Questões de Concurso Sobre verbos | verbs em inglês

Foram encontradas 2.952 questões

Q2763250 Inglês

Mark the correct alternative.


There’s_____________________at the door. Can you open it, please?
Sure! But I went there two minutes ago and there was ___________there.

Alternativas
Q2763248 Inglês

The sequence of phrasal verbs that completes the sentences correctly is:


I. My daughter _________________ all her friends.
II. My son _____________________ by himself every weekend.
III. My friend Lucy _________________ from every boring meeting.

Alternativas
Q2763246 Inglês

Leia o cartum abaixo e marque a alternativa correta.


Imagem associada para resolução da questão
O verbo modal que pode substituir “ought to” no texto, sem alteração de significado, é:

Alternativas
Q2763216 Inglês

Read the text below and answer questions 28 and 29. 


Advantages of Being Bilingual 

Most children have the capacity and facility to learn more than one language. Researchers say that there are advantages to being bilingual. These advantages might include; 
• Being able to learn new words easily 
• Playing rhyming games with words like "cat" and "hat" 
• Breaking down words by sounds, such as C-AT for cat 
• Being able to use information in new ways 
• Putting words into categories 
• Coming up with solutions to problems 
• Good listening skills 
• Connecting with others 

According to the National Center for Educational Statistics, more than one in 5 school-aged children (21%) speak a language other than English at home. That number of bilingual speakers is projected to increase in the coming years. 
Children who are learning to speak two languages follow patterns of learning. The sounds of the first language can influence how children learn and use a second language. It is easier to learn sounds and words when the languages you are learning are similar. Over time, the more difficult sounds and words will be learned. 
Fact: Communication disorders affect more than 42 million Americans. Of these, 28 million have a hearing loss and 14 million have a speech or language disorder. 
If a child _______ a speech or language problem, it ________up in both languages. However, these problems are not caused by learning two languages. If you know a child who is learning a second language and you have concerns about speech and language development, ASHA recommends contacting a bilingual speech-language pathologist (SLP). If you are unable to find a bilingual speech-language pathologist, look for a SLP who has knows the rules and structure of both languages and who has access to an interpreter. For more information or for a referral to a SLP, contact ASHA at 800-638-TALK (8255) (Spanish- speaking operators available) 

Acessado em 25/02/2015 http://www.asha.org/public/speech/developm ent/The- Advantages-of-Being-Bilingual/

Which pair best completes the blanks in the text?

Alternativas
Q2763209 Inglês

Read the text and answer questions 22 to 25.

Slowly does it
Feb 19th 2015, 17:34 BY R.L.G. | BERLIN


LAST week’s column looked at the long history of language declinism: for more than 600 years people have complained that youngsters cannot write proper English anymore, and even ancient Sumerian schoolmasters worried about the state of the “scribal art” in the world’s first written language. Two universal truths emerge: languages are always changing, and older people always worry that the young are not taking proper care of the language.
But what if the sticklers have a point? Of course language always changes, but could technology (or a simple increase in youthful insouciance and lack of respect for tradition) mean that in some ages it changes faster than in others? Is change accelerating? In this case, a real problem could arise. Even if language change is not harmful, the faster language changes, the less new generations will be able to understand what their forebears wrote.
The Middle English quotation in last week’s column ________ the point for some readers: it is all but impenetrable to modern understanding without special training. It is, in effect, a foreign language. Is this a problem? Perhaps it is too much to expect writing to stay fresh on the shelf for 600 years. More recent writing holds up quite well. Pupils read Shakespeare with only modernised spelling and a bit of help from teachers. And Thomas Jefferson and Jane Austen are perfectly readable.
But maybe a greater conservatism would let modern readers peer further back in their own literary history. If change had been slower, perhaps Chaucer would be only as difficult as Shakespeare is to us; “Beowulf” only as distant as Chaucer is now. What’s not to like?
The problem is that conservatism works differently on writing than it does on speech. Writing is more permanent, so people choose their words carefully and conservatively. It is slow and considered, so people can avoid new usages widely seen as mistakes. It is taught carefully by adults to children, which naturally exerts some conservative drag on the written language. And it is often edited, so (say) a young journalist with a breezy contemporary style may well be edited to a more traditional one by an older editor.
Speech is different: instead of permanent, slow, considered and taught, it is impermanent, fast, spontaneous and learned naturally by children from their surroundings. Speech will—at almost any level of linguistic conservatism—change faster than written language.
The problem with overly successful conservatism then becomes clear. Speech moves on, writing does not, and the two diverge over time. Take just one example: English spelling. As with all languages, the pronunciation of English has changed a lot over the centuries. Spelling has changed much more slowly. Thanks to the Great Vowel Shift of the middle of the last millennium, English uses vowels differently from almost all other European languages. Silent letters like the gh in night are a remnant of an earlier pronunciation (a bit like the German nicht). Other odd spellings were intended to keep etymologies clear: a b was inserted into debt to show the link with Latin debitum. Some linguistic innovations do not make it into writing at all: nearly everyone says gonna and writes going to. ________ a language pays homage to the past, _________modern schoolchildren will find learning to write a bit like learning to speak a foreign tongue.

Which words complete the conclusion correctly.

Alternativas
Q2763202 Inglês

Read the text and answer questions 22 to 25.

Slowly does it
Feb 19th 2015, 17:34 BY R.L.G. | BERLIN


LAST week’s column looked at the long history of language declinism: for more than 600 years people have complained that youngsters cannot write proper English anymore, and even ancient Sumerian schoolmasters worried about the state of the “scribal art” in the world’s first written language. Two universal truths emerge: languages are always changing, and older people always worry that the young are not taking proper care of the language.
But what if the sticklers have a point? Of course language always changes, but could technology (or a simple increase in youthful insouciance and lack of respect for tradition) mean that in some ages it changes faster than in others? Is change accelerating? In this case, a real problem could arise. Even if language change is not harmful, the faster language changes, the less new generations will be able to understand what their forebears wrote.
The Middle English quotation in last week’s column ________ the point for some readers: it is all but impenetrable to modern understanding without special training. It is, in effect, a foreign language. Is this a problem? Perhaps it is too much to expect writing to stay fresh on the shelf for 600 years. More recent writing holds up quite well. Pupils read Shakespeare with only modernised spelling and a bit of help from teachers. And Thomas Jefferson and Jane Austen are perfectly readable.
But maybe a greater conservatism would let modern readers peer further back in their own literary history. If change had been slower, perhaps Chaucer would be only as difficult as Shakespeare is to us; “Beowulf” only as distant as Chaucer is now. What’s not to like?
The problem is that conservatism works differently on writing than it does on speech. Writing is more permanent, so people choose their words carefully and conservatively. It is slow and considered, so people can avoid new usages widely seen as mistakes. It is taught carefully by adults to children, which naturally exerts some conservative drag on the written language. And it is often edited, so (say) a young journalist with a breezy contemporary style may well be edited to a more traditional one by an older editor.
Speech is different: instead of permanent, slow, considered and taught, it is impermanent, fast, spontaneous and learned naturally by children from their surroundings. Speech will—at almost any level of linguistic conservatism—change faster than written language.
The problem with overly successful conservatism then becomes clear. Speech moves on, writing does not, and the two diverge over time. Take just one example: English spelling. As with all languages, the pronunciation of English has changed a lot over the centuries. Spelling has changed much more slowly. Thanks to the Great Vowel Shift of the middle of the last millennium, English uses vowels differently from almost all other European languages. Silent letters like the gh in night are a remnant of an earlier pronunciation (a bit like the German nicht). Other odd spellings were intended to keep etymologies clear: a b was inserted into debt to show the link with Latin debitum. Some linguistic innovations do not make it into writing at all: nearly everyone says gonna and writes going to. ________ a language pays homage to the past, _________modern schoolchildren will find learning to write a bit like learning to speak a foreign tongue.

Which verbal tense best completes the sentence” The Middle English quotation in last week’s column ________ the point for some readers”

Alternativas
Q2122704 Inglês
Choose the option where the future with ‘will’ is used correctly.
Alternativas
Q2122703 Inglês
Choose the option where the future with ‘going to’ is used correctly.
Alternativas
Q2122702 Inglês
Choose the option where the simple past is used incorrectly.
Alternativas
Q2122701 Inglês
Choose the option where the present perfect is used incorrectly.
Alternativas
Q2122700 Inglês
From the question, choose the option that has the same meaning and idea as the sentences in italics.
I think it’s wrong for her to work so late every day.
Alternativas
Q2122699 Inglês
From the question, choose the option that has the same meaning and idea as the sentences in italics.
It’s possible that the train will be very late
Alternativas
Q2122698 Inglês
From the question, choose the option that has the same meaning and idea as the sentences in italics.
When I lived in Spain, I used to go to the beach every night.
Alternativas
Q2122696 Inglês
In the question, choose the phrasal verb that best replaces the underlined phrase or verb.
I’ll be glad to reach the end of this awful business.
Alternativas
Q2122695 Inglês
In the question, choose the phrasal verb that best replaces the underlined phrase or verb.
I don’t agree with the idea of using force.
Alternativas
Q2122694 Inglês
In the question, choose the phrasal verb that best replaces the underlined phrase or verb.
Simone has kindly agreed to take the place of Paul at the next meeting.
Alternativas
Q1347901 Inglês
Choose the alternative which contains the correct form of the verbs to fill the gaps in the following paragraph: “The most notorious computer lifeforms ___________ the electronic viruses that ____________injected into computer networks. Like real viruses, these programs ____________ the ability to ____________ a host computer and ___________ without restraint, sometimes ______________ considerable damage.
Alternativas
Q1347376 Inglês
Roraima is an interesting mountain located in the Guiana Highlands. The peak actually shares the border with Venezuela, Brazil, and Guyana, but the mountain is almost always approached from the Venezuela side. The Brazil and Guyana sides are much more difficult. The mountain's highest point is Maverick Rock which is at and on the Venezuela side (though some other sources may differ on this). The Guiana Highlands is a very unusual mountain range covering parts of Venezuela, Brazil, Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana. The highlands are made of ancient sedimentary rock that is over two billion years old and are some of the oldest sedimentary rocks on the planet.
The mountain is known as a Tepui, which describes a flattopped mountain with vertical sides. Many waterfalls spill off Roraima, and the other Tepuis; nearly everyone has heard of Angel Falls, which spills off another nearby Tepui. There are many interesting plants that grow on the summit, including many carnivorous plants, i.e., ones that eat insects. There is little soil on top because the constant rains wash it away.
Monte Roraima was the first of the Tepuis to be climbed and the credit goes to English botanist Everard Im Thurn on an expedition sponsored by the Royal Geographical Society in 1884. It was his subsequent lectures in England, that are believed to have inspired Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's book 'The Lost World'.
Which word below, extracted from the text, is NOT a verb? 
Alternativas
Q1250295 Inglês

Choose the best verb sequence for the sentence below.

“When I (1) the awful news yesterday I couldn't (2) it”.

Alternativas
Q1250289 Inglês

Choose the better modal for the sentence bellow.

“I wish somebody (…) buy me the lunch”.

Alternativas
Respostas
2561: B
2562: D
2563: E
2564: C
2565: C
2566: C
2567: C
2568: D
2569: D
2570: B
2571: A
2572: B
2573: A
2574: A
2575: D
2576: C
2577: A
2578: D
2579: B
2580: D