Selecionar segmento
Estude com questões de diferentes segmentos
Atenção: Isso limpará todos os campos já preenchidos no filtro!
Foram encontradas 1.017 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Biologia - 2ª Fase - 1º Dia (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3812978
Biologia
Em ervilhas, duas características são determinadas por genes independentes com dominância completa:
• o gene A controla a cor da semente: A (amarela, dominante) e a (verde, recessivo).
• o gene R controla a textura da semente: R (lisa, dominante)e r (rugosa, recessivo).
Um cruzamento é feito entre uma planta heterozigota para ambas as características e uma planta que é verde e lisa homozigota. Assim, é correto afirmar que as proporções fenotípicas esperadas na descendência são as seguintes:
• o gene A controla a cor da semente: A (amarela, dominante) e a (verde, recessivo).
• o gene R controla a textura da semente: R (lisa, dominante)e r (rugosa, recessivo).
Um cruzamento é feito entre uma planta heterozigota para ambas as características e uma planta que é verde e lisa homozigota. Assim, é correto afirmar que as proporções fenotípicas esperadas na descendência são as seguintes:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Biologia - 2ª Fase - 1º Dia (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3812977
Biologia
Considere que uma população de insetos fitófagos que vive
na Caatinga apresenta variação na coloração corporal, indo do
verde-claro ao marrom-escuro. Durante longos períodos de seca,
a vegetação perde folhas e a coloração do ambiente torna-se
mais parda. Ao longo de várias gerações, os insetos fitófagos de
coloração mais escura se tornaram mais frequentes.
Paralelamente, ocorreu redução da variabilidade em alguns loci,
especialmente em populações pequenas e isoladas desses
insetos. Em outro conjunto de populações dos insetos fitófagos,
verificou-se a entrada de novos alelos associados à coloração
intermediária, trazidos por indivíduos provenientes de áreas
vizinhas.
Com base nos mecanismos evolutivos, é correto afirmar que a
Com base nos mecanismos evolutivos, é correto afirmar que a
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Biologia - 2ª Fase - 1º Dia (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3812976
Biologia
As plantas, por serem organismos fotossintetizantes, são
essenciais para o funcionamento dos ecossistemas, atuando
como produtoras nas cadeias e teias alimentares. Considerando esse contexto e os processos envolvidos na fisiologia vegetal,
assinale a afirmação verdadeira.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Biologia - 2ª Fase - 1º Dia (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3812975
Biologia
Em uma pesquisa sobre os helmintos parasitas do lagarto
Colobosauroides cearensis, realizada em área de Caatinga, foi
identificado que lagartos de maior tamanho corporal
apresentaram maior riqueza e abundância parasitária, enquanto
não houve diferença significativa entre os sexos.
Fonte: https://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-21100
Considerando os dados apresentados e os aspectos biológicos relacionados, assinale as seguintes afirmações com V ou F conforme sejam verdadeiras ou falsas.
( ) As diferenças sexuais afetam a infecção parasitária, pois machos e fêmeas possuem características hormonais, fisiológicas e comportamentais distintas, resultando em variações na quantidade de helmintos.
( ) O aumento no tamanho corporal dos lagartos favorece o estabelecimento e a manutenção dos helmintos, porque proporciona maior espaço para colonização e mais recursos para desenvolvimento dos parasitas.
( ) A variação na resistência imunológica entre lagartos pode influenciar a riqueza e a abundância de helmintos, que também sofrem variação com o tamanho corporal do lagarto.
( ) A competição interespecífica entre lagartos adultos e jovens de Colobosauroides cearensis, explica a maior infestação dos adultos, pois indivíduos maiores são mais eficientes na exploração de recursos.
Está correta, de cima para baixo, a seguinte sequência:
Fonte: https://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-21100
Considerando os dados apresentados e os aspectos biológicos relacionados, assinale as seguintes afirmações com V ou F conforme sejam verdadeiras ou falsas.
( ) As diferenças sexuais afetam a infecção parasitária, pois machos e fêmeas possuem características hormonais, fisiológicas e comportamentais distintas, resultando em variações na quantidade de helmintos.
( ) O aumento no tamanho corporal dos lagartos favorece o estabelecimento e a manutenção dos helmintos, porque proporciona maior espaço para colonização e mais recursos para desenvolvimento dos parasitas.
( ) A variação na resistência imunológica entre lagartos pode influenciar a riqueza e a abundância de helmintos, que também sofrem variação com o tamanho corporal do lagarto.
( ) A competição interespecífica entre lagartos adultos e jovens de Colobosauroides cearensis, explica a maior infestação dos adultos, pois indivíduos maiores são mais eficientes na exploração de recursos.
Está correta, de cima para baixo, a seguinte sequência:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Biologia - 2ª Fase - 1º Dia (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3812974
Biologia
“Por que as aves megacoloridas sumiram das cidades?”
Essa foi a pergunta norteadora de uma pesquisa que obteve,
dentre seus resultados, a constatação de que “no ambiente
urbanizado, há filtros que impedem o desenvolvimento e a
adaptação de aves mais coloridas. Isso pode ser determinado
pelas pressões ambientais”. Segundo o biólogo Nascimento, “O
ambiente urbano seleciona espécies onívoras e espécies grandes,
só que as espécies mais coloridas tendem a ser pequenas e com
dieta especialista”.
(https://jornal.usp.br/ciencias/por-que-as-aves-megacoloridas-sumiramdas-cidades/)
Sobre as aves megacoloridas, é correto afirmar que
(https://jornal.usp.br/ciencias/por-que-as-aves-megacoloridas-sumiramdas-cidades/)
Sobre as aves megacoloridas, é correto afirmar que
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811478
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
Because the author is a fan of physical media in the age of
streamings, he admits being considered
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811477
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
The author makes it clear that there was an attempt to elicit
a comment from Amazon, which
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811476
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
The author of the text looked for examples of practices in the
streaming platforms that were similar to what the mentioned
lawsuit labels as ‘deceptive practice’ and
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811475
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
In the circumstance of purchasing a film from a streaming
platform, in case the access to the product is interrupted,
according to the text, the customer is
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811474
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
The text explains what really happens when a person decides
to buy a film from a streaming platform, exemplifying with Amazon
Prime. In such a dealing, the person
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811473
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
According to the author, because of constraints related to
streamings as reported in the text, what seemed to be an
improbable thing is happening now: the revival of physical media.
Mentioned as an example is the opening of
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811472
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
It is mentioned in the text that, in the early days of
streaming, people were assured they would get access to all types
of materials of their choice the moment they wanted. That
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811471
Inglês
Texto associado
Think you actually own all those movies you’ve been buying
digitally? Think again
A possible class-action lawsuit against Amazon Prime, one
of the world’s biggest platforms for streaming film and television,
has raised an odd question: what does it mean to buy something?
The proposed lawsuit, which was filed last week in
federal court and first reported by the Hollywood Reporter, alleges
that Prime’s practice of offering users the chance to “buy” (as
opposed to “rent”) content is inherently deceptive. The suit argues
that buying something implies perpetual possession – but that
Amazon, like many other streaming services, is really just selling its
customers viewing licenses that can be revoked at any time, in
keeping with fine print that most customers do not read or
understand.
Regardless of whether the lawsuit is ultimately
successful, it speaks to a real problem in an age when people
access films, television series, music and video games through
fickle online platforms: impermanence. The advent of streaming
promised a world of digital riches in which we could access libraries
of our favorite content whenever we wanted. It hasn’t exactly
worked out that way.
Many movie fans are already familiar with a certain
scenario. Let’s say that you are seized, this Friday night, by an urge
to rewatch one of your favorite films, Double Indemnity. (You are a
popular and sociable person – charismatic, attractive, with many
friends – but feel under the weather this weekend.) If you are
especially prudent, you own the film on a physical format – such as
a Criterion Collection Blu-ray – but if not, you just type watch
double indemnity 1944 into a search engine and see what comes
up.
Given that beloved older films and television shows are
increasingly difficult to find on streaming platforms, you will be
relieved to see the film listed on any of the services you subscribe
to, such as Netflix, Hulu or HBO Max. When you click on the links,
however, there is a high chance that one of those dreaded landing
pages appears: “REMIND ME WHEN THIS IS AVAILABLE” or “THIS
TITLE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN YOUR COUNTRY.”
There are ways to watch the film that don’t
involve paying, but let’s say that you’re a scrupulously honest
person. Fortunately, Amazon Prime has Double Indemnity available
on demand: you can rent the movie, for 48 hours of playback, for
$3.79 – or “buy” it for $14.99. The second option is more
expensive, but if it is truly one of your favorite movies you may
decide to buy it so you can watch it again whenever you want. And
in just a couple of clicks – faster than Barbara Stanwyck can light a
cigarette in the darkened living room of a California villa – the
Paramount logo is blooming on your television screen. Not bad,
right?
The problem is that you aren’t downloading the movie, to
own and watch forever; you’re just getting access to it on Amazon’s
servers – a right that only lasts as long as Amazon also has access to
the film, which depends on capricious licensing agreements that
vary from title to title. A month or five years from now, that license
may expire – and the movie will disappear from your Amazon
library. Yet the $14.99 you paid does not reappear in your pocket.
If you’re a film buff, like me, you may already have heard
of things like this happening. In 2018, users of iTunes who had
purchased titles for their digital libraries were unhappy to learn that the company had deleted some of them without telling them.
Last year, customers of Funimation, an anime streaming service
that was acquired by another company, discovered that the titles
they had purchased from Funimation would not be ported over to
the new platform. Video game and music fans have reported
similar frustrations.
If online chatter is any indication, a class-action lawsuit
against Prime would have some takers. Reacting to the news of the
suit, someone on Reddit described buying the director’s cut of
Aliens from Prime; after watching it for 10 years, “I went to my
purchased movies in the Amazon app and it is now gone. No
explanation and no recourse.”
“Happened to me,” another person wrote. “Bought the
original Battlestar Galactica series. Now it’s gone.”
(Amazon did not respond to my request for comment at
the time of publication.)
Disappointment with streaming’s limitations are a major
reason that many pop culture fans have, in recent years,
returned to a format long thought dying: physical media. Like vinyl
records, which have had an unexpected renaissance, film discs and
other seemingly old-school technologies have been embraced in
recent years by a small but passionate segment of film and TV
buffs. Earlier this year, the first new physical video store in many
years opened in New York.
In particular, movie fans have rediscovered Blu-rays,
which debuted in 2006 as a higher-definition successor to DVDs, as
well as their new and even higher-definition sibling, the 4K UHD,
which has become the gold-standard for “home cinema” enthusiasts. I’m one of those physical-media fans. I have about 400
movies on disc, mostly Blu-rays, hidden in a cabinet beneath my
TV. In the age of streaming, some of my friends think I’m deranged.
But the films look great, don’t need the internet to watch
and – most importantly – never disappear.
From: https://www.theguardian.com/2025/aug/27/
According to the text, a lawsuit against Amazon Prime has
brought into question the idea of ‘buying’ because the word
implicitly contains the notion of
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811470
Sociologia
A interseccionalidade nos estudos de gênero nas ciências sociais significa que, de forma geral, é preciso considerar fatores como os de raça, de classe social e de idade, por exemplo, na compreensão e explicação das diferenças entre homens, mulheres e pessoas de outras identidades de gênero. Em síntese, a lógica é a de que as mulheres negras e pobres não vivenciam, numa sociedade como a brasileira, as mesmas condicionalidades sociais que mulheres brancas de classe alta, por exemplo, e o mesmo vale para as pessoas LGBTQIAPN+ que se diferenciam umas das outras por variados fatores que se interseccionam.
Partindo desse enunciado, avalie as seguintes afirmações:
I. A perspectiva da interseccionalidade considera que as mulheres podem passar pelas mesmas experiências de violência, independente de classe social.
II. Os estudos de gênero nas ciências sociais demonstram que a interseccionalidade confirma as categorias “mulher” e “homem” como universais.
III. A noção de interseccionalidade aponta que as opressões que mulheres e pessoas trans sofrem se diferenciam por classe, raça e sexualidade.
IV. A análise das diferenças entre homens e mulheres é insuficiente quando não incluir as desigualdades entre brancos e negros e brancas e negras.
É correto o que se afirma em
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811469
Sociologia
O Estado-nação moderno é soberano quando estabelece
normas e condutas para pautar e organizar a vida coletiva de seus
cidadãos em nível interno bem como o seu comportamento
externo com o objetivo de promover o bem-estar destes e protegelos de ameaças internas ou externas. E para garantir a soberania, a
organização nacional do Estado não pode estar submetida aos
interesses particulares de grupos sociais intermediários internos
e/ou externos de vontades estrangeiras de outros Estados ou
entidades.
MODERNA PLUS – Sociologia em Movimento. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Moderna, 2024.
Considerando o exposto, assinale a afirmação verdadeira.
MODERNA PLUS – Sociologia em Movimento. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Moderna, 2024.
Considerando o exposto, assinale a afirmação verdadeira.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811468
Sociologia
A Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Brasileira de 1996
sofreu alterações com a Lei 11.645/2008, que ordenou a
obrigatoriedade do ensino de história e cultura afro-brasileira e
indígena nas redes regulares de educação básica. Essa legislação
determina que o conteúdo programático das escolas deve incluir o
estudo da história da África e dos africanos, a luta dos negros e dos
povos indígenas no Brasil, a cultura negra e indígena brasileira e o
negro e o índio na formação da sociedade nacional. O objetivo é
lançar luz sobre as diversas contribuições dos negros e dos povos
indígenas nas áreas social, econômica e política, pertinentes à
história do Brasil.
Sobre o enunciado acima, assinale a afirmação verdadeira.
Sobre o enunciado acima, assinale a afirmação verdadeira.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811467
Meio Ambiente
Leia o seguinte trecho de uma reportagem:
A cidade de Fortaleza pode ficar 4 °C mais quente e ter 40% mais chuvas extremas até 2100, segundo informa o portal de estudos científicos sobre meteorologia e hidrologia Climate Information. Os moradores de áreas próximas às desembocaduras de rios, com terrenos mais rebaixados e as comunidades mais pobres serão os mais afetados, afirma o professor-pesquisador Paulo Sousa do Instituto de Ciências do Mar da Universidade Federal do Ceará. Nas ruas e becos do Pirambu, um dos bairros mais vulneráveis de Fortaleza, a população já sente as dores das chuvas intensas e da elevação do nível do mar. Algumas comunidades do bairro se formaram em cima das dunas e atualmente muitas casas ainda estão em situação de precariedade. Contudo, existem ações do poder público para a remoção de moradias coladas com a faixa de areia do mar e construção de calçadão vinculado ao projeto Vila do Mar.
FALCONERY, Lucas. 9 bairros de Fortaleza já estão com índices mais altos de riscos para mudanças climáticas. Diário do Nordeste, Fortaleza, 17 de outubro de 2023.
Considerando o trecho acima apresentado, é correto afirmar que
A cidade de Fortaleza pode ficar 4 °C mais quente e ter 40% mais chuvas extremas até 2100, segundo informa o portal de estudos científicos sobre meteorologia e hidrologia Climate Information. Os moradores de áreas próximas às desembocaduras de rios, com terrenos mais rebaixados e as comunidades mais pobres serão os mais afetados, afirma o professor-pesquisador Paulo Sousa do Instituto de Ciências do Mar da Universidade Federal do Ceará. Nas ruas e becos do Pirambu, um dos bairros mais vulneráveis de Fortaleza, a população já sente as dores das chuvas intensas e da elevação do nível do mar. Algumas comunidades do bairro se formaram em cima das dunas e atualmente muitas casas ainda estão em situação de precariedade. Contudo, existem ações do poder público para a remoção de moradias coladas com a faixa de areia do mar e construção de calçadão vinculado ao projeto Vila do Mar.
FALCONERY, Lucas. 9 bairros de Fortaleza já estão com índices mais altos de riscos para mudanças climáticas. Diário do Nordeste, Fortaleza, 17 de outubro de 2023.
Considerando o trecho acima apresentado, é correto afirmar que
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811466
Sociologia
A estrutura das sociedades e o modo como a mudança social
se dá em cada sociedade são temas importantes da sociologia
desde o seu início. A estrutura de uma sociedade é o modo como
diferentes grupos, estratos ou classes sociais estão organizados,
divididos e classificados, em geral, de forma hierárquica ou
piramidal, a partir de critérios econômicos de distinção. A mudança
social para os estudos sociológicos, por sua vez, diz respeito aos
modos de transformação de uma sociedade e, por vezes, isto
significa a modificação da estrutura social e de suas hierarquias e
divisões. Assim, estrutura e mudança sociais são temas sociológicos
intrinsecamente correlatos.
Partindo do exposto, é correto afirmar que
Partindo do exposto, é correto afirmar que
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811465
Filosofia
“As teorias do contrato social consideram o Estado-nação sua
unidade básica. São obrigadas a fazer isso em função de razões
internas à estrutura de suas teorias. Tais teorias não podem
fornecer abordagens adequadas a problemas de justiça global, isto
é, de justiça que lide com desigualdades entre nações ricas e
pobres, e entre seres humanos de qualquer nação. Para solucionar
esses problemas, devemos avaliar a complexa interdependência de
cidadãos de diversas nações, as obrigações morais tanto de
indivíduos quanto de nações com relação a outras nações, e o
papel das entidades transnacionais (corporações, mercados,
organizações não governamentais, acordos internacionais) em
assegurar às pessoas as oportunidades mais básicas para uma vida
humana completa.”
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Fronteiras da justiça: deficiência, nacionalidade, pertencimento à espécie. Trad. Susana de Castro. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2013, p.112.
Na sua crítica ao modelo contratualista de tratar a relação das nações, Martha Nussbaum propõe uma teoria capaz de
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Fronteiras da justiça: deficiência, nacionalidade, pertencimento à espécie. Trad. Susana de Castro. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2013, p.112.
Na sua crítica ao modelo contratualista de tratar a relação das nações, Martha Nussbaum propõe uma teoria capaz de
Ano: 2025
Banca:
UECE-CEV
Órgão:
UECE
Prova:
UECE-CEV - 2025 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais - 1ª Fase (1º Semestre de 2026) |
Q3811464
Raciocínio Lógico
O filósofo inglês George Boole (1815 – 1864) propôs, em
1847, que “toda proposição lógica, categórica ou hipotética,
deveria poder ser formulada por meio de uma expressão exata e
rigorosa. Por isso pretendo estabelecer o cálculo da lógica e
reivindico para ele um lugar entre as formas conhecidas de análise
matemática”.
BOOLE, George. The mathematical analysis of logic: being an essay towards a calculus of deductive reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 4ss. (Adaptado).
Atente para a seguinte sintaxe lógica:
Se aceitarmos a sintaxe proposta acima, sabendo que as proposições têm um valor de verdade binário – verdadeiro (1) ou falso (0) –, a conclusão e a demonstração do silogismo acima é
BOOLE, George. The mathematical analysis of logic: being an essay towards a calculus of deductive reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 4ss. (Adaptado).
Atente para a seguinte sintaxe lógica:
Se aceitarmos a sintaxe proposta acima, sabendo que as proposições têm um valor de verdade binário – verdadeiro (1) ou falso (0) –, a conclusão e a demonstração do silogismo acima é
Conheça nossos planos