Foram encontradas 25.503 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3883691 Inglês

Read the following text and answer the next five question.



The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate 



    Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.


    Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.


    At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.


    Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]


    The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.



Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf 


 


The first word in “shifts in the information ecosystem” (1st paragraph) is close in meaning to:

Alternativas
Q3883690 Inglês

Read the following text and answer the next five question.



The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate 



    Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.


    Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.


    At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.


    Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]


    The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.



Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf 


 


“Indeed” in “Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent” (1st paragraph) indicates:

Alternativas
Q3883689 Inglês

Read the following text and answer the next five question.



The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate 



    Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.


    Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.


    At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.


    Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]


    The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.



Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf 


 


Based on the information provided by the text, mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F).



( ) Public messages are detached from their environment.


( ) The pervasiveness of “many-to-many” communication predates the turn of the century.


( ) Innovations in technology have enabled the quick spread of inaccurate information.



The statements are, respectively:

Alternativas
Q3880544 Inglês
English is often described as having a "deep orthography," meaning there is not a one-to-one correspondence between sounds and letters. This leads to challenges in both reading and spelling. Mark T for True and F for False:

(__)The "Silent E" rule often indicates that the preceding vowel should be pronounced as a long vowel, as seen in the word "plane" compared to "plan."

(__)The digraph "ch" always represents the phoneme /t?/ across all words of English origin, Greek origin, and French origin.

(__)Homophones are words that share the same spelling but have different pronunciations and meanings, such as "lead" (metal) and "lead" (to guide).

(__)The letter "c" usually represents the phoneme /s/ when followed by the vowels "e", "i", or "y", as in the word "cinema" or "center."

After analysis, choose the alternative that presents the correct sequence:
Alternativas
Q3880542 Inglês
The complexity of a sentence is determined by the number and type of clauses it contains. Mastery of these structures allows for more nuanced and sophisticated communication. Analyze the following statements:

I.A "Simple Sentence" contains only one independent clause and no subordinate clauses, even if it has a compound subject or verb.

II.A "Compound Sentence" consists of two or more independent clauses joined by coordinating conjunctions such as "and," "but," or "or."

III.A "Complex Sentence" is formed by joining two or more independent clauses without the use of any dependent clauses or relative pronouns.

Which statements are correct:
Alternativas
Q3880541 Inglês
Textual genres are social constructs that dictate the style, tone, and structure of a document based on its communicative purpose. Mark T for True and F for False:

(__)A "Report" is typically characterized by an objective tone, the use of headings, and the presentation of facts or findings without excessive poetic imagery.

(__)An "Argumentative Essay" must present a clear thesis and provide logical evidence to persuade the reader to accept a specific point of view.

(__)"Formal Letters" in English should always begin with the salutation "Hi there!" to establish a friendly and approachable relationship with the recipient.

(__)"Narratives" often follow a structural pattern involving an orientation, a complication, a climax, and a resolution to engage the reader's interest.

After analysis, choose the alternative that presents the correct sequence:
Alternativas
Q3880540 Inglês
Morphological changes in English adjectives and nouns often follow predictable patterns, but irregular forms persist due to historical linguistic influences. Regarding plurals, comparatives, and superlatives, choose the correct alternative.
Alternativas
Q3880539 Inglês
Effective writing requires the logical organization of ideas through the use of "Topic Sentences" and "Transitions." A coherent paragraph must focus on a single unifying idea. Regarding the structure and coherence of written production, choose the correct alternative.
Alternativas
Q3880538 Inglês
Reading strategies in the English Language Teaching context often involve specific cognitive processes such as scanning, skimming, and predicting. However, a less frequently discussed but vital technique for advanced critical literacy is the "Socratic Questioning" method applied to texts, which aims to uncover underlying assumptions and perspectives within a passage. Considering the development of high-level reading skills, choose the correct alternative regarding reading strategies.
Alternativas
Q3880537 Inglês
English is primarily an SVO (Subject-Verb-Object) language, meaning the position of a word often determines its grammatical role. However, certain structures allow for "Inversion" for emphasis or literary effect. Regarding sentence structure, mark T for True and F for False:

(__)Subject-Auxiliary Inversion is mandatory in most direct questions, such as "Have you seen the film?" instead of "You have seen the film."

(__)The "Direct Object" always follows the "Indirect Object" when the preposition "to" or "for" is omitted, as in "He gave her the flowers."

(__)In English, the adjective must always be placed after the noun it modifies to ensure the sentence follows a logical predicative order.

(__)A "Complement" is a word or phrase that completes the meaning of a subject or object, often following a linking verb like "be" or "seem."

After analysis, choose the alternative that presents the correct sequence:
Alternativas
Q3880536 Inglês

The distinction between literary and non-literary texts lies in the use of language and the primary function of the discourse. About the interpretation of different genres, mark T for True and F for False:



(__)Narratives are primarily characterized by the use of "mimesis" or "diegesis" to represent a sequence of events involving characters in a specific setting.



(__)Expository texts aim to persuade the reader by using emotional appeal and rhetorical devices such as hyperbole and irony to defend a subjective point of view.



(__)Literary texts often employ "defamiliarization," a technique that makes common objects or situations seem strange to enhance the reader's perception.



(__)Descriptive texts in technical manuals are strictly forbidden from using adjectives because they must remain purely objective and mathematical.



After analysis, choose the alternative that presents the correct sequence:

Alternativas
Q3880535 Inglês
Textual linguistics defines cohesion and coherence as the two main pillars of textuality. While cohesion deals with the surface linguistic links, coherence relates to the underlying meaning. Analyze the following statements about these concepts:

I.Anaphora is a cohesive device where a word in a text refers back to a previously mentioned entity, such as using "it" to refer to "the book."

II.Lexical cohesion can be achieved through the use of hyponyms and hypernyms, creating a semantic chain that maintains the thematic unity of the passage.

III.Coherence is entirely dependent on the presence of explicit conjunctions, meaning a text without "but" or "therefore" cannot be logically understood.

Which statements are correct:
Alternativas
Q3880534 Inglês
In English phonetics and phonology, the study of sound production and perception focuses on how phonemes are articulated and distinguished. Regarding English vowels and consonants, choose the correct alternative.
Alternativas
Q3880533 Inglês
Word formation in English involves processes such as affixation, compounding, and conversion. Understanding how bound morphemes change the grammatical category of a word is essential for vocabulary development. Analyze the following statements:

I.Derivational suffixes like "-ly" often change adjectives into adverbs, modifying the syntactic function of the base word.

II.Inflectional morphemes in English, such as the "-ed" in "walked," change the core meaning of the verb to create an entirely new lexical entry.

III.Compounding is the process of combining two free morphemes to create a new word, which can be written as one word, two words, or hyphenated.

Which statements are correct:
Alternativas
Q3880532 Inglês
Conversational competence involves more than just grammatical accuracy; it requires the ability to manage turns, use "back-channeling," and adhere to the "Cooperative Principle." Analyze the following statements about conversation skills:

I."Back-channeling" involves providing vocal or non-verbal cues, such as "uh-huh" or nodding, to show that one is listening without interrupting the speaker.

II."Turn-taking" is the conversational mechanism where one person speaks at a time in an orderly fashion, avoiding long silences or frequent overlaps.

III.The "Maxim of Quality" in Grice's Cooperative Principle states that speakers should be as brief as possible and avoid any complex vocabulary in casual talk.

Which statements are correct:
Alternativas
Q3877699 Inglês
A fonética é a ciência que apresenta os métodos para a descrição, classificação e transcrição dos sons da fala, principalmente aqueles sons utilizados na linguagem humana.
Informe se é verdadeiro (V) ou falso (F) o que se afirma sobre a fonética e a pronúncia da língua inglesa.

( ) Os sons ʃ e ʒ são fricativos, o primeiro está presente na palavra “push” e o segundo na palavra “rouge”.

( ) Os sons θ e ð tem o mesmo correlato ortográfico – que é “th” –, o primeiro é desvozeado e o segundo é vozeado.

( ) O inglês é uma língua que tem vogais longas, que são produzidas com a duração menor do que as vogais breves ou vogais curtas.

( ) Todas as línguas apresentam consoantes e vogais, vogais são tipicamente vozeadas e consoantes podem ser vozeadas ou desvozeadas.

( ) Quando não ocorre vibração das cordas vocais, temos um som vozeado; quando o ar provoca a vibração das cordas vocais, temos um som desvozeado.

De acordo com as afirmações, a sequência correta é: 
Alternativas
Q3877690 Inglês
Verb tense indicates when an action or state of being occurs: in the past, present, or future.
Avalie as sentenças a seguir e os usos dos verb tenses nelas empregados. 
I What do you usually do at weekends?. II- I have been traveling to France when I was a child. III- He has gone to Italy. IV- lt hasn't rained this week. V- You're out of breath. Were you been running?.
Está correto apenas o que se afirma em
Alternativas
Q3877689 Inglês
The intellectual bankruptcy of anti-AI academic alarmism: A rebuttal

Posted on 28 Oct 2025 by Neil Harrison


A few years ago, a philosophy colleague and I taught a college English composition course at Lindenwood University organized around a single, surprising (for students) word: bullshit. We leaned into the theme, using Harry Frankfurt’s classic essay as our guide and asking students to explore what it means to be sincere, what it means to be a fraud, and how to tell the difference. We also decided to lean into the AI moment. This was Fall of 2023, the beginning of the first full academic year since ChatGPT was introduced. We didn’t ban the new generative AI tools; we invited them into the classroom. We experimented with writing papers with AI assistance, making the central work of the course not just writing, but thinking critically about how we write. Our guiding principle was trust. We trusted that by including students in the conversation, by empowering them to use and critique these strange new tools, they would become more engaged and curious, not less. We wanted to replace the impulse to police our students with an invitation to collaborate with them.

AI and critical skills
That classroom experience felt vital and exciting. But it now feels like it exists in opposition to a dominant and growing mood in academia. I see a rising tide of anxiety about AI, a kind of moral panic that my co-author James Hutson and I have started calling “academic alarmism.” This rhetoric often cloaks itself in philosophical rigor, insisting that because AI lacks human “moral agency,” it is unfit to serve educational roles. We hear that terms like “tutor” or “collaborator” must be restricted to humans, a kind of linguistic gatekeeping that ignores centuries of learning with non-human tools. (…)

Guide, not gatekeeper
(…)
We argue that the university’s role isn’t to be a gatekeeper but a guide.
The alarmists warn of disengaged students and the death of critical thinking. But when I hear those warnings, I think of a specific student from that “bullshit” class. She dove into the experiment, using AI tools with an intellectual curiosity that was inspiring. (…)
The university has always been a place of mediated knowledge, from the un-agential textbook to the impersonal learning management system. To insist now that only unmediated, Socratic dialogue with humans is “authentic” education is to weaponize a fiction against pragmatic innovation, especially in an era of mass education where that ideal is rarely the reality for many students.
The real pedagogical crisis is not the advent of generative AI but the structural underfunding and the challenges of widespread university access that have defined higher education for generations. AI, thoughtfully integrated, has the potential to redistribute scarce human attention and restore some measure of the engagement we all yearn for. The challenge of higher education in the age of AI is not to shield students from complexity but to equip them with the habits of mind, skepticism, and  metacognitive awareness required to flourish amid it. The pedagogical imperative is not less responsibility but more.
Daniel Plate (Lindenwood University)

Disponível em: https://teachinginhighereducation.wordpress. com/2025/10/28/the-intellectual-bankruptcy-of-anti-ai-academic-alarmism-a-rebuttal/. Access: 21 nov. 2025. (Adaptado).
What is one of the conclusions that Daniel Plate states in his text?
Alternativas
Q3877688 Inglês
The intellectual bankruptcy of anti-AI academic alarmism: A rebuttal

Posted on 28 Oct 2025 by Neil Harrison


A few years ago, a philosophy colleague and I taught a college English composition course at Lindenwood University organized around a single, surprising (for students) word: bullshit. We leaned into the theme, using Harry Frankfurt’s classic essay as our guide and asking students to explore what it means to be sincere, what it means to be a fraud, and how to tell the difference. We also decided to lean into the AI moment. This was Fall of 2023, the beginning of the first full academic year since ChatGPT was introduced. We didn’t ban the new generative AI tools; we invited them into the classroom. We experimented with writing papers with AI assistance, making the central work of the course not just writing, but thinking critically about how we write. Our guiding principle was trust. We trusted that by including students in the conversation, by empowering them to use and critique these strange new tools, they would become more engaged and curious, not less. We wanted to replace the impulse to police our students with an invitation to collaborate with them.

AI and critical skills
That classroom experience felt vital and exciting. But it now feels like it exists in opposition to a dominant and growing mood in academia. I see a rising tide of anxiety about AI, a kind of moral panic that my co-author James Hutson and I have started calling “academic alarmism.” This rhetoric often cloaks itself in philosophical rigor, insisting that because AI lacks human “moral agency,” it is unfit to serve educational roles. We hear that terms like “tutor” or “collaborator” must be restricted to humans, a kind of linguistic gatekeeping that ignores centuries of learning with non-human tools. (…)

Guide, not gatekeeper
(…)
We argue that the university’s role isn’t to be a gatekeeper but a guide.
The alarmists warn of disengaged students and the death of critical thinking. But when I hear those warnings, I think of a specific student from that “bullshit” class. She dove into the experiment, using AI tools with an intellectual curiosity that was inspiring. (…)
The university has always been a place of mediated knowledge, from the un-agential textbook to the impersonal learning management system. To insist now that only unmediated, Socratic dialogue with humans is “authentic” education is to weaponize a fiction against pragmatic innovation, especially in an era of mass education where that ideal is rarely the reality for many students.
The real pedagogical crisis is not the advent of generative AI but the structural underfunding and the challenges of widespread university access that have defined higher education for generations. AI, thoughtfully integrated, has the potential to redistribute scarce human attention and restore some measure of the engagement we all yearn for. The challenge of higher education in the age of AI is not to shield students from complexity but to equip them with the habits of mind, skepticism, and  metacognitive awareness required to flourish amid it. The pedagogical imperative is not less responsibility but more.
Daniel Plate (Lindenwood University)

Disponível em: https://teachinginhighereducation.wordpress. com/2025/10/28/the-intellectual-bankruptcy-of-anti-ai-academic-alarmism-a-rebuttal/. Access: 21 nov. 2025. (Adaptado).
How does Daniel Plate see the general academic relation to AI?
Alternativas
Q3877687 Inglês
The intellectual bankruptcy of anti-AI academic alarmism: A rebuttal

Posted on 28 Oct 2025 by Neil Harrison


A few years ago, a philosophy colleague and I taught a college English composition course at Lindenwood University organized around a single, surprising (for students) word: bullshit. We leaned into the theme, using Harry Frankfurt’s classic essay as our guide and asking students to explore what it means to be sincere, what it means to be a fraud, and how to tell the difference. We also decided to lean into the AI moment. This was Fall of 2023, the beginning of the first full academic year since ChatGPT was introduced. We didn’t ban the new generative AI tools; we invited them into the classroom. We experimented with writing papers with AI assistance, making the central work of the course not just writing, but thinking critically about how we write. Our guiding principle was trust. We trusted that by including students in the conversation, by empowering them to use and critique these strange new tools, they would become more engaged and curious, not less. We wanted to replace the impulse to police our students with an invitation to collaborate with them.

AI and critical skills
That classroom experience felt vital and exciting. But it now feels like it exists in opposition to a dominant and growing mood in academia. I see a rising tide of anxiety about AI, a kind of moral panic that my co-author James Hutson and I have started calling “academic alarmism.” This rhetoric often cloaks itself in philosophical rigor, insisting that because AI lacks human “moral agency,” it is unfit to serve educational roles. We hear that terms like “tutor” or “collaborator” must be restricted to humans, a kind of linguistic gatekeeping that ignores centuries of learning with non-human tools. (…)

Guide, not gatekeeper
(…)
We argue that the university’s role isn’t to be a gatekeeper but a guide.
The alarmists warn of disengaged students and the death of critical thinking. But when I hear those warnings, I think of a specific student from that “bullshit” class. She dove into the experiment, using AI tools with an intellectual curiosity that was inspiring. (…)
The university has always been a place of mediated knowledge, from the un-agential textbook to the impersonal learning management system. To insist now that only unmediated, Socratic dialogue with humans is “authentic” education is to weaponize a fiction against pragmatic innovation, especially in an era of mass education where that ideal is rarely the reality for many students.
The real pedagogical crisis is not the advent of generative AI but the structural underfunding and the challenges of widespread university access that have defined higher education for generations. AI, thoughtfully integrated, has the potential to redistribute scarce human attention and restore some measure of the engagement we all yearn for. The challenge of higher education in the age of AI is not to shield students from complexity but to equip them with the habits of mind, skepticism, and  metacognitive awareness required to flourish amid it. The pedagogical imperative is not less responsibility but more.
Daniel Plate (Lindenwood University)

Disponível em: https://teachinginhighereducation.wordpress. com/2025/10/28/the-intellectual-bankruptcy-of-anti-ai-academic-alarmism-a-rebuttal/. Access: 21 nov. 2025. (Adaptado).
What was Plate and his colleague’s approach at a university course they taught some year ago?
Alternativas
Respostas
1181: C
1182: C
1183: E
1184: C
1185: C
1186: D
1187: C
1188: C
1189: B
1190: C
1191: B
1192: C
1193: B
1194: C
1195: D
1196: C
1197: A
1198: E
1199: A
1200: A