Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 25.448 questões
Há, sublinhada nas sentenças a seguir, a mesma forma de superlativo adjetivo apresentada em the biggest, EXCETO na alternativa:
1. “ the first global football championship held in South America”
2. “roads are being built”
3. “people are being employed and trained”
As formas infinitivas dos verbos destacados acima se encontram dispostas, correta e respectivamente, na alternativa:
Assinale a seguir a alternativa que traz, corretamente, essa proibição quanto ao estacionamento, em Inglês:
“The drugs affected by grapefruit juice usually have some difficulty entering the body after they are consumed because an intestinal enzyme partially destroys them as they ______________.”
“When we eat, the food is _________ down into glucose (blood sugar), the body’s main energy source. As blood flows through the pancreas, this organ detects the high levels of glucose and knows to release insulin, a hormone that it produces in order to allow the cells _____________ the body to use the glucose. The cells have insulin receptors that allow glucose to enter. Then the cell either uses the glucose to make energy right away or __________ it as a future energy source.”
“Dealing with Alzheimer’s disease can be extremely difficult, but planning ahead and getting support can lighten the load.”
It is correct to affirm that the underlined expression means that.
“Ongoing studies are looking at whether some things can help prevent or delay the disease.”
“Margarine can fulfill needs that butter can’t.”
“Sales of margarine have plummeted in the last year, according to Kantar, with ‘health’ spreads dropping 7.4% in sales. Flora has been particularly badly hit, losing £24m in sales, partly due to reformulating its recipe.”
I. The possessive pronoun “its” refers to Flora’s new recipe.
II. “Due to” establishes a relation of cause to the situation exposed.
III. “Badly” has the same gramar classification as “wooly”.
The correct assertion(s) is(are)
I. According to Signe Johansen, nowadays, people are more concerned with what they consume, looking for unprocessed food.
II. Although margarine and butter have a difference in taste, margarine still beats butter when it comes to sales.
III. Marguerite Patten doesn’t stand for margarine.
The correct assertion(s) is(are).
“Fast-food chains test their meat five to ten times more often than the USDA for bacteria and would reject meat that the USDA deems safe for consumption.”
( ) The text reflects the obesity issue due to the careless inspection of school food.
( ) Though the U.S. Department of Agriculture presents deficiencies in the overhaul of meat’s quality, it detected ground beef from a plant with a salmonella outbreak and, in time, it precluded the shipping of the product to schools.
( ) The NEA is one of the institutes in charge to supervise the procedures of food maintenance adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Mike Jackson, Steve Crouch and Rob Baxter
Criteria-based assessment is a quantitative assessment of the software in terms of sustainability, maintainability, and usability. This can inform high-level decisions on specific areas for software improvement.
Open Source Initiative
A criteria-based assessment gives a measurement of quality in a number of areas. These areas are derived from ISO/IEC 9126-1 Software engineering − Product quality and include usability, sustainability and maintainability.
The assessment involves checking whether the software, and the project that develops it, conforms to various characteristics or exhibits various qualities that are expected of sustainable software. The more characteristics that are satisfied, the more sustainable the software. Please note that not all qualities have equal weight e.g. having an OSI-approved open source licence is of more importance than avoiding TAB characters in text files.
In performing the evaluation, you may want to consider how different user classes affect the importance of the criteria. For example, for Usability-Understandability, a small set of well-defined, accurate, task-oriented user documentation may be comprehensive for Users but inadequate for Developers. Assessments specific to user classes allow the requirements of these specific user classes to be factored in and so, for example, show that a project rates highly for Users but poorly for Developers, or vice versa.
Scoring can also be affected by the nature of the software itself e.g. for A one could envisage an application that has been well-designed, offers context-sensitive help etc. and consequently is so easy to use that tutorials aren’t needed. Portability can apply to both the software and its development infrastructure e.g. the open source software OGSA-DAI2 can be built, compiled and tested on Unix, Windows or Linux (and so is highly portable for Users and User-Developers). However, its Ruby test framework cannot yet run on Windows, so running integration tests would involve the manual setup of OGSA-DAI servers (so this is far less portable for Developers and, especially, Members).
(Adaptado de: http://africanpot.org/index.php/resource-center/re...)
Mike Jackson, Steve Crouch and Rob Baxter
Criteria-based assessment is a quantitative assessment of the software in terms of sustainability, maintainability, and usability. This can inform high-level decisions on specific areas for software improvement.
Open Source Initiative
A criteria-based assessment gives a measurement of quality in a number of areas. These areas are derived from ISO/IEC 9126-1 Software engineering − Product quality and include usability, sustainability and maintainability.
The assessment involves checking whether the software, and the project that develops it, conforms to various characteristics or exhibits various qualities that are expected of sustainable software. The more characteristics that are satisfied, the more sustainable the software. Please note that not all qualities have equal weight e.g. having an OSI-approved open source licence is of more importance than avoiding TAB characters in text files.
In performing the evaluation, you may want to consider how different user classes affect the importance of the criteria. For example, for Usability-Understandability, a small set of well-defined, accurate, task-oriented user documentation may be comprehensive for Users but inadequate for Developers. Assessments specific to user classes allow the requirements of these specific user classes to be factored in and so, for example, show that a project rates highly for Users but poorly for Developers, or vice versa.
Scoring can also be affected by the nature of the software itself e.g. for A one could envisage an application that has been well-designed, offers context-sensitive help etc. and consequently is so easy to use that tutorials aren’t needed. Portability can apply to both the software and its development infrastructure e.g. the open source software OGSA-DAI2 can be built, compiled and tested on Unix, Windows or Linux (and so is highly portable for Users and User-Developers). However, its Ruby test framework cannot yet run on Windows, so running integration tests would involve the manual setup of OGSA-DAI servers (so this is far less portable for Developers and, especially, Members).
(Adaptado de: http://africanpot.org/index.php/resource-center/re...)
Mike Jackson, Steve Crouch and Rob Baxter
Criteria-based assessment is a quantitative assessment of the software in terms of sustainability, maintainability, and usability. This can inform high-level decisions on specific areas for software improvement.
Open Source Initiative
A criteria-based assessment gives a measurement of quality in a number of areas. These areas are derived from ISO/IEC 9126-1 Software engineering − Product quality and include usability, sustainability and maintainability.
The assessment involves checking whether the software, and the project that develops it, conforms to various characteristics or exhibits various qualities that are expected of sustainable software. The more characteristics that are satisfied, the more sustainable the software. Please note that not all qualities have equal weight e.g. having an OSI-approved open source licence is of more importance than avoiding TAB characters in text files.
In performing the evaluation, you may want to consider how different user classes affect the importance of the criteria. For example, for Usability-Understandability, a small set of well-defined, accurate, task-oriented user documentation may be comprehensive for Users but inadequate for Developers. Assessments specific to user classes allow the requirements of these specific user classes to be factored in and so, for example, show that a project rates highly for Users but poorly for Developers, or vice versa.
Scoring can also be affected by the nature of the software itself e.g. for A one could envisage an application that has been well-designed, offers context-sensitive help etc. and consequently is so easy to use that tutorials aren’t needed. Portability can apply to both the software and its development infrastructure e.g. the open source software OGSA-DAI2 can be built, compiled and tested on Unix, Windows or Linux (and so is highly portable for Users and User-Developers). However, its Ruby test framework cannot yet run on Windows, so running integration tests would involve the manual setup of OGSA-DAI servers (so this is far less portable for Developers and, especially, Members).
(Adaptado de: http://africanpot.org/index.php/resource-center/re...)
