Questões de Concurso Para vunesp

Foram encontradas 138.718 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q4395942 Biologia
Referente ao aquecimento global, foram apresentados dados convincentes mostrando que a concentração atmosférica de dióxido de carbono (CO2) aumentou nas últimas décadas em decorrência, entre outros fatores, da queima de combustíveis fósseis e da redução da cobertura vegetal nativa.

A relação entre o ciclo do carbono e o efeito estufa decorre que
Alternativas
Q4395941 Biologia
A membrana plasmática é constituída por uma bicamada lipídica com proteínas inseridas, além de carboidratos e esteroides, conforme a figura a seguir.

Imagem associada para resolução da questão (Disponível em: www.biologianet.com)

Com base na organização da membrana plasmática, afirma-se que
Alternativas
Q4395940 Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária
O ciclo da água e o saneamento básico estão totalmente interligados, além dos processos naturais de evaporação, precipitação e infiltração, o ambiente urbano depende de diferentes sistemas de tubulações para garantir o abastecimento de água, a coleta de esgoto e o manejo das águas das chuvas.

A correta compreensão do transporte de fluidos nessas três tubulações permite compreender a importância do ciclo da água para o ser humano e distinguir suas funções no saneamento básico, uma vez que
Alternativas
Q4395939 Meio Ambiente
Em um remanescente de Mata Atlântica, pesquisadores observaram um grupo de bugios alimentando-se dos frutos de uma figueira que abrigava bromélias as quais acumulavam água entre suas folhas, servindo de abrigo para anfíbios e invertebrados. No mesmo ambiente, registraram elevada umidade do ar, solo rico em matéria orgânica e baixa incidência de luz no sub-bosque.

Ao discutir a dinâmica desse ecossistema, um dos pesquisadores destacou a importância da integração entre fatores abióticos e bióticos, uma vez que
Alternativas
Q4395938 Biologia
Durante uma aula do Ensino Médio, foi proposto aos estudantes o cruzamento entre duas linhagens puras de ervilhas, uma com sementes amarelas e outra com sementes verdes, nos mesmos moldes desenvolvidos por Gregor Mendel. Após obterem a geração F1, os estudantes realizaram a autofecundação dos indivíduos heterozigotos e observaram a esperada proporção fenotípica da geração F2.

Para explicar o resultado obtido, destaca-se um princípio fundamental da genética clássica:
Alternativas
Q4395897 Inglês
Leia a tirinha a seguir:

Q50.png (432×590)
(https://maryannall.weebly.com)

The way Michael’s mother reacts to the boy’s statements reflects the view of the nature of language encountered in
Alternativas
Q4395896 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Central to an approach or method in language teaching is a view of the nature of language, and this shapes teaching goals, the organization of the curriculum, and the emphasis given in classroom teaching. A lexical approach in language teaching refers to one derived from the belief that the building blocks of language learning and communication are not grammar, functions, notions or some other unit of planning and teaching but lexis, that is, words and word combinations. The lexical view holds that only a minority of spoken sentences are entirely novel creations and that multiword units functioning as ‘chunks” or memorized patterns form a high proportion of the fluent stretches of speech heard in everyday conversations.

     Collocations are ‘language chunks’ that form an integral part of any discourse, written or spoken. The term refers to the regular occurrence together of words. For example, compare the following collocations of verbs with nouns:

    Do my hair/ the cooking /the laundry/ my work

    Make my bed/ a promise/ coffee/ a meal


(RICHARDS, Jack C.; RODGERS, Theodore S. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Adaptado)
A correct collocation with the verb “make” is found in alternative
Alternativas
Q4395895 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Central to an approach or method in language teaching is a view of the nature of language, and this shapes teaching goals, the organization of the curriculum, and the emphasis given in classroom teaching. A lexical approach in language teaching refers to one derived from the belief that the building blocks of language learning and communication are not grammar, functions, notions or some other unit of planning and teaching but lexis, that is, words and word combinations. The lexical view holds that only a minority of spoken sentences are entirely novel creations and that multiword units functioning as ‘chunks” or memorized patterns form a high proportion of the fluent stretches of speech heard in everyday conversations.

     Collocations are ‘language chunks’ that form an integral part of any discourse, written or spoken. The term refers to the regular occurrence together of words. For example, compare the following collocations of verbs with nouns:

    Do my hair/ the cooking /the laundry/ my work

    Make my bed/ a promise/ coffee/ a meal


(RICHARDS, Jack C.; RODGERS, Theodore S. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Adaptado)
Lexical approaches stress the teaching of the lexicon because, under this perspective, words or multiword lexical chunks
Alternativas
Q4395894 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Notional-functional syllabuses (hereafter referred to as NFS) began to be used in the United Kingdom in the 1970’s. The distinguishing characteristics of the NFS were its attention to functions as the organizing elements of English language curriculum, and its contrast with a structural syllabus in which sequenced grammatical structures served as organizers. Thus, the NFS focused strongly on the pragmatic purposes to which we put language. Curricula were then organized around such functions as identifying, reporting, denying, accepting, declining, apologizing, etc. Some seventy different language functions were identified.

    The NFS quickly provided popular underpinnings for the development of communicative textbooks and materials in English language courses. It is important to emphasize that the NFS did not necessarily develop communicative competence in learners because, as a syllabus, it still presented language as an inventory of units – functional rather than grammatical units, but units nonetheless. Communicative competence implies a set of strategies for getting messages sent and received and for negotiating meaning as an interactive participant in discourse, whether spoken or written. It pressuposes the learners’ ability to “know how to do” things, being able to act in different situations as they put their constructed knowledge into practice.


(BROWN, H. Douglas. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994. Adaptado)
Grande parte dos aprendizes brasileiros de Inglês percebe o sufixo -ed no passado e particípio passado de verbos regulares como tendo o mesmo som quando, na verdade, -ed pode assumir diversos sons. Dos verbos a seguir, retirados do texto, assinale aquele em que o -ed final é pronunciado como /id/ e acrescenta uma sílaba à palavra.
Alternativas
Q4395893 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Notional-functional syllabuses (hereafter referred to as NFS) began to be used in the United Kingdom in the 1970’s. The distinguishing characteristics of the NFS were its attention to functions as the organizing elements of English language curriculum, and its contrast with a structural syllabus in which sequenced grammatical structures served as organizers. Thus, the NFS focused strongly on the pragmatic purposes to which we put language. Curricula were then organized around such functions as identifying, reporting, denying, accepting, declining, apologizing, etc. Some seventy different language functions were identified.

    The NFS quickly provided popular underpinnings for the development of communicative textbooks and materials in English language courses. It is important to emphasize that the NFS did not necessarily develop communicative competence in learners because, as a syllabus, it still presented language as an inventory of units – functional rather than grammatical units, but units nonetheless. Communicative competence implies a set of strategies for getting messages sent and received and for negotiating meaning as an interactive participant in discourse, whether spoken or written. It pressuposes the learners’ ability to “know how to do” things, being able to act in different situations as they put their constructed knowledge into practice.


(BROWN, H. Douglas. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994. Adaptado)
It is an example of a meaning-focused classroom activity, fulfilling a genuine communicative purpose:
Alternativas
Q4395892 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Notional-functional syllabuses (hereafter referred to as NFS) began to be used in the United Kingdom in the 1970’s. The distinguishing characteristics of the NFS were its attention to functions as the organizing elements of English language curriculum, and its contrast with a structural syllabus in which sequenced grammatical structures served as organizers. Thus, the NFS focused strongly on the pragmatic purposes to which we put language. Curricula were then organized around such functions as identifying, reporting, denying, accepting, declining, apologizing, etc. Some seventy different language functions were identified.

    The NFS quickly provided popular underpinnings for the development of communicative textbooks and materials in English language courses. It is important to emphasize that the NFS did not necessarily develop communicative competence in learners because, as a syllabus, it still presented language as an inventory of units – functional rather than grammatical units, but units nonetheless. Communicative competence implies a set of strategies for getting messages sent and received and for negotiating meaning as an interactive participant in discourse, whether spoken or written. It pressuposes the learners’ ability to “know how to do” things, being able to act in different situations as they put their constructed knowledge into practice.


(BROWN, H. Douglas. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994. Adaptado)
Teachers who understand competence as “the learners’ ability to “know how to do” things, being able to act in different situations as they put their constructed knowledge into practice” (paragraph 2) will, in their English classes,
Alternativas
Q4395891 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Notional-functional syllabuses (hereafter referred to as NFS) began to be used in the United Kingdom in the 1970’s. The distinguishing characteristics of the NFS were its attention to functions as the organizing elements of English language curriculum, and its contrast with a structural syllabus in which sequenced grammatical structures served as organizers. Thus, the NFS focused strongly on the pragmatic purposes to which we put language. Curricula were then organized around such functions as identifying, reporting, denying, accepting, declining, apologizing, etc. Some seventy different language functions were identified.

    The NFS quickly provided popular underpinnings for the development of communicative textbooks and materials in English language courses. It is important to emphasize that the NFS did not necessarily develop communicative competence in learners because, as a syllabus, it still presented language as an inventory of units – functional rather than grammatical units, but units nonetheless. Communicative competence implies a set of strategies for getting messages sent and received and for negotiating meaning as an interactive participant in discourse, whether spoken or written. It pressuposes the learners’ ability to “know how to do” things, being able to act in different situations as they put their constructed knowledge into practice.


(BROWN, H. Douglas. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994. Adaptado)
Na frase do primeiro parágrafo “Thus, the NFS focused strongly on the pragmatic purposes to which we put language”, o termo destacado pode ser substituído, respeitando o sentido e o nível de formalidade do discurso, por
Alternativas
Q4395890 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Notional-functional syllabuses (hereafter referred to as NFS) began to be used in the United Kingdom in the 1970’s. The distinguishing characteristics of the NFS were its attention to functions as the organizing elements of English language curriculum, and its contrast with a structural syllabus in which sequenced grammatical structures served as organizers. Thus, the NFS focused strongly on the pragmatic purposes to which we put language. Curricula were then organized around such functions as identifying, reporting, denying, accepting, declining, apologizing, etc. Some seventy different language functions were identified.

    The NFS quickly provided popular underpinnings for the development of communicative textbooks and materials in English language courses. It is important to emphasize that the NFS did not necessarily develop communicative competence in learners because, as a syllabus, it still presented language as an inventory of units – functional rather than grammatical units, but units nonetheless. Communicative competence implies a set of strategies for getting messages sent and received and for negotiating meaning as an interactive participant in discourse, whether spoken or written. It pressuposes the learners’ ability to “know how to do” things, being able to act in different situations as they put their constructed knowledge into practice.


(BROWN, H. Douglas. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994. Adaptado)
Academic and scientific English makes regular use of Latin and Greek words and adopts their plural forms as well, as we see in “curriculum” and “curricula” (paragraph 1).

Mark the alternative in which a singular noun is correctly followed by its plural form.
Alternativas
Q4395889 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    Notional-functional syllabuses (hereafter referred to as NFS) began to be used in the United Kingdom in the 1970’s. The distinguishing characteristics of the NFS were its attention to functions as the organizing elements of English language curriculum, and its contrast with a structural syllabus in which sequenced grammatical structures served as organizers. Thus, the NFS focused strongly on the pragmatic purposes to which we put language. Curricula were then organized around such functions as identifying, reporting, denying, accepting, declining, apologizing, etc. Some seventy different language functions were identified.

    The NFS quickly provided popular underpinnings for the development of communicative textbooks and materials in English language courses. It is important to emphasize that the NFS did not necessarily develop communicative competence in learners because, as a syllabus, it still presented language as an inventory of units – functional rather than grammatical units, but units nonetheless. Communicative competence implies a set of strategies for getting messages sent and received and for negotiating meaning as an interactive participant in discourse, whether spoken or written. It pressuposes the learners’ ability to “know how to do” things, being able to act in different situations as they put their constructed knowledge into practice.


(BROWN, H. Douglas. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994. Adaptado)
The same function can be performed at different levels of formality, depending on the context and the intimacy between speakers.

There is an adequate choice of grammar and vocabulary in the function ‘making a recommendation’ in the situation illustrated in alternative
Alternativas
Q4395888 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


What makes a teacher


    The idea that if you know something, you can teach it, may seem a straight line. For a gifted few, it might be. But many experts argue that teaching children and young people requires knowing how to teach the content to achieve understanding that is useful to actual learning.

    Knowing how to teach children and young people means having in-depth knowledge of pedagogy (varied philosophies of learning and teaching), assessment, learning styles and needs — and the varied complex dynamics that dictate the context for how effective teaching happens. This fundamental knowledge happens alongside opportunities to practise and refine one’s teaching skills.

    This is the difference between being taught by qualified teachers and by people who know stuff. Knowing content is not synonymous with good teaching. Getting teachers into classrooms faster may fill classrooms, but at what cost? There is a cautionary tale here worth paying attention to.

    Shortening, and in some cases not requiring teacher education at all, has been tried and failed. Studies have shown that a major predictor of student achievement is the preparedness of teachers. For teachers who have entered into classrooms via expedited pathways, evidence showed negative impacts for all student groups.

     I fear we are on a road of short-term gain for long-term pain.

   In any society, a well-trained certified workforce supports continuity of learning and achievement. We wouldn’t contemplate having an unqualified doctor treat us any more than we want an uncertified electrician wiring our house. So why is an unqualified teacher OK? Our children deserve better.


(http://theconversation.com, 25.05.2026. Adaptado)
Compare o texto What makes a teacher e a tirinha a seguir:

Q41.png (856×617)
(https://www.itchyfeetcomic.com)

A última fala do quadrinho “Right! Which makes me totally unqualified to teach it” 
Alternativas
Q4395887 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


What makes a teacher


    The idea that if you know something, you can teach it, may seem a straight line. For a gifted few, it might be. But many experts argue that teaching children and young people requires knowing how to teach the content to achieve understanding that is useful to actual learning.

    Knowing how to teach children and young people means having in-depth knowledge of pedagogy (varied philosophies of learning and teaching), assessment, learning styles and needs — and the varied complex dynamics that dictate the context for how effective teaching happens. This fundamental knowledge happens alongside opportunities to practise and refine one’s teaching skills.

    This is the difference between being taught by qualified teachers and by people who know stuff. Knowing content is not synonymous with good teaching. Getting teachers into classrooms faster may fill classrooms, but at what cost? There is a cautionary tale here worth paying attention to.

    Shortening, and in some cases not requiring teacher education at all, has been tried and failed. Studies have shown that a major predictor of student achievement is the preparedness of teachers. For teachers who have entered into classrooms via expedited pathways, evidence showed negative impacts for all student groups.

     I fear we are on a road of short-term gain for long-term pain.

   In any society, a well-trained certified workforce supports continuity of learning and achievement. We wouldn’t contemplate having an unqualified doctor treat us any more than we want an uncertified electrician wiring our house. So why is an unqualified teacher OK? Our children deserve better.


(http://theconversation.com, 25.05.2026. Adaptado)
In the three last paragraphs, the author of the text, mainly,
Alternativas
Q4395886 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


What makes a teacher


    The idea that if you know something, you can teach it, may seem a straight line. For a gifted few, it might be. But many experts argue that teaching children and young people requires knowing how to teach the content to achieve understanding that is useful to actual learning.

    Knowing how to teach children and young people means having in-depth knowledge of pedagogy (varied philosophies of learning and teaching), assessment, learning styles and needs — and the varied complex dynamics that dictate the context for how effective teaching happens. This fundamental knowledge happens alongside opportunities to practise and refine one’s teaching skills.

    This is the difference between being taught by qualified teachers and by people who know stuff. Knowing content is not synonymous with good teaching. Getting teachers into classrooms faster may fill classrooms, but at what cost? There is a cautionary tale here worth paying attention to.

    Shortening, and in some cases not requiring teacher education at all, has been tried and failed. Studies have shown that a major predictor of student achievement is the preparedness of teachers. For teachers who have entered into classrooms via expedited pathways, evidence showed negative impacts for all student groups.

     I fear we are on a road of short-term gain for long-term pain.

   In any society, a well-trained certified workforce supports continuity of learning and achievement. We wouldn’t contemplate having an unqualified doctor treat us any more than we want an uncertified electrician wiring our house. So why is an unqualified teacher OK? Our children deserve better.


(http://theconversation.com, 25.05.2026. Adaptado)
While reading the text, a certain reader comes across the expression “people who know stuff”, whose meaning they do not identify at first sight. In order to try to understand what the expression means, this reader may pay attention to context and employ the reading strategy known as
Alternativas
Q4395885 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


What makes a teacher


    The idea that if you know something, you can teach it, may seem a straight line. For a gifted few, it might be. But many experts argue that teaching children and young people requires knowing how to teach the content to achieve understanding that is useful to actual learning.

    Knowing how to teach children and young people means having in-depth knowledge of pedagogy (varied philosophies of learning and teaching), assessment, learning styles and needs — and the varied complex dynamics that dictate the context for how effective teaching happens. This fundamental knowledge happens alongside opportunities to practise and refine one’s teaching skills.

    This is the difference between being taught by qualified teachers and by people who know stuff. Knowing content is not synonymous with good teaching. Getting teachers into classrooms faster may fill classrooms, but at what cost? There is a cautionary tale here worth paying attention to.

    Shortening, and in some cases not requiring teacher education at all, has been tried and failed. Studies have shown that a major predictor of student achievement is the preparedness of teachers. For teachers who have entered into classrooms via expedited pathways, evidence showed negative impacts for all student groups.

     I fear we are on a road of short-term gain for long-term pain.

   In any society, a well-trained certified workforce supports continuity of learning and achievement. We wouldn’t contemplate having an unqualified doctor treat us any more than we want an uncertified electrician wiring our house. So why is an unqualified teacher OK? Our children deserve better.


(http://theconversation.com, 25.05.2026. Adaptado)
The fragment from the third paragraph “people who know stuff” refers to
Alternativas
Q4395884 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


What makes a teacher


    The idea that if you know something, you can teach it, may seem a straight line. For a gifted few, it might be. But many experts argue that teaching children and young people requires knowing how to teach the content to achieve understanding that is useful to actual learning.

    Knowing how to teach children and young people means having in-depth knowledge of pedagogy (varied philosophies of learning and teaching), assessment, learning styles and needs — and the varied complex dynamics that dictate the context for how effective teaching happens. This fundamental knowledge happens alongside opportunities to practise and refine one’s teaching skills.

    This is the difference between being taught by qualified teachers and by people who know stuff. Knowing content is not synonymous with good teaching. Getting teachers into classrooms faster may fill classrooms, but at what cost? There is a cautionary tale here worth paying attention to.

    Shortening, and in some cases not requiring teacher education at all, has been tried and failed. Studies have shown that a major predictor of student achievement is the preparedness of teachers. For teachers who have entered into classrooms via expedited pathways, evidence showed negative impacts for all student groups.

     I fear we are on a road of short-term gain for long-term pain.

   In any society, a well-trained certified workforce supports continuity of learning and achievement. We wouldn’t contemplate having an unqualified doctor treat us any more than we want an uncertified electrician wiring our house. So why is an unqualified teacher OK? Our children deserve better.


(http://theconversation.com, 25.05.2026. Adaptado)
 In the excerpt below (from paragraphs 1 and 2 in the text), the word which functions as an adjective in the context is:

     …many experts argue that teaching (1) children and young people requires knowing how to teach the content to achieve understanding that is useful to actual learning (2).
    Knowing how to teach children and young people means having in-depth knowledge of pedagogy (varied philosophies of learning (3) and teaching, assessment, learning styles and needs — and the varied complex dynamics that dictate the context for how effective teaching (4) happens. This fundamental knowledge happens alongside opportunities to practise and refine one’s teaching (5) skills.
Alternativas
Q4395883 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


What makes a teacher


    The idea that if you know something, you can teach it, may seem a straight line. For a gifted few, it might be. But many experts argue that teaching children and young people requires knowing how to teach the content to achieve understanding that is useful to actual learning.

    Knowing how to teach children and young people means having in-depth knowledge of pedagogy (varied philosophies of learning and teaching), assessment, learning styles and needs — and the varied complex dynamics that dictate the context for how effective teaching happens. This fundamental knowledge happens alongside opportunities to practise and refine one’s teaching skills.

    This is the difference between being taught by qualified teachers and by people who know stuff. Knowing content is not synonymous with good teaching. Getting teachers into classrooms faster may fill classrooms, but at what cost? There is a cautionary tale here worth paying attention to.

    Shortening, and in some cases not requiring teacher education at all, has been tried and failed. Studies have shown that a major predictor of student achievement is the preparedness of teachers. For teachers who have entered into classrooms via expedited pathways, evidence showed negative impacts for all student groups.

     I fear we are on a road of short-term gain for long-term pain.

   In any society, a well-trained certified workforce supports continuity of learning and achievement. We wouldn’t contemplate having an unqualified doctor treat us any more than we want an uncertified electrician wiring our house. So why is an unqualified teacher OK? Our children deserve better.


(http://theconversation.com, 25.05.2026. Adaptado)
The combination of a teacher’s in-depth understanding of pedagogical theories (as described in the first sentence of the second paragraph) together with their experience and awareness acquired through practice in the classroom has been more recently referred to as a teacher’s
Alternativas
Respostas
401: E
402: C
403: B
404: D
405: A
406: D
407: A
408: C
409: E
410: C
411: E
412: A
413: D
414: B
415: B
416: D
417: A
418: C
419: E
420: B