso aos livros desde bebê tem um interesse natural pela alfabetização, e essa motivação é um dos maiores preditores para o sucesso.
     Ampliação de vocabulário: uma criança exposta aos livros desenvolve um vocabulário muito mais amplo. Oralmente, ela produz frases mais completas e entende melhor o que escuta, o que facilita bastante o início da leitura.
    Desenvolvimento da consciência fonológica: o contato com histórias, rimas e cantigas desenvolve muito mais rapidamente a consciência fonológica, habilidade essencial para a alfabetização.
     O contato com os livros desde cedo, viabilizado por meio da família e da escola, fomenta a formação de leitores críticos e engajados.


Adaptado de: https://educador.brasilescola.uol.com.br/noticias/dianacional-livro-infantil-importancia-leitura-desenvolvimento-infantilalfabetizacao/33475.html. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2026.
Assinale a alternativa em que a substituição proposta entre parênteses para a expressão destacada pode ser realizada sem que haja, com isso, alteração de sentido. 
Alternativas
Q4212868 Português
Dia Nacional do Livro Infantil: entenda a importância da leitura para o desenvolvimento e a alfabetização

     O Dia Nacional do Livro Infantil é celebrado no dia 18 de abril. A data é uma referência ao nascimento do escritor Monteiro Lobato, considerado o pai da literatura infantil brasileira. A oportunidade homenageia o autor e reforça o papel do livro infantil na formação das crianças. Incentivar a leitura desde os primeiros anos de vida potencializa o processo de desenvolvimento integral das crianças. Para além de preparar melhor para a alfabetização dos pequenos, a vivência com os livros, narrativas e ilustrações auxilia na formação de vínculos afetivos com a leitura, como também amplia o vocabulário e desenvolvimento de habilidades cognitivas importantes para as crianças.
     “O contato com o livro e a leitura é uma das experiências mais ricas na vida de um indivíduo, pois abre portas para todas as áreas do conhecimento. Quando ele acontece de forma prazerosa desde cedo, a criança desenvolve a atenção, a memória e a concentração, amplia o vocabulário e o repertório, fortalece a imaginação, desenvolve a criatividade, o raciocínio lógico, escreve melhor e se expressa melhor”, afirma a pedagoga Maria Cardoso.
     A partir da leitura, com o passar do tempo, as crianças conseguem expor de forma mais objetiva e consistente seus pensamentos e emoções, o que é importante tanto na infância quanto na vida adulta, considera a especialista.
     Maria destaca que livros com ilustrações coloridas, textos curtos e formatos variados (como obras feitas de tecido, plástico ou papelão) ajudam a tornar a experiência mais acessível e lúdica. 
    “É importante que, no momento de contar as histórias dos livros infantis, o adulto utilize entonação de voz diferente conforme os personagens, mostre as figuras e nomeie os objetos. Esses detalhes possibilitam uma melhor experiência para a criança, além de despertar mais interesse. A partir dos 2 anos, já é possível pedir para a criança participar da história, recontando a parte que ouviu e criando uma nova história por meio das imagens presentes no livro”, afirma.
     Estimular a leitura na infância ajuda o cérebro da criança a se preparar melhor para o processo de alfabetização. Maria Cardoso lista abaixo benefícios da leitura:
     O gosto pela leitura: uma criança que tem acesso aos livros desde bebê tem um interesse natural pela alfabetização, e essa motivação é um dos maiores preditores para o sucesso.
     Ampliação de vocabulário: uma criança exposta aos livros desenvolve um vocabulário muito mais amplo. Oralmente, ela produz frases mais completas e entende melhor o que escuta, o que facilita bastante o início da leitura.
    Desenvolvimento da consciência fonológica: o contato com histórias, rimas e cantigas desenvolve muito mais rapidamente a consciência fonológica, habilidade essencial para a alfabetização.
     O contato com os livros desde cedo, viabilizado por meio da família e da escola, fomenta a formação de leitores críticos e engajados.


Adaptado de: https://educador.brasilescola.uol.com.br/noticias/dianacional-livro-infantil-importancia-leitura-desenvolvimento-infantilalfabetizacao/33475.html. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2026.
Assinale a alternativa em que a reescrita da sentença manteve o sentido do texto original, respeitando a norma-padrão. 
Alternativas
Q4212571 Redação Oficial
Segundo o Manual de Redação da Presidência da República, o padrão ofício tem como característica principal:
Alternativas
Q4212537 Português

Considere a tirinha do cartunista Alexandre Beck a seguir.



Na expressão "vendo pôr do sol", constante no último quadrinho da tirinha, considerando o contexto em que ela foi empregada, o sujeito da oração classifica-se como:
Alternativas
Q4212536 Português

Considere a tirinha do cartunista Alexandre Beck a seguir.



O principal recurso semântico responsável pelo efeito de humor da tirinha de Alexandre Beck é:
Alternativas
Q4212535 Português

Considere a tirinha do cartunista Alexandre Beck a seguir.



Quanto aos tipos e gêneros textuais, sobre a tirinha de Beck, é CORRETO afirmar que:
Alternativas
Q4212534 Português

Considere a tirinha do cartunista Alexandre Beck a seguir.



Considerando os conceitos de letra e de fonema e a definição de dígrafos consonantais e vocálicos, assinale a alternativa CORRETA.
Alternativas
Q4212533 Português

Considere a tirinha do cartunista Alexandre Beck a seguir.



Interpretando assertivamente a tirinha, INCORRETO afirmar que:
Alternativas
Q4212321 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

Read the excerpt below:


"Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or 'proto-Japanese' relate to the Ainu [...]?"


According to the excerpt and the organization of the first paragraph, it is CORRECT to state that the text: 

Alternativas
Q4212318 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

Regarding pronunciation and stress patterns in words related to the text "Japan in the Ancient World," judge the statements below.


I. In "archaeological," the spelling "ch" represents the sound /k/.

II. In "ceramic," the primary stress falls on the second syllable.

III. In "probably," the primary stress falls on the second syllable.


Which proposition(s) is/are CORRECT?

Alternativas
Q4212317 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

Read the excerpt below:


"Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period."


According to the text, the function of this sentence is to:

Alternativas
Q4212316 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

In the text, expressions such as "probably," "most likely," "it appears that," and "suggesting" contribute to the construction of meaning by: 
Alternativas
Q4212315 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

Regarding the verb structure and meaning of the excerpt "Japan has probably been occupied for at least 30,000 years, if not longer" from the text, judge the statements below.


I.The structure "have probably been occupied" is in the present perfect passive and suggests cautious probability, while "if not longer" extends the stated time span beyond the minimum mentioned.

II.The adverb "probably" expresses absolute certainty and shows that the author presents the information as an unquestionable fact.

III.The expression "if not longer" restricts the occupation period to exactly 30,000 years.


Which proposition(s) is/are CORRECT?

Alternativas
Q4212312 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

Read the excerpt below:


"However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged."


The relation among "however," "therefore" and "some" indicates that the author:

Alternativas
Q4212310 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

According to the text, the organization of early Japanese history is presented as:
Alternativas
Q4212309 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

In the text, the terms "preceramic," "cord-marked," "stone-tool," and "well-defined" illustrate different mechanisms of word formation and modification in English. The correct linguistic analysis is:
Alternativas
Q4212308 Inglês

Japan in the Ancient World 


Japanese archaeologists divide the earliest part of Japanese history into four periods: the Paleolithic (preceramic) period, the Jomon (cord-marked pottery) period, the Yayoi period, and the Kofun (burial mound) period. Underlying this chronology, however, are two basic problems: First, who are the Japanese, and where did they come from? Second, how do the Japanese or "proto-Japanese" relate to the Ainu, a group of people who have resided in Japan since about 7500 B.C.E. but differ racially, culturally, and linguistically from modern Japanese in significant ways? 


Paleolithic Japan (before 10,000 B.C.E.)


The Japanese islands have probably been occupied by humans for at least 30,000 years, if not longer. However, 10,000 years ago, Paleolithic Japan was a cooler place, and the sea level was 125 feet (38 meters) lower; therefore, some of the archaeological evidence of the earliest inhabitants is submerged. These hunters and gatherers, who had an extensive stone-tool inventory, most likely came to southern Japan through present-day Korea or to northern Japan from eastern Siberia, though there is abundant evidence of land connections to Asia at this time throughout the islands. It appears that the complete physical separation of the Japanese islands occurred only as recently as 18,000 to 12,000 years ago.


Jomon period (c. 10,000-c. 300 B.C.E.)


Starting about 13,000 years ago, when the Japanese climate began to warm, beautiful local pottery traditions—characterized by complex impressions made by twisted cords or sticks on the outside of pots before baking—abruptly appeared at various locales. Such ceramics eventually became commonplace throughout the islands. The Jomon people (named for this distinctive "cord-marked" ceramic style) were probably the direct descendants of the people of the previous Paleolithic traditions. They were very successful at hunting, fishing, and gathering, and because of the numerous rivers and rugged coastlines, they were largely sedentary. Shell mounds all over the islands indicate how extensively the ocean and rivers were exploited by Jomon people. The Jomon pottery eventually came to show distinctive regional styles, suggesting the existence of rather well-defined cultural groups and local folk traditions.


Yayoi (c. 300 B.C.E.-c. 300 C.E.)


About two thousand years ago, a distinct break occurred in the archaeological record. In Kyushu, the southernmost main island of Japan, bronze from the Korean peninsula and a newer style of earthenware pottery appeared, and iron smelting was developed. These changes characterize the Yayoi period, named after the district in modern Tokyo where certain artifacts were first discovered. The Yayoi period also saw the beginning of Japanese-style intensive irrigated wet-rice cultivation, which became the main means of subsistence for almost everyone on the islands. This agrarian rice-based economy—with basically the same kind of farming practices—would persist until Japan's westernization in the late nineteenth century.


However, controversy surrounds the origins of this culture. The Yayoi people may have come from overseas and replaced the earlier Jomon people (as evidenced by the presence of many new technologies from abroad). For many years, Japanese archaeologists have assumed this to be true, with the implication being that the Jomon people are the ancestors of modern Ainu, and modern Japanese are the descendants of those who migrated from the Asian mainland during the Yayoi and Kofun periods. However, a majority of archaeologists feel that the record probably indicates a gradual but direct continuity from Jomon people to early, but historically identifiable, Japanese, with any migration from the mainland blending in with the local cultures. In either case, by the end of the Yayoi period, certain institutional structures were in place—a division of labor, the accumulation of prestige and luxury goods by particular individuals, and the rise of complex political organizations—which created a more stratified society, allowing for the development of a full-fledged Japanese state in the Kofun period.


https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/japan-ancient-world 

Regarding language teaching approaches in a reading-and-writing lesson based on the text "Japan in the Ancient World," judge the statements below.


I.The procedure corresponds to task-based language teaching because students use reading, inference, comparison and language resources to produce a communicative outcome connected to a meaningful context.

II.The procedure corresponds to grammar-translation methodology because students mainly translate every sentence and memorize isolated vocabulary lists.

III.The procedure corresponds to audiolingual methodology because students mainly repeat fixed oral structures until pronunciation errors disappear.


Which proposition(s) is/are CORRECT?

Alternativas
Q4211432 Português

Texto para responder à questão.



Comunicação



    É importante saber o nome das coisas. Ou, pelo menos, saber comunicar o que você quer. Imagine-se entrando numa loja para comprar um… um… como é mesmo o nome?

    “Posso ajudá-lo, cavalheiro?”

    “Pode. Eu quero um daqueles, daqueles…”

    “Pois não?”

    “Um… como é mesmo o nome?”

    “Sim?”

    “Pomba! Um… um… Que cabeça a minha. A palavra me escapou por completo. É uma coisa simples, conhecidíssima.”

    “Sim, senhor.”

    “O senhor vai dar risada quando souber.”

    “Sim, senhor.”

    “Olha, é pontuda, certo?”

    “O quê, cavalheiro?”

    “Isso que eu quero. Tem uma ponta assim, entende? Depois vem assim, assim, faz uma volta, aí vem reto de novo, e na outra ponta tem uma espécie de encaixe, entende? Na ponta tem outra volta, só que esta é mais fechada. E tem um, um… Uma espécie de, como é que se diz? De sulco. Um sulco onde encaixa a outra ponta; a pontuda, de sorte que o, a, o negócio, entende, fica fechado. É isso. Uma coisa pontuda que fecha. Entende?”

    [...]

    “Não! Escuta aqui. Vamos tentar de novo…”

    “Tentemos por outro lado. Para o que serve?”

   “Serve assim para prender. Entende? Uma coisa pontuda que prende. Você enfia a ponta pontuda por aqui, encaixa a ponta no sulco e prende as duas partes de uma coisa.”

    “Certo. Esse instrumento que o senhor procura funciona mais ou menos como um gigantesco alfinete de segurança e…”

    “Mas é isso! É isso! Um alfinete de segurança!”

    “Mas do jeito que o senhor descrevia parecia uma coisa enorme, cavalheiro!”

    “É que eu sou meio expansivo. Me vê aí um… um… como é mesmo o nome?”



(VERISSIMO, Luis Fernando. Comunicação. Amor brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Editora José Olympio, 1977. p. 143-145. Fragmento.)

Considerando os aspectos morfológicos da língua portuguesa, assinale, a seguir, o termo destacado que se diferencia dos demais quanto à classe de palavras a que pertence.
Alternativas
Q4211431 Português

Texto para responder à questão.



Comunicação



    É importante saber o nome das coisas. Ou, pelo menos, saber comunicar o que você quer. Imagine-se entrando numa loja para comprar um… um… como é mesmo o nome?

    “Posso ajudá-lo, cavalheiro?”

    “Pode. Eu quero um daqueles, daqueles…”

    “Pois não?”

    “Um… como é mesmo o nome?”

    “Sim?”

    “Pomba! Um… um… Que cabeça a minha. A palavra me escapou por completo. É uma coisa simples, conhecidíssima.”

    “Sim, senhor.”

    “O senhor vai dar risada quando souber.”

    “Sim, senhor.”

    “Olha, é pontuda, certo?”

    “O quê, cavalheiro?”

    “Isso que eu quero. Tem uma ponta assim, entende? Depois vem assim, assim, faz uma volta, aí vem reto de novo, e na outra ponta tem uma espécie de encaixe, entende? Na ponta tem outra volta, só que esta é mais fechada. E tem um, um… Uma espécie de, como é que se diz? De sulco. Um sulco onde encaixa a outra ponta; a pontuda, de sorte que o, a, o negócio, entende, fica fechado. É isso. Uma coisa pontuda que fecha. Entende?”

    [...]

    “Não! Escuta aqui. Vamos tentar de novo…”

    “Tentemos por outro lado. Para o que serve?”

   “Serve assim para prender. Entende? Uma coisa pontuda que prende. Você enfia a ponta pontuda por aqui, encaixa a ponta no sulco e prende as duas partes de uma coisa.”

    “Certo. Esse instrumento que o senhor procura funciona mais ou menos como um gigantesco alfinete de segurança e…”

    “Mas é isso! É isso! Um alfinete de segurança!”

    “Mas do jeito que o senhor descrevia parecia uma coisa enorme, cavalheiro!”

    “É que eu sou meio expansivo. Me vê aí um… um… como é mesmo o nome?”



(VERISSIMO, Luis Fernando. Comunicação. Amor brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Editora José Olympio, 1977. p. 143-145. Fragmento.)

De acordo com a narrativa apresentada, pode-se compreender que:  
Alternativas
Q4211430 Português

Texto para responder à questão.



Políticas de troca e a prevenção de conflitos nas relações de consumo



    As relações de consumo não se encerram no momento da venda. Em muitos casos, é justamente no pós-venda que a qualidade da relação entre consumidor e fornecedor é efetivamente testada.

    Trocas, devoluções, reclamações sobre vícios, solicitações de cancelamento e pedidos de reembolso são situações comuns na rotina empresarial. Apesar disso, muitas empresas ainda tratam esses temas de forma improvisada, sem política clara, sem padronização interna e sem adequado registro dos atendimentos.

    Esse cenário aumenta o risco de conflito. Não necessariamente porque o fornecedor tenha agido de má-fé, mas porque a ausência de clareza gera insegurança, frustração e ruído comunicacional.

    Nesse contexto, a política de troca deve ser compreendida não apenas como uma regra comercial, mas como um instrumento de governança, transparência e prevenção de riscos nas relações de consumo.

    A transparência é um dos pilares das relações de consumo. O consumidor precisa compreender, antes ou no momento da contratação, quais são as condições aplicáveis à aquisição do produto ou serviço.

    No caso das trocas, essa transparência é especialmente relevante porque muitas divergências decorrem da confusão entre situações juridicamente distintas.

    Há diferença entre troca por liberalidade comercial, troca decorrente de vício do produto e direito de arrependimento em compras realizadas fora do estabelecimento comercial.

    A troca por liberalidade é aquela oferecida pelo fornecedor como política interna, em situações nas quais não há, necessariamente, defeito ou vício. É comum em lojas físicas que permitem a troca de roupas, calçados ou presentes por tamanho, cor ou modelo, desde que respeitadas determinadas condições.

    Já a reclamação por vício do produto ou serviço envolve hipótese diversa, relacionada à inadequação, defeito de funcionamento, problema de qualidade ou desconformidade com a oferta.

    O direito de arrependimento, por sua vez, possui aplicação própria nas contratações realizadas fora do estabelecimento comercial, especialmente em compras pela internet, telefone ou aplicativos.

    Quando a empresa não comunica essas diferenças, o consumidor pode acreditar que toda solicitação de troca segue a mesma lógica. Do outro lado, o fornecedor pode negar pedidos de forma genérica, sem explicar adequadamente a razão da negativa.

    A transparência, portanto, não apenas informa. Ela reduz expectativas desalinhadas.


(Por: Victor Hugo Souza Tosta. Disponível em: https://www.migalhas.com.br/. Acesso em: maio de 2026. Adaptado.) 

Considerando os termos destacados do texto apresentado, sobre os aspectos fonológicos da língua portuguesa, analise as afirmativas a seguir.



I. No vocábulo “ainda”, a divisão silábica correta evidencia um hiato.


II. Na palavra “encerram”, ocorre dígrafo consonantal e dígrafo vocálico.


III. No termo “justamente”, o número de letras é diferente do número de fonemas.


IV. A forma “própia” é aceita pela norma-padrão como variante prosódica de “própria”.



Está correto o que se afirma em 

Alternativas
Respostas
8961: E
8962: A
8963: C
8964: A
8965: A
8966: E
8967: D
8968: B
8969: B
8970: B
8971: A
8972: D
8973: C
8974: D
8975: D
8976: C
8977: B
8978: D
8979: C
8980: D