Questões de Concurso Comentadas para prefeitura de piracuruca - pi

Foram encontradas 523 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3790618 Português
Em um texto acadêmico de divulgação científica, o leitor percebe que o autor introduz conceitos com aparente neutralidade, mas altera sutilmente o valor modal ao longo do texto, reforçando obrigatoriedades na conclusão. A estratégia interpretativa acionada para identificar esse deslocamento é: 
Alternativas
Q3790617 Pedagogia
Ao propor que o ensino de língua estrangeira se organize em torno de práticas de uso, e não de listas prescritivas de formas, os PCN-LE convergem com qual fundamentação metodológica  
Alternativas
Q3790616 Inglês
Considerando que a BNCC concebe o inglês como prática de linguagem atravessada por multiletramentos, assinale a alternativa que melhor traduz essa concepção, entendendo-a como articulação entre repertórios culturais, modos de significação e participação social.  
Alternativas
Q3790615 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
In the third paragraph, the author suggests that AI invites us to confront, with uncomfortable clarity, the parts of ourselves we outsource. Considering the metaphorical structure and the argumentative movement of the text as a whole, the most accurate interpretation is that this statement: 
Alternativas
Q3790614 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
From a global reading of the text, one may infer that the author views the human–AI relationship as:  
Alternativas
Q3790613 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
Which interpretation most closely aligns with the central argument of the final paragraph?  
Alternativas
Q3790612 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
In the third paragraph, the author states that AI mirrors human beings. In context, this metaphor implies that:  
Alternativas
Q3790611 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
Considering the author’s portrayal of AI as a force that subtly rearranges human habits, choose the option that best captures the paradox suggested in the second paragraph regarding autonomy and decision-making. 
Alternativas
Q3789778 Português
Considere o período:
A divulgação precipitada dos dados comprometeu a clareza do relatório, levando o público a interpretações equivocadas.
Assinale a alternativa cuja reescrita preserva integralmente o sentido sem modificar as relações causais e a hierarquia informacional: 
Alternativas
Q3789777 Português
Analise o período:
Caso a equipe insista em rever o projeto antes da reunião, recomenda-se que se reconsiderem as etapas previamente validadas.
A interpretação adequada da estrutura sintático-semântica permite concluir que: 
Alternativas
Q3789776 Português
A seguir, considere a situação comunicativa:
Um pesquisador, ao tentar persuadir uma comunidade científica sobre a relevância de um novo protocolo experimental, opta por redigir um texto cuja estrutura apresenta problema, fundamentação teórica, descrição metodológica, discussão e projeção de desdobramentos futuros.
À luz das práticas de linguagem e da caracterização de gêneros conforme sua função social, a escolha feita pelo pesquisador indica a intenção de produzir: 
Alternativas
Q3789775 Português
No fragmento a seguir, extraído de um relatório institucional fictício, observe o comportamento das expressões referenciais:
A comissão analisou minuciosamente os documentos enviados pelos setores envolvidos. Embora alguns desses apresentassem lacunas evidentes, as omissões não comprometeram o parecer final, uma vez que elas foram supridas por diligências complementares.

Considerando o encadeamento coesivo e a necessidade de manutenção da progressão temática, a correta interpretação das cadeias referenciais exige reconhecer que:  
Alternativas
Q3789774 Português
Leia o enunciado:
O silêncio caiu sobre a rua como um lençol pesado.
Considerando o efeito conotativo e o tipo de relação estabelecida entre os elementos comparados, o recurso expressivo empregado é: 
Alternativas
Q3789773 Português
Considere o período:
As críticas foram tantas que a equipe decidiu adiar a publicação.
Assinale a alternativa que preserva integralmente a relação de causa e consequência expressa no enunciado original, sem alterar o sentido global. 
Alternativas
Q3789772 Português
Assinale a alternativa correta quanto ao uso dos parônimos: 
Alternativas
Q3789771 Português
Assinale a alternativa em que há oração subordinada adverbial causal: 
Alternativas
Q3789770 Português

Assinale a frase em que a colocação pronominal está inadequada: 

Alternativas
Q3789769 Português
Assinale a frase cuja regência está correta:  
Alternativas
Q3789768 Português
Leia o trecho a seguir:
O relatório aponta que houve queda expressiva nos índices de leitura no país ao longo do último ano. Mais adiante, registra que a ampliação das bibliotecas em todas as regiões provocou diminuição do acesso aos livros.
Considerando o princípio da coerência interna e a relação lógica entre as informações apresentadas, a ruptura ocorre porque:  
Alternativas
Q3789766 Português
A BNCC, ao tratar das práticas de leitura no Componente Curricular de Língua Portuguesa, descreve a leitura como um ato que envolve escolhas estratégicas do leitor em função do gênero, da situação comunicativa e dos objetivos da atividade. Nesse sentido, uma prática coerente com essa perspectiva é:
Alternativas
Respostas
201: D
202: A
203: B
204: B
205: D
206: C
207: A
208: B
209: A
210: D
211: B
212: C
213: D
214: A
215: B
216: A
217: D
218: D
219: D
220: C