Foram encontradas 25.503 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

www.qconcursos.com
Q3753584
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753584 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The article discusses Chancellor Rachel Reeves' budget strategy and its political implications. Consider this passage: "Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable." The author's tone reveals an implicit assessment. Additionally, the text states: "The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer." Based on comprehensive analysis of explicit and implicit meanings, what can be accurately inferred about the author's perspective?
Alternativas
Q3753583
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753583 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach emphasizes meaningful communication and functional language use over mechanical grammar drills. Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), an extension of CLT, organizes instruction around tasks that reflect real-world language use. Using the article about UK budget policy, a teacher could design a task-based lesson where students engage with authentic content. The task cycle typically includes: pre-task (introducing topic and useful language), task (students complete the task in pairs/groups), planning (preparing to report to class), report (presenting findings), analysis (examining language features), and practice (focused work on language forms that emerged). Which lesson design exemplifies task-based principles while using this article?
Alternativas
Q3753582
Inglês Orações condicionais | Conditional Clauses ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753582 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
Examine this sentence from the article: "Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control." This sentence contains two conditional structures. The phrase "Even if effective" represents a concessive conditional (acknowledging a possibility while suggesting it may not change the outcome), while "if inflation is not brought under control" is a first conditional (real possibility in the future). Understanding conditional structures is essential for both comprehension and production in English. Which of the following statements correctly analyzes the conditional structures and their functions in academic and journalistic English?
Alternativas
Q3753581
Inglês Voz Ativa e Passiva | Passive and Active Voice , Verbos | Verbs , Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: AMEOSC Órgão: Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC Prova: AMEOSC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3753581 Inglês
O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.


Tax rises and benefit cuts are on the horizon as Reeves prepares the UK for a bad-news budget


The UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has made it clear that taxes will go up, and more cuts to welfare spending are on the horizon. The moves will be deeply unpopular and controversial − but in an extraordinary press conference ahead of the UK budget on November 26, Reeves made it clear that she believes both will be necessary.

In a highly unusual move, the chancellor used the press conference to set out her priorities for balancing the books while growing the economy. Notably, she did not mention the pledge in Labour's manifesto not to raise taxes on working people or increase national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Instead, she said her focus was on lowering the burden of excessive government borrowing and debt, improving public services and tackling the cost of living.

Reeves gave particular importance to sticking with her "iron-clad" fiscal rules. These, she argued, were essential for showing she is being responsible with the nation's finances and preventing a further rise in the cost of borrowing (the interest the government pays on its debt).

At more than £100 billion per year, this already makes up 10% of all government spending. The government's spending watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), projects the total to rise to £111 billion by the next financial year.

She also emphasised the importance of measures to boost UK productivity. Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices. Reeves questioned whether the forecast would accurately predict the future − but has accepted that she will have to work within the OBR's constraints in this year's budget.

The chancellor is right that there is a pressing need to boost productivity. But it is by no means certain that planned investment in things like housing, nuclear power and a third runway at Heathrow will yield big gains, at least in the near term.

 At the same time, she made it clear that to meet her budget target there will need to be cuts to public spending. Some cuts will come from more "efficiency" savings by government departments (that perennial option that all chancellors reach for).

But they will also come from tackling the UK's rapidly rising welfare budget, focusing on the large number of young people who are not in education, employment or training but depend on state benefits (so-called "Neets").

Any cuts to the welfare budget, as well as a failure to abolish the two-child benefit limit (although she is under pressure from colleagues to bite the bullet and axe it), will cause dismay within the parliamentary Labour party as well as many party activists.

As ever, the budget choices will be political as well as economic. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK will accuse Labour of breaking its manifesto promises. They will also claim Labour is undermining any chance of growth by raising taxes by a larger amount than any UK government has done in the last 50 years.

 At the same time, it will become even more difficult for Labour to manage its large but fractious parliamentary majority. Earlier this year, backbenchers forced the government to restore the winter fuel payment for some pensioners and abandon plans to cut personal independence payments for disabled claimants.

Local government elections, as well as elections to the Scottish and Welsh parliaments, are looming next May. Reeves risks further alienating Labour's grassroot supporters and pushing them towards smaller left-wing parties such as the Greens. They already seem to be pulling ahead of Labour among younger voters.

The stakes could not be higher. A bad result could even lead to questions about the future of both the chancellor and the prime minister Keir Starmer.

Finally, the chancellor's goal to cut the cost of living for working people does not seem particularly ambitious. Her suggested approach involves cutting energy costs by investing more in electricity generation, and reducing the cost of food by changing the business rates system to help small businesses.

Even if effective, these changes will take some time to work through and may not be enough to convince voters that Labour is on their side − particularly if inflation is not brought under control.

Reeves' appeal to the public to back her long-term approach to sorting out the British economy may be admirable. But the political risks to her personally − and Labour more broadly − remain considerable.


https://theconversation.com/tax-rises-and-benefit-cuts-are-on-the-horizo n-as-reeves-prepares-the-uk-for-a-bad-news-budget-269008
The text contains several instances of passive voice constructions. Examine this sentence: "Productivity forecasts are expected to be downgraded by the OBR, heaping yet more pressure on the chancellor's budget choices." This sentence uses passive voice with an infinitive construction. Understanding the transformation between active and passive voice, particularly with complex verb structures, is crucial for advanced writing. Which of the following correctly identifies the grammatical structure and appropriate active voice transformation?
Alternativas
Q3751465
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: Unesc Órgão: Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC Prova: Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751465 Inglês
Methodologies and teaching approaches for teaching English in the early and later years of Elementary School When planning English language instruction in Elementary School, the teacher must adapt the approach to the age group. Which methodological practice is most appropriate for the early years (1st to 5th grade)?
Alternativas
Q3751464
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: Unesc Órgão: Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC Prova: Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751464 Inglês
Skimming and scanning strategies are essential to optimize reading comprehension in English. Analyze the statements below:

I. Skimming is the strategy of reading a text quickly and superficially, focusing on elements such as titles, subtitles, cognates, and the first and last paragraphs, with the goal of grasping the main idea (the "gist").
II. Scanning is the strategy of rapidly searching for a specific piece of information in the text, such as a name, a date, a number, or a keyword, running one's eyes over the text without reading every word.
III. Skimming is the term used for detailed, analytical reading of a text, focusing on every word and grammatical structure for deep comprehension.

Which statements are correct? 
Alternativas
Q3751463
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: Unesc Órgão: Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC Prova: Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751463 Inglês
Teaching English in the early years of primary education has specific features that differ from teaching adolescents or adults. Mark T for true and F for false:

(__) The main focus is raising awareness of linguistic and cultural diversity, using playful activities such as games, songs, and stories.
(__) The priority is explicit grammatical correction and the production of complex passive-voice sentences, aiming at academic proficiency.
(__) Contact with English broadens students' awareness of their own mother tongue (Portuguese) through contrast and comparison (metalinguistic awareness).
(__) The goal is to achieve full oral fluency and native-like pronunciation before 6th grade, this being the main indicator of success.

Select the option that shows the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Alternativas
Q3751462
Inglês Pronomes | Pronouns ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: Unesc Órgão: Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC Prova: Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751462 Inglês
In the sentence "My brother bought a new laptop last week. Although it was expensive, the computer is very fast," which textual cohesion mechanism is used by the word "it"?
Alternativas
Q3751461
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: Unesc Órgão: Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC Prova: Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751461 Inglês
A dimensão intercultural no ensino de Língua Inglesa, conforme preconizado pela Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC), vai além do ensino de "curiosidades" sobre países de língua inglesa. Qual é o objetivo central dessa abordagem? 
Alternativas
Q3751460
Inglês Verbos | Verbs ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: Unesc Órgão: Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC Prova: Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Três Barras - SC - Professor de Inglês |
Q3751460 Inglês
In the sentence "She might travel to the beach this weekend, but she is not sure yet," what is the primary semantic function of the modal verb "might"?
Alternativas
Q3750970
Inglês Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750970 Inglês
Within the framework of the Brazilian National Curriculum Guidelines (BNCC, 2018), what should be the teacher’s main focus when teaching phonemes and their allophonic variations in English?
Alternativas
Q3750969
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750969 Inglês
According to the Brazilian National Curriculum Guidelines (BNCC, 2018), English is conceived as a Lingua Franca (EFL), a perspective that legitimizes the diverse linguistic and cultural repertoires of speakers worldwide and challenges the notion that only American or British varieties of English should be considered “correct.” Based on this premise, which of the following represents an implication for the adoption of English as a Lingua Franca in language education?
Alternativas
Q3750968
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750968 Inglês
In light of the conceptualization of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) – which emphasizes the use of English as a means of communication among speakers from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds – it is incorrect to affirm that:
Alternativas
Q3750966
Inglês Vocabulário | Vocabulary , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750966 Inglês
Which strategy for enhancing vocabulary and lexicogrammatical competence in written production is considered ineffective?
Alternativas
Q3750965
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750965 Inglês
Which instructional focus should teachers adopt to develop students’ macro-level reading comprehension skills?
Alternativas
Q3750964
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750964 Inglês

Given that reading strategies should be selected in accordance with both the students’ proficiency levels and the genre of the text, align each text genre with the corresponding level of students’ proficiency.



I. Shopping lists, dialogues, postcards


II. Editorials, research summaries, literary texts


III. Newspapers, magazines, short stories



( ) Beginners


( ) Intermediate students


( ) Advanced students

Alternativas
Q3750963
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750963 Inglês
If the English teacher intends to assess students’ progress in oral skills over the course of instruction, they may administer:
Alternativas
Q3750962
Inglês Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750962 Inglês

Brown and Abeywickrama (2019) also provide comprehensive explanations of language assessment and its implementation in classroom contexts. In Chapter II, the authors discuss five fundamental principles of language assessment. Read each principle carefully and match it to its corresponding definition.



I. Validity


II. Practicality


III. Reliability


IV. Authenticity


V. Washback



( ) This principle refers to the logistical, down-to-earth, administrative issues involved in making, giving, and scoring an assessment instrument.


( ) This principle positively influences what and how teacher teach and learners learn.


( ) This principle has consistent conditions across two or more administrations and gives clear directions for scoring and evaluation. It also contains items/tasks that are unambiguous to the test-taker.


( ) This principle reflects real-world language use. It contains language that is as natural as possible.


( ) This principle measures exactly what it proposes to measure, relying as much as possible on empirical evidence (performance).




The correct sequence is:

Alternativas
Q3750961
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension , Ensino da Língua Estrangeira Inglesa ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750961 Inglês
Brown and Abeywickrama (2019) provide a detailed explanation of the five most common types of tests, namely achievement tests, diagnostic tests, placement tests, proficiency tests, and aptitude tests. Read each definition below carefully and select the one that best defines proficiency tests.
Alternativas
Q3750960
Inglês Discurso direto e indireto | Reported speech , Verbos | Verbs ,
Ano: 2025 Banca: CEV-URCA Órgão: Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE Prova: CEV-URCA - 2025 - Prefeitura de Mauriti - CE - Professor de Letras - Inglês |
Q3750960 Inglês
Text 2 – The Picture of Dorian Gray


The Picture of Dorian Gray, moral fantasy novel by Irish writer Oscar Wilde, published in an early form in Lippincott’s Monthly Magazine in 1890. The novel, the only one written by Wilde, had six additional chapters when it was released as a book in 1891. An archetypal tale of a young man who purchases eternal youth at the expense of his soul, the work is a romantic exposition of Wilde’s own Aestheticism.

The story begins in the art studio of Basil Hallward, who is discussing a current painting with his witty and amoral friend Lord Henry Wotton. Henry thinks that the painting, a portrait of an extraordinarily beautiful young man, should be displayed, but Basil disagrees, fearing that his obsession with the portrait’s subject, Dorian Gray, can be seen in the work. Dorian then arrives, and he is fascinated as Henry explains his belief that one should live life to the fullest by indulging one’s impulses. Henry also points out that beauty and youth are fleeting, and Dorian declares that he would give his soul if the portrait were to grow old and wrinkled while he remained young and handsome. Basil gives the painting to Dorian.


From: https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Picture-of-Dorian-Gray-novel-by-Wilde. Accessed on 10/15/2025
Which of the following sentences correctly represents this statement “Basil gives the painting to Dorian.” in reported speech?
Alternativas
Respostas
2881: A
2882: D
2883: A
2884: B
2885: A
2886: B
2887: D
2888: E
2889: C
2890: E
2891: C
2892: B
2893: E
2894: D
2895: A
2896: B
2897: A
2898: E
2899: A
2900: D
www.qconcursos.com