Questões de Concurso Para professor - inglês

Foram encontradas 31.245 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q4208678 Português
TEXTO II


Leia o texto a seguir.


Artifícios


    Meia noite. O céu se colore pelas cores da despedida e pelos brindes e goles do espumante, pela chegada.
    Um se vai, outro chega. Abraços, beijos, cânticos saudando o convidado que adentra ao findar da contagem regressiva. As mãos se unem em orações e meditações diversas. Sorrisos, lágrimas pela despedida, pelo que se foi. Sim. Lágrimas de melancolia, de alívio, de "graças a Deus, já foi tarde". Entretanto outras, de gratidão.
    Outros olham o novo, o convidado especial; alguns o recebem de branco, outros de amarelo, outros mergulhados no brilho, pois o novo merece. Ele promete. Promete? 
     A embriaguez toma conta de muitos, por satisfação, felicidade, mas também por pura e melancólica certeza de que é só mais uma noite e nada irá mudar.
     Amanhece. O novo pretende ficar por um bom tempo. Ou melhor, mais precisamente por 365 dias, indubitavelmente. Contudo, percebe-se que só ele é novo. Ao abrir a janela, a rua é a mesma, as casas são as mesmas, o tempo é o mesmo. E o novo nem parece ali estar mais. Mas está. Em seu sorriso, com certo sarcasmo, apenas deixa implícito para muitos, que deixam passar por despercebidos, entretanto explícito para outros que percebem que a rua é a mesma, que o tempo é o mesmo, que o dia é o mesmo, que nada mudou, ou mudará? Todavia o que poderá se tornar novo é o pulsar dentro de cada um que não se rende ao trivial e se propõe a seguir o curso do rio da vida, deixando-se navegar pela correnteza da esperança, não se entregando à água tácita e incrédula, nem rendendo-se à tórrida estagnação.

Tulius Mendonça
“O novo pretende ficar por um bom tempo. Ou melhor, mais precisamente por 365 dias, indubitavelmente. Contudo, percebe-se que só ele é novo. Ao abrir a janela, a rua é a mesma, as casas são as mesmas, o tempo é o mesmo.” A palavra destacada pode ser substituída sem prejuízo de sentido por:
Alternativas
Q4208675 Português
TEXTO II


Leia o texto a seguir.


Artifícios


    Meia noite. O céu se colore pelas cores da despedida e pelos brindes e goles do espumante, pela chegada.
    Um se vai, outro chega. Abraços, beijos, cânticos saudando o convidado que adentra ao findar da contagem regressiva. As mãos se unem em orações e meditações diversas. Sorrisos, lágrimas pela despedida, pelo que se foi. Sim. Lágrimas de melancolia, de alívio, de "graças a Deus, já foi tarde". Entretanto outras, de gratidão.
    Outros olham o novo, o convidado especial; alguns o recebem de branco, outros de amarelo, outros mergulhados no brilho, pois o novo merece. Ele promete. Promete? 
     A embriaguez toma conta de muitos, por satisfação, felicidade, mas também por pura e melancólica certeza de que é só mais uma noite e nada irá mudar.
     Amanhece. O novo pretende ficar por um bom tempo. Ou melhor, mais precisamente por 365 dias, indubitavelmente. Contudo, percebe-se que só ele é novo. Ao abrir a janela, a rua é a mesma, as casas são as mesmas, o tempo é o mesmo. E o novo nem parece ali estar mais. Mas está. Em seu sorriso, com certo sarcasmo, apenas deixa implícito para muitos, que deixam passar por despercebidos, entretanto explícito para outros que percebem que a rua é a mesma, que o tempo é o mesmo, que o dia é o mesmo, que nada mudou, ou mudará? Todavia o que poderá se tornar novo é o pulsar dentro de cada um que não se rende ao trivial e se propõe a seguir o curso do rio da vida, deixando-se navegar pela correnteza da esperança, não se entregando à água tácita e incrédula, nem rendendo-se à tórrida estagnação.

Tulius Mendonça
“Outros olham o novo, o convidado especial; alguns o recebem de branco, outros de amarelo, outros mergulhados no brilho, pois o novo merece. Ele promete. Promete?” Nesse trecho, percebe-se o emprego de uma figura de linguagem, que consiste numa omissão de um termo já citado, denominada:
Alternativas
Q4208666 Português
TEXTO I

Leia o poema a seguir.


Ano Novo
Ficção de que começa alguma coisa!
Nada começa: tudo continua.
Na fluida e incerta essência misteriosa.
Da vida, flui em sombra a água nua.

Curvas do rio escondem só o movimento.
O mesmo rio flui onde se vê.
Começar só começa em pensamento.

(Fernando Pessoa)
"Da vida, flui em sombra a água nua." O núcleo do sujeito desse período é: 
Alternativas
Q4208664 Inglês
A sentença “The best student won the prize” na voz passiva é
Alternativas
Q4208663 Inglês
Observe a conversa entre um diretor de uma escola americana que veio visitar outra escola no Brasil e complete o diálogo com as palavras certas.

M: Good morning Mrs. Forks! I’m very pleased to have you here. F: “Good morning Mrs. Miranda! Thanks for having me here at school. M: Let me show you _____________ the school. F: Sure, but first I___________ like to know more ______________ the school. M: Absolutely. What do you have in _____________________?

Escolha a opção CORRETA.
Alternativas
Q4208662 Inglês
Leia e analise as sentenças abaixo
“Don’t give up your Dreams.” e “It doesn’t seem possible, but you can do it.”
1) Imperative form and presente tense respectively. 2) Both in the imperative form. 3) Both in presente tense. 4) Both in the imperative negative.

Marque a opção CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q4208661 Inglês

Leia o texto e responda a questão




As palavras “richer – more fulfilling – stronger – more just' estão:
Alternativas
Q4208660 Inglês

Leia o texto e responda a questão




"Qual é a proposta do anúncio feito pelo jornal americano The New York Times?
Alternativas
Q4208659 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
"A palavra que melhor substitui o modal em destaque na frase “The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them” é:
Alternativas
Q4208658 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
Dentre as palavras presentes no texto analisado, aquela que NÃO é cognato é:
Alternativas
Q4208657 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
A palavra "argues" pode ser substituída por diferentes termos sem perder o sentido, EXCETO por:
"The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending." 
Alternativas
Q4208656 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
Em “Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized', a palavra 'frequently' refere-se a um: 
Alternativas
Q4208655 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
Após a leitura do texto, analise as assertivas abaixo.

I. Ao longo do tempo, as instituições de ensino sempre priorizaram a "inclusão".
II. As escolas modernas procuram assegurar que todos os alunos recebam prêmios.
III. As tentativas de tornar a educação mais inclusiva não são alvo de críticas.
Alternativas
Q4208646 Pedagogia
Na perspectiva de Vygotsky sobre a zona de desenvolvimento proximal (ZDP), o conhecimento na escola deve ser orientado de forma a:
Alternativas
Q3991307 Inglês
What are the two ways of saying 9:15 am correctly?
Alternativas
Q3991306 Inglês
Which are some of the countries that have English as the/an official Language? Choose the correct answer:
Alternativas
Q3991305 Inglês
Still according to the text, which are some of the countries that have English native speakers? choose the correct answer:
Alternativas
Q3991304 Inglês
According to the text, what is the rank English holds by the number of native speakers?
Alternativas
Q3991303 Inglês
Read the text below and answer the questions about it correctly:
Over 2 billion people speak English as a first or second language, which means one out of 4 people can speak English! It makes English the largest language by the number of speakers, and the third largest language by the number of native speakers. With 300 million native speakers, the United States of America is the largest English-speaking country. And by the way, the US doesn’t have an official language. Additionally, there are 60 million native speakers in the United Kingdom, 29 million in Canada, 25.1 million in Australia, 4.7 million in the Republic of Ireland, and 4.9 million in New Zealand.It is an official language of 67 countries as well as 27 non-sovereign entities such as Hong Kong or Puerto Rico. From the website: https://englishwithnab.com/25-facts-about-the-english-language/
According to the text, which position English as a language holds among the most spoken languages of the world?
Alternativas
Q3991302 Inglês
Choose the option which displays the right order and right spelling of the ordinal numbers:
Alternativas
Respostas
8501: C
8502: D
8503: C
8504: A
8505: D
8506: B
8507: C
8508: A
8509: B
8510: C
8511: A
8512: B
8513: C
8514: D
8515: A
8516: C
8517: B
8518: C
8519: A
8520: C