Questões de Concurso Para prefeitura

Foram encontradas 494.734 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q4361963 Saúde Pública
A vacinação é uma das mais eficazes medidas de prevenção de doenças. Analise as afirmativas a seguir sobre o Calendário Nacional de Vacinação e a importância do saneamento básico:

I- A vacina BCG, prevista no Calendário Nacional de Vacinação, é indicada principalmente para prevenir formas graves de tuberculose, especialmente em crianças, enquanto o saneamento básico contribui para a prevenção de doenças relacionadas à água e às condições inadequadas de higiene.
II- A vacinação constitui uma medida de prevenção primária, pois busca evitar o surgimento de doenças, enquanto o saneamento básico também atua na prevenção de doenças ao proporcionar condições adequadas de abastecimento de água, esgotamento sanitário e manejo de resíduos sólidos.
III- O saneamento básico e a vacinação são medidas complementares de saúde pública, pois, enquanto a vacinação estimula a proteção imunológica contra determinadas doenças, o saneamento básico reduz a exposição da população a agentes causadores de doenças.

Está(ão) CORRETA(S) a(s) afirmativa(s) 
Alternativas
Q4361962 Direito Sanitário
O ACS Carlos Alberto, durante uma visita domiciliar, tomou conhecimento de que uma moradora de sua comunidade está em tratamento para uma doença sexualmente transmissível. Em uma conversa informal com outros moradores, Carlos comentou a situação da paciente.

Considerando os princípios éticos que regem a atuação do ACS, a conduta de Carlos
Alternativas
Q4361961 Saúde Pública
Analise as afirmativas a seguir sobre a Covid-19, doença causada pelo coronavírus SARS-CoV-2, e assinale V para as verdadeiras e F para as falsas:

( ) A transmissão ocorre principalmente por gotículas respiratórias e contato com superfícies contaminadas.
( ) O uso de máscaras e a higienização das mãos são medidas eficazes de prevenção.
( ) A vacinação contra a Covid-19 está disponível apenas para grupos de risco.

Marque a sequência CORRETA, considerando as afirmativas de cima para baixo. 
Alternativas
Q4361960 Enfermagem
Em uma comunidade rural, o ACS identificou a presença de caramujos em um curso d'água utilizado pelos moradores para banho e lavagem de roupas. Alguns moradores relataram dor abdominal e diarreia com sangue. Considerando o quadro apresentado, qual doença o ACS deve suspeitar e qual medida de prevenção deve orientar, respectivamente?
Alternativas
Q4361959 Biologia
A prevenção de doenças endêmicas é uma das atribuições do ACS, que deve orientar a população sobre medidas de controle. Relacione as doenças (coluna I) às respectivas medidas de prevenção (coluna II):

Coluna I 
1- Dengue
2- Doença de Chagas
3- Leishmaniose Visceral

Coluna II
( ) Combate ao barbeiro e melhoria da habitação.
( ) Uso de repelente, telas e eliminação de criadouros.
( ) Eliminação de focos de água parada.

Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a correlação CORRETA, considerando a coluna II de cima para baixo.
Alternativas
Q4361958 Legislação Federal
Maria é Agente Comunitária de Saúde (ACS) em uma Unidade Básica de Saúde. Em sua rotina, realiza visitas domiciliares, atualiza cadastros e orienta as famílias sobre hábitos saudáveis. Considerando as atribuições do ACS previstas na legislação, analise a situação a seguir:

Durante uma visita, Maria identificou que uma família se mudou recentemente para o território, mas ainda não possui cadastro na unidade. Além disso, observou que um dos moradores apresenta sintomas sugestivos de dengue. Com base nas atribuições do ACS, a conduta CORRETA de Maria é:
Alternativas
Q4361957 Saúde Pública
A Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) visa à reorganização da Atenção Básica no Brasil, com atuação territorializada, e vínculo com a comunidade. Assinale a alternativa CORRETA sobre a ESF.
Alternativas
Q4361956 Direito Sanitário
A Lei Orgânica da Saúde (Lei n.º 8.080/1990) dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes. Considerando o disposto nessa lei, analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I- A saúde é um direito fundamental do ser humano, devendo o Estado prover as condições indispensáveis ao seu pleno exercício.
II- A participação da iniciativa privada no SUS pode ocorrer em caráter complementar, mediante contrato ou convênio.
III- O dever do Estado de garantir a saúde exclui a responsabilidade de outras esferas de poder.

Está(ão) CORRETA(S) a(s) afirmativa(s)
Alternativas
Q4361955 Saúde Pública
A Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil (1988) estabelece que a saúde é direito de todos e dever do Estado, garantido mediante políticas sociais e econômicas que visem à redução do risco de doença e de outros agravos. Sobre os princípios e as diretrizes do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), assinale a alternativa CORRETA. 
Alternativas
Q4361879 Inglês
Choose the sentence in which must is used correctly.
Alternativas
Q4361878 Inglês
Choose the sentence in which the verb agrees correctly with the subject.
Alternativas
Q4361877 Pedagogia
What was the Manifesto of the Pioneers of New Education, published in Brazil in 1932?
Alternativas
Q4361876 Inglês
Choose the sentence in which the possessive adjective is used correctly.
Alternativas
Q4361875 Pedagogia
Which classroom practice is most closely associated with the Lexical Approach?
Alternativas
Q4361874 Inglês
In the sentence “Could you look after this matter while I am away?”, the phrasal verb look after means:
Alternativas
Q4361873 Inglês
Read the text and answer question.

What's worth measuring? The future of assessment in the AI age

The rise of AI tools disrupts traditional ideas of assessment, and urges a shift toward promoting and evaluating higher-order thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning.

By Hrishikesh Desai

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT have fundamentally disrupted traditional notions of assessment in education. When a machine can generate essays, solve complex problems, and even mimic creative writing, educators are forced to ask: What skills should we assess, and how do we evaluate learning in a world where AI can perform tasks once thought uniquely human? This think piece explores the implications of AI for assessment and argues that we must shift from measuring rote knowledge to promoting and evaluating higher-order thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning. 

    Historically, educational assessment has relied on measurable outputs, such as essays, exams, and problem sets that test memorization, comprehension, and technical proficiency. However, AI’s ability to generate these outputs undermines their reliability as indicators of individual effort or understanding. For example, a student can prompt ChatGPT or DeepSeek to write a 1000-word essay on climate change in minutes, complete with citations, which leaves educators grappling with how to distinguish human work from machinegenerated content. This disruption extends beyond writing to mathematics, coding, and even creative tasks, where AI tools like GitHub Copilot and DALL-E provide solutions or artifacts that mimic human ingenuity. As AI becomes a ubiquitous resource, the traditional metrics of learning are no longer fit for purpose. The emergence of generative AI has precipitated what can only be described as an assessment crisis.

    This technological disruption to learning has arrived at a critical juncture. For decades, faculty have critiqued assessment methods that prioritize memorization and formulaic responses over deeper learning. The emergence of sophisticated AI tools has transformed this critique from a theoretical ideal into an immediate practical necessity. We can no longer rely on conventional assessment methods that AI can bypass with ease. I argue that generative AI is not merely challenging our assessment techniques but providing an opportunity to fundamentally realign educational evaluation with more authentic demonstrations of human learning, thinking, and creation.

Source: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/whats-worth-measuring-future-assessment-ai-age
What opportunity does the author associate with the rise of generative AI? 
Alternativas
Q4361872 Inglês
Read the text and answer question.

What's worth measuring? The future of assessment in the AI age

The rise of AI tools disrupts traditional ideas of assessment, and urges a shift toward promoting and evaluating higher-order thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning.

By Hrishikesh Desai

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT have fundamentally disrupted traditional notions of assessment in education. When a machine can generate essays, solve complex problems, and even mimic creative writing, educators are forced to ask: What skills should we assess, and how do we evaluate learning in a world where AI can perform tasks once thought uniquely human? This think piece explores the implications of AI for assessment and argues that we must shift from measuring rote knowledge to promoting and evaluating higher-order thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning. 

    Historically, educational assessment has relied on measurable outputs, such as essays, exams, and problem sets that test memorization, comprehension, and technical proficiency. However, AI’s ability to generate these outputs undermines their reliability as indicators of individual effort or understanding. For example, a student can prompt ChatGPT or DeepSeek to write a 1000-word essay on climate change in minutes, complete with citations, which leaves educators grappling with how to distinguish human work from machinegenerated content. This disruption extends beyond writing to mathematics, coding, and even creative tasks, where AI tools like GitHub Copilot and DALL-E provide solutions or artifacts that mimic human ingenuity. As AI becomes a ubiquitous resource, the traditional metrics of learning are no longer fit for purpose. The emergence of generative AI has precipitated what can only be described as an assessment crisis.

    This technological disruption to learning has arrived at a critical juncture. For decades, faculty have critiqued assessment methods that prioritize memorization and formulaic responses over deeper learning. The emergence of sophisticated AI tools has transformed this critique from a theoretical ideal into an immediate practical necessity. We can no longer rely on conventional assessment methods that AI can bypass with ease. I argue that generative AI is not merely challenging our assessment techniques but providing an opportunity to fundamentally realign educational evaluation with more authentic demonstrations of human learning, thinking, and creation.

Source: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/whats-worth-measuring-future-assessment-ai-age
What criticism of traditional assessment existed before the widespread use of generative AI? 
Alternativas
Q4361871 Inglês
Read the text and answer question.

What's worth measuring? The future of assessment in the AI age

The rise of AI tools disrupts traditional ideas of assessment, and urges a shift toward promoting and evaluating higher-order thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning.

By Hrishikesh Desai

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT have fundamentally disrupted traditional notions of assessment in education. When a machine can generate essays, solve complex problems, and even mimic creative writing, educators are forced to ask: What skills should we assess, and how do we evaluate learning in a world where AI can perform tasks once thought uniquely human? This think piece explores the implications of AI for assessment and argues that we must shift from measuring rote knowledge to promoting and evaluating higher-order thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning. 

    Historically, educational assessment has relied on measurable outputs, such as essays, exams, and problem sets that test memorization, comprehension, and technical proficiency. However, AI’s ability to generate these outputs undermines their reliability as indicators of individual effort or understanding. For example, a student can prompt ChatGPT or DeepSeek to write a 1000-word essay on climate change in minutes, complete with citations, which leaves educators grappling with how to distinguish human work from machinegenerated content. This disruption extends beyond writing to mathematics, coding, and even creative tasks, where AI tools like GitHub Copilot and DALL-E provide solutions or artifacts that mimic human ingenuity. As AI becomes a ubiquitous resource, the traditional metrics of learning are no longer fit for purpose. The emergence of generative AI has precipitated what can only be described as an assessment crisis.

    This technological disruption to learning has arrived at a critical juncture. For decades, faculty have critiqued assessment methods that prioritize memorization and formulaic responses over deeper learning. The emergence of sophisticated AI tools has transformed this critique from a theoretical ideal into an immediate practical necessity. We can no longer rely on conventional assessment methods that AI can bypass with ease. I argue that generative AI is not merely challenging our assessment techniques but providing an opportunity to fundamentally realign educational evaluation with more authentic demonstrations of human learning, thinking, and creation.

Source: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/whats-worth-measuring-future-assessment-ai-age
Why does the author believe traditional assessment outputs have become less reliable?
Alternativas
Q4361870 Inglês
Choose the sentence in which the irregular verb is correctly used in the past participle form. 
Alternativas
Q4361869 Inglês
Choose the sentence that correctly shows the sequence of two completed events in the past. 
Alternativas
Respostas
9301: B
9302: E
9303: A
9304: C
9305: D
9306: B
9307: E
9308: A
9309: C
9310: B
9311: D
9312: D
9313: C
9314: E
9315: C
9316: D
9317: C
9318: A
9319: C
9320: A