Foram encontradas 24.682 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3637102 Direito Constitucional

A educação, direito de todos e dever do Estado e da família, será promovida e incentivada com a colaboração da sociedade, visando ao pleno desenvolvimento da pessoa, seu preparo para o exercício da cidadania e sua qualificação para o trabalho. Nesse sentido, acerca dos ditames previstos sobre a educação na Constituição Federal. Julgue os itens como V para aqueles que são verdadeiros e F para os que são falsos.



( ) O dever do Estado com a educação será efetivado mediante a garantia de educação básica obrigatória e gratuita dos 4 (quatro) aos 17 (dezessete) anos de idade, assegurada inclusive sua oferta gratuita para todos os que a ela não tiveram acesso na idade própria.


( ) Serão fixados conteúdos mínimos para o ensino fundamental, de maneira a assegurar formação básica comum e respeito aos valores culturais e artísticos, nacionais e regionais.


( ) Os Municípios atuarão exclusivamente no ensino fundamental e na educação infantil.


( ) A educação básica pública terá como fonte adicional de financiamento a contribuição social do salário-educação, recolhida pelas empresas na forma da lei, inclusive para pagamento de aposentadorias e pensões.


( ) Os recursos públicos serão destinados exclusivamente para escolas públicas.


( ) O dever do Estado com a educação será efetivado mediante a garantia de acesso aos níveis mais elevados do ensino, da pesquisa e da criação artística, segundo a capacidade de cada um.


( ) O não-oferecimento do ensino obrigatório pelo Poder Público, ou sua oferta irregular, importa responsabilidade da autoridade competente. 


( ) O acesso ao ensino obrigatório e gratuito é direito público subjetivo e objetivo.



A sequência correta é respectivamente:

Alternativas
Q3635465 Pedagogia
Qual é a principal crítica ao uso exclusivo de avaliações somativas no processo educacional?
Alternativas
Q3635464 Pedagogia
No que concerne à principal diferença entre o planejamento curricular de sentido amplo e o planejamento curricular de sentido específico, assinale a alternativa CORRETA.
Alternativas
Q3635463 Inglês
What is the primary purpose of the AI-powered app Remini and its competitors mentioned in the text?
Alternativas
Q3635462 Pedagogia
Sobre a principal diferença entre a Educação Básica e a Educação Superior, de acordo com a Lei nº 9.394/96 − Lei de Diretrizes e Base da Educação Nacional, assinale a alternativa CORRET
Alternativas
Q3635461 Pedagogia
Na perspectiva da Teoria da Atividade, como são definidas as contradições em um contexto educacional?
Alternativas
Q3635460 Inglês
Como a interculturalidade pode influenciar a tradução de textos entre diferentes idiomas?
Alternativas
Q3635459 Direito da Criança e do Adolescente - Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (ECA) - Lei nº 8.069 de 1990
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta o princípio fundamental da Lei nº 8.069/90 − Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (ECA) que assegura o direito à convivência familiar e comunitária, garantindo a proteção contra negligência e discriminação? 
Alternativas
Q3635458 Pedagogia
O Plano Nacional de Educação (PNE) estabelece metas específicas para a Educação Infantil, visando a universalização do atendimento a crianças de 0 a 5 anos. Qual é um dos objetivos principais dessa meta?
Alternativas
Q3635457 Pedagogia
Acerca da Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC), julgue as frases abaixo.

I.O papel dos professores na implementação eficaz da BNCC é adaptar e contextualizar o currículo de acordo com as necessidades e contextos locais dos estudantes.
II.A BNCC aborda a diversidade cultural e étnica na educação padronizando o currículo para evitar conflitos culturais.
III.A BNCC garante que os estudantes com deficiência tenham acesso às mesmas aprendizagens que os demais, bem como propõe financiamento adicional para escolas inclusivas.

Está (ão) CORRETA (S) a (s) seguinte (s) proposição (ões). 
Alternativas
Q3635456 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


(1º§) Over the summer a video went viral on TikTok. It was captioned "using this trend to get a new LinkedIn headshot". In the short clip, a young woman shows both how she looks in real life, and the professional-looking headshot photos that she created using an AI-powered app called Remini. The video has now been watched 52.3 million times, and a host of similar ones from other TikTokers have also been extensively viewed. Remini, and competitors such as Try It On AI and AI Suit Up, use AI-based software to create slick profile photos that aim to look as if they were taken by an expert photographer. With Remini you are asked to upload eight to 10 selfies, preferably taken from different angles, and all in good lighting. The AI uses those pictures to learn about the way you look.


(2º§) Then just a few minutes later it will start creating artificial photos of you looking very smart and even glamorous, with your hair in different styles or positions, and you wearing different clothes while sitting in perfect lighting. It also gives you faultless skin, and improves your make-up. Plus, you get different backdrops. And some users find that it makes them look thinner.


(3º§) The results are somewhat in the eye of the beholder - some say they are realistic, while others find that the images look artificial. But while previous online image manipulation trends, such as drastically changing your hair or eye colour, have been about having fun on social media, this one is very much focused on LinkedIn and other job hunting websites.


(4º§) For some the attraction of the AI services is that they are cheap. Divya Shishodia, 24, a digital marketer, from Australia, says that while AI headshots "are obviously generated, some people might not have the budget to go and get a professional headshot taken". While going to a professional photographer can cost more than £100, Remini and the other providers will generally give you free trials lasting a few days. "I'm not saying they're the most realistic, but for the amount of time and effort you have to put in... the output is worth it," says Ms Shishodia. She adds that, by contrast, if you try to take a decent profile photo yourself it can be very difficult. "You need angles, lighting, you are trying to avoid shadows... only actual photographers can do it." 


(5º§) For Michelle Genobisa, 26, from Aalborg, Denmark, it is the low to no cost of the AI generated profile photos that she is on board with. "I quite often change my looks, like my hair colour... so it was an easy way to collect some pictures with the effect of a professional photoshoot," she says. "To get that kind of photo taken, professionally, it's very expensive."


(6º§) Others are less impressed by the technology, such as Molly McCrann, a 25-year-old actor from Australia. "I just think it looks so fake, you can tell that it looks heavily edited, or it looks like AI," she says. "When I posted mine it made me look so skinny, and I don't look McCrann adds that she thinks it is probably better to show prospective employers what you actually look like.


(7º§) However, she is also prepared to see the other side of the argument. "Someone wrote a comment that I actually agree with - if this company is going to base off looks, I want to get in the room. And if this is going to get me in the room, then I am going to use AI headshots to get the interview." But what about the potential impact that AI-improved images can have on our self-esteem? Consumer psychologist Dr Paul Marsden says there are two sides to the issue. "On one hand it could allow us to put our best self forward, and the image of ourselves that we want to project to the world, and in turn motivate us to be that way inclined in real life," he tells the BBC. "The psychology of first impressions is how we make snap decisions based on initial impressions, and by using AI people can put themselves in the running to potentially be considered for an opportunity. On the other hand it could affect people's self-worth and beliefs that they themselves are not good enough comparatively to their AI generation resulting in low confidence.


(8º§) Do recruiters care? Tristan Barthel from London-based Tate Recruitment has seen a big rise in the number of people using AI to improve their photos. He says that it makes no difference in how he deals with a person's application. "I can see if a picture has been AI generated, and it wouldn't affect my decision, for me it's about the qualifications."


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67054382



What is the verb tense of the sentence below?


(1º§) "Over the summer a video went viral on TikTok." 

Alternativas
Q3635455 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


(1º§) Over the summer a video went viral on TikTok. It was captioned "using this trend to get a new LinkedIn headshot". In the short clip, a young woman shows both how she looks in real life, and the professional-looking headshot photos that she created using an AI-powered app called Remini. The video has now been watched 52.3 million times, and a host of similar ones from other TikTokers have also been extensively viewed. Remini, and competitors such as Try It On AI and AI Suit Up, use AI-based software to create slick profile photos that aim to look as if they were taken by an expert photographer. With Remini you are asked to upload eight to 10 selfies, preferably taken from different angles, and all in good lighting. The AI uses those pictures to learn about the way you look.


(2º§) Then just a few minutes later it will start creating artificial photos of you looking very smart and even glamorous, with your hair in different styles or positions, and you wearing different clothes while sitting in perfect lighting. It also gives you faultless skin, and improves your make-up. Plus, you get different backdrops. And some users find that it makes them look thinner.


(3º§) The results are somewhat in the eye of the beholder - some say they are realistic, while others find that the images look artificial. But while previous online image manipulation trends, such as drastically changing your hair or eye colour, have been about having fun on social media, this one is very much focused on LinkedIn and other job hunting websites.


(4º§) For some the attraction of the AI services is that they are cheap. Divya Shishodia, 24, a digital marketer, from Australia, says that while AI headshots "are obviously generated, some people might not have the budget to go and get a professional headshot taken". While going to a professional photographer can cost more than £100, Remini and the other providers will generally give you free trials lasting a few days. "I'm not saying they're the most realistic, but for the amount of time and effort you have to put in... the output is worth it," says Ms Shishodia. She adds that, by contrast, if you try to take a decent profile photo yourself it can be very difficult. "You need angles, lighting, you are trying to avoid shadows... only actual photographers can do it." 


(5º§) For Michelle Genobisa, 26, from Aalborg, Denmark, it is the low to no cost of the AI generated profile photos that she is on board with. "I quite often change my looks, like my hair colour... so it was an easy way to collect some pictures with the effect of a professional photoshoot," she says. "To get that kind of photo taken, professionally, it's very expensive."


(6º§) Others are less impressed by the technology, such as Molly McCrann, a 25-year-old actor from Australia. "I just think it looks so fake, you can tell that it looks heavily edited, or it looks like AI," she says. "When I posted mine it made me look so skinny, and I don't look McCrann adds that she thinks it is probably better to show prospective employers what you actually look like.


(7º§) However, she is also prepared to see the other side of the argument. "Someone wrote a comment that I actually agree with - if this company is going to base off looks, I want to get in the room. And if this is going to get me in the room, then I am going to use AI headshots to get the interview." But what about the potential impact that AI-improved images can have on our self-esteem? Consumer psychologist Dr Paul Marsden says there are two sides to the issue. "On one hand it could allow us to put our best self forward, and the image of ourselves that we want to project to the world, and in turn motivate us to be that way inclined in real life," he tells the BBC. "The psychology of first impressions is how we make snap decisions based on initial impressions, and by using AI people can put themselves in the running to potentially be considered for an opportunity. On the other hand it could affect people's self-worth and beliefs that they themselves are not good enough comparatively to their AI generation resulting in low confidence.


(8º§) Do recruiters care? Tristan Barthel from London-based Tate Recruitment has seen a big rise in the number of people using AI to improve their photos. He says that it makes no difference in how he deals with a person's application. "I can see if a picture has been AI generated, and it wouldn't affect my decision, for me it's about the qualifications."


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67054382



Consider the excerpt below:

(2º§) "It also gives you faultless skin, and improves your make-up. Plus, you get different backdrops."

In this context, the word "backdrops" can be translated as:
Alternativas
Q3635454 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


(1º§) Over the summer a video went viral on TikTok. It was captioned "using this trend to get a new LinkedIn headshot". In the short clip, a young woman shows both how she looks in real life, and the professional-looking headshot photos that she created using an AI-powered app called Remini. The video has now been watched 52.3 million times, and a host of similar ones from other TikTokers have also been extensively viewed. Remini, and competitors such as Try It On AI and AI Suit Up, use AI-based software to create slick profile photos that aim to look as if they were taken by an expert photographer. With Remini you are asked to upload eight to 10 selfies, preferably taken from different angles, and all in good lighting. The AI uses those pictures to learn about the way you look.


(2º§) Then just a few minutes later it will start creating artificial photos of you looking very smart and even glamorous, with your hair in different styles or positions, and you wearing different clothes while sitting in perfect lighting. It also gives you faultless skin, and improves your make-up. Plus, you get different backdrops. And some users find that it makes them look thinner.


(3º§) The results are somewhat in the eye of the beholder - some say they are realistic, while others find that the images look artificial. But while previous online image manipulation trends, such as drastically changing your hair or eye colour, have been about having fun on social media, this one is very much focused on LinkedIn and other job hunting websites.


(4º§) For some the attraction of the AI services is that they are cheap. Divya Shishodia, 24, a digital marketer, from Australia, says that while AI headshots "are obviously generated, some people might not have the budget to go and get a professional headshot taken". While going to a professional photographer can cost more than £100, Remini and the other providers will generally give you free trials lasting a few days. "I'm not saying they're the most realistic, but for the amount of time and effort you have to put in... the output is worth it," says Ms Shishodia. She adds that, by contrast, if you try to take a decent profile photo yourself it can be very difficult. "You need angles, lighting, you are trying to avoid shadows... only actual photographers can do it." 


(5º§) For Michelle Genobisa, 26, from Aalborg, Denmark, it is the low to no cost of the AI generated profile photos that she is on board with. "I quite often change my looks, like my hair colour... so it was an easy way to collect some pictures with the effect of a professional photoshoot," she says. "To get that kind of photo taken, professionally, it's very expensive."


(6º§) Others are less impressed by the technology, such as Molly McCrann, a 25-year-old actor from Australia. "I just think it looks so fake, you can tell that it looks heavily edited, or it looks like AI," she says. "When I posted mine it made me look so skinny, and I don't look McCrann adds that she thinks it is probably better to show prospective employers what you actually look like.


(7º§) However, she is also prepared to see the other side of the argument. "Someone wrote a comment that I actually agree with - if this company is going to base off looks, I want to get in the room. And if this is going to get me in the room, then I am going to use AI headshots to get the interview." But what about the potential impact that AI-improved images can have on our self-esteem? Consumer psychologist Dr Paul Marsden says there are two sides to the issue. "On one hand it could allow us to put our best self forward, and the image of ourselves that we want to project to the world, and in turn motivate us to be that way inclined in real life," he tells the BBC. "The psychology of first impressions is how we make snap decisions based on initial impressions, and by using AI people can put themselves in the running to potentially be considered for an opportunity. On the other hand it could affect people's self-worth and beliefs that they themselves are not good enough comparatively to their AI generation resulting in low confidence.


(8º§) Do recruiters care? Tristan Barthel from London-based Tate Recruitment has seen a big rise in the number of people using AI to improve their photos. He says that it makes no difference in how he deals with a person's application. "I can see if a picture has been AI generated, and it wouldn't affect my decision, for me it's about the qualifications."


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67054382



Considering the context, select the alternative that presents a synonym for the word "beholder" (3º§).
Alternativas
Q3635453 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


(1º§) Over the summer a video went viral on TikTok. It was captioned "using this trend to get a new LinkedIn headshot". In the short clip, a young woman shows both how she looks in real life, and the professional-looking headshot photos that she created using an AI-powered app called Remini. The video has now been watched 52.3 million times, and a host of similar ones from other TikTokers have also been extensively viewed. Remini, and competitors such as Try It On AI and AI Suit Up, use AI-based software to create slick profile photos that aim to look as if they were taken by an expert photographer. With Remini you are asked to upload eight to 10 selfies, preferably taken from different angles, and all in good lighting. The AI uses those pictures to learn about the way you look.


(2º§) Then just a few minutes later it will start creating artificial photos of you looking very smart and even glamorous, with your hair in different styles or positions, and you wearing different clothes while sitting in perfect lighting. It also gives you faultless skin, and improves your make-up. Plus, you get different backdrops. And some users find that it makes them look thinner.


(3º§) The results are somewhat in the eye of the beholder - some say they are realistic, while others find that the images look artificial. But while previous online image manipulation trends, such as drastically changing your hair or eye colour, have been about having fun on social media, this one is very much focused on LinkedIn and other job hunting websites.


(4º§) For some the attraction of the AI services is that they are cheap. Divya Shishodia, 24, a digital marketer, from Australia, says that while AI headshots "are obviously generated, some people might not have the budget to go and get a professional headshot taken". While going to a professional photographer can cost more than £100, Remini and the other providers will generally give you free trials lasting a few days. "I'm not saying they're the most realistic, but for the amount of time and effort you have to put in... the output is worth it," says Ms Shishodia. She adds that, by contrast, if you try to take a decent profile photo yourself it can be very difficult. "You need angles, lighting, you are trying to avoid shadows... only actual photographers can do it." 


(5º§) For Michelle Genobisa, 26, from Aalborg, Denmark, it is the low to no cost of the AI generated profile photos that she is on board with. "I quite often change my looks, like my hair colour... so it was an easy way to collect some pictures with the effect of a professional photoshoot," she says. "To get that kind of photo taken, professionally, it's very expensive."


(6º§) Others are less impressed by the technology, such as Molly McCrann, a 25-year-old actor from Australia. "I just think it looks so fake, you can tell that it looks heavily edited, or it looks like AI," she says. "When I posted mine it made me look so skinny, and I don't look McCrann adds that she thinks it is probably better to show prospective employers what you actually look like.


(7º§) However, she is also prepared to see the other side of the argument. "Someone wrote a comment that I actually agree with - if this company is going to base off looks, I want to get in the room. And if this is going to get me in the room, then I am going to use AI headshots to get the interview." But what about the potential impact that AI-improved images can have on our self-esteem? Consumer psychologist Dr Paul Marsden says there are two sides to the issue. "On one hand it could allow us to put our best self forward, and the image of ourselves that we want to project to the world, and in turn motivate us to be that way inclined in real life," he tells the BBC. "The psychology of first impressions is how we make snap decisions based on initial impressions, and by using AI people can put themselves in the running to potentially be considered for an opportunity. On the other hand it could affect people's self-worth and beliefs that they themselves are not good enough comparatively to their AI generation resulting in low confidence.


(8º§) Do recruiters care? Tristan Barthel from London-based Tate Recruitment has seen a big rise in the number of people using AI to improve their photos. He says that it makes no difference in how he deals with a person's application. "I can see if a picture has been AI generated, and it wouldn't affect my decision, for me it's about the qualifications."


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67054382



Which statement best summarizes Molly McCrann's opinion about AI-generated headshots, as mentioned in the text?
Alternativas
Q3635452 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


(1º§) Over the summer a video went viral on TikTok. It was captioned "using this trend to get a new LinkedIn headshot". In the short clip, a young woman shows both how she looks in real life, and the professional-looking headshot photos that she created using an AI-powered app called Remini. The video has now been watched 52.3 million times, and a host of similar ones from other TikTokers have also been extensively viewed. Remini, and competitors such as Try It On AI and AI Suit Up, use AI-based software to create slick profile photos that aim to look as if they were taken by an expert photographer. With Remini you are asked to upload eight to 10 selfies, preferably taken from different angles, and all in good lighting. The AI uses those pictures to learn about the way you look.


(2º§) Then just a few minutes later it will start creating artificial photos of you looking very smart and even glamorous, with your hair in different styles or positions, and you wearing different clothes while sitting in perfect lighting. It also gives you faultless skin, and improves your make-up. Plus, you get different backdrops. And some users find that it makes them look thinner.


(3º§) The results are somewhat in the eye of the beholder - some say they are realistic, while others find that the images look artificial. But while previous online image manipulation trends, such as drastically changing your hair or eye colour, have been about having fun on social media, this one is very much focused on LinkedIn and other job hunting websites.


(4º§) For some the attraction of the AI services is that they are cheap. Divya Shishodia, 24, a digital marketer, from Australia, says that while AI headshots "are obviously generated, some people might not have the budget to go and get a professional headshot taken". While going to a professional photographer can cost more than £100, Remini and the other providers will generally give you free trials lasting a few days. "I'm not saying they're the most realistic, but for the amount of time and effort you have to put in... the output is worth it," says Ms Shishodia. She adds that, by contrast, if you try to take a decent profile photo yourself it can be very difficult. "You need angles, lighting, you are trying to avoid shadows... only actual photographers can do it." 


(5º§) For Michelle Genobisa, 26, from Aalborg, Denmark, it is the low to no cost of the AI generated profile photos that she is on board with. "I quite often change my looks, like my hair colour... so it was an easy way to collect some pictures with the effect of a professional photoshoot," she says. "To get that kind of photo taken, professionally, it's very expensive."


(6º§) Others are less impressed by the technology, such as Molly McCrann, a 25-year-old actor from Australia. "I just think it looks so fake, you can tell that it looks heavily edited, or it looks like AI," she says. "When I posted mine it made me look so skinny, and I don't look McCrann adds that she thinks it is probably better to show prospective employers what you actually look like.


(7º§) However, she is also prepared to see the other side of the argument. "Someone wrote a comment that I actually agree with - if this company is going to base off looks, I want to get in the room. And if this is going to get me in the room, then I am going to use AI headshots to get the interview." But what about the potential impact that AI-improved images can have on our self-esteem? Consumer psychologist Dr Paul Marsden says there are two sides to the issue. "On one hand it could allow us to put our best self forward, and the image of ourselves that we want to project to the world, and in turn motivate us to be that way inclined in real life," he tells the BBC. "The psychology of first impressions is how we make snap decisions based on initial impressions, and by using AI people can put themselves in the running to potentially be considered for an opportunity. On the other hand it could affect people's self-worth and beliefs that they themselves are not good enough comparatively to their AI generation resulting in low confidence.


(8º§) Do recruiters care? Tristan Barthel from London-based Tate Recruitment has seen a big rise in the number of people using AI to improve their photos. He says that it makes no difference in how he deals with a person's application. "I can see if a picture has been AI generated, and it wouldn't affect my decision, for me it's about the qualifications."


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67054382



How did the experience of using an artificial intelligence photo editing service impact the confidence of the users mentioned in the text?
Alternativas
Q3635121 Geografia
Principal bacia hidrográfica que corta o município de Porto Real do Colégio: 
Alternativas
Q3635120 História e Geografia de Estados e Municípios
Qual dos seguintes elementos é mencionado no hino da cidade de Porto Real do Colégio - AL/Brasil como uma característica importante da cidade?
Alternativas
Q3635118 Psicologia
Sobre a relação entre saúde mental, bemestar e os desafios globais contemporâneos, é correto afirmar:
Alternativas
Q3635112 Direito do Trabalho
Qual das seguintes afirmações descreve corretamente o conceito de "trabalho análogo à escravidão"?
Alternativas
Q3635108 Português
O FIM DO EMPREGO

O futuro do trabalho no mundo globalizado


Fui demitido. Perdi o emprego em que estava trabalhando há seis anos. Especialista numa área em que poucos profissionais possuem conhecimento e preparo para atuar, definitivamente não esperava que isso viesse a acontecer. Nem meus colegas de trabalho entenderam os motivos que levaram a instituição a tomar essa providência.

Por incrível que pareça, fiquei menos abalado do que todos os demais. Não que eu estivesse esperando, pois já estávamos fazendo planos com o departamento em que atuava para novas aulas e cursos no ano que iria começar... Mas, como sabemos o quanto o mundo é competitivo, e como a globalização tem redirecionado as energias e exigido custos mínimos e máxima produtividade, penso até que isso demorou a acontecer. Já havia ocorrido idêntica situação com outros profissionais de qualidade que, engajados em projetos da instituição, da noite para o dia foram simplesmente “desligados” de suas funções, demitidos sumariamente...

Não que isso seja uma particularidade dessa instituição onde estive trabalhando ao longo dos últimos anos. Tampouco é possível encarar os acontecimentos como derivados de alguma perseguição ou diferença pessoal. Tudo ocorre da forma mais impessoal possível. A despeito de todo o trabalho feito, do reconhecimento do público-alvo, o que é avaliado não é sua capacidade profissional, e sim o quanto você custa para a empresa. Num mercado altamente competitivo, no qual os custos com publicidade são cada vez mais exorbitantes, em que é necessário dispor de infraestrutura e recursos materiais de ponta, a mão de obra qualificada e de alto custo deixou de ser um diferencial no qual seja prioritário investir.

O fim do emprego, como era concebido nos últimos 50 ou 60 anos, é uma realidade. Poucos serão os que ficarão por mais de 5 ou 8 anos numa mesma empresa. Carreiras duradouras, em que o sujeito trabalhava ao longo de toda sua existência num mesmo emprego, serão raríssimas. A rotatividade profissional do trabalhador, até recentemente vista como um sinal de imaturidade ou falta de seriedade, passou a ser encarada como acúmulo de experiências e de diversidade de habilidades e possibilidades funcionais. De acordo com o consultor Ricardo Neves, em seu livro O Novo Mundo Digital, adentramos um mundo em que o emprego, aquele vínculo entre empresa e empregado, que dá ao funcionário uma forte sensação de estabilidade associada a fatores, como os benefícios trabalhistas e, principalmente, o salário mensal, está dando lugar ao conceito de trabalho. E o que seria então trabalho? Seria, no caso, a vinculação a projetos e planos, ações e realizações de prazo variável (curto, médio ou longo), para os quais os profissionais seriam contratados como “terceiros”, enquanto durassem essas empreitadas. E as garantias trabalhistas? São suprimidas, pois representam custos altos que as empresas precisam cortar. E os salários? São substituídos por honorários pagos aos profissionais que atuam como empresas, ou seja, que são identificados como pessoas jurídicas. O que se estabelece, a partir de agora, passa a ser o vínculo profissional free-lance, bastante conhecido dos profissionais que atuam na imprensa.

Também é uma prerrogativa dos novos tempos que a tecnologia esteja cada vez mais incorporada ao cotidiano e que, em alguns casos, como já ocorreu em vários segmentos profissionais, máquinas, como computadores, robôs e sistemas sofisticados substituam trabalhadores.

Outra situação bastante comum, em vigor nos Estados Unidos e em outros países, é a transferência dos setores de produção mais pesada para onde a mão de obra e os custos governamentais sejam menores. Exemplos de onde isso já está efetivado são a Índia e a China, que absorveram grande parte dos investimentos deslocados do primeiro mundo em busca de custos mais baixos.  

É por isso que, mesmo tendo perdido o emprego, não acreditei, em momento algum, que fosse vítima de alguma perseguição da instituição. Entendi que os custos que significava para a empresa eram um pouco mais altos do que a média local e que, em virtude disso, fui mais uma vítima da competição globalizada...

O que fazer? Se preparar para o futuro – que não será tenebroso e sim diferente – estudando, se preparando, buscando novos espaços, virando a página e dando a volta por cima...
Os vocábulos “concebidos” (linha 35); “sumariamente” (Linha 20) e “exorbitante” (linha 30) podem ser substituídos, sem prejuízo de sentido e correção gramatical, por:
Alternativas
Respostas
10481: A
10482: B
10483: A
10484: D
10485: C
10486: B
10487: C
10488: B
10489: D
10490: D
10491: D
10492: C
10493: B
10494: D
10495: D
10496: A
10497: C
10498: C
10499: C
10500: A