According to the text, medical students, nowadays, 

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Q3508160 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão.

We often hear older generations talk about how much more difficult they had it when they were young—and doctors are no exception. It’s not uncommon to hear older physicians and younger physicians argue about whose training was more difficult. But how does medical school today actually compare to medical school in the past? Let’s explore both sides of the argument to determine who had it tougher.

Medical students today have much more information to learn compared to previous years. According to a 2011 article, the doubling time of medical knowledge in 1950 was approximately 50 years. In 1980, it was 7 years. In 2010, it was 3.5 years.

And today, medical knowledge is believed to double every 2-3 months.

Although there is a lag between the primary literature and the information that is added to medical school curricula, students are still learning much more information today than in previous years. Despite these vast increases in knowledge, medical school is still the same duration that it has been for decades. Students complete 2 years of preclinical coursework followed by 2 years of clinicals. This means that students have to cram much more learning into those 4 short years.

That being said, the way that today’s medical students learn is very different than what it was for students in the past. We have a much better understanding of how to optimize learning today. People have developed countless methods to be more efficient with studying. From the Pomodoro method to the Feynman technique and spaced repetition, we have hacked our study strategies so that we can learn more in less time.

In the past, medical students had to flip through their textbooks or notes to find the information they needed. Nowadays, you can take out your phone, put your question into Google, and have more information than you could want on whatever topic you’re trying to learn.

Beyond the amount of information and resources, however, there is also the fact that many schools nowadays are transitioning to pass-fail curriculums. In fact, within the last year, USMLE Step 1, which has long been the most important test in determining your competitiveness for residency, has also become pass-fail.

The goal of these changes has been to decrease stress and burnout among students as research has shown that student wellbeing is enhanced and academic performance is not negatively affected by pass-fail curriculums. That being said, due to the nature of these curricula, students may need to spend more time on extracurricular activities such as research and leadership to stand out for residency applications.

In addition, just because medical school curriculums and Step 1 are pass-fail doesn’t make them easy. Students must still put in significant time and effort to pass while managing their other activities. As such it can be difficult to gauge how much time to put into medical school classes vs studying for boards vs extracurricular activities. Achieving the perfect balance between all of these responsibilities can often feel near impossible.

Disponível em: https://medschoolinsiders.com/pre-med/medical-school-today-vs-in-the-past/. Acesso em: 7 maio 2025. (Adaptado).
According to the text, medical students, nowadays, 
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Tema central: Interpretação de Texto – Leitura e identificação de informações explícitas

Esta questão exige que o candidato identifique informações diretamente afirmadas no texto original, habilidade fundamental nas provas de Reading Comprehension. É indispensável buscar evidências literais sobre a experiência dos estudantes de medicina atualmente.

Análise da alternativa correta (E):

E) have more sources to research for knowledge.

O texto explicita: “Nowadays, you can take out your phone, put your question into Google, and have more information than you could want on whatever topic you’re trying to learn.” Ou seja, os estudantes de hoje têm acesso facilitado a diversas fontes de pesquisa via tecnologia e internet, aspecto que diferencia claramente o tempo atual do passado. Logo, a alternativa E está correta por ser a única que corresponde literalmente ao conteúdo textual.

Análise das alternativas incorretas:

A) Fala em término do curso em 7 anos desde os anos 80. O texto, no entanto, informa (“medical school is still the same duration that it has been for decades”) que a duração não mudou.

B) Afirma que os alunos passam menos anos na faculdade, mas o texto deixa claro que o curso continua com a mesma duração de décadas anteriores.

C) Sugere ausência de auxílio contra estresse como antigamente, mas o texto ressalta mudanças (pass-fail curriculums) justamente para diminuir o estresse dos estudantes.

D) Diz que o currículo é igual ao passado. Porém, o texto evidencia que o volume de conhecimento exigido aumentou exponencialmente, além das novas técnicas e recursos de estudo.

Estratégia aplicada: O ponto-chave foi localizar frases que comprovassem cada afirmativa. Alternativas que generalizam ou alteram fatos textuais (como duração do curso ou ausência de recursos atuais) devem ser eliminadas.

Dica: Ao interpretar questões, fique atento(a) a termos absolutos, mudanças temporais e recursos surgidos com a tecnologia, comum em comparações entre passado e presente.

Resumo final: A alternativa E é a correta, pois traduz literalmente uma informação relevante apresentada no texto, facilitando a decisão do aluno que utiliza evidência textual como base para resposta.

Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo