According to the text, medical students, in the past,

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Q3508161 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão.

We often hear older generations talk about how much more difficult they had it when they were young—and doctors are no exception. It’s not uncommon to hear older physicians and younger physicians argue about whose training was more difficult. But how does medical school today actually compare to medical school in the past? Let’s explore both sides of the argument to determine who had it tougher.

Medical students today have much more information to learn compared to previous years. According to a 2011 article, the doubling time of medical knowledge in 1950 was approximately 50 years. In 1980, it was 7 years. In 2010, it was 3.5 years.

And today, medical knowledge is believed to double every 2-3 months.

Although there is a lag between the primary literature and the information that is added to medical school curricula, students are still learning much more information today than in previous years. Despite these vast increases in knowledge, medical school is still the same duration that it has been for decades. Students complete 2 years of preclinical coursework followed by 2 years of clinicals. This means that students have to cram much more learning into those 4 short years.

That being said, the way that today’s medical students learn is very different than what it was for students in the past. We have a much better understanding of how to optimize learning today. People have developed countless methods to be more efficient with studying. From the Pomodoro method to the Feynman technique and spaced repetition, we have hacked our study strategies so that we can learn more in less time.

In the past, medical students had to flip through their textbooks or notes to find the information they needed. Nowadays, you can take out your phone, put your question into Google, and have more information than you could want on whatever topic you’re trying to learn.

Beyond the amount of information and resources, however, there is also the fact that many schools nowadays are transitioning to pass-fail curriculums. In fact, within the last year, USMLE Step 1, which has long been the most important test in determining your competitiveness for residency, has also become pass-fail.

The goal of these changes has been to decrease stress and burnout among students as research has shown that student wellbeing is enhanced and academic performance is not negatively affected by pass-fail curriculums. That being said, due to the nature of these curricula, students may need to spend more time on extracurricular activities such as research and leadership to stand out for residency applications.

In addition, just because medical school curriculums and Step 1 are pass-fail doesn’t make them easy. Students must still put in significant time and effort to pass while managing their other activities. As such it can be difficult to gauge how much time to put into medical school classes vs studying for boards vs extracurricular activities. Achieving the perfect balance between all of these responsibilities can often feel near impossible.

Disponível em: https://medschoolinsiders.com/pre-med/medical-school-today-vs-in-the-past/. Acesso em: 7 maio 2025. (Adaptado).
According to the text, medical students, in the past,
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Tema central da questão:
Esta questão aborda interpretação de texto em inglês, exigindo que o candidato identifique uma informação específica sobre os métodos de estudo utilizados por estudantes de medicina no passado. O tema central é comparar práticas passadas e atuais no acesso ao conhecimento médico.

Alternativa correta: B) had books and notes as main source of information.

Justificativa:
Utilizando a estratégia de scanning para localizar informações pontuais, encontramos no texto: "In the past, medical students had to flip through their textbooks or notes to find the information they needed." Ou seja, os estudantes do passado dependiam fortemente de livros e anotações como principais fontes de informação, já que recursos digitais não estavam disponíveis.

Por que as demais alternativas estão incorretas?

A) "used to take fifty years to become good doctors."
O texto indica que o conhecimento médico dobrava a cada 50 anos em 1950, mas nunca afirma que levaria 50 anos para um estudante se tornar um bom médico.

C) "had to have pass-fail in their med school curriculums."
Na verdade, o sistema pass-fail (aprovado-reprovado) é apresentado como mudança recente. O texto diz claramente que este formato NÃO era usado no passado.

D) "normally had more difficult training at med schools."
O texto apenas debate se a formação era mais difícil, mas não afirma que antigamente era sempre mais rigorosa. Fique atento a generalizações não sustentadas.

E) "spent longer time to graduate from med schools."
Segundo o texto, a duração do curso médico (4 anos) permanece igual há décadas. Logo, esta opção está incorreta.

Estratégias de Leitura & Dicas de Prova:
Ao fazer interpretação de texto, busque palavras-chave (ex: "in the past", "textbooks", "notes") que direcionem para a informação exigida. Desconfie de alternativas com dados não explícitos ou que exagerem informações do texto. O skimming para captar o contexto geral e o scanning para buscar detalhes são essenciais – especialmente em questões com múltiplas alternativas que testam detalhes específicos.

Resumo: Para vencer questões desse tipo, pratique localizar informações e identificar especificidades no texto. Cuidado com pegadinhas, como generalizações ou uso de palavras como "always", "normally", "had to".

Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo

Comentários

Veja os comentários dos nossos alunos

Letra B

Clique para visualizar este comentário

Visualize os comentários desta questão clicando no botão abaixo