Foram encontradas 3.620 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q4210906 Direito Sanitário
Os Recursos do Fundo Nacional de Saúde, de acordo com a Lei no 8.142, de 1990, serão alocados como:
Alternativas
Q4208664 Inglês
A sentença “The best student won the prize” na voz passiva é
Alternativas
Q4208663 Inglês
Observe a conversa entre um diretor de uma escola americana que veio visitar outra escola no Brasil e complete o diálogo com as palavras certas.

M: Good morning Mrs. Forks! I’m very pleased to have you here. F: “Good morning Mrs. Miranda! Thanks for having me here at school. M: Let me show you _____________ the school. F: Sure, but first I___________ like to know more ______________ the school. M: Absolutely. What do you have in _____________________?

Escolha a opção CORRETA.
Alternativas
Q4208662 Inglês
Leia e analise as sentenças abaixo
“Don’t give up your Dreams.” e “It doesn’t seem possible, but you can do it.”
1) Imperative form and presente tense respectively. 2) Both in the imperative form. 3) Both in presente tense. 4) Both in the imperative negative.

Marque a opção CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q4208659 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
"A palavra que melhor substitui o modal em destaque na frase “The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them” é:
Alternativas
Q4208658 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
Dentre as palavras presentes no texto analisado, aquela que NÃO é cognato é:
Alternativas
Q4208657 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
A palavra "argues" pode ser substituída por diferentes termos sem perder o sentido, EXCETO por:
"The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending." 
Alternativas
Q4208656 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
Em “Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized', a palavra 'frequently' refere-se a um: 
Alternativas
Q4208655 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir.


For decades, it seemed that the purpose of our education system was to encourage competition. Schools would award prizes to the most talented student and proudly display their names on bulletin boards. Nowadays, in many institutions, the key word has become "inclusion": no one should be left behind. Resources are channeled into helping the east capable; everyone's work (good or bad) is on the walls; and prize tables are heavily loaded with awards to make sure everyone is awarded a prize for something. Which approach is right?

Attempts to make education more inclusive are frequently criticized. Many point out that once students leave the protective environment of the classroom, they will face the challenges of the working world: what use will false reassurance be then? The purpose of school must be to reveal to people their limitations, so that they can find a vocation that suits them.

In the past, allowing the talented to rise to the top through competition would certainly have been important. In most factories, it was useful to separate the potential managers from the unskilled workforce, and companies relied on finding talented individuals to win business before their competitors did. An ethos of competition also helped countries to compete effectively with other nations as they scrambled for territory, raced to accumulate armaments or even traveled into space ahead of rivals.

But in the 21st century, are we really preparing young people for a world of competition? The academic James F. Moore argues that the days when businesses competed with each other are ending. Moore believes we should talk of "business ecosystems" nowadays. International corporations operate in global networks of suppliers and partners. Sometimes; even rival corporations work together. For example: companies often have to collaborate to define common industry standards.

What's more, hierarchies are disappearing within organizations. Modern companies have a wider range of business functions (public relations, IT, research and development), and so skills. Knowledge and decision-making are spread throughout the organization. In a modern marketing department alone, there are teams for collecting and analyzing a wealth of customer data, designing brands, advertising, etc. Each individual contributes vital skills and must receive equal training. Low-skilled work, by comparison, is increasingly being performed by automated labor; that is, robots.

But it isn't just in businesses that cooperation is becoming the norm. In the past, individuals, colleges, governments, and companies didn't have to collaborate. Now', 'collective impact" is becoming the gold standard. For example, an anti-obesity project called "Shape Up Somerville" managed to significantly bring down the average BMI (body mass index) in the town in just three years, by involving schools, colleges, local businesses, charities, government, and local citizens in a program of collective action. Led by academics, and funded by four agencies. The work involved designing school lunch menus, improving walkways, introducing gym membership packages, and running campaigns amongst the public.

Competition can still be useful. It's stimulating and can help us learn about ourselves. But it should not become a dominant feature of education systems. Those who do not receive investment will find it increasingly hard to fit into the modern world. It really is learning to take part that counts.

Fonte: (Texto retirado do livro Accelerate 2 p. 56.)
Após a leitura do texto, analise as assertivas abaixo.

I. Ao longo do tempo, as instituições de ensino sempre priorizaram a "inclusão".
II. As escolas modernas procuram assegurar que todos os alunos recebam prêmios.
III. As tentativas de tornar a educação mais inclusiva não são alvo de críticas.
Alternativas
Q4208646 Pedagogia
Na perspectiva de Vygotsky sobre a zona de desenvolvimento proximal (ZDP), o conhecimento na escola deve ser orientado de forma a:
Alternativas
Q4208484 Educação Física
Analise as seguintes afirmações avançadas sobre técnicas e regras do voleibol e assinale verdadeiro (V) ou falso (F).

( )Em um mesmo lance, é permitido ao jogador tocar a bola duas vezes consecutivas se o primeiro toque for um bloqueio e o segundo um toque regular.

( ) Durante o ataque, é considerada uma falta se o jogador atacante toca a rede com qualquer parte do corpo enquanto executa uma ação de jogo.

( ) No voleibol, a regra do 'toque duplo' é flexível para a recepção de saques, permitindo toques irregulares, desde que não sejam intencionais.

( ) Um jogador de defesa pode executar um saque por baixo ou por cima, mas não pode realizar um saque 'flutuante' que altere a trajetória da bola de forma imprevisível.

A sequência CORRETA é:
Alternativas
Q4208483 Educação Física
Relacione os métodos de avaliação em Educação Física com suas respectivas características e objetivos.

1. Avaliação Formativa. 2. Avaliação Somativa. 3. Autoavaliação. 4. Avaliação Baseada em Competências.

( ) Focada em medir o desempenho do aluno ao final de um período de ensino, geralmente através de testes ou atividades práticas.
( )Processo contínuo que visa identificar as necessidades de aprendizagem dos alunos e ajustar as estratégias de ensino ao longo do curso.
( )Permite que os alunos reflitam sobre seu próprio aprendizado e desenvolvimento, incentivando a autonomia e a responsabilidade.
( )Avalia o grau de desenvolvimento de habilidades e competências específicas, considerando os padrões estabelecidos no currículo.


A sequência CORRETA é:
Alternativas
Q4208482 Educação Física
Em uma aula de Educação Física com enfoque pedagógico avançado, um professor planeja discutir as implicações das diferentes abordagens metodológicas para o ensino de esportes, considerando não apenas o desenvolvimento de habilidades físicas, mas também o crescimento cognitivo, emocional e social dos alunos. Ele elabora a seguinte questão para seus colegas professores: Considerando uma abordagem pedagógica avançada para o ensino de esportes, que integre habilidades físicas, cognitivas, emocionais e sociais, qual das seguintes metodologias é mais adequada?
Alternativas
Q4208481 Educação Física
Durante uma aula de Educação Física, um professor deseja explicar aos seus alunos sobre as alterações fisiológicas que ocorrem no sistema cardiovascular e pulmonar durante a atividade física. Ele elabora a seguinte pergunta: Qual das seguintes afirmações melhor descreve as alterações que ocorrem no sistema cardiovascular e pulmonar durante a atividade física intensa?
Alternativas
Q4208480 Educação Física
Analise as seguintes afirmações sobre os efeitos do exercício físico na saúde e na aptidão física.

I. O exercício aeróbico regular melhora significativamente a capacidade cardiorrespiratória, reduzindo o risco de doenças cardiovasculares.

II. A prática regular de exercícios físicos não influencia os níveis de colesterol LDL (mau colesterol) e HDL (bom colesterol) no organismo.

III. Exercícios de alta intensidade, como o treinamento intervalado de alta intensidade (HIIT), podem contribuir para a melhora da resistência muscular e da saúde metabólica.

IV.A atividade física regular não tem impacto significativo na saúde mental e bem-estar psicológico dos indivíduos.


Estão CORRETAS as afirmativas:
Alternativas
Q4208479 Educação Física
Em uma aula de Educação Física, um professor deseja integrar o conceito de lazer como uma dimensão educacional importante. Ele planeja uma atividade que não apenas promova o lazer, mas também ofereça oportunidades de aprendizagem significativas para os alunos. Qual das seguintes atividades melhor incorpora o lazer como uma dimensão educacional na Educação Física?
Alternativas
Q4208478 Educação Física
Complete a seguinte frase sobre a abordagem da Educação Física em relação às diferenças individuais dos alunos:
A Educação Física moderna deve abordar as diferenças entre os alunos, promovendo ________.
Alternativas
Q4208477 Educação Física
Como os diferentes significados culturais atribuídos ao corpo podem influenciar as práticas e abordagens pedagógicas em Educação Física?
Alternativas
Q4208476 Pedagogia
Relacione as concepções e teorias pedagógicas da Educação Física com suas respectivas descrições e especificidades práticas. 

1. Educação Física Humanista. 2. Educação Física Crítica. 3. Educação Física Psicomotora. 4. Educação Física Construtivista.
( )Enfatiza o desenvolvimento de habilidades motoras, cognitivas e afetivas, considerando o movimento como meio para o desenvolvimento integral da criança.
( ) Foca na formação crítica do aluno, incentivando a compreensão das relações sociais e políticas dentro do contexto esportivo e da atividade física.
( )Baseia-se na ideia de que o conhecimento é construído pelo aluno através da experimentação ativa e da resolução de problemas no contexto físico e esportivo.
( )Prioriza o desenvolvimento pessoal e a autoexpressão, enfatizando o valor educativo da Educação Física para a realização humana.


A sequência CORRETA é:
Alternativas
Q4208475 Educação Física
Analise as seguintes afirmações sobre a história da Educação Física Escolar e assinale verdadeiro (V) ou falso (F).

( )A Educação Física, como disciplina escolar, surgiu no contexto europeu do século XIX, influenciada pelo movimento da ginástica alemã de Friedrich Ludwig Jahn.

( ) No Brasil, a Educação Física foi inicialmente introduzida nas escolas como parte da preparação militar durante o período do Império.

( )A prática da Educação Física nas escolas brasileiras, até meados do século XX, era fortemente baseada em princípios higienistas e eugenistas.

( ) Com a Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional de 1996, a Educação Física foi excluída do currículo escolar obrigatório no Brasil.

A sequência CORRETA é:
Alternativas
Respostas
721: B
722: A
723: D
724: B
725: B
726: C
727: A
728: B
729: C
730: D
731: B
732: D
733: C
734: C
735: A
736: D
737: C
738: B
739: D
740: A