Foram encontradas 10.019 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

www.qconcursos.com
Q3916822
Administração Pública Gestão de Politicas Públicas ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916822 Administração Pública
A Teoria da Mudança (Theory of Change) é amplamente utilizada no planejamento e na avaliação de políticas públicas e programas sociais. Um de seus elementos distintivos em relação a outros instrumentos de planejamento consiste na
Alternativas
Q3916821
Direito Administrativo Contratos Administrativos - Lei nº 8.666 de 1993 [Revogada] ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916821 Direito Administrativo
Considere que a Administração pretenda celebrar instrumento de parceria com o terceiro setor para realização de atividades culturais no centro de São Paulo. De acordo com a legislação de regência, poderá firmar
Alternativas
Q3916820
Administração Pública Modelos teóricos de Administração Pública ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916820 Administração Pública
A evolução da Administração Pública no Brasil perpassa a adoção de diferentes modelos, de acordo com a moldura política, social e econômica vigente, sendo que o modelo
Alternativas
Q3916819
Administração Pública Histórico, Reformas e Evolução da Administração Pública no Brasil ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916819 Administração Pública
O Plano Diretor da Reforma do Aparelho do Estado (PDRAE), lançado em 1995, durante o governo Fernando Henrique Cardoso, sob a coordenação do então Ministério da Administração e Reforma do Estado (MARE), liderado por Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira, introduziu o conceito de publicização, segundo o qual
Alternativas
Q3916818
Legislação Federal Lei nº 12.527 de 2011 - Lei de Acesso à Informação e Decreto nº 7.724 de 2012 ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916818 Legislação Federal
Suponha que determinado cidadão tenha solicitado à Secretaria da Fazenda informações relativas a estudos contratados junto a consultoria especializada, relativos a projeto de securitização de royalties de petróleo e gás levado a efeito pela Pasta. A solicitação foi feita com base na Lei de Acesso à Informação (LAI), Lei nº 12.527, de 2011, tendo recebido negativa, sob o fundamento de tratar-se de documento produzido por terceiros e não pela Administração e também por não terem sido apresentadas as justificativas para a solicitação. Vale notar que o interessado manteve-se anônimo, negando-se a revelar sua identidade. Considerando as disposições da LAI, tem-se que 
Alternativas
Q3916817
Análise de Balanços Análise por Índices ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916817 Análise de Balanços
A partir da análise de balanço e demonstrações financeiras de uma empresa, é possível realizar análises a respeito de aspectos econômicos, financeiros e patrimoniais, inclusive com índices e fórmulas comumente utilizados para diferentes finalidades. Nesse contexto, o Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) é utilizado como indicador
Alternativas
Q3916816
Contabilidade de Custos Análise Custo-Volume-Lucro ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916816 Contabilidade de Custos
Determinada empresa que possua grau elevado de alavancagem financeira e baixo grau de alavancagem operacional apresenta, como regra geral, as seguintes características:

I. a estrutura de capital contém uma parcela significativa de dívida com encargos financeiros fixos, de modo que pequenas variações no resultado operacional produzem grandes variações no lucro líquido e no retorno ao acionista.
II. a estrutura de custos operacionais é predominantemente variável, com baixa participação de custos fixos, de modo que variações na receita provocam variações relativamente pequenas no resultado operacional.
III. o retorno ao acionista tende a ser baixo, pois há uso intensivo de capital próprio (equity) e a relação entre custos e despesas operacionais apresenta tendência negativa e alta volatilidade.
IV. a estrutura de custos é composta quase que exclusivamente por custos fixos, permitindo poucos ganhos marginais, enquanto na estrutura de capital predomina o uso de instrumentos financeiros, como debêntures e derivativos.

Está correto o que se afirma APENAS em
Alternativas
Q3916815
Auditoria Controle Interno ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916815 Auditoria
O COSO (The Commitee of Sponsoring Organizations), criado em 1985, é uma entidade privada sem fins lucrativos e com objetivo de aperfeiçoar a qualidade de relatórios financeiros, em especial quanto à ocorrência de fraudes. Com a obra de 2004 Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework, o COSO realizou um trabalho voltado para o gerenciamento de riscos corporativos e, nesse contexto, a representação gráfica então apresentada consiste
Alternativas
Q3916814
Gerência de Projetos Conceitos básicos no Gerenciamento de Projetos , Áreas de conhecimento ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916814 Gerência de Projetos
No que concerne à gestão de projetos, há, entre outros, dois métodos consagrados que são comumente utilizados pelas organizações: o Método do Caminho Crítico - Critical Path Method (CPM) e o Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), sendo que
Alternativas
Q3916813
Gestão de Pessoas Gestão Participativa e Trabalho em Equipe ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916813 Gestão de Pessoas
Suponha que determinado gestor pretenda avaliar o desempenho de sua equipe utilizando ferramentas e metodologias consagradas de avaliação de desempenho. Nesse contexto, pretende aplicar a Avaliação 360°, também denominada Avaliação Circular, o que significa que
Alternativas
Q3916812
Gestão de Pessoas Desenho de Cargos ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916812 Gestão de Pessoas
As atividades da análise e da descrição de cargos são complementares dentro do escopo mais amplo da gestão de recursos humanos, em especial nas etapas de recrutamento e seleção, sendo que
Alternativas
Q3916811
Gestão de Pessoas Comportamento de Pessoas nas Organizações ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916811 Gestão de Pessoas
De acordo com o Modelo Situacional de liderança, desenvolvido por Paul Hersey e Kenneth Blanchard, a eficácia da liderança depende, principalmente,
Alternativas
Q3916810
Gestão de Pessoas Comportamento de Pessoas nas Organizações ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916810 Gestão de Pessoas
Entre as teorias clássicas que buscam explicar o fenômeno da motivação, aplicadas no âmbito das instituições públicas e privadas, a Teoria X e a Teoria Y, desenvolvidas por McGregor,
Alternativas
Q3916809
Administração Geral Processo Decisório ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916809 Administração Geral
Suponha que, ao realizar o diagnóstico do processo decisório praticado em determinada organização, a consultoria contratada para tal finalidade tenha identificado um número maior de decisões classificadas como não programadas e um menor número de decisões classificadas como programadas. De acordo com os conceitos aplicáveis, a consultoria deverá apontar
Alternativas
Q3916808
Administração Geral Organizações, Sistemas e Métodos ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916808 Administração Geral
Suponha que determinada organização, estruturada de acordo com o modelo divisional, esteja em um processo de reestruturação e cogite adotar o modelo matricial. Considerando as características próprias do referido modelo, a mudança cogitada
Alternativas
Q3916807
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916807 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Why Audits Fail: A Story of Missteps and Lessons Learned


24 January 2025

Let's look at three common reasons why audits fall apart and see what we can learn from them.


1. _[subtítulo]_

Picture an auditor walking into a company with a checklist and a laptop, ready to make sense of the chaos. But instead of finding clarity, they're handed a series of false assumptions. Maybe management paints an overly rosy picture of their processes. Or worse, the evidence provided is incomplete or outright fabricated. Imagine the frustration of trying to solve a puzzle when pieces are deliberately hidden or swapped out.

Sometimes it's not malicious - management might not even realize their statements are misleading. But the result is the same: the auditor can't do theirjob, and critical issues go unnoticed.


2. A Lack of Skilled Resources


Now imagine the audit team itself. Maybe they're new, overwhelmed, or simply don't have the expertise needed to navigate the complexities of this organization. Instead of spotting red flags, they miss them - or worse, don't even know where to look.

Auditing isn't easy. It takes specialized knowledge to dig into systems, spot gaps in controls, and interpret what the data is really saying. Without skilled resources, even the most thorough audit plan can fall apart.


3. No Support from the Organization


Finally, imagine the company itself. The audit team asks for access to critical systems but gets stuck waiting for approval. Employees avoid answering questions because they're either too busy or worried about saying the wrong thing. The systems in place are outdated, making it impossible to track down reliable data. At this point, it's like the auditor is running a race with their shoelaces tied together.

Auditors can't succeed without support. They need access to systems, cooperation from employees, and tools that make their job easier -not harder. When the organization doesn't provide this support, even the most well-intentioned audit is doomed.


How to Avoid a Failed Audit


So, how can we change the ending to this story? It comes down to preparation and collaboration. Here are a few things every organization can do:

- Be Transparent: Don't hide problems. Audits are there to help, not punish.

- Invest in Skills: Train your audit team and give them the tools they need to succeed.

- Foster a Supportive Culture: Make sure employees see audits as opportunities for growth, not something to fear.


(Adapted from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-audits-fail-story-missteps-lessons-learned-morfa-itil-cobit-5-1rghe/)
Segundo o texto,
Alternativas
Q3916806
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916806 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Why Audits Fail: A Story of Missteps and Lessons Learned


24 January 2025

Let's look at three common reasons why audits fall apart and see what we can learn from them.


1. _[subtítulo]_

Picture an auditor walking into a company with a checklist and a laptop, ready to make sense of the chaos. But instead of finding clarity, they're handed a series of false assumptions. Maybe management paints an overly rosy picture of their processes. Or worse, the evidence provided is incomplete or outright fabricated. Imagine the frustration of trying to solve a puzzle when pieces are deliberately hidden or swapped out.

Sometimes it's not malicious - management might not even realize their statements are misleading. But the result is the same: the auditor can't do theirjob, and critical issues go unnoticed.


2. A Lack of Skilled Resources


Now imagine the audit team itself. Maybe they're new, overwhelmed, or simply don't have the expertise needed to navigate the complexities of this organization. Instead of spotting red flags, they miss them - or worse, don't even know where to look.

Auditing isn't easy. It takes specialized knowledge to dig into systems, spot gaps in controls, and interpret what the data is really saying. Without skilled resources, even the most thorough audit plan can fall apart.


3. No Support from the Organization


Finally, imagine the company itself. The audit team asks for access to critical systems but gets stuck waiting for approval. Employees avoid answering questions because they're either too busy or worried about saying the wrong thing. The systems in place are outdated, making it impossible to track down reliable data. At this point, it's like the auditor is running a race with their shoelaces tied together.

Auditors can't succeed without support. They need access to systems, cooperation from employees, and tools that make their job easier -not harder. When the organization doesn't provide this support, even the most well-intentioned audit is doomed.


How to Avoid a Failed Audit


So, how can we change the ending to this story? It comes down to preparation and collaboration. Here are a few things every organization can do:

- Be Transparent: Don't hide problems. Audits are there to help, not punish.

- Invest in Skills: Train your audit team and give them the tools they need to succeed.

- Foster a Supportive Culture: Make sure employees see audits as opportunities for growth, not something to fear.


(Adapted from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-audits-fail-story-missteps-lessons-learned-morfa-itil-cobit-5-1rghe/)
Um subtítulo adequado para a primeira circunstância que pode impedir uma boa auditoria é
Alternativas
Q3916805
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916805 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Big Techs

When tax bills are in the millions or even billions, some individuals will go to any lengths to avoid paying up


RS, HMRC, FTS or CRA: whatever you like to call him, there's no hiding from the taxman. No individual or institution is immune from the annual tax deadline, although many aim to reduce what they pay as much as possible through regulatory loopholes and profit redistribution schemes.

When that tips over into illegal territory, though, it becomes a major problem. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that over $600bn is lost every year due to tax avoidance, with the US, China and Japan named as the greatest culprits.

Multinational technology companies including Google, Apple and Amazon have been slapped with multiple allegations in recent years regarding non-payment of taxes in Europe. In 2016, Apple was ordered to pay $15.4bn in back taxes to Ireland after it was revealed that the company paid just one percent tax on its European profits in 2003, down to 0.005 percent in 2014. That same year Google was accused of using two regulatory loopholes, nicknamed the 'double Irish', allowing it to pay just six percent corporation tax rather than the required 19.3 percent.

The Double Irish arrangement was a base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax avoidance tool used mainly by United States multinationals since the late 1980s to avoid corporate taxation on non-US profits. (The US was one of a small number of countries that did not use a "territorial" tax system, and taxed corporations on all profits, no matter whether the profit was made outside the US or not, in contrast to "territorial" tax systems which tax only profits made within that country.) It was the largest tax avoidance tool in history. By 2010, it was shielding US$100 billion annually in US multinational foreign profits from taxation, and was the main tool by which US multinationals built up untaxed offshore reserves of US$1 trillion from 2004 to 2018.

Despite US knowledge of the Double Irish for a decade, it was the European Commission that in October 2014 forced Ireland to close the scheme, starting in January 2015. However, users of existing schemes, such as Apple, Google, Facebook and Pfizer, were given until January 2020 to close them.

At the announcement of the closure, it was known that multinationals had replacement BEPS tools in Ireland, the Single Malt (2014), and Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) (2009):

-Single malt is almost identical to the Double Irish, and was identified with Microsoft (Linkedln), and Allergan in 2017;

-CAIA can provide up to twice the tax shield of Single Malt, or Double Irish, and was identified with Apple in the 2015 leprechaun economics affair, i.e., a huge statistical distortion in Ireland's GDP caused by Apple's tax restructuring. The company transferred intangible assets to its Irish subsidiary, which artificially inflated the country's GDP by more than 26.3% in a single year (later revised to 24.6%), an absurd leap for a relatively small economy. This growth did not reflect real production, but rather Apple's tax inversion of about US$ 300 billion of its intangible assets (mainly intellectual property) to Ireland.


 (Adapted from https://www.worldfinance.com/wealth-management/top-5-tax-scandals)
De acordo com o texto.
Alternativas
Q3916804
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916804 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Big Techs

When tax bills are in the millions or even billions, some individuals will go to any lengths to avoid paying up


RS, HMRC, FTS or CRA: whatever you like to call him, there's no hiding from the taxman. No individual or institution is immune from the annual tax deadline, although many aim to reduce what they pay as much as possible through regulatory loopholes and profit redistribution schemes.

When that tips over into illegal territory, though, it becomes a major problem. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that over $600bn is lost every year due to tax avoidance, with the US, China and Japan named as the greatest culprits.

Multinational technology companies including Google, Apple and Amazon have been slapped with multiple allegations in recent years regarding non-payment of taxes in Europe. In 2016, Apple was ordered to pay $15.4bn in back taxes to Ireland after it was revealed that the company paid just one percent tax on its European profits in 2003, down to 0.005 percent in 2014. That same year Google was accused of using two regulatory loopholes, nicknamed the 'double Irish', allowing it to pay just six percent corporation tax rather than the required 19.3 percent.

The Double Irish arrangement was a base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax avoidance tool used mainly by United States multinationals since the late 1980s to avoid corporate taxation on non-US profits. (The US was one of a small number of countries that did not use a "territorial" tax system, and taxed corporations on all profits, no matter whether the profit was made outside the US or not, in contrast to "territorial" tax systems which tax only profits made within that country.) It was the largest tax avoidance tool in history. By 2010, it was shielding US$100 billion annually in US multinational foreign profits from taxation, and was the main tool by which US multinationals built up untaxed offshore reserves of US$1 trillion from 2004 to 2018.

Despite US knowledge of the Double Irish for a decade, it was the European Commission that in October 2014 forced Ireland to close the scheme, starting in January 2015. However, users of existing schemes, such as Apple, Google, Facebook and Pfizer, were given until January 2020 to close them.

At the announcement of the closure, it was known that multinationals had replacement BEPS tools in Ireland, the Single Malt (2014), and Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) (2009):

-Single malt is almost identical to the Double Irish, and was identified with Microsoft (Linkedln), and Allergan in 2017;

-CAIA can provide up to twice the tax shield of Single Malt, or Double Irish, and was identified with Apple in the 2015 leprechaun economics affair, i.e., a huge statistical distortion in Ireland's GDP caused by Apple's tax restructuring. The company transferred intangible assets to its Irish subsidiary, which artificially inflated the country's GDP by more than 26.3% in a single year (later revised to 24.6%), an absurd leap for a relatively small economy. This growth did not reflect real production, but rather Apple's tax inversion of about US$ 300 billion of its intangible assets (mainly intellectual property) to Ireland.


 (Adapted from https://www.worldfinance.com/wealth-management/top-5-tax-scandals)
De acordo com o texto,
Alternativas
Q3916803
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2026 Banca: FCC Órgão: SEFAZ-SP Prova: FCC - 2026 - SEFAZ-SP - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - AFRE - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - Conhecimentos Gerais (P1) |
Q3916803 Inglês
Atenção: Considere o texto abaixo para responder à questão.


Big Techs

When tax bills are in the millions or even billions, some individuals will go to any lengths to avoid paying up


RS, HMRC, FTS or CRA: whatever you like to call him, there's no hiding from the taxman. No individual or institution is immune from the annual tax deadline, although many aim to reduce what they pay as much as possible through regulatory loopholes and profit redistribution schemes.

When that tips over into illegal territory, though, it becomes a major problem. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that over $600bn is lost every year due to tax avoidance, with the US, China and Japan named as the greatest culprits.

Multinational technology companies including Google, Apple and Amazon have been slapped with multiple allegations in recent years regarding non-payment of taxes in Europe. In 2016, Apple was ordered to pay $15.4bn in back taxes to Ireland after it was revealed that the company paid just one percent tax on its European profits in 2003, down to 0.005 percent in 2014. That same year Google was accused of using two regulatory loopholes, nicknamed the 'double Irish', allowing it to pay just six percent corporation tax rather than the required 19.3 percent.

The Double Irish arrangement was a base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax avoidance tool used mainly by United States multinationals since the late 1980s to avoid corporate taxation on non-US profits. (The US was one of a small number of countries that did not use a "territorial" tax system, and taxed corporations on all profits, no matter whether the profit was made outside the US or not, in contrast to "territorial" tax systems which tax only profits made within that country.) It was the largest tax avoidance tool in history. By 2010, it was shielding US$100 billion annually in US multinational foreign profits from taxation, and was the main tool by which US multinationals built up untaxed offshore reserves of US$1 trillion from 2004 to 2018.

Despite US knowledge of the Double Irish for a decade, it was the European Commission that in October 2014 forced Ireland to close the scheme, starting in January 2015. However, users of existing schemes, such as Apple, Google, Facebook and Pfizer, were given until January 2020 to close them.

At the announcement of the closure, it was known that multinationals had replacement BEPS tools in Ireland, the Single Malt (2014), and Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) (2009):

-Single malt is almost identical to the Double Irish, and was identified with Microsoft (Linkedln), and Allergan in 2017;

-CAIA can provide up to twice the tax shield of Single Malt, or Double Irish, and was identified with Apple in the 2015 leprechaun economics affair, i.e., a huge statistical distortion in Ireland's GDP caused by Apple's tax restructuring. The company transferred intangible assets to its Irish subsidiary, which artificially inflated the country's GDP by more than 26.3% in a single year (later revised to 24.6%), an absurd leap for a relatively small economy. This growth did not reflect real production, but rather Apple's tax inversion of about US$ 300 billion of its intangible assets (mainly intellectual property) to Ireland.


 (Adapted from https://www.worldfinance.com/wealth-management/top-5-tax-scandals)
Segundo o texto, a principal finalidade do Double Irish era
Alternativas
Respostas
401: B
402: A
403: C
404: E
405: D
406: A
407: B
408: C
409: E
410: A
411: C
412: D
413: E
414: A
415: C
416: B
417: A
418: B
419: A
420: C
www.qconcursos.com