Questões de Concurso Comentadas para petroquímica suape

Foram encontradas 214 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q181826 Química
Relacione os tipos de processos de polimerização às respectivas características.
I – Em massa
II – Em solução
III – Em suspensão

Q – homogênea, sem uso de solvente.
R – homogênea, com uso de solvente
S – heterogênea, com o monômero e o iniciador insolúveis no meio dispersante (em geral, a água). 
T – heterogênea, com o iniciador solúvel em água e o monômero apenas parcialmente solúvel.
A associação correta é:
Alternativas
Q181825 Química
A cadeia de produção do setor petroquímico é dividida em indústrias de primeira, segunda e terceira gerações. Os objetivos dessas indústrias são:
Alternativas
Q181797 Química
As unidades da grandeza condutividade térmica expressas em termos das unidades de base do Sistema Internacional são:
Alternativas
Q181795 Raciocínio Lógico
Três irmãs brincavam no jardim quando a avó apareceu e perguntou: “Que dia é hoje?"
A mais nova disse: Ontem foi quarta-feira.
A do meio disse: Hoje não é sexta-feira.
A mais velha disse: Amanhã será sábado.

Sabendo-se que uma das crianças mentiu e as outras disseram a verdade, o dia da semana em que esta história ocorreu foi
Alternativas
Q181790 Matemática
A função f de variável real é tal que f (0) = 1, f (1) = 0 , e sua segunda derivada é f"(x) = 12x - 8. O valor de f(3) é
Alternativas
Q181781 Inglês
                                                        Cleaning up a spill 
                                                       Written by Laura Hill

Water and oil don’t mix. We see this every day; just try washing olive oil off your hands without soap or washing your face in the morning with only water. It just doesn’t work!
When an oil spill occurs in the ocean, like the catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, what do scientists do to clean up the toxic mess? There are a number of options for an oil spill cleanup and most efforts use a combination of many techniques. The fact that oil and water don’t mix is a blessing and a curse. If oil mixed with water, it would be difficult to divide the two.
Crude oil is less dense than water; it spreads out to make a very thin layer (about one millimetre thick) that floats on top of the water. This is good because we can tell what is water and what is oil. It is also bad, because it means the oil can spread really quickly and cover a very large area, which becomes difficult to manage. Combined with wind, ocean currents and waves, oil spill cleanup starts to get really tricky.
Chemical dispersants can be used to break up big oil slicks into small oil droplets. They work like soaps by emulsifying the hydrophobic (waterrepelling) oil in the water. These small droplets can degrade in the ecosystem quicker than the big oil slick. But unfortunately, this means that marine life of all sizes ingest these toxic, broken-down particles and chemicals.
If the oil is thick enough, it could be set fire, a process called “in situ burning”. Because the oil is highly flammable and floats on top of the water, it is very easy to set it alight. It’s not environmentallyfriendly though; the combustion of oil releases thick smoke that contains greenhouse gases and other dangerous air pollutants.
Some techniques can contain and recapture spilled oil without changing its chemical composition. Booms float on top of the water and act as barriers to the movement of oil. Once the oil is controlled, it can be gathered using sorbents. “Sorbent” is a fancy word for sponge. These sponges absorb the oil and allow it to be collected by siphoning it off the water.
However, weather and sea conditions can prevent and obstruct the use of booms, sorbents and in situ burning. Imagine trying to perform these operations on the open sea with wind, waves and water currents moving the oil (and your boat!) around on the water.
What about the plants and animals? It’s easy to forget about the organisms in the sea that are under water. Out of sight, out of mind! There is not much we can do to help them. But when oil reaches the shore it impacts sensitive coastal environments including the many fish, bird, amphibian, reptilian, and crustaceanspecies that live there. We have easy access to these areas and there are some things we can do to clean up. For the plants, it is often a matter of setting them on fire, or leaving them to degrade the oil naturally. Sometimes, we can spray the oil with nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) that can encourage the growth of specialized microorganisms. For species that can tolerate our soaps, manpower is needed to wash every affected animal. Yet, if the animal has tried to lick itself clean, it can die from ingesting the toxic oil.
Unfortunately, there can be many negative economic and social impacts, in addition to the environmental impacts of oil spills and, as you’ve just read, the clean up techniques are far from perfect. Prevention is the very best cleanup technique we have. http://www.curiocity.ca/everyday-science/environme... -cleaning-up-a-spill.html, retrieved on Dec 10, 2010
In “They work like soaps by emulsifying the hydrophobic (water-repelling) oil in the water." (lines 21-23), they refers to
Alternativas
Q181780 Inglês
                                                        Cleaning up a spill 
                                                       Written by Laura Hill

Water and oil don’t mix. We see this every day; just try washing olive oil off your hands without soap or washing your face in the morning with only water. It just doesn’t work!
When an oil spill occurs in the ocean, like the catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, what do scientists do to clean up the toxic mess? There are a number of options for an oil spill cleanup and most efforts use a combination of many techniques. The fact that oil and water don’t mix is a blessing and a curse. If oil mixed with water, it would be difficult to divide the two.
Crude oil is less dense than water; it spreads out to make a very thin layer (about one millimetre thick) that floats on top of the water. This is good because we can tell what is water and what is oil. It is also bad, because it means the oil can spread really quickly and cover a very large area, which becomes difficult to manage. Combined with wind, ocean currents and waves, oil spill cleanup starts to get really tricky.
Chemical dispersants can be used to break up big oil slicks into small oil droplets. They work like soaps by emulsifying the hydrophobic (waterrepelling) oil in the water. These small droplets can degrade in the ecosystem quicker than the big oil slick. But unfortunately, this means that marine life of all sizes ingest these toxic, broken-down particles and chemicals.
If the oil is thick enough, it could be set fire, a process called “in situ burning”. Because the oil is highly flammable and floats on top of the water, it is very easy to set it alight. It’s not environmentallyfriendly though; the combustion of oil releases thick smoke that contains greenhouse gases and other dangerous air pollutants.
Some techniques can contain and recapture spilled oil without changing its chemical composition. Booms float on top of the water and act as barriers to the movement of oil. Once the oil is controlled, it can be gathered using sorbents. “Sorbent” is a fancy word for sponge. These sponges absorb the oil and allow it to be collected by siphoning it off the water.
However, weather and sea conditions can prevent and obstruct the use of booms, sorbents and in situ burning. Imagine trying to perform these operations on the open sea with wind, waves and water currents moving the oil (and your boat!) around on the water.
What about the plants and animals? It’s easy to forget about the organisms in the sea that are under water. Out of sight, out of mind! There is not much we can do to help them. But when oil reaches the shore it impacts sensitive coastal environments including the many fish, bird, amphibian, reptilian, and crustaceanspecies that live there. We have easy access to these areas and there are some things we can do to clean up. For the plants, it is often a matter of setting them on fire, or leaving them to degrade the oil naturally. Sometimes, we can spray the oil with nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) that can encourage the growth of specialized microorganisms. For species that can tolerate our soaps, manpower is needed to wash every affected animal. Yet, if the animal has tried to lick itself clean, it can die from ingesting the toxic oil.
Unfortunately, there can be many negative economic and social impacts, in addition to the environmental impacts of oil spills and, as you’ve just read, the clean up techniques are far from perfect. Prevention is the very best cleanup technique we have. http://www.curiocity.ca/everyday-science/environme... -cleaning-up-a-spill.html, retrieved on Dec 10, 2010
The only sentence where the boldfaced word DOES NOT express an idea of contrast is
Alternativas
Q181779 Inglês
                                                        Cleaning up a spill 
                                                       Written by Laura Hill

Water and oil don’t mix. We see this every day; just try washing olive oil off your hands without soap or washing your face in the morning with only water. It just doesn’t work!
When an oil spill occurs in the ocean, like the catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, what do scientists do to clean up the toxic mess? There are a number of options for an oil spill cleanup and most efforts use a combination of many techniques. The fact that oil and water don’t mix is a blessing and a curse. If oil mixed with water, it would be difficult to divide the two.
Crude oil is less dense than water; it spreads out to make a very thin layer (about one millimetre thick) that floats on top of the water. This is good because we can tell what is water and what is oil. It is also bad, because it means the oil can spread really quickly and cover a very large area, which becomes difficult to manage. Combined with wind, ocean currents and waves, oil spill cleanup starts to get really tricky.
Chemical dispersants can be used to break up big oil slicks into small oil droplets. They work like soaps by emulsifying the hydrophobic (waterrepelling) oil in the water. These small droplets can degrade in the ecosystem quicker than the big oil slick. But unfortunately, this means that marine life of all sizes ingest these toxic, broken-down particles and chemicals.
If the oil is thick enough, it could be set fire, a process called “in situ burning”. Because the oil is highly flammable and floats on top of the water, it is very easy to set it alight. It’s not environmentallyfriendly though; the combustion of oil releases thick smoke that contains greenhouse gases and other dangerous air pollutants.
Some techniques can contain and recapture spilled oil without changing its chemical composition. Booms float on top of the water and act as barriers to the movement of oil. Once the oil is controlled, it can be gathered using sorbents. “Sorbent” is a fancy word for sponge. These sponges absorb the oil and allow it to be collected by siphoning it off the water.
However, weather and sea conditions can prevent and obstruct the use of booms, sorbents and in situ burning. Imagine trying to perform these operations on the open sea with wind, waves and water currents moving the oil (and your boat!) around on the water.
What about the plants and animals? It’s easy to forget about the organisms in the sea that are under water. Out of sight, out of mind! There is not much we can do to help them. But when oil reaches the shore it impacts sensitive coastal environments including the many fish, bird, amphibian, reptilian, and crustaceanspecies that live there. We have easy access to these areas and there are some things we can do to clean up. For the plants, it is often a matter of setting them on fire, or leaving them to degrade the oil naturally. Sometimes, we can spray the oil with nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) that can encourage the growth of specialized microorganisms. For species that can tolerate our soaps, manpower is needed to wash every affected animal. Yet, if the animal has tried to lick itself clean, it can die from ingesting the toxic oil.
Unfortunately, there can be many negative economic and social impacts, in addition to the environmental impacts of oil spills and, as you’ve just read, the clean up techniques are far from perfect. Prevention is the very best cleanup technique we have. http://www.curiocity.ca/everyday-science/environme... -cleaning-up-a-spill.html, retrieved on Dec 10, 2010
In terms of meaning it is correct to say that
Alternativas
Q181778 Inglês
                                                        Cleaning up a spill 
                                                       Written by Laura Hill

Water and oil don’t mix. We see this every day; just try washing olive oil off your hands without soap or washing your face in the morning with only water. It just doesn’t work!
When an oil spill occurs in the ocean, like the catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, what do scientists do to clean up the toxic mess? There are a number of options for an oil spill cleanup and most efforts use a combination of many techniques. The fact that oil and water don’t mix is a blessing and a curse. If oil mixed with water, it would be difficult to divide the two.
Crude oil is less dense than water; it spreads out to make a very thin layer (about one millimetre thick) that floats on top of the water. This is good because we can tell what is water and what is oil. It is also bad, because it means the oil can spread really quickly and cover a very large area, which becomes difficult to manage. Combined with wind, ocean currents and waves, oil spill cleanup starts to get really tricky.
Chemical dispersants can be used to break up big oil slicks into small oil droplets. They work like soaps by emulsifying the hydrophobic (waterrepelling) oil in the water. These small droplets can degrade in the ecosystem quicker than the big oil slick. But unfortunately, this means that marine life of all sizes ingest these toxic, broken-down particles and chemicals.
If the oil is thick enough, it could be set fire, a process called “in situ burning”. Because the oil is highly flammable and floats on top of the water, it is very easy to set it alight. It’s not environmentallyfriendly though; the combustion of oil releases thick smoke that contains greenhouse gases and other dangerous air pollutants.
Some techniques can contain and recapture spilled oil without changing its chemical composition. Booms float on top of the water and act as barriers to the movement of oil. Once the oil is controlled, it can be gathered using sorbents. “Sorbent” is a fancy word for sponge. These sponges absorb the oil and allow it to be collected by siphoning it off the water.
However, weather and sea conditions can prevent and obstruct the use of booms, sorbents and in situ burning. Imagine trying to perform these operations on the open sea with wind, waves and water currents moving the oil (and your boat!) around on the water.
What about the plants and animals? It’s easy to forget about the organisms in the sea that are under water. Out of sight, out of mind! There is not much we can do to help them. But when oil reaches the shore it impacts sensitive coastal environments including the many fish, bird, amphibian, reptilian, and crustaceanspecies that live there. We have easy access to these areas and there are some things we can do to clean up. For the plants, it is often a matter of setting them on fire, or leaving them to degrade the oil naturally. Sometimes, we can spray the oil with nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) that can encourage the growth of specialized microorganisms. For species that can tolerate our soaps, manpower is needed to wash every affected animal. Yet, if the animal has tried to lick itself clean, it can die from ingesting the toxic oil.
Unfortunately, there can be many negative economic and social impacts, in addition to the environmental impacts of oil spills and, as you’ve just read, the clean up techniques are far from perfect. Prevention is the very best cleanup technique we have. http://www.curiocity.ca/everyday-science/environme... -cleaning-up-a-spill.html, retrieved on Dec 10, 2010
According to the text, “in situ burning" (line 29) is
Alternativas
Q181777 Inglês
                                                        Cleaning up a spill 
                                                       Written by Laura Hill

Water and oil don’t mix. We see this every day; just try washing olive oil off your hands without soap or washing your face in the morning with only water. It just doesn’t work!
When an oil spill occurs in the ocean, like the catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, what do scientists do to clean up the toxic mess? There are a number of options for an oil spill cleanup and most efforts use a combination of many techniques. The fact that oil and water don’t mix is a blessing and a curse. If oil mixed with water, it would be difficult to divide the two.
Crude oil is less dense than water; it spreads out to make a very thin layer (about one millimetre thick) that floats on top of the water. This is good because we can tell what is water and what is oil. It is also bad, because it means the oil can spread really quickly and cover a very large area, which becomes difficult to manage. Combined with wind, ocean currents and waves, oil spill cleanup starts to get really tricky.
Chemical dispersants can be used to break up big oil slicks into small oil droplets. They work like soaps by emulsifying the hydrophobic (waterrepelling) oil in the water. These small droplets can degrade in the ecosystem quicker than the big oil slick. But unfortunately, this means that marine life of all sizes ingest these toxic, broken-down particles and chemicals.
If the oil is thick enough, it could be set fire, a process called “in situ burning”. Because the oil is highly flammable and floats on top of the water, it is very easy to set it alight. It’s not environmentallyfriendly though; the combustion of oil releases thick smoke that contains greenhouse gases and other dangerous air pollutants.
Some techniques can contain and recapture spilled oil without changing its chemical composition. Booms float on top of the water and act as barriers to the movement of oil. Once the oil is controlled, it can be gathered using sorbents. “Sorbent” is a fancy word for sponge. These sponges absorb the oil and allow it to be collected by siphoning it off the water.
However, weather and sea conditions can prevent and obstruct the use of booms, sorbents and in situ burning. Imagine trying to perform these operations on the open sea with wind, waves and water currents moving the oil (and your boat!) around on the water.
What about the plants and animals? It’s easy to forget about the organisms in the sea that are under water. Out of sight, out of mind! There is not much we can do to help them. But when oil reaches the shore it impacts sensitive coastal environments including the many fish, bird, amphibian, reptilian, and crustaceanspecies that live there. We have easy access to these areas and there are some things we can do to clean up. For the plants, it is often a matter of setting them on fire, or leaving them to degrade the oil naturally. Sometimes, we can spray the oil with nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) that can encourage the growth of specialized microorganisms. For species that can tolerate our soaps, manpower is needed to wash every affected animal. Yet, if the animal has tried to lick itself clean, it can die from ingesting the toxic oil.
Unfortunately, there can be many negative economic and social impacts, in addition to the environmental impacts of oil spills and, as you’ve just read, the clean up techniques are far from perfect. Prevention is the very best cleanup technique we have. http://www.curiocity.ca/everyday-science/environme... -cleaning-up-a-spill.html, retrieved on Dec 10, 2010
The main purpose of the text is to
Alternativas
Q181773 Português
MINHA ALMA (A paz que eu não quero)

A minha alma está armada
E apontada para a cara do
Sossego
Pois paz sem voz
Não é paz é medo

Às vezes eu falo com a vida
Às vezes é ela quem diz
Qual a paz que eu não
Quero conservar
Para tentar ser feliz

As grades do condomínio
São para trazer proteção
Mas também trazem a dúvida

Se é você que está nesta prisão
Me abrace e me dê um beijo
Faça um filho comigo
Mas não me deixe sentar
Na poltrona no dia de domingo
Procurando novas drogas de aluguel
Nesse vídeo coagido pela paz
Que eu não quero seguir admitido

Às vezes eu falo com a vida
Às vezes é ela quem diz

YUKA, Marcelo / O Rappa. CD Lado B Lado A. WEA, 1999.
“A minha alma está armada
E apontada para a cara do
Sossego
Pois paz sem voz
Não é paz é medo" (v. 1-5)

A palavra “sossego", no texto, não apresenta um valor positivo. Sem prejuízo para a mensagem da letra da música, esse vocábulo pode ser substituído por
Alternativas
Q181772 Português
MINHA ALMA (A paz que eu não quero)

A minha alma está armada
E apontada para a cara do
Sossego
Pois paz sem voz
Não é paz é medo

Às vezes eu falo com a vida
Às vezes é ela quem diz
Qual a paz que eu não
Quero conservar
Para tentar ser feliz

As grades do condomínio
São para trazer proteção
Mas também trazem a dúvida

Se é você que está nesta prisão
Me abrace e me dê um beijo
Faça um filho comigo
Mas não me deixe sentar
Na poltrona no dia de domingo
Procurando novas drogas de aluguel
Nesse vídeo coagido pela paz
Que eu não quero seguir admitido

Às vezes eu falo com a vida
Às vezes é ela quem diz

YUKA, Marcelo / O Rappa. CD Lado B Lado A. WEA, 1999.
“Mas não me deixe sentar" (v. 17)
Considerando a passagem transcrita acima, analise as afirmações a seguir.
A colocação do pronome destacado no verso transcrito está adequada à norma padrão da Língua Portuguesa.
                                                                  PORQUE

A palavra “não", advérbio de negação, exige que o pronome oblíquo esteja em posição proclítica.
A esse respeito, conclui-se que
Alternativas
Q181764 Eletrônica
Um transmissor de temperatura eletrônico possui um range de -20 °C a +20 °C correspondente a um sinal de 4 a 20 mA. Caso o transmissor esteja medindo
10 °C, qual o valor transmitido correspondente em mA?
Alternativas
Q181762 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho
Sobre a avaliação de ruídos de impacto, a NR-15 estabelece que
Alternativas
Q181761 Mecânica
Em um trocador de calor de correntes opostas, o fluido quente entra a 520 °C e sai a 420 °C, e o fluido frio entra a 20 °C e deverá sair a 220 °C. A variação média da temperatura, em °C, nesse caso, é aproximadamente igual a
Dados: ln 4 = 1,4 e ln 3 = 1,1
Alternativas
Q181760 Mecânica
Em uma bomba centrífuga, o componente giratório dotado de pás, cuja função é transformar a energia mecânica para dotar o fluido de velocidade e pressão, denomina-se
Alternativas
Q181759 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho
Tendo como base o fato de que, para a extinção de um incêndio, basta eliminar um dos elementos que formam o triângulo do fogo, NÃO constitui uma técnica de extinção de incêndio a(o)
Alternativas
Q181758 Mecânica
Os erros de medição são compostos de parcelas ou tipos que favorecem a compreensão das diferentes circunstâncias em que ocorrem a fim de que sejam corrigidos. Nessa perspectiva,
Alternativas
Q181757 Mecânica
Em um voltímetro com resistência interna igual a 1.500 ohms, a faixa de medição deverá ser ampliada de 12 V para 90 V. O valor da resistência, em ohms, do resistor de pré-ligação será igual a
Alternativas
Q181752 Química
Os metais do grupo 1A e do grupo 2A da tabela periódica possuem 1 elétron e 2 elétrons, respectivamente, na camada de valência, e, numa ligação, tendem a perder esses elétrons. Os ametais dos grupos 7A e 6A possuem 7 elétrons e 6 elétrons, respectivamente, na camada de valência e, numa ligação, tendem a ganhar elétrons e a se aproximar da estrutura do gás nobre. Nessa perspectiva, o número de oxidação do cromo no dicromato de potássio, de fórmula K2 Cr2 O7 , e do carbono no carbonato de cálcio, de fórmula CaCO3 são, respectivamente,
Alternativas
Respostas
161: A
162: E
163: A
164: D
165: B
166: B
167: B
168: D
169: C
170: E
171: D
172: A
173: D
174: E
175: C
176: E
177: B
178: D
179: B
180: D