According to the text, Primary Health Care (PHC)
Making family medicine a more attractive specialty: strategies to address the shortage of primary care specialists in Brazil
Primary Health Care (PHC) is often the first level of the health system and is responsible for the coordination of medical and interdisciplinary care. As the preferred entry point to the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), PHC is of fundamental importance and is present in all regions of the country. It aims to enable access to health care and ensures the coordination and completeness of care. This structure can treat approximately 80% of the overall need related to diseases presented in the Basic Health Units.
Despite its importance, the valorization of PHC and Family Medicine (FM) as a discipline and a public policy has not been prioritized in most Brazilian educational institutions. According to the study on medical demography carried out by the Regional Medical Council of São Paulo (CREMESP), Brazil had 500,000 physicians in 2020, but with unequal distribution among the nation’s five regions, and a concentration of professionals in the capital cities compared to the countryside.
This issue is faced by many countries. In the United States (US) of 8,116 primary care postgraduate training positions (which includes pediatrics, internal medicine, and family doctors), 42 percent were filled by graduates of U.S. medical schools and the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) projects a shortage of 21,100 to 55,200 primary care physicians (PCP) by 2034. In Europe, where PCP was traditionally respected and recognized, the lack of General Practitioners (GP) is also increasing and is a matter of concern. Workload and a lack of perceived prestige associated with the PCP track can make primary care less attractive. These sorts of misconceptions, along with lower salaries, burnout, and difficult career advancement makes primary care a difficult specialty to attract and retain doctors.
For Feuerwerker, vacancies in Brazilian institutions are the result of several elements: the encouragement of distinctive specialties and institutions, the historical misunderstanding and importance of the practice, and the increased incentive of specialization in medical education. The lack of investments in supplies and infrastructure in primary care, career development concerns, and low salaries, and the valorization of the formation of FM doctors in the work of the EFS also contribute to difficulty in retaining these positions in Brazil.
With the aim to reduce the vacancy rate in the medical residency programs for FM, some Brazilian health departments introduced reforms and additional financing for FM training. In 2020, the region of Campinas, where we work, introduced a program called “More Doctors for the City of Campinas” (PMMC), which established a partnership between public and private higher education institutions, hospitals, and Urgency/Emergency Units with a novel post-graduation proposal for FM. It created a program to support the training of specialists in family medicine, stimulate research, and expand care in Basic Health Units, and has since resulted in a 50% decrease in vacancies.
One of the successful elements of the Campinas program, together with quality of medical training, is that it helps bring medical classroom training closer to the community and everyday social reality. PMMC-trained physicians are aware of how their work impacts the local community and its particular health needs. The program has resulted in care that is more responsive to community needs, especially from the perspective of adopting a care model that prioritizes health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in an integrated manner. However, for the EFS to continue to innovate and improve its response capacity to contemporary health problems, it must invest heavily in professional training, the rational incorporation of information and communication technologies, and the creation of appropriate working conditions for multidisciplinary teams.
Disponível em: https://speakingofmedicine.plos.org/2023/01/13/. Acesso em: 4 mar. 2024. [Adaptado].
Gabarito comentado
Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores
Gabarito Comentado – Inglês (Interpretação de Texto)
Tema central: O foco da questão é a Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS), chamada em inglês de Primary Health Care (PHC), e seu papel no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), bem como os desafios da valorização e distribuição dos profissionais de saúde, principalmente médicos de família.
Estratégia de resolução: Em questões de interpretação, busque identificar no texto referência direta ou paráfrases das alternativas; atente-se a palavras-chave como importance, entry point, distribution, government e Medical Councils. Evite ser induzido por palavras genéricas ou informações que o texto não apresenta de forma clara.
Justificativa da alternativa correta (C):
O texto afirma expressamente que a Primary Health Care (PHC) “is of fundamental importance and is present in all regions of the country. It aims to enable access to health care and ensures the coordination and completeness of care. This structure can treat approximately 80% of the overall need...”. Destaca ainda que a PHC é a porta de entrada preferencial para o SUS (preferred entry point). Portanto, a alternativa C) is very important and also the entry way to SUS está correta e traduz fielmente as ideias centrais do texto.
Análise das alternativas incorretas:
A) “has been in first order of importance by the Government.”
O texto ressalta que a valorização da PHC/Família não tem sido prioridade (has not been prioritized). Logo, está incorreta.
B) “has an equal distribution in the country’s regions.”
O texto menciona distribuição desigual de médicos entre regiões, especialmente com concentração nas capitais. Portanto, a alternativa está errada.
D) “had a number of half a million doctors in 2020.”
O número de 500 mil médicos refere-se ao total nacional, não à PHC especificamente. Portanto, a alternativa generaliza indevidamente o dado.
E) “is disciplined by Medical Councils in Brazil.”
Apesar de Conselhos regularem a profissão, o texto não afirma que disciplinam a PHC – informação ausente e, portanto, incorreta.
Dica de prova: Palavras como “always”, “all” e “disciplined” sugerem generalizações ou excessos; desconfie se o texto foi mais restritivo ou específico.
Aprendizado: Questões de interpretação exigem que associe ideias centrais e detalhes do texto com precisão linguística; pratique paráfrases e eliminação de respostas por incompatibilidade textual.
Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!
Clique para visualizar este gabarito
Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo