Considering the theoretical intersections among Critical Literacy, English as a Lingua Franca (ELF), and Additional Language (AL) acquisition, analyze the following propositions. 

I - The concept of ELF problematizes the notion of language “ownership”—historically attributed to the native speaker—and decenters Anglo-American standards. From the perspective of Critical Literacy, this entails the teacher problematizing the very erasure of non-hegemonic varieties. 
II - Understanding English as an AL implies recognizing that the new language integrates into the student’s plurilingual repertoire in an additive, rather than subtractive, manner. However, for Critical Literacy to occur, pedagogical practice must go beyond the affirmation of identity, equipping the student to unveil how mastery of a global language reproduces or challenges geopolitical and class-based asymmetries.
III - Critical pedagogy applied to ELT presupposes the adoption of a “didactics of tolerance,” in which an exclusive focus on mutual intelligibility suspends the need to reflect on local linguistic norms, thereby legitimizing any discursive output based on the argument of cultural hybridization. 
IV - Within the framework of Critical Literacy, pedagogical practice adopting ELF must abandon the teaching of the standard norm or prestige varieties. This is because the focus on social emancipation demands the rejection of any hegemonic linguistic conventions, which are viewed purely as instruments of oppression and linguistic colonization. 
V - The connection between AL and Critical Literacy presupposes that the process of meaning-making in a new language is a space of agency and contestation. Thus, classroom language practices must equip the student to “rewrite” and subvert hegemonic discourses, using English not as a code to be imitated, but as a resource for social performativity and the creation of new meanings.

The correct statements are