Selecionar segmento
Estude com questões de diferentes segmentos
Atenção: Isso limpará todos os campos já preenchidos no filtro!
Foram encontradas 25.572 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524648
Inglês
Texto associado
Technology has always been at the forefront of human
education. From the days of carving figures on rock walls to
today, when most students are equipped with several portable
technological devices at any given time, technology continues
to push educational capabilities to new levels. In looking at
where educational methods and tools have come from to
where they are going in the future, technology’s importance in
the classroom is evident now more than ever.
In the Colonial years, wooden paddles with printed
lessons, called Horn-Books, were used to assist students in
learning verses. Over 200 years later, in 1870, technology
advanced to include the Magic Lantern, a primitive version of
a slide projector that projected images printed on glass plates.
By the time World War I ended, around 8000 lantern slides
were circulating through the Chicago public school system.
By the time the Chalkboard came around in 1890, followed by
the pencil in 1900, it was clear that students were hungry for
more advanced educational tools.
Examples of these are: in the 1920s, radio sparked an
entirely new wave of learning; on-air classes began popping
up for any student within listening range. Next came the
overhead projector in 1930, followed by the ballpoint pen
in 1940 and headphones in 1950. Videotapes arrived on
the scene in 1951, creating a new and exciting method of
instruction.
The pre-computer years were formative in the choices
made for computers in the years following. Immediate
response-type systems (video, calculator, Scantron) had
become necessary, and quick production of teaching
materials, using the photocopier, had become a standard.
Teachers needed new methods of instruction and testing, and
students were looking for new ways to communicate, study,
and learn.
Although the first computers were developed in the
‘30s, everyday use computers were introduced in the ‘80s.
When IBM introduced its first personal computer in 1981, the
educational world knew that it was on the verge of greatness.
The foundation of immediate learning capabilities had been
laid. Time magazine declared, “it is the end result of a
technological revolution that has been in the making for four
decades and is now, quite literally, hitting home.”
(https://education.purdue.edu/. Adaptado)
The tittle that best applies to the text is:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524647
Inglês
Texto associado
The paper reflects on the role of technology in English
language teaching (ELT) methodologies and on the impact
of globalization and internationalization in education in
general and in the ELT in particular. The study is based on
the assumption that access to information and technology
is necessary to build social capital (WARSCHAUER, 2003)
and that this access requires some English knowledge
and digital literacy (FINARDI; PREBIANCA; MOMM,
2013). Departing from a bibliographic review on the use of
ELT methodologies and the role of technologies in these
methodologies, the study proposes that both the resistance to
and the uncritical use of technologies and methodologies may
bring negative consequences to the development of English
language proficiency and social development in Brazil. The
study concludes that in the post-method (BROWN, 2002;
KUMARAVADIVELO, 2003) and information era (LEVY,
1999) technologies have a relevant and crucial role that
should be critically considered in ELT methodologies. The
study also suggests that the informed use of technologies
and methodologies, allied with the teaching of English as
an international language are essential to leverage the
development and the internationalization of education in
Brazil in a critical way in relation to the effects of globalization.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. 2014. Adaptado)
In the excerpt “the study proposes that both the
resistance to and the uncritical use of technologies and
methodologies”, there is the use of the paired conjunctions
“both … and”. Indicate the alternative in which the bolded
paired conjunctions are placed appropriately in the
sentence.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524646
Inglês
Texto associado
The paper reflects on the role of technology in English
language teaching (ELT) methodologies and on the impact
of globalization and internationalization in education in
general and in the ELT in particular. The study is based on
the assumption that access to information and technology
is necessary to build social capital (WARSCHAUER, 2003)
and that this access requires some English knowledge
and digital literacy (FINARDI; PREBIANCA; MOMM,
2013). Departing from a bibliographic review on the use of
ELT methodologies and the role of technologies in these
methodologies, the study proposes that both the resistance to
and the uncritical use of technologies and methodologies may
bring negative consequences to the development of English
language proficiency and social development in Brazil. The
study concludes that in the post-method (BROWN, 2002;
KUMARAVADIVELO, 2003) and information era (LEVY,
1999) technologies have a relevant and crucial role that
should be critically considered in ELT methodologies. The
study also suggests that the informed use of technologies
and methodologies, allied with the teaching of English as
an international language are essential to leverage the
development and the internationalization of education in
Brazil in a critical way in relation to the effects of globalization.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. 2014. Adaptado)
In the excerpt “technologies have a relevant and crucial
role that should be critically considered” the word in bold
may be substituted, with no change in meaning, for
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524645
Inglês
Texto associado
The paper reflects on the role of technology in English
language teaching (ELT) methodologies and on the impact
of globalization and internationalization in education in
general and in the ELT in particular. The study is based on
the assumption that access to information and technology
is necessary to build social capital (WARSCHAUER, 2003)
and that this access requires some English knowledge
and digital literacy (FINARDI; PREBIANCA; MOMM,
2013). Departing from a bibliographic review on the use of
ELT methodologies and the role of technologies in these
methodologies, the study proposes that both the resistance to
and the uncritical use of technologies and methodologies may
bring negative consequences to the development of English
language proficiency and social development in Brazil. The
study concludes that in the post-method (BROWN, 2002;
KUMARAVADIVELO, 2003) and information era (LEVY,
1999) technologies have a relevant and crucial role that
should be critically considered in ELT methodologies. The
study also suggests that the informed use of technologies
and methodologies, allied with the teaching of English as
an international language are essential to leverage the
development and the internationalization of education in
Brazil in a critical way in relation to the effects of globalization.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. 2014. Adaptado)
No texto, as autoras mencionam que
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524644
Inglês
Texto associado
The paper reflects on the role of technology in English
language teaching (ELT) methodologies and on the impact
of globalization and internationalization in education in
general and in the ELT in particular. The study is based on
the assumption that access to information and technology
is necessary to build social capital (WARSCHAUER, 2003)
and that this access requires some English knowledge
and digital literacy (FINARDI; PREBIANCA; MOMM,
2013). Departing from a bibliographic review on the use of
ELT methodologies and the role of technologies in these
methodologies, the study proposes that both the resistance to
and the uncritical use of technologies and methodologies may
bring negative consequences to the development of English
language proficiency and social development in Brazil. The
study concludes that in the post-method (BROWN, 2002;
KUMARAVADIVELO, 2003) and information era (LEVY,
1999) technologies have a relevant and crucial role that
should be critically considered in ELT methodologies. The
study also suggests that the informed use of technologies
and methodologies, allied with the teaching of English as
an international language are essential to leverage the
development and the internationalization of education in
Brazil in a critical way in relation to the effects of globalization.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. 2014. Adaptado)
O texto menciona o ensino de inglês como língua internacional. O Currículo Paulista, tendo como referência a
Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC), propõe o ensino de inglês como língua franca, que se caracteriza como
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524643
Inglês
Texto associado
The paper reflects on the role of technology in English
language teaching (ELT) methodologies and on the impact
of globalization and internationalization in education in
general and in the ELT in particular. The study is based on
the assumption that access to information and technology
is necessary to build social capital (WARSCHAUER, 2003)
and that this access requires some English knowledge
and digital literacy (FINARDI; PREBIANCA; MOMM,
2013). Departing from a bibliographic review on the use of
ELT methodologies and the role of technologies in these
methodologies, the study proposes that both the resistance to
and the uncritical use of technologies and methodologies may
bring negative consequences to the development of English
language proficiency and social development in Brazil. The
study concludes that in the post-method (BROWN, 2002;
KUMARAVADIVELO, 2003) and information era (LEVY,
1999) technologies have a relevant and crucial role that
should be critically considered in ELT methodologies. The
study also suggests that the informed use of technologies
and methodologies, allied with the teaching of English as
an international language are essential to leverage the
development and the internationalization of education in
Brazil in a critical way in relation to the effects of globalization.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. 2014. Adaptado)
One of the authors’ objectives in the study described is to
understand
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524642
Inglês
Texto associado
The paper reflects on the role of technology in English
language teaching (ELT) methodologies and on the impact
of globalization and internationalization in education in
general and in the ELT in particular. The study is based on
the assumption that access to information and technology
is necessary to build social capital (WARSCHAUER, 2003)
and that this access requires some English knowledge
and digital literacy (FINARDI; PREBIANCA; MOMM,
2013). Departing from a bibliographic review on the use of
ELT methodologies and the role of technologies in these
methodologies, the study proposes that both the resistance to
and the uncritical use of technologies and methodologies may
bring negative consequences to the development of English
language proficiency and social development in Brazil. The
study concludes that in the post-method (BROWN, 2002;
KUMARAVADIVELO, 2003) and information era (LEVY,
1999) technologies have a relevant and crucial role that
should be critically considered in ELT methodologies. The
study also suggests that the informed use of technologies
and methodologies, allied with the teaching of English as
an international language are essential to leverage the
development and the internationalization of education in
Brazil in a critical way in relation to the effects of globalization.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. 2014. Adaptado)
The linguistic and discourse characteristics of the text are
consistent with those of an academic article’s
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524640
Inglês
Texto associado
The good news about formulating a strong lesson plan for
a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) class is
that it will contain many of the same features of a good lesson
plan for any class. That is, it will include transitions from and
to the previous class and the next one, it will warm students
up to the day’s lesson in an engaging way, it will present new
material and recycle familiar material, it will include some
ways to assess progress during the class, and it will be
flexible enough to account for classes that move slower or
more quickly than you had anticipated.
What’s important about CLIL lesson plans, though, is that
you include both subject area content and language points so
that you derive the full benefits of a CLIL approach. If you try
to wing it, you might wind up concentrating on one area to the
detriment of the other.
The key elements of CLIL lesson plans are:
Content – Most teachers find it easiest to start by
considering the content. What knowledge – that is, what
subject area material – do you want to transmit? How
are you going to present it – through an article, a video, a
demonstration, a discussion, or an experiment?
It can be helpful when planning to finish sentences such
as I want my students to be able to/At the end of the class,
they should know… If you have a cooperating content area
teacher at your institution, meet with that person in advance
to go over your goals and see how they interact with theirs.
Language – Once you have the content pinned down,
you can pick out the necessary language and communication
skills that students will need to engage with the material.
For example, these could include: specialized vocabulary,
functional phrases and collocations, pronunciation or
intonation practice, grammatical structures, features of text
organization.
You’ll find these linguistic features in the texts that you
present, but also in the language that students need to
complete tasks. Imagine yourself as a student carrying out a
task. What will you say? What will you write? Then, determine
if you’ll need to teach any of this language to your class before
presenting students with the task.
(https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/clil-lesson-plans/. Adaptado)
Homophones are words that sound the same but differ
in meaning or spelling. Identify the alternative containing
homophones.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524639
Inglês
Texto associado
The good news about formulating a strong lesson plan for
a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) class is
that it will contain many of the same features of a good lesson
plan for any class. That is, it will include transitions from and
to the previous class and the next one, it will warm students
up to the day’s lesson in an engaging way, it will present new
material and recycle familiar material, it will include some
ways to assess progress during the class, and it will be
flexible enough to account for classes that move slower or
more quickly than you had anticipated.
What’s important about CLIL lesson plans, though, is that
you include both subject area content and language points so
that you derive the full benefits of a CLIL approach. If you try
to wing it, you might wind up concentrating on one area to the
detriment of the other.
The key elements of CLIL lesson plans are:
Content – Most teachers find it easiest to start by
considering the content. What knowledge – that is, what
subject area material – do you want to transmit? How
are you going to present it – through an article, a video, a
demonstration, a discussion, or an experiment?
It can be helpful when planning to finish sentences such
as I want my students to be able to/At the end of the class,
they should know… If you have a cooperating content area
teacher at your institution, meet with that person in advance
to go over your goals and see how they interact with theirs.
Language – Once you have the content pinned down,
you can pick out the necessary language and communication
skills that students will need to engage with the material.
For example, these could include: specialized vocabulary,
functional phrases and collocations, pronunciation or
intonation practice, grammatical structures, features of text
organization.
You’ll find these linguistic features in the texts that you
present, but also in the language that students need to
complete tasks. Imagine yourself as a student carrying out a
task. What will you say? What will you write? Then, determine
if you’ll need to teach any of this language to your class before
presenting students with the task.
(https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/clil-lesson-plans/. Adaptado)
The text mentions pronunciation and intonation as
language and communication skills to be developed in
CLIL. Identifying word stress would be one of these skills.
Choose the alternative in which the word bears the same
stressed syllable, whether it is used as a verb or as a
noun.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524638
Inglês
Texto associado
The good news about formulating a strong lesson plan for
a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) class is
that it will contain many of the same features of a good lesson
plan for any class. That is, it will include transitions from and
to the previous class and the next one, it will warm students
up to the day’s lesson in an engaging way, it will present new
material and recycle familiar material, it will include some
ways to assess progress during the class, and it will be
flexible enough to account for classes that move slower or
more quickly than you had anticipated.
What’s important about CLIL lesson plans, though, is that
you include both subject area content and language points so
that you derive the full benefits of a CLIL approach. If you try
to wing it, you might wind up concentrating on one area to the
detriment of the other.
The key elements of CLIL lesson plans are:
Content – Most teachers find it easiest to start by
considering the content. What knowledge – that is, what
subject area material – do you want to transmit? How
are you going to present it – through an article, a video, a
demonstration, a discussion, or an experiment?
It can be helpful when planning to finish sentences such
as I want my students to be able to/At the end of the class,
they should know… If you have a cooperating content area
teacher at your institution, meet with that person in advance
to go over your goals and see how they interact with theirs.
Language – Once you have the content pinned down,
you can pick out the necessary language and communication
skills that students will need to engage with the material.
For example, these could include: specialized vocabulary,
functional phrases and collocations, pronunciation or
intonation practice, grammatical structures, features of text
organization.
You’ll find these linguistic features in the texts that you
present, but also in the language that students need to
complete tasks. Imagine yourself as a student carrying out a
task. What will you say? What will you write? Then, determine
if you’ll need to teach any of this language to your class before
presenting students with the task.
(https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/clil-lesson-plans/. Adaptado)
Collocations are mentioned in the text as one of the
language aspects to be covered in CLIL. A well-known
difficulty Brazilian students contend with is the decision
between “make” and “do” in collocations. The alternative
with the correct use of a collocation is:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524637
Inglês
Texto associado
The good news about formulating a strong lesson plan for
a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) class is
that it will contain many of the same features of a good lesson
plan for any class. That is, it will include transitions from and
to the previous class and the next one, it will warm students
up to the day’s lesson in an engaging way, it will present new
material and recycle familiar material, it will include some
ways to assess progress during the class, and it will be
flexible enough to account for classes that move slower or
more quickly than you had anticipated.
What’s important about CLIL lesson plans, though, is that
you include both subject area content and language points so
that you derive the full benefits of a CLIL approach. If you try
to wing it, you might wind up concentrating on one area to the
detriment of the other.
The key elements of CLIL lesson plans are:
Content – Most teachers find it easiest to start by
considering the content. What knowledge – that is, what
subject area material – do you want to transmit? How
are you going to present it – through an article, a video, a
demonstration, a discussion, or an experiment?
It can be helpful when planning to finish sentences such
as I want my students to be able to/At the end of the class,
they should know… If you have a cooperating content area
teacher at your institution, meet with that person in advance
to go over your goals and see how they interact with theirs.
Language – Once you have the content pinned down,
you can pick out the necessary language and communication
skills that students will need to engage with the material.
For example, these could include: specialized vocabulary,
functional phrases and collocations, pronunciation or
intonation practice, grammatical structures, features of text
organization.
You’ll find these linguistic features in the texts that you
present, but also in the language that students need to
complete tasks. Imagine yourself as a student carrying out a
task. What will you say? What will you write? Then, determine
if you’ll need to teach any of this language to your class before
presenting students with the task.
(https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/clil-lesson-plans/. Adaptado)
It is correct to say that, in CLIL, the language teacher
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524636
Inglês
Texto associado
The good news about formulating a strong lesson plan for
a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) class is
that it will contain many of the same features of a good lesson
plan for any class. That is, it will include transitions from and
to the previous class and the next one, it will warm students
up to the day’s lesson in an engaging way, it will present new
material and recycle familiar material, it will include some
ways to assess progress during the class, and it will be
flexible enough to account for classes that move slower or
more quickly than you had anticipated.
What’s important about CLIL lesson plans, though, is that
you include both subject area content and language points so
that you derive the full benefits of a CLIL approach. If you try
to wing it, you might wind up concentrating on one area to the
detriment of the other.
The key elements of CLIL lesson plans are:
Content – Most teachers find it easiest to start by
considering the content. What knowledge – that is, what
subject area material – do you want to transmit? How
are you going to present it – through an article, a video, a
demonstration, a discussion, or an experiment?
It can be helpful when planning to finish sentences such
as I want my students to be able to/At the end of the class,
they should know… If you have a cooperating content area
teacher at your institution, meet with that person in advance
to go over your goals and see how they interact with theirs.
Language – Once you have the content pinned down,
you can pick out the necessary language and communication
skills that students will need to engage with the material.
For example, these could include: specialized vocabulary,
functional phrases and collocations, pronunciation or
intonation practice, grammatical structures, features of text
organization.
You’ll find these linguistic features in the texts that you
present, but also in the language that students need to
complete tasks. Imagine yourself as a student carrying out a
task. What will you say? What will you write? Then, determine
if you’ll need to teach any of this language to your class before
presenting students with the task.
(https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/clil-lesson-plans/. Adaptado)
As far as the element “content” in CLIL is concerned, the
fourth and fifth paragraphs state that
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524635
Inglês
Texto associado
The good news about formulating a strong lesson plan for
a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) class is
that it will contain many of the same features of a good lesson
plan for any class. That is, it will include transitions from and
to the previous class and the next one, it will warm students
up to the day’s lesson in an engaging way, it will present new
material and recycle familiar material, it will include some
ways to assess progress during the class, and it will be
flexible enough to account for classes that move slower or
more quickly than you had anticipated.
What’s important about CLIL lesson plans, though, is that
you include both subject area content and language points so
that you derive the full benefits of a CLIL approach. If you try
to wing it, you might wind up concentrating on one area to the
detriment of the other.
The key elements of CLIL lesson plans are:
Content – Most teachers find it easiest to start by
considering the content. What knowledge – that is, what
subject area material – do you want to transmit? How
are you going to present it – through an article, a video, a
demonstration, a discussion, or an experiment?
It can be helpful when planning to finish sentences such
as I want my students to be able to/At the end of the class,
they should know… If you have a cooperating content area
teacher at your institution, meet with that person in advance
to go over your goals and see how they interact with theirs.
Language – Once you have the content pinned down,
you can pick out the necessary language and communication
skills that students will need to engage with the material.
For example, these could include: specialized vocabulary,
functional phrases and collocations, pronunciation or
intonation practice, grammatical structures, features of text
organization.
You’ll find these linguistic features in the texts that you
present, but also in the language that students need to
complete tasks. Imagine yourself as a student carrying out a
task. What will you say? What will you write? Then, determine
if you’ll need to teach any of this language to your class before
presenting students with the task.
(https://bridge.edu/tefl/blog/clil-lesson-plans/. Adaptado)
In paragraph 1, we learn that a good CLIL lesson plan
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524634
Inglês
Texto associado
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a
dual-focused educational approach in which an additional
language* is used for the learning and teaching of both
content and language. That is, in the teaching and learning
process, there is a focus not only on content, and not only on
language. Each is interwoven, even if the emphasis is greater
on one or the other at a given time. CLIL is not a new form of
language education. It is not a new form of subject education.
It is an innovative fusion of both. CLIL is closely related to and
shares some elements of a range of educational practices.
Some of these practices – such as bilingual education and
immersion – have been in operation for decades in specific
countries and contexts; others, such as content-based
language teaching or English as an Additional Language
(EAL), may share some basic theories and practice but are
not synonymous with CLIL, since there are some fundamental
differences. CLIL is content-driven, and this is where it both
extends the experience of learning a language, and where it
becomes different to existing language-teaching approaches.
* “often a learner’s ‘foreign language’, but it may also be a second language
or some form of heritage or community language.”
(COYLE, Do; HOOD, Philip; MARSH, David. 2010, p. 1. Adaptado)
While reading this text, a teacher comes across the word
“interwoven” in the fragment “Each is interwoven, even
if the emphasis is greater on one or the other at a given
time”. A fluent reader, this teacher resorts to context to
arrive at the meaning of this word and, doing so, makes
use of the reading strategy named
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524633
Inglês
Texto associado
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a
dual-focused educational approach in which an additional
language* is used for the learning and teaching of both
content and language. That is, in the teaching and learning
process, there is a focus not only on content, and not only on
language. Each is interwoven, even if the emphasis is greater
on one or the other at a given time. CLIL is not a new form of
language education. It is not a new form of subject education.
It is an innovative fusion of both. CLIL is closely related to and
shares some elements of a range of educational practices.
Some of these practices – such as bilingual education and
immersion – have been in operation for decades in specific
countries and contexts; others, such as content-based
language teaching or English as an Additional Language
(EAL), may share some basic theories and practice but are
not synonymous with CLIL, since there are some fundamental
differences. CLIL is content-driven, and this is where it both
extends the experience of learning a language, and where it
becomes different to existing language-teaching approaches.
* “often a learner’s ‘foreign language’, but it may also be a second language
or some form of heritage or community language.”
(COYLE, Do; HOOD, Philip; MARSH, David. 2010, p. 1. Adaptado)
The word “since” is polysemic in English. Choose
the alternative in which it is being used with the same
meaning as in the excerpt “but are not synonymous with
CLIL since there are some fundamental differences”.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524632
Inglês
Texto associado
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a
dual-focused educational approach in which an additional
language* is used for the learning and teaching of both
content and language. That is, in the teaching and learning
process, there is a focus not only on content, and not only on
language. Each is interwoven, even if the emphasis is greater
on one or the other at a given time. CLIL is not a new form of
language education. It is not a new form of subject education.
It is an innovative fusion of both. CLIL is closely related to and
shares some elements of a range of educational practices.
Some of these practices – such as bilingual education and
immersion – have been in operation for decades in specific
countries and contexts; others, such as content-based
language teaching or English as an Additional Language
(EAL), may share some basic theories and practice but are
not synonymous with CLIL, since there are some fundamental
differences. CLIL is content-driven, and this is where it both
extends the experience of learning a language, and where it
becomes different to existing language-teaching approaches.
* “often a learner’s ‘foreign language’, but it may also be a second language
or some form of heritage or community language.”
(COYLE, Do; HOOD, Philip; MARSH, David. 2010, p. 1. Adaptado)
Look at the fragment: “others, such as content-based
language teaching or English as an Additional Language
(EAL)”. In English, there are also the terms other,
another, the other, the others – all of them used to
refer to something or someone different from the one(s)
already mentioned.
Choose the alternative with the correct use of one of these terms.
Choose the alternative with the correct use of one of these terms.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524631
Inglês
Texto associado
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a
dual-focused educational approach in which an additional
language* is used for the learning and teaching of both
content and language. That is, in the teaching and learning
process, there is a focus not only on content, and not only on
language. Each is interwoven, even if the emphasis is greater
on one or the other at a given time. CLIL is not a new form of
language education. It is not a new form of subject education.
It is an innovative fusion of both. CLIL is closely related to and
shares some elements of a range of educational practices.
Some of these practices – such as bilingual education and
immersion – have been in operation for decades in specific
countries and contexts; others, such as content-based
language teaching or English as an Additional Language
(EAL), may share some basic theories and practice but are
not synonymous with CLIL, since there are some fundamental
differences. CLIL is content-driven, and this is where it both
extends the experience of learning a language, and where it
becomes different to existing language-teaching approaches.
* “often a learner’s ‘foreign language’, but it may also be a second language
or some form of heritage or community language.”
(COYLE, Do; HOOD, Philip; MARSH, David. 2010, p. 1. Adaptado)
An example of an activity consistent with CLIL is found in
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524630
Inglês
Texto associado
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a
dual-focused educational approach in which an additional
language* is used for the learning and teaching of both
content and language. That is, in the teaching and learning
process, there is a focus not only on content, and not only on
language. Each is interwoven, even if the emphasis is greater
on one or the other at a given time. CLIL is not a new form of
language education. It is not a new form of subject education.
It is an innovative fusion of both. CLIL is closely related to and
shares some elements of a range of educational practices.
Some of these practices – such as bilingual education and
immersion – have been in operation for decades in specific
countries and contexts; others, such as content-based
language teaching or English as an Additional Language
(EAL), may share some basic theories and practice but are
not synonymous with CLIL, since there are some fundamental
differences. CLIL is content-driven, and this is where it both
extends the experience of learning a language, and where it
becomes different to existing language-teaching approaches.
* “often a learner’s ‘foreign language’, but it may also be a second language
or some form of heritage or community language.”
(COYLE, Do; HOOD, Philip; MARSH, David. 2010, p. 1. Adaptado)
The expression in bold in the excerpt “such as contentbased language teaching” is being used to
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2018 |
Q3524629
Inglês
Texto associado
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is a
dual-focused educational approach in which an additional
language* is used for the learning and teaching of both
content and language. That is, in the teaching and learning
process, there is a focus not only on content, and not only on
language. Each is interwoven, even if the emphasis is greater
on one or the other at a given time. CLIL is not a new form of
language education. It is not a new form of subject education.
It is an innovative fusion of both. CLIL is closely related to and
shares some elements of a range of educational practices.
Some of these practices – such as bilingual education and
immersion – have been in operation for decades in specific
countries and contexts; others, such as content-based
language teaching or English as an Additional Language
(EAL), may share some basic theories and practice but are
not synonymous with CLIL, since there are some fundamental
differences. CLIL is content-driven, and this is where it both
extends the experience of learning a language, and where it
becomes different to existing language-teaching approaches.
* “often a learner’s ‘foreign language’, but it may also be a second language
or some form of heritage or community language.”
(COYLE, Do; HOOD, Philip; MARSH, David. 2010, p. 1. Adaptado)
According to the text, the concept “additional language”
refers to
Ano: 2025
Banca:
AMAUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Jaborá - SC
Prova:
AMAUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Jaborá - SC - Professor de Inglês - Edital nº 1 |
Q3522166
Inglês
Consider the following sentence: "She couldn't bear the
heavy workload, but she bore it with patience."
Which of the following explanations best describes the use of the word "bear" in both parts of the sentence?
Which of the following explanations best describes the use of the word "bear" in both parts of the sentence?
Conheça nossos planos