Selecionar segmento
Estude com questões de diferentes segmentos
Atenção: Isso limpará todos os campos já preenchidos no filtro!
Foram encontradas 555 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790630
Pedagogia
À luz da LDB e de sua articulação com os documentos
orientadores de línguas estrangeiras, o ensino de inglês
deve:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790629
Pedagogia
Em ambientes híbridos de aprendizagem, textos como
threads, microblogs e chat prompts apresentam qual
característica central para sua análise pedagógica ?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790628
Inglês
Em narrativas contemporâneas, a fusão entre voz
narrativa e consciência da personagem, sem marcas
explícitas de citação, caracteriza:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790627
Inglês
Considere o enunciado:
The policy will significantly reshape how teachers evaluate multimodal assignments.
O advérbio significantly tem escopo sobre:
The policy will significantly reshape how teachers evaluate multimodal assignments.
O advérbio significantly tem escopo sobre:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790626
Inglês
No período She revised the draft thoroughly, whereas
the committee moved on without further discussion, a
conjunção whereas estabelece relação de:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790625
Inglês
Assinale a alternativa em que a preposição responde
adequadamente às restrições lexicais do verbo:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790624
Inglês
Considere a frase: The teacher’s mentors’ feedback
was incorporated into the final proposal. A construção
indica:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790623
Inglês
No contexto de um relatório acadêmico sobre evasão
escolar, o enunciado Researchers are still trying to pin
down the variables that intensify dropout rates emprega
pin down com o sentido de:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790622
Inglês
Ao analisar a frase By next semester, the school will
have been implementing the new curriculum for two
years, o professor deve reconhecer que o tempo verbal
expressa:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790621
Inglês
Em um texto regulatório, a sentença Teachers must
report any incident within 24 hours expressa:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790620
Inglês
Leia o trecho:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790619
Inglês
Um texto produzido por uma ONG internacional
combina: (1) dados estatísticos, (2) depoimentos de
comunidades vulneráveis, (3) infográficos interativos e
(4) recomendações políticas dirigidas a governos. A
classificação adequada, considerando função social e
composição discursiva, é:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790618
Português
Em um texto acadêmico de divulgação científica, o
leitor percebe que o autor introduz conceitos com
aparente neutralidade, mas altera sutilmente o valor
modal ao longo do texto, reforçando obrigatoriedades
na conclusão. A estratégia interpretativa acionada para
identificar esse deslocamento é:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790617
Pedagogia
Ao propor que o ensino de língua estrangeira se
organize em torno de práticas de uso, e não de listas
prescritivas de formas, os PCN-LE convergem com qual
fundamentação metodológica
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790616
Inglês
Considerando que a BNCC concebe o inglês como
prática de linguagem atravessada por
multiletramentos, assinale a alternativa que melhor
traduz essa concepção, entendendo-a como
articulação entre repertórios culturais, modos de
significação e participação social.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790615
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
In the third paragraph, the author suggests that AI
invites us to confront, with uncomfortable clarity, the
parts of ourselves we outsource. Considering the
metaphorical structure and the argumentative
movement of the text as a whole, the most accurate
interpretation is that this statement:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790614
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
From a global reading of the text, one may infer that the
author views the human–AI relationship as:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790613
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
Which interpretation most closely aligns with the
central argument of the final paragraph?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790612
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
In the third paragraph, the author states that AI mirrors
human beings. In context, this metaphor implies that:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790611
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
Considering the author’s portrayal of AI as a force that
subtly rearranges human habits, choose the option that
best captures the paradox suggested in the second
paragraph regarding autonomy and decision-making.
Conheça nossos planos