Questões de Concurso Comentadas por alunos sobre aspectos linguísticos | linguistic aspects em inglês
Foram encontradas 533 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2023
Banca:
FUNDATEC
Órgão:
IF-RS
Prova:
FUNDATEC - 2023 - IF-RS - Professor - Portugues - Inglês |
Q2359884
Inglês
Considere o seguinte trecho:
Translanguaging is a theoretical lens that offers a different view of bilingualism and multilingualism (Vogel; Garcia; 2017).
Acerca do construto translanguaging, analise as assertivas a seguir, assinalando V, se verdadeiras, ou F, se falsas.
( ) Ao mencionar que a translanguaging oferece uma visão diferente de bilinguismo e multilinguismo, os autores se referem à ruptura da visão estanque e compartimentalizada de línguas.
( ) A translanguaging implica a concepção de um repertório linguístico único para comunicação.
( ) As visões de translanguaging e code-switching são sinônimas, não havendo, portanto, diferenças epistemológicas entre os termos.
A ordem correta de preenchimento dos parênteses, de cima para baixo, é:
Translanguaging is a theoretical lens that offers a different view of bilingualism and multilingualism (Vogel; Garcia; 2017).
Acerca do construto translanguaging, analise as assertivas a seguir, assinalando V, se verdadeiras, ou F, se falsas.
( ) Ao mencionar que a translanguaging oferece uma visão diferente de bilinguismo e multilinguismo, os autores se referem à ruptura da visão estanque e compartimentalizada de línguas.
( ) A translanguaging implica a concepção de um repertório linguístico único para comunicação.
( ) As visões de translanguaging e code-switching são sinônimas, não havendo, portanto, diferenças epistemológicas entre os termos.
A ordem correta de preenchimento dos parênteses, de cima para baixo, é:
Ano: 2023
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Prova:
FGV - 2023 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Informática Legislativa - Manhã |
Q2326029
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
Generative Art – What’s real?
There is nothing new about the concept and creation of
‘artificial intelligence art’ or ‘generative art’. However, discussion
of its legal and ethical or societal implications (both intended and
unintended) hit the headlines last week.
Boris Eldagsen refused his Sony World Photography Award
2023 prize in the creative open category on the basis that his
entry was the product of artificial intelligence. Mr Eldagsen
himself has sparked the latest debate by claiming that “AI is not
photography” and that the rationale for entering the Awards with
the work in question was “…to find out if the competitions are
prepared for AI images to enter. They are not”.
The reaction of the World Photography Organisation (running
the Sony Awards) has been to acknowledge the need for an
element of human involvement, which is the crux of the debate:
“While elements of AI practices are relevant in artistic contexts of
image-making, the Awards always have been and will continue to
be a platform for championing the excellence and skill of
photographers and artists working in this medium”.
[…]
The conventional (and long assumed) approach has been to
recognise the importance of the human hand to an artwork. The
question then is: to what extent is the human creator or inputter
the ‘artist’ as opposed to the generative system or is the system
merely representing the human creator or inputter’s artistic
idea? Flowing from that question is what that might then mean in
terms of the ownership and value of such works. The debate
looks set to continue in this particular context of imagery creation
and reproduction coinciding with the increasing availability and
use of consumer-grade AI image generation programmes, and
the natural inclination of artists to continue to create.
Adapted from https://www.rosenblatt-law.co.uk/insight/generative-art-whats-real/
The phrase “The crux of the debate” (3rd paragraph) is the same
as the
Ano: 2023
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Prova:
FGV - 2023 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Informática Legislativa - Manhã |
Q2326028
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
Generative Art – What’s real?
There is nothing new about the concept and creation of
‘artificial intelligence art’ or ‘generative art’. However, discussion
of its legal and ethical or societal implications (both intended and
unintended) hit the headlines last week.
Boris Eldagsen refused his Sony World Photography Award
2023 prize in the creative open category on the basis that his
entry was the product of artificial intelligence. Mr Eldagsen
himself has sparked the latest debate by claiming that “AI is not
photography” and that the rationale for entering the Awards with
the work in question was “…to find out if the competitions are
prepared for AI images to enter. They are not”.
The reaction of the World Photography Organisation (running
the Sony Awards) has been to acknowledge the need for an
element of human involvement, which is the crux of the debate:
“While elements of AI practices are relevant in artistic contexts of
image-making, the Awards always have been and will continue to
be a platform for championing the excellence and skill of
photographers and artists working in this medium”.
[…]
The conventional (and long assumed) approach has been to
recognise the importance of the human hand to an artwork. The
question then is: to what extent is the human creator or inputter
the ‘artist’ as opposed to the generative system or is the system
merely representing the human creator or inputter’s artistic
idea? Flowing from that question is what that might then mean in
terms of the ownership and value of such works. The debate
looks set to continue in this particular context of imagery creation
and reproduction coinciding with the increasing availability and
use of consumer-grade AI image generation programmes, and
the natural inclination of artists to continue to create.
Adapted from https://www.rosenblatt-law.co.uk/insight/generative-art-whats-real/
In the first paragraph, the relation between the two sentences is
one of
Ano: 2023
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Pombos - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2023 - Prefeitura de Pombos - PE - Professor de Língua Inglesa |
Q2316907
Inglês
Julgue o item subsequente.
Intonation, the rise and fall of pitch in speech, plays a
crucial role in conveying the speaker's attitude, mood, and
intended meaning in American English. Different
intonation patterns can distinguish between statements,
questions, and exclamations, contributing significantly to
effective communication.
Ano: 2023
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Pombos - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2023 - Prefeitura de Pombos - PE - Professor de Língua Inglesa |
Q2316892
Inglês
Julgue o item subsequente.
Word stress in American English is a crucial aspect of
pronunciation. It involves emphasizing a specific syllable
within a word, and its correct application plays a
significant role in conveying meaning and maintaining
intelligibility.