Foram encontradas 25.503 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3969214 Inglês

Considering the lexeme "heart" as used in the phrase with the canker of ennui at his heart (1.30–31), evaluate the following statements regarding its grammatical and lexical properties. Mark the CORRECT alternative, considering T for True and F for False.


(_) Heart functions as a concrete, countable noun referring literally to the anatomical organ within this context.


(_) The word heart here operates metaphorically, denoting the emperor's emotional or spiritual core.


(_) Heart is derived from Old English and retains exclusively physiological meaning in contemporary usage.


(_) In this construction, heart functions as an abstract, uncountable noun expressing cause.


Alternativas
Q3969213 Inglês
Which of the following grammatical categories are present in the syntactic construction With implacable and weary gaze, from beneath unmoving lids that seem carven of purple-veined onyx (1.5–7)? Mark the CORRECT alternative.

I. Nouns: gaze, lids, onyx.
II. Past participle: carven (archaic/poetic past participle of carve).
III. Adjectives: implacable, weary, unmoving, purple-veined.
Alternativas
Q3969212 Inglês
Within the extended syntactical sequence Vainly, with the verse of the more inventive poets, the fanciful purple-threaded fabrics of the subtlest looms, the unfamiliar gems and minerals from the uttermost land (l.20–23), the function of the prepositional phrase "with the verse of the more inventive poets" is best described as:

Alternativas
Q3969211 Inglês
Which lexical item among the options below may, through its orthographic or phonetic resemblance to a Portuguese term, mislead an uncritical L2 reader into a false cognate interpretation when considered in isolation? Mark the CORRECT alternative, considering T for True and F for False.
( ) casket (l.30)
( ) mineral (l.23)
( ) mordant (l.31)
( ) crown (l.19)
Alternativas
Q3969210 Inglês
In the sentence Oppressive as nightmare, a formless nameless fatigue, heavier than any burden the slaves of the mines must bear, lies forever at his heart (l.9–12), the simile "Oppressive as nightmare" performs a distinct textual function. It primarily acts as a(n) ______, designed to accentuate the atmosphere of metaphysical oppression and existential suffocation permeating the emperor's condition, rather than to ______ or to ______. Which option correctly completes the blanks in order? Mark the CORRECT alternative.
Alternativas
Q3969209 Inglês

Considering the thematic substratum of the passage, what constitutes the predominant conceptual axis underpinning the text's imagery and narrative exposition? Mark the CORRECT alternative.


Alternativas
Q3929654 Inglês
Text 1A3-II


       The argument for the existence of life in different places in the universe can lead to endless and aimless (but fascinating) speculation. Why assume that aliens so far advanced technologically are still bound by the chains of aging bodies? As we see our own technology advancing, and our minds becoming ever more entangled with digital devices, we can envision a kind of transhuman future whereby our mind’s essence, what we (loosely) identify with our inner self and memories, becomes immaterial, soullike, tethered to reality through information alone. In his novel 2001: A Space Odyssey, Arthur C. Clarke speculated that aliens would have broken away from carbon-based and robotic machine structures so “that the mind would eventually free itself from matter (…) and if there is anything beyond that, its name could only be God.”

       This is where astrotheology begins, as we envision aliens as the techno-version of godlike creatures, with the obvious subtext that one day we are going to get there too. So, not only is their technology magic to us, but their very existence becomes equivalent to a supernatural presence — omniscient, omnipresent, and undetectable by our feeble human senses and machines. Such aliens are indistinguishable from gods inhabiting the heavenly realm, being as elusive as countless deities have been throughout human history. They exist only in that intangible dimension of faith.


Marcelo Gleiser. The dawn of a mindful universe: a manifesto for humanity’s future. HarperOne, San Francisco (CA) (adapted). 
The main objective of text 1A3-II is to 
Alternativas
Q3929653 Inglês
Text 1A3-II


       The argument for the existence of life in different places in the universe can lead to endless and aimless (but fascinating) speculation. Why assume that aliens so far advanced technologically are still bound by the chains of aging bodies? As we see our own technology advancing, and our minds becoming ever more entangled with digital devices, we can envision a kind of transhuman future whereby our mind’s essence, what we (loosely) identify with our inner self and memories, becomes immaterial, soullike, tethered to reality through information alone. In his novel 2001: A Space Odyssey, Arthur C. Clarke speculated that aliens would have broken away from carbon-based and robotic machine structures so “that the mind would eventually free itself from matter (…) and if there is anything beyond that, its name could only be God.”

       This is where astrotheology begins, as we envision aliens as the techno-version of godlike creatures, with the obvious subtext that one day we are going to get there too. So, not only is their technology magic to us, but their very existence becomes equivalent to a supernatural presence — omniscient, omnipresent, and undetectable by our feeble human senses and machines. Such aliens are indistinguishable from gods inhabiting the heavenly realm, being as elusive as countless deities have been throughout human history. They exist only in that intangible dimension of faith.


Marcelo Gleiser. The dawn of a mindful universe: a manifesto for humanity’s future. HarperOne, San Francisco (CA) (adapted). 
The word “envision”, in “as we envision aliens” (first sentence of the second paragraph of text 1A3-II), has a similar meaning to 
Alternativas
Q3929652 Inglês
Text 1A3-II


       The argument for the existence of life in different places in the universe can lead to endless and aimless (but fascinating) speculation. Why assume that aliens so far advanced technologically are still bound by the chains of aging bodies? As we see our own technology advancing, and our minds becoming ever more entangled with digital devices, we can envision a kind of transhuman future whereby our mind’s essence, what we (loosely) identify with our inner self and memories, becomes immaterial, soullike, tethered to reality through information alone. In his novel 2001: A Space Odyssey, Arthur C. Clarke speculated that aliens would have broken away from carbon-based and robotic machine structures so “that the mind would eventually free itself from matter (…) and if there is anything beyond that, its name could only be God.”

       This is where astrotheology begins, as we envision aliens as the techno-version of godlike creatures, with the obvious subtext that one day we are going to get there too. So, not only is their technology magic to us, but their very existence becomes equivalent to a supernatural presence — omniscient, omnipresent, and undetectable by our feeble human senses and machines. Such aliens are indistinguishable from gods inhabiting the heavenly realm, being as elusive as countless deities have been throughout human history. They exist only in that intangible dimension of faith.


Marcelo Gleiser. The dawn of a mindful universe: a manifesto for humanity’s future. HarperOne, San Francisco (CA) (adapted). 
With the question “Why assume that aliens so far advanced technologically are still bound by the chains of aging bodies?” (second sentence of text 1A3-II), the author is  
Alternativas
Q3929651 Inglês
Text 1A3-II


       The argument for the existence of life in different places in the universe can lead to endless and aimless (but fascinating) speculation. Why assume that aliens so far advanced technologically are still bound by the chains of aging bodies? As we see our own technology advancing, and our minds becoming ever more entangled with digital devices, we can envision a kind of transhuman future whereby our mind’s essence, what we (loosely) identify with our inner self and memories, becomes immaterial, soullike, tethered to reality through information alone. In his novel 2001: A Space Odyssey, Arthur C. Clarke speculated that aliens would have broken away from carbon-based and robotic machine structures so “that the mind would eventually free itself from matter (…) and if there is anything beyond that, its name could only be God.”

       This is where astrotheology begins, as we envision aliens as the techno-version of godlike creatures, with the obvious subtext that one day we are going to get there too. So, not only is their technology magic to us, but their very existence becomes equivalent to a supernatural presence — omniscient, omnipresent, and undetectable by our feeble human senses and machines. Such aliens are indistinguishable from gods inhabiting the heavenly realm, being as elusive as countless deities have been throughout human history. They exist only in that intangible dimension of faith.


Marcelo Gleiser. The dawn of a mindful universe: a manifesto for humanity’s future. HarperOne, San Francisco (CA) (adapted). 
In text 1A3-II, the author 
Alternativas
Q3929650 Inglês
Text 1A3-II


       The argument for the existence of life in different places in the universe can lead to endless and aimless (but fascinating) speculation. Why assume that aliens so far advanced technologically are still bound by the chains of aging bodies? As we see our own technology advancing, and our minds becoming ever more entangled with digital devices, we can envision a kind of transhuman future whereby our mind’s essence, what we (loosely) identify with our inner self and memories, becomes immaterial, soullike, tethered to reality through information alone. In his novel 2001: A Space Odyssey, Arthur C. Clarke speculated that aliens would have broken away from carbon-based and robotic machine structures so “that the mind would eventually free itself from matter (…) and if there is anything beyond that, its name could only be God.”

       This is where astrotheology begins, as we envision aliens as the techno-version of godlike creatures, with the obvious subtext that one day we are going to get there too. So, not only is their technology magic to us, but their very existence becomes equivalent to a supernatural presence — omniscient, omnipresent, and undetectable by our feeble human senses and machines. Such aliens are indistinguishable from gods inhabiting the heavenly realm, being as elusive as countless deities have been throughout human history. They exist only in that intangible dimension of faith.


Marcelo Gleiser. The dawn of a mindful universe: a manifesto for humanity’s future. HarperOne, San Francisco (CA) (adapted). 
Maintaining the original meaning of text 1A3-II, the fragment “but their very existence becomes equivalent to a supernatural presence” (second sentence of the second paragraph) can be correctly replaced with 
Alternativas
Q3929649 Inglês
Text 1A3-I


       Art and technology have long inspired each other, but recent advancements are driving their fusion like never before. From AI-generated art and immersive experiences to new ownership models, the creative landscape is evolving in ways we could barely imagine a few years ago. This fusion of creativity and innovation isn’t just adding to the world of art. It’s redefining it, making us rethink what art can be and who has the tools to create it. One such innovation is interactive art.

      With interactive art, artists can break down traditional boundaries between the creator and the viewer. Participatory art involves the audience directly, allowing them to influence the outcome of the artwork itself. Artists are using technologies like motion tracking, sensors, and facial recognition to create installations that change based on viewer movement, expression, or even mood.

     This level of interactivity invites viewers to move from passive observation to active participation, making them a part of the artwork’s story. This trend reflects a cultural shift toward collaboration and personalization, where audiences expect to be involved in the creative experience. Participatory art installations are not only transforming gallery experiences but also allowing viewers to experience art as an unfolding story that changes with each interaction. 

Petra Ivanigova. The Future of Art and Technology:
Key Trends Shaping the Creative Landscape. Internet: <https://medium.com> (adapted). 

In the last sentence of text 1A3-I, the author  
Alternativas
Q3929648 Inglês
Text 1A3-I


       Art and technology have long inspired each other, but recent advancements are driving their fusion like never before. From AI-generated art and immersive experiences to new ownership models, the creative landscape is evolving in ways we could barely imagine a few years ago. This fusion of creativity and innovation isn’t just adding to the world of art. It’s redefining it, making us rethink what art can be and who has the tools to create it. One such innovation is interactive art.

      With interactive art, artists can break down traditional boundaries between the creator and the viewer. Participatory art involves the audience directly, allowing them to influence the outcome of the artwork itself. Artists are using technologies like motion tracking, sensors, and facial recognition to create installations that change based on viewer movement, expression, or even mood.

     This level of interactivity invites viewers to move from passive observation to active participation, making them a part of the artwork’s story. This trend reflects a cultural shift toward collaboration and personalization, where audiences expect to be involved in the creative experience. Participatory art installations are not only transforming gallery experiences but also allowing viewers to experience art as an unfolding story that changes with each interaction. 

Petra Ivanigova. The Future of Art and Technology:
Key Trends Shaping the Creative Landscape. Internet: <https://medium.com> (adapted). 

In the context of text 1A3-I, the pronoun “it” in “redefining it” (fourth sentence of the first paragraph) 
Alternativas
Q3929647 Inglês
Text 1A3-I


       Art and technology have long inspired each other, but recent advancements are driving their fusion like never before. From AI-generated art and immersive experiences to new ownership models, the creative landscape is evolving in ways we could barely imagine a few years ago. This fusion of creativity and innovation isn’t just adding to the world of art. It’s redefining it, making us rethink what art can be and who has the tools to create it. One such innovation is interactive art.

      With interactive art, artists can break down traditional boundaries between the creator and the viewer. Participatory art involves the audience directly, allowing them to influence the outcome of the artwork itself. Artists are using technologies like motion tracking, sensors, and facial recognition to create installations that change based on viewer movement, expression, or even mood.

     This level of interactivity invites viewers to move from passive observation to active participation, making them a part of the artwork’s story. This trend reflects a cultural shift toward collaboration and personalization, where audiences expect to be involved in the creative experience. Participatory art installations are not only transforming gallery experiences but also allowing viewers to experience art as an unfolding story that changes with each interaction. 

Petra Ivanigova. The Future of Art and Technology:
Key Trends Shaping the Creative Landscape. Internet: <https://medium.com> (adapted). 

Choose the option in which is presented a word that could correctly replace “barely” in the second sentence of the first paragraph, without changing the original meaning of text 1A3-I.  
Alternativas
Q3929646 Inglês
Text 1A3-I


       Art and technology have long inspired each other, but recent advancements are driving their fusion like never before. From AI-generated art and immersive experiences to new ownership models, the creative landscape is evolving in ways we could barely imagine a few years ago. This fusion of creativity and innovation isn’t just adding to the world of art. It’s redefining it, making us rethink what art can be and who has the tools to create it. One such innovation is interactive art.

      With interactive art, artists can break down traditional boundaries between the creator and the viewer. Participatory art involves the audience directly, allowing them to influence the outcome of the artwork itself. Artists are using technologies like motion tracking, sensors, and facial recognition to create installations that change based on viewer movement, expression, or even mood.

     This level of interactivity invites viewers to move from passive observation to active participation, making them a part of the artwork’s story. This trend reflects a cultural shift toward collaboration and personalization, where audiences expect to be involved in the creative experience. Participatory art installations are not only transforming gallery experiences but also allowing viewers to experience art as an unfolding story that changes with each interaction. 

Petra Ivanigova. The Future of Art and Technology:
Key Trends Shaping the Creative Landscape. Internet: <https://medium.com> (adapted). 

According to text 1A3-I, art and technology  
Alternativas
Q3928901 Inglês
Text 1A15


    Last year, I had a strange dream. My father and I were walking through a canal with difficulty as thousands of fish were released around us. In the dream, I knew that the fish thought they were drowning, as if they had to face death before becoming adults. The next day, my father told me that when I was three, he had taken me to see fish being put into a pond. I could not remember it, but the vision had stayed in my mind. Memories, like images, can return years later in unexpected ways.

    Today, it is common to see old images suddenly appear online. We spend hours looking at photos that record our daily lives in ways never seen before. For young people under twenty-five, who have grown up with social media, childhood is no longer private or mysterious. According to Kate Eichhorn, a media historian at the New School, this constant exposure is sure to affect how identity develops, although we are not yet sure exactly how.

    Eichhorn explains that there are two sides. On the positive side, children and teenagers have more control than before. In the past, adults were the ones who decided how childhood should be remembered, using books, photo albums, or home videos. Today, young people can create and share their own images without depending on adults. This gives them the power to tell their own stories and decide what to remember about their lives.

    On the negative side, social media can make it difficult to leave the past behind. We are not the only ones posting—our friends and families also share moments of our lives, often without asking us. This makes it hard to forget mistakes or change identities. Eichhorn warns that the danger now is not that childhood disappears, but that it might never end, because the past is always visible online.

    It would, indeed, be surprising if we could see painful memories as finished and gone. But most difficult experiences are not captured on screens. Social media shows only part of life, often the happy or triumphant side, and leaves out the tears and struggles. What remains online is rarely the full truth, but fragments that stay with us, shaping how we remember ourselves.


Nausicaa Renner. How Social Media Shapes Our Identity.
Internet:<www.newyorker.com>  (adapted).  
Choose the option in which the fragment “this constant exposure is sure to affect how identity develops” (last sentence of the second paragraph of text 1A15) is adequately translated into Portuguese.  
Alternativas
Q3928900 Inglês
Text 1A15


    Last year, I had a strange dream. My father and I were walking through a canal with difficulty as thousands of fish were released around us. In the dream, I knew that the fish thought they were drowning, as if they had to face death before becoming adults. The next day, my father told me that when I was three, he had taken me to see fish being put into a pond. I could not remember it, but the vision had stayed in my mind. Memories, like images, can return years later in unexpected ways.

    Today, it is common to see old images suddenly appear online. We spend hours looking at photos that record our daily lives in ways never seen before. For young people under twenty-five, who have grown up with social media, childhood is no longer private or mysterious. According to Kate Eichhorn, a media historian at the New School, this constant exposure is sure to affect how identity develops, although we are not yet sure exactly how.

    Eichhorn explains that there are two sides. On the positive side, children and teenagers have more control than before. In the past, adults were the ones who decided how childhood should be remembered, using books, photo albums, or home videos. Today, young people can create and share their own images without depending on adults. This gives them the power to tell their own stories and decide what to remember about their lives.

    On the negative side, social media can make it difficult to leave the past behind. We are not the only ones posting—our friends and families also share moments of our lives, often without asking us. This makes it hard to forget mistakes or change identities. Eichhorn warns that the danger now is not that childhood disappears, but that it might never end, because the past is always visible online.

    It would, indeed, be surprising if we could see painful memories as finished and gone. But most difficult experiences are not captured on screens. Social media shows only part of life, often the happy or triumphant side, and leaves out the tears and struggles. What remains online is rarely the full truth, but fragments that stay with us, shaping how we remember ourselves.


Nausicaa Renner. How Social Media Shapes Our Identity.
Internet:<www.newyorker.com>  (adapted).  
It is correct to conclude from text 1A15 that what makes it difficult for young people to “leave the past behind” (fourth paragraph) is 
Alternativas
Q3928899 Inglês
Text 1A15


    Last year, I had a strange dream. My father and I were walking through a canal with difficulty as thousands of fish were released around us. In the dream, I knew that the fish thought they were drowning, as if they had to face death before becoming adults. The next day, my father told me that when I was three, he had taken me to see fish being put into a pond. I could not remember it, but the vision had stayed in my mind. Memories, like images, can return years later in unexpected ways.

    Today, it is common to see old images suddenly appear online. We spend hours looking at photos that record our daily lives in ways never seen before. For young people under twenty-five, who have grown up with social media, childhood is no longer private or mysterious. According to Kate Eichhorn, a media historian at the New School, this constant exposure is sure to affect how identity develops, although we are not yet sure exactly how.

    Eichhorn explains that there are two sides. On the positive side, children and teenagers have more control than before. In the past, adults were the ones who decided how childhood should be remembered, using books, photo albums, or home videos. Today, young people can create and share their own images without depending on adults. This gives them the power to tell their own stories and decide what to remember about their lives.

    On the negative side, social media can make it difficult to leave the past behind. We are not the only ones posting—our friends and families also share moments of our lives, often without asking us. This makes it hard to forget mistakes or change identities. Eichhorn warns that the danger now is not that childhood disappears, but that it might never end, because the past is always visible online.

    It would, indeed, be surprising if we could see painful memories as finished and gone. But most difficult experiences are not captured on screens. Social media shows only part of life, often the happy or triumphant side, and leaves out the tears and struggles. What remains online is rarely the full truth, but fragments that stay with us, shaping how we remember ourselves.


Nausicaa Renner. How Social Media Shapes Our Identity.
Internet:<www.newyorker.com>  (adapted).  
In the third paragraph of text 1A15, the pronoun “them”, in “This gives them the power to tell their own stories and decide what to remember about their lives” (last sentence), refers to 
Alternativas
Q3928898 Inglês
Text 1A15


    Last year, I had a strange dream. My father and I were walking through a canal with difficulty as thousands of fish were released around us. In the dream, I knew that the fish thought they were drowning, as if they had to face death before becoming adults. The next day, my father told me that when I was three, he had taken me to see fish being put into a pond. I could not remember it, but the vision had stayed in my mind. Memories, like images, can return years later in unexpected ways.

    Today, it is common to see old images suddenly appear online. We spend hours looking at photos that record our daily lives in ways never seen before. For young people under twenty-five, who have grown up with social media, childhood is no longer private or mysterious. According to Kate Eichhorn, a media historian at the New School, this constant exposure is sure to affect how identity develops, although we are not yet sure exactly how.

    Eichhorn explains that there are two sides. On the positive side, children and teenagers have more control than before. In the past, adults were the ones who decided how childhood should be remembered, using books, photo albums, or home videos. Today, young people can create and share their own images without depending on adults. This gives them the power to tell their own stories and decide what to remember about their lives.

    On the negative side, social media can make it difficult to leave the past behind. We are not the only ones posting—our friends and families also share moments of our lives, often without asking us. This makes it hard to forget mistakes or change identities. Eichhorn warns that the danger now is not that childhood disappears, but that it might never end, because the past is always visible online.

    It would, indeed, be surprising if we could see painful memories as finished and gone. But most difficult experiences are not captured on screens. Social media shows only part of life, often the happy or triumphant side, and leaves out the tears and struggles. What remains online is rarely the full truth, but fragments that stay with us, shaping how we remember ourselves.


Nausicaa Renner. How Social Media Shapes Our Identity.
Internet:<www.newyorker.com>  (adapted).  
According to the ideas of Kate Eichhorn, media historian mentioned in text 1A15, one of the positive effects of the use of social media by young people is that they  
Alternativas
Q3928897 Inglês
Text 1A15


    Last year, I had a strange dream. My father and I were walking through a canal with difficulty as thousands of fish were released around us. In the dream, I knew that the fish thought they were drowning, as if they had to face death before becoming adults. The next day, my father told me that when I was three, he had taken me to see fish being put into a pond. I could not remember it, but the vision had stayed in my mind. Memories, like images, can return years later in unexpected ways.

    Today, it is common to see old images suddenly appear online. We spend hours looking at photos that record our daily lives in ways never seen before. For young people under twenty-five, who have grown up with social media, childhood is no longer private or mysterious. According to Kate Eichhorn, a media historian at the New School, this constant exposure is sure to affect how identity develops, although we are not yet sure exactly how.

    Eichhorn explains that there are two sides. On the positive side, children and teenagers have more control than before. In the past, adults were the ones who decided how childhood should be remembered, using books, photo albums, or home videos. Today, young people can create and share their own images without depending on adults. This gives them the power to tell their own stories and decide what to remember about their lives.

    On the negative side, social media can make it difficult to leave the past behind. We are not the only ones posting—our friends and families also share moments of our lives, often without asking us. This makes it hard to forget mistakes or change identities. Eichhorn warns that the danger now is not that childhood disappears, but that it might never end, because the past is always visible online.

    It would, indeed, be surprising if we could see painful memories as finished and gone. But most difficult experiences are not captured on screens. Social media shows only part of life, often the happy or triumphant side, and leaves out the tears and struggles. What remains online is rarely the full truth, but fragments that stay with us, shaping how we remember ourselves.


Nausicaa Renner. How Social Media Shapes Our Identity.
Internet:<www.newyorker.com>  (adapted).  
In text 1A15, the author mentions that childhood is no longer private or mysterious for those who grew up with social media. The main idea behind this statement is that  
Alternativas
Respostas
1821: A
1822: A
1823: C
1824: B
1825: B
1826: B
1827: D
1828: A
1829: B
1830: D
1831: C
1832: E
1833: C
1834: A
1835: D
1836: C
1837: B
1838: A
1839: C
1840: D