In the final paragraph, the author reinforces the overall a...

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Q3988631 Inglês
     With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom reality. The public, including many students, now has widespread access to GenAI tools and large language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use these tools with schoolwork. School boards have taken different approaches to regulating or integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers, meanwhile, find themselves responding to these paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and wider expectations AI raises.

     There are many questions about the purpose of education, including questions around academic integrity and how education can uphold fairness and equity. Questions include: How can students successfully navigate the use of these tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can schools prepare students for the future as organizations and institutions scramble to determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide students as they grapple with the existential and social implications of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this complex challenge alone — they need support and to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important role.

      There’s a growing international consensus echoed by calls to action that teachers are essential players as learners develop AI literacy. Despite growing resources, the development of AI technology continues to outpace implementation support and essential training for teachers. This widening gap between teacher competencies and the demands of an AI-infused classroom is unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers to guide the next generation in a world transformed by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide students and shape students’ critical and responsible engagement with this technology.

      Teachers cannot do this alone. Successfully integrating AI into education requires a concerted and collaborative effort from all stakeholders within the educational ecosystem. Together, these partners can help establish clear, strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate robust funding for essential tools and comprehensive training and research to foster innovative spaces where educators and researchers can experiment and study practices. Research is needed to assess the broader effects of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across all jurisdictions.

    Implementation should also consider teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities that teachers carry. What can be removed, and what robust supports can be provided so teachers can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to recognize that investing in teachers is one of the most powerful ways we can invest in our students and in a better future for all of us.


Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In the final paragraph, the author reinforces the overall argument by emphasizing that: 
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Gabarito: B

Fundamento decisivo: O comando pede a ideia reforçada no parágrafo final, que conclui com a necessidade de considerar o burnout docente e o bem-estar dos professores ao tratar da integração da IA.

Tema central: apoio aos professores
Análise das alternativas
A
Errada
Incorreta. O parágrafo final manda considerar o burnout docente e as responsabilidades já existentes, mas não diz que a causa principal do burnout seja resistência à inovação digital. A alternativa inventa uma causa específica que o texto não afirma.
B
Certa
A alternativa B está correta porque reproduz a conclusão do último parágrafo: investir nos professores, com atenção ao bem-estar e à capacidade profissional, é apresentado como forma de investir nos estudantes e no futuro.
C
Errada
Incorreta. O texto não propõe adiar a integração da IA. O que ele defende é implementação com suporte robusto, sem comprometer o bem-estar e a efetividade dos professores. A alternativa troca implementação apoiada por postergação.
D
Errada
Incorreta. O texto não sustenta que a mudança tecnológica comprometa inevitavelmente a eficácia docente e o desempenho dos estudantes. Ao contrário, defende integração estratégica, equitativa e responsável, com condições adequadas para que isso funcione.
Pegadinha da questão
A confusão real era ler a cautela com burnout e sobrecarga como se o autor defendesse adiar a IA, ou transformar um argumento político de apoio aos docentes em uma tese fatalista sobre os efeitos da tecnologia.
Dica para questões semelhantes
  • Em perguntas sobre o parágrafo final, identifique o trecho conclusivo e verifique qual alternativa o parafraseia sem acrescentar causa, condição ou consequência não dita.
  • Quando o texto defende suporte para implementar algo, elimine alternativas que trocam suporte por adiamento ou rejeição.
  • Desconfie de alternativas que absolutizam a ideia do texto com termos como 'primarily' ou 'inevitably' quando o original fala em condições, apoio e estratégia.

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo