Questões de Concurso
Sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês
Foram encontradas 12.921 questões
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753592
Inglês
Read the passage below:
_____ is a game-based learning platform that makes English lessons more dynamic and engaging. Teachers can create interactive quizzes, surveys, and challenges that motivate students to participate actively. By answering questions in real time, learners improve vocabulary, grammar, and reading comprehension while having fun. The competitive element encourages focus and quick thinking. This tool also allows teachers to assess understanding instantly. It can be used to review content, introduce new topics, or prepare for exams. The colorful interface and background music help create a relaxed and enjoyable atmosphere. In group activities, students collaborate and communicate in English. Overall, this approach transforms traditional lessons into exciting and meaningful learning experiences.
Fill in the blank above and mark the correct alternative.
_____ is a game-based learning platform that makes English lessons more dynamic and engaging. Teachers can create interactive quizzes, surveys, and challenges that motivate students to participate actively. By answering questions in real time, learners improve vocabulary, grammar, and reading comprehension while having fun. The competitive element encourages focus and quick thinking. This tool also allows teachers to assess understanding instantly. It can be used to review content, introduce new topics, or prepare for exams. The colorful interface and background music help create a relaxed and enjoyable atmosphere. In group activities, students collaborate and communicate in English. Overall, this approach transforms traditional lessons into exciting and meaningful learning experiences.
Fill in the blank above and mark the correct alternative.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753590
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article employs collocations and fixed expressions
characteristic of British political journalism. The text
includes: "balancing the books," "iron-clad fiscal rules,"
"heaping pressure," "bite the bullet," "the stakes could not
be higher," and "pulling ahead." These phrases carry
meanings beyond literal interpretations. Understanding
these conventional word combinations is essential for
comprehension and production. Which of the following demonstrates accurate understanding of the collocations
and idiomatic expressions used in the text?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753588
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article discusses Chancellor Rachel Reeves'
approach to the upcoming UK budget, highlighting
various economic and political challenges. According to
the text, Reeves held an "extraordinary press
conference" before the budget announcement, which was
described as "highly unusual." The purpose of this
pre-budget communication was to prepare the public for
difficult decisions ahead. In the press conference,
Reeves notably avoided mentioning certain Labour
manifesto pledges while emphasizing other priorities.
Based on a comprehensive reading of the article, which
statement accurately reflects the strategic communication
choices made by Chancellor Reeves during the press
conference?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753587
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The text employs sophisticated vocabulary specific to
economics, government finance, and political analysis.
Terms like "fiscal," "manifesto," "productivity," "borrowing
costs," "welfare," "backbenchers," "grassroot supporters,"
and "OBR" (Office for Budget Responsibility) carry
specific meanings in British political-economic discourse.
Understanding these terms requires knowledge of their
precise meanings within specialized contexts. Which
analysis accurately defines these terms as used in this
political-economic context?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753586
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The text describes multiple interconnected factors
affecting Reeves' budget decisions: government debt,
borrowing costs, productivity forecasts, welfare spending,
tax policy, fiscal rules, upcoming elections, intra-party
tensions, and cost of living concerns. Understanding how
these elements relate causally is essential for deep
comprehension. Which statement accurately represents
the complex causal chains and constraints described in
the article?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMEOSC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Prova:
AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753584
Inglês
Texto associado
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.
Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as
Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget
The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear
that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending
are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular
and controversial − but in an extraordinary press
conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26,
Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be
necessary.
In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press
conference to set out her priorities for balancing the
books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not
mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise
taxes on working people or increase national insurance,
VAT or income tax.
Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden
of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving
public services and tackling the cost of living.
Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her
"iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential
for showing she is being responsible with the nation's
finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of
borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).
At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up
10% of all government spending. The government's
spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility
(OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next
financial year.
She also emphasised the importance of measures to
boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are
expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet
more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices.
Reeves questioned whether the forecast would
accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she
will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this
year's budget.
The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to
boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that
planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power
and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at
least in the near term.
At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her
budget target there will need to be cuts to public
spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency"
savings by government departments (that perennial
option that all chancellors reach for).
But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly
rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of
young people who are not in education, employment or
training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").
Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under
pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will
cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as
well as many party activists.
As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as
economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will
accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They
will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of
growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK
government has done in the last 50 years.
At the same time, it will become even more difficult for
Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary
majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the
government to restore the winter fuel payment for some
pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal
independence payments for disabled claimants.
Local government elections, as well as elections to the
Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May.
Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot
supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing
parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be
pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.
The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even
lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor
and the prime minister Keir Starmer.
Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for
working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her
suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by
investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the
cost of food by changing the business rates system to
help small businesses.
Even if effective, these changes will take some time to
work through and may not be enough to convince voters
that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not
brought under control.
Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term
approach to sorting out the British economy may be
admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and
Labour more broadly − remain considerable.
https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo
n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article discusses Chancellor Rachel Reeves' budget
strategy and its political implications. Consider this
passage: "Reeves' appeal to the public to back her
long-term approach to sorting out the British economy
may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally
− and Labour more broadly − remain considerable." The
author's tone reveals an implicit assessment.
Additionally, the text states: "The stakes could not be
higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about
the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister
Keir Starmer." Based on comprehensive analysis of
explicit and implicit meanings, what can be accurately
inferred about the author's perspective?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751464
Inglês
Skimming and scanning strategies are essential to
optimize reading comprehension in English. Analyze the
statements below:
I. Skimming is the strategy of reading a text quickly and superficially, focusing on elements such as titles, subtitles, cognates, and the first and last paragraphs, with the goal of grasping the main idea (the "gist").
II. Scanning is the strategy of rapidly searching for a specific piece of information in the text, such as a name, a date, a number, or a keyword, running one's eyes over the text without reading every word.
III. Skimming is the term used for detailed, analytical reading of a text, focusing on every word and grammatical structure for deep comprehension.
Which statements are correct?
I. Skimming is the strategy of reading a text quickly and superficially, focusing on elements such as titles, subtitles, cognates, and the first and last paragraphs, with the goal of grasping the main idea (the "gist").
II. Scanning is the strategy of rapidly searching for a specific piece of information in the text, such as a name, a date, a number, or a keyword, running one's eyes over the text without reading every word.
III. Skimming is the term used for detailed, analytical reading of a text, focusing on every word and grammatical structure for deep comprehension.
Which statements are correct?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750965
Inglês
Which instructional focus should teachers adopt to develop students’ macro-level reading comprehension skills?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750964
Inglês
Given that reading strategies should be selected in accordance with both the students’ proficiency levels and the genre of the text, align each text genre with the corresponding level of students’ proficiency.
I. Shopping lists, dialogues, postcards
II. Editorials, research summaries, literary texts
III. Newspapers, magazines, short stories
( ) Beginners
( ) Intermediate students
( ) Advanced students
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750961
Inglês
Brown and Abeywickrama (2019) provide a detailed explanation of the five most common types of tests, namely achievement tests, diagnostic tests, placement tests, proficiency tests, and aptitude tests. Read each definition below carefully and select the one that best defines proficiency tests.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
EDUCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB
Prova:
EDUCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB - Técnico de Tecnologia da Informação |
Q3749890
Inglês
Leia atentamente o trecho do manual de manutenção
de um switch de rede (em inglês) e responda à questão
a seguir:
Chapter 3: Troubleshooting Guide
“If the STATUS LED is red, a system error has occurred. First, check all power connections and ensure the power cord is securely seated in the inlet and the wall outlet. If the issue persists, power cycle the device. CAUTION: Before proceeding, back up all configuration data. If the error remains, contact technical support and provide the serial number of the unit.”
De acordo com o manual técnico, assinale a primeira ação que o técnico deve tomar se o LED de STATUS estiver vermelho:
Chapter 3: Troubleshooting Guide
“If the STATUS LED is red, a system error has occurred. First, check all power connections and ensure the power cord is securely seated in the inlet and the wall outlet. If the issue persists, power cycle the device. CAUTION: Before proceeding, back up all configuration data. If the error remains, contact technical support and provide the serial number of the unit.”
De acordo com o manual técnico, assinale a primeira ação que o técnico deve tomar se o LED de STATUS estiver vermelho:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CORE-SP
Provas:
Quadrix - 2025 - CORE-SP - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação
|
Quadrix - 2025 - CORE-SP - Assistente Jurídico |
Quadrix - 2025 - CORE-SP - Contador |
Q3748900
Inglês
Texto associado
Since the 1950s, researchers, inventors and
entrepreneurs have been fascinated by the idea of
Artificial Intelligence (AI) to replicate human behaviour
and thinking into technology. Over time AI has evolved to
mimic human behaviour in information technology (IT)
with key milestones like machine learning, natural
language processing and understanding, generative AI
and orchestrating decision making and now the latest
advancement: agentic AI.
Today, AI is not just a technology but a critical
part of modern IT strategies. AI in the IT industry has been
a transformative force, automating tasks, analysing vast
amounts of data and improving operational processes. By
using AI for ITSM, organisations can adapt to a changing
technology landscape and complex digital environments
and keep their IT infrastructure future proof.
AI has come a long way from theory to software
to recent innovations like machine learning (ML). ML is
about developing AI algorithms and models that help
systems learn and make decisions based on patterns and
relationships in data. Instead of programming each decision
manually, systems can make decisions on their own based
on large amounts of data. Continuous learning on data
allows systems to get better over time. At the next level
is natural language processing (NLP), a branch of machine
learning that’s about interpreting human language and
generating intelligent and contextual responses. By using
ML algorithms on language, machines can do things
like response generation, speech recognition, language
translation and more. NLP is the foundation for modern
day chatbots that can understand user intent and generate
responses to user requests.
AI is revolutionizing ITSM by introducing innovative
solutions such as an AI service desk that enhances IT
operations. With automated ticket triaging, routing,
deflection, and process automation, organizations can
streamline tasks that IT agents encounter daily.
By providing agents with agent assist capabilities
and an AI Copilot, organizations can reduce redundant
and repetitive service tasks and improve productivity,
thereby minimizing the need for human intervention
in these repetitive tasks. With AIOps, organizations can
also stay ahead of potential incidents and outages with
proactive detection and remediation, as well as automated
incident management.
AI also plays a big role in software development
and testing. It helps quality assurance teams by generating
test cases and predicting defects. This means they can catch
and fix bugs much earlier which prevents bigger issues
down the line. When it comes to data center security,
computer vision is a powerful tool. It allows systems to
analyze images and videos to monitor infrastructure and
spot anything unusual. Additionally, machine learning
models can analyze network traffic in real time to detect
cyber threats and fraud and allow teams to respond quickly
and protect their systems.
Internet:<aisera.com> (adapted).
In the text, Natural Language Processing is a branch of
Machine Learning that can be summarized as
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CORE-SP
Provas:
Quadrix - 2025 - CORE-SP - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação
|
Quadrix - 2025 - CORE-SP - Assistente Jurídico |
Quadrix - 2025 - CORE-SP - Contador |
Q3748899
Inglês
Texto associado
Since the 1950s, researchers, inventors and
entrepreneurs have been fascinated by the idea of
Artificial Intelligence (AI) to replicate human behaviour
and thinking into technology. Over time AI has evolved to
mimic human behaviour in information technology (IT)
with key milestones like machine learning, natural
language processing and understanding, generative AI
and orchestrating decision making and now the latest
advancement: agentic AI.
Today, AI is not just a technology but a critical
part of modern IT strategies. AI in the IT industry has been
a transformative force, automating tasks, analysing vast
amounts of data and improving operational processes. By
using AI for ITSM, organisations can adapt to a changing
technology landscape and complex digital environments
and keep their IT infrastructure future proof.
AI has come a long way from theory to software
to recent innovations like machine learning (ML). ML is
about developing AI algorithms and models that help
systems learn and make decisions based on patterns and
relationships in data. Instead of programming each decision
manually, systems can make decisions on their own based
on large amounts of data. Continuous learning on data
allows systems to get better over time. At the next level
is natural language processing (NLP), a branch of machine
learning that’s about interpreting human language and
generating intelligent and contextual responses. By using
ML algorithms on language, machines can do things
like response generation, speech recognition, language
translation and more. NLP is the foundation for modern
day chatbots that can understand user intent and generate
responses to user requests.
AI is revolutionizing ITSM by introducing innovative
solutions such as an AI service desk that enhances IT
operations. With automated ticket triaging, routing,
deflection, and process automation, organizations can
streamline tasks that IT agents encounter daily.
By providing agents with agent assist capabilities
and an AI Copilot, organizations can reduce redundant
and repetitive service tasks and improve productivity,
thereby minimizing the need for human intervention
in these repetitive tasks. With AIOps, organizations can
also stay ahead of potential incidents and outages with
proactive detection and remediation, as well as automated
incident management.
AI also plays a big role in software development
and testing. It helps quality assurance teams by generating
test cases and predicting defects. This means they can catch
and fix bugs much earlier which prevents bigger issues
down the line. When it comes to data center security,
computer vision is a powerful tool. It allows systems to
analyze images and videos to monitor infrastructure and
spot anything unusual. Additionally, machine learning
models can analyze network traffic in real time to detect
cyber threats and fraud and allow teams to respond quickly
and protect their systems.
Internet:<aisera.com> (adapted).
According to the text, Artificial Intelligence in IT is helping
multiple organizations due to its
Ano: 2025
Banca:
OBJETIVA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José do Ouro - RS
Prova:
OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de São José do Ouro - RS - Professor – Português-Habilitação Língua Inglesa |
Q3747834
Inglês
Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice” is a classic novel that
explores themes of:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
OBJETIVA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de São José do Ouro - RS
Prova:
OBJETIVA - 2025 - Prefeitura de São José do Ouro - RS - Professor – Português-Habilitação Língua Inglesa |
Q3747830
Inglês
Texto associado
We might be confronted on a weekly basis by a
different trend or TikTok 'aesthetic' to try, but all the bestdressed people in the world stick to what they know works
best. Having distinctive personal style is all about defining
what suits you and never venturing too far from it. Of
course, this makes getting dressed every morning easier and
leads to a lot less stress when shopping – but embracing
your own uniqueness in fashion can have a positive impact
on your mental health more generally.
According to the fashion psychologist Shakaila
Forbes-Bell, standing out via your clothing is all about
gaining validation, and this can boost your confidence and
change the way that others interact with you.
“As humans, our desire to stand out is ingrained
because achieving special recognition and validation boosts
our self-image and increases our likelihood of being
rewarded,” she explains.
Source: Harper’s Bazaar. Adaptation.
According to the text, clothing has a positive impact on
our mental health because:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
EDUCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB
Prova:
EDUCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB - Professor Classe B – Inglês |
Q3747552
Inglês
Texto associado
TEXT 2
English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics:
Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners
Introduction
When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of
the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like
a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the
quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused
educational systems, English is often taught as though it
were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language,
however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions.
Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to
it.
The problem with the “Physics” Approach
Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down.
Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and
vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at
you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s
how many beginner-level English learners feel. This
method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists,
and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners
may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but
they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language
like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.
What language really is
Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language
by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction,
repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with
textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and
gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes.
This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners,
especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process
as much as possible. The focus should shift from
knowledge about the language to using the language. There
should also be some emphasis on making sure the process
is enjoyable.
Rethinking success
We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner
English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about
confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple
conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand
what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I
remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing
words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”),
and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t
you?!”
It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they
can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed,
they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs
memorized but can’t use them.
Conclusion
English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on
paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood,
building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as
well as keep being interested in improving and using
English long after moving on from our lessons together, we
need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific
formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human
skill.
Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and
communication, not calculation.
Content extracted and adapted from:
https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
The expression “zero fear of making mistakes”,
extracted from Text 2, emphasizes the importance of:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
EDUCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB
Prova:
EDUCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB - Professor Classe B – Inglês |
Q3747550
Inglês
Texto associado
TEXT 2
English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics:
Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners
Introduction
When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of
the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like
a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the
quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused
educational systems, English is often taught as though it
were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language,
however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions.
Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to
it.
The problem with the “Physics” Approach
Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down.
Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and
vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at
you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s
how many beginner-level English learners feel. This
method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists,
and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners
may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but
they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language
like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.
What language really is
Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language
by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction,
repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with
textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and
gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes.
This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners,
especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process
as much as possible. The focus should shift from
knowledge about the language to using the language. There
should also be some emphasis on making sure the process
is enjoyable.
Rethinking success
We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner
English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about
confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple
conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand
what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I
remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing
words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”),
and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t
you?!”
It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they
can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed,
they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs
memorized but can’t use them.
Conclusion
English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on
paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood,
building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as
well as keep being interested in improving and using
English long after moving on from our lessons together, we
need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific
formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human
skill.
Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and
communication, not calculation.
Content extracted and adapted from:
https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
Consider the following excerpt extracted from Text 2:
“This is how language sticks”. Now, choose the
alternative that correctly corresponds to the topic(s) in
which it is associated in its original context:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
EDUCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB
Prova:
EDUCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB - Professor Classe B – Inglês |
Q3747549
Inglês
Texto associado
TEXT 2
English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics:
Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners
Introduction
When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of
the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like
a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the
quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused
educational systems, English is often taught as though it
were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language,
however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions.
Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to
it.
The problem with the “Physics” Approach
Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down.
Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and
vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at
you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s
how many beginner-level English learners feel. This
method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists,
and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners
may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but
they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language
like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.
What language really is
Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language
by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction,
repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with
textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and
gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes.
This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners,
especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process
as much as possible. The focus should shift from
knowledge about the language to using the language. There
should also be some emphasis on making sure the process
is enjoyable.
Rethinking success
We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner
English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about
confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple
conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand
what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I
remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing
words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”),
and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t
you?!”
It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they
can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed,
they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs
memorized but can’t use them.
Conclusion
English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on
paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood,
building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as
well as keep being interested in improving and using
English long after moving on from our lessons together, we
need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific
formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human
skill.
Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and
communication, not calculation.
Content extracted and adapted from:
https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
Supported by Text 2, choose the alternative that
correctly reflects characteristic(s) of the teaching
approach criticized by the author:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
EDUCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB
Prova:
EDUCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB - Professor Classe B – Inglês |
Q3747548
Inglês
Texto associado
TEXT 2
English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics:
Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners
Introduction
When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of
the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like
a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the
quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused
educational systems, English is often taught as though it
were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language,
however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions.
Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to
it.
The problem with the “Physics” Approach
Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down.
Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and
vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at
you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s
how many beginner-level English learners feel. This
method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists,
and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners
may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but
they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language
like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.
What language really is
Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language
by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction,
repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with
textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and
gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes.
This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners,
especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process
as much as possible. The focus should shift from
knowledge about the language to using the language. There
should also be some emphasis on making sure the process
is enjoyable.
Rethinking success
We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner
English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about
confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple
conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand
what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I
remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing
words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”),
and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t
you?!”
It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they
can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed,
they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs
memorized but can’t use them.
Conclusion
English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on
paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood,
building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as
well as keep being interested in improving and using
English long after moving on from our lessons together, we
need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific
formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human
skill.
Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and
communication, not calculation.
Content extracted and adapted from:
https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
According to Text 2, the author believes that success,
for beginner learners of English language, should be
measured by:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
EDUCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB
Prova:
EDUCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Brejo do Cruz - PB - Professor Classe B – Inglês |
Q3747544
Inglês
Texto associado
The Design Thinking Classroom: Using Design
Thinking to Reimagine the Role and Practice of
Educators (English Edition)
By David Jakes (Author) | ☆☆☆☆☆
A Design-Oriented Approach That Can Best Serve
Today's Students and Educators Alike
How can we make schools more relevant, engaging, and
capable of supporting the development of skills and
dispositions that will help students themselves design a life
worth living?
Drawing from his ample experience in the classroom, as a
school administrator, and as a designer, author David Jakes
makes the case that design thinking offers an approach to
education that is responsive, collaborative, and well-suited
to the opportunities of the twenty-first century. Full of
exercises and suggestions for how design thinking can
change educators’ approach to classroom layout, virtual
learning, assessment, and more, this book shows how we
can make today's classrooms better places to teach and
learn.
The Design Thinking Classroom helps create the
conditions for K–12 teachers and school leaders to innovate
and improve a new kind of educational experience. It’s a
book for readers who are invested in rising to the challenges
faced by modern institutions and a powerful argument for
the ways design thinking can transform education.
Excerpt extracted and adapted from:
https://www.amazon.com.br/Design-Thinking-Classroom-ReimagineEducators-ebook/dp/B0BR8MPY76?ref_=ast_author_mpb
The expression “a life worth living” (extracted from
Text 1) suggests:
Conheça nossos planos