Foram encontradas 74.590 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Específica Biologia - 2ª Fase do Vestibular |
Q1802357 Biologia
Considerando as características das briófitas e pteridófitas, numere os parênteses abaixo de acordo com a seguinte indicação:
1. briófitas; 2. pteridófitas.
( ) Seu tamanho está associado à ausência de vasos para a condução dos nutrientes, os quais são transportados de célula a célula por todo o vegetal. ( ) Samambaias, avencas, xaxins e cavalinhas são alguns dos seus representantes mais conhecidos. ( ) Os musgos e as hepáticas são seus principais representantes. ( ) Foram os primeiros vegetais a apresentar um sistema de vasos para conduzir nutrientes.
A sequência correta, de cima para baixo, é:
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Específica Biologia - 2ª Fase do Vestibular |
Q1802356 Biologia
Assinale a opção que corresponde a doenças humanas classificadas como hereditárias.
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Específica Biologia - 2ª Fase do Vestibular |
Q1802355 Biologia
No que concerne aos reinos dos seres vivos, escreva V ou F conforme seja verdadeiro ou falso o que se afirma nos itens abaixo.
( ) As plantas são eucariontes, multicelulares e quimiossintetizantes, com o corpo organizado em tecidos. ( ) Os protozoários são unicelulares, eucariontes e autótrofos. ( ) O reino dos fungos é formado por seres eucariontes e heterótrofos, existindo representantes unicelulares e multicelulares. ( ) As algas são eucariontes, autótrofas e podem ser uni ou multicelulares, mas não formam tecidos.
Está correta, de cima para baixo, a seguinte sequência:
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Específica Biologia - 2ª Fase do Vestibular |
Q1802354 Biologia
Sobre os anexos embrionários, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Específica Biologia - 2ª Fase do Vestibular |
Q1802353 Biologia
Considerando as características dos sistemas humanos, numere os parênteses abaixo de acordo com a seguinte indicação:
1. esquelético; 2. respiratório; 3. circulatório; 4. nervoso.
( ) Envolvido na proteção dos órgãos internos, nos movimentos e na sustentação do corpo. ( ) Controla as contrações musculares e o funcionamento das vísceras, coordena os movimentos cardiorrespiratórios e a secreção de hormônios pelas glândulas endócrinas. ( ) Captura o oxigênio necessário para as células do corpo e elimina o gás carbônico. ( ) Possibilita recolher e transportar os resíduos do metabolismo e o gás carbônico produzidos pelas células; transportar e distribuir nutrientes, oxigênio, hormônios, etc.
A sequência correta, de cima para baixo, é:
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802352 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

As for the companies which will be part of the LEAF coalition, they must have the commitment to
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802351 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

Still about the countries which will receive financial support from the coalition to reduce emissions and deforestation, the text mentions that they will
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802350 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

Countries that will benefit from the investments of the LEAF coalition, will have to
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802349 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

The text mentions situations in which sometimes companies have tried to fund projects in defense of tropical forests, but were prey to circumstances related to
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802348 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

Statistics related to deforestation in tropical forests show that in 2020 it
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802347 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

According to John Kerry, the LEAF coalition constitutes an essential endeavor towards the
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802346 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

The initiative effort of countries and companies to protect tropical forests is in line with the attempt to
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802345 Inglês

T E X T

Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


    Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


    The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


    Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


    “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

    An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


    The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


    Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


    Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

According to the text, tropical forests are being cut down, among other reasons, for
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802344 Sociologia
Quando da unificação da Itália em 1861, um político de nome Massimo d’Azeglio afirmou: “Fizemos a Itália. Agora é preciso fazer os italianos”. Este curioso fato aponta para questões que parte dos sociólogos e cientistas sociais, de modo geral, estudam e investigam: a formação sociocultural da Nação e do Nacionalismo. Muitas das nações hoje existentes se formaram há mais de duzentos anos, contudo, existem movimentos nacionalistas pelo mundo que ainda lutam por formar novos Estados-Nação independentes como os bascos, na Espanha. No Brasil, nos últimos anos, muitas pessoas reacenderam um sentimento nacionalista motivadas por posicionamentos e desavenças político-ideológicas e proclamam um “orgulho renovado de ser brasileiro”.
Partindo de uma perspectiva sociológica sobre as ideias de nação e/ou nacionalismo na atualidade, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802343 Sociologia
Karl Marx (1818-1883) é para a Sociologia um dos mais importantes teóricos e analistas da história e do funcionamento do modo social de produção capitalista. Independentemente do fato de que Marx tenha vinculado a explicação e compreensão do capitalismo a uma visão do futuro (o porvir de uma “sociedade comunista”) e a uma vontade de ação (a revolução socialista/proletária), é inegável sua importância, ainda atualmente, para o debate sobre as lógicas e as consequências sociais desse sistema socioeconômico.
Na perspectiva teórica de Marx, que define o modo social de produção capitalista, apresentam-se como principais características
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802342 Sociologia
Nas Ciências Sociais e Humanas, de modo geral, durante todo o século XX, as concepções sobre o “masculino” e o “feminino” foram reinterpretadas à luz de perspectivas teóricas que impulsionaram os movimentos feministas e pela diversidade de orientação sexual no mundo. Tais teorias deram outros significados a conceitos como os de “sexo” e “gênero” e criaram novas conceituações como a de “identidade de gênero”. Essas reinterpretações e ressignificações têm revolucionado as sociedades contemporâneas que, cada vez mais, se defrontam com a necessidade democrática de conviver com as diferenças.
Sobre os conceitos de “sexo”, “gênero” e “identidade de gênero” defendidos pelas referidas perspectivas teóricas, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802341 Sociologia
No capitalismo moderno, o conceito de Indústria Cultural procura descrever e explicar a produção em grande escala e seriada de produtos culturais que se transformam em bens simbólicos à venda, a fim de servir ao consumo das massas de trabalhadores para os momentos de lazer. Tais produtos culturais industrializados, que têm sido veiculados pelo cinema, rádio e televisão desde o início do século XX, transformaram a cultura em puro entretenimento das massas podendo, assim, proporcionar visões acríticas sobre o sistema de dominação econômico vigente: o capitalismo.
A corrente de pensamento teórico que desenvolveu esta concepção sobre a Indústria Cultural foi
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802340 Sociologia
A discussão pública sobre “multiculturalismo” e “sociodiversidade”, iniciada nos EUA e Europa, e difundida, em seguida, em outras sociedades democráticas, tem ocorrido desde as últimas décadas do século XX até o momento (2021). Esses dois temas dizem respeito às questões das identidades culturais e das diferenças ou, mais precisamente, ao direito de a pessoa ser diferente em um mundo contemporâneo e global, com grande diversidade e muitos contatos interculturais e socioculturais. Na sociedade brasileira, especificamente, ainda nos dias atuais, debater sobre identidade cultural e diferenças é questionar e combater as razões que levam algumas pessoas, por exemplo, a enxergarem nordestinos como analfabetos e ignorantes; negros como marginais; povos indígenas como indolentes e selvagens; mulheres inferiores a homens e homossexuais como anormais.
Considerando o combate aos preconceitos contra as diferenças e identidades diversas, atente para as seguintes proposições a respeito dos debates sobre esse tema:
I. É importante debater sobre as diferenças, uma vez que é necessário e válido fazer frente a todos os anormais, bárbaros e selvagens para que sejamos iguais. II. Discutir sobre as diversas identidades culturais demonstra que não existem culturas “certas” ou “erradas” ou uma “superior” a outra: elas são apenas diferentes. III. O debate multicultural aponta que precisamos exercer a tolerância a favor do convívio democrático e não julgar diferenças culturais de modo excludente. IV. A discussão sobre a sociodiversidade hoje enfrenta os males do racismo contra pessoas brancas e transforma em anormais as relações heterossexuais.
Está correto o que se afirma somente em
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802339 Filosofia
Atente para o seguinte excerto da teoria do governo, de Aristóteles, que é a base de sua teoria da justiça: “[N]ão são a mesma coisa o governo despótico e o governo político e [...] nem todas as formas de governo são as mesmas, como alguns dizem. Com efeito, uma das formas de governo exerce-se sobre homens naturalmente livres, a outra sobre escravos. O governo de uma casa (oíkos) é uma monarquia, já que um só governa toda a casa, enquanto o governo político é exercido pelos que são livres e iguais”.
Aristóteles. A política (Edição Bilíngue), 1255b. Trad. port. e notas Antonio Carlos Amaral e Carlos de Carvalho Gomes. Lisboa: Vega, 1998 [Adaptado].
Sobre a teoria do governo de Aristóteles, exposta parcialmente acima, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Ano: 2021 Banca: UECE-CEV Órgão: UECE Prova: UECE-CEV - 2021 - UECE - Prova de Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q1802338 Filosofia
Referindo-se a Walter Benjamin, a filósofa Jeanne Marie Gagnebin afirma que “seu primeiro texto traduzido no Brasil foi A Obra de Arte na Era de sua Reprodutibilidade Técnica. O ensaio introduz hipóteses essenciais para uma teoria da arte contemporânea, marcada, segundo Benjamin, pela ‘reprodutibilidade técnica’, central na fotografia e no cinema, que abole progressivamente ‘aura’ de unicidade e de autenticidade da obra de arte”.
Gagnebin, J. M. Walter Benjamin na era da reprodutibilidade técnica. In: Folha de São Paulo, em 07/10/2012. Disponível em: https://m.folha.uol.com.br/ilustrissima/2012/10/1164782wa lter-benjamin-na-era-da-reprodutibilidade-tecnica.shtml.
Sobre o conceito benjaminiano de reprodutibilidade técnica, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Respostas
9481: B
9482: C
9483: D
9484: B
9485: C
9486: B
9487: D
9488: A
9489: C
9490: B
9491: A
9492: D
9493: C
9494: B
9495: A
9496: C
9497: D
9498: B
9499: C
9500: C